Before a packed township council meeting Tuesday night, the manager of the Edwin B. Forsythe National Wildlife Refuge told boaters from across the Jersey Shore that one of their favorite destinations would be off-limits this summer.
Virginia Rettig told dozens of angry boaters that any recreation in the areas known as F-Cove and T-Cove must be tied to wildlife, and "boating, for boating's sake ... is what we call, 'not an appropriate use of a wildlife refuge.'"
Technically, Rettig said, public access was never allowed at the 12-acre cove off Barnegat Bay, which got its name because its lagoons – once slated to be a residential housing development – are in the shape of the letter 'F.'
But since 1991, when the federal government took over the site and included it as part of the refuge, the access ban was never enforced, partly because there was a question as to who owned the actual waterways in between the federally owned land. Last year, Rettig said, a determination was made after consultations with the state and government lawyers that the waterways were under federal jurisdiction, mainly because they were manmade, and thus not a naturally-occurring tidal flow area.
That explanation did not sit well with members of the boating community, nor township council members.
"It just hurts," said Brick resident Kevin Kohler. "People spent their entire lives there, they have memories there."
"One could kind of compare this to what's going on with the Port Authority and the toll hikes — ram it through, and then ask questions later," he added.
"What wildlife is being harmed?" asked Point Pleasant Beach resident Chris Cavaiola.
"We have not done specific studies that have addressed that," Rettig replied, to a round of grumbles from the audience.
"Honestly, I think this is a little too much government," said Councilman Domenick Brando, who pledged to contact federal and state officials in hopes of working out a solution.
Next Steps
While Rettig said the cove will definitely remain closed for the 2012 summer season, a formal review will begin next fall which will eventually determine the scope of public access — if any — that will be allowed in the area.
Under federal law, any public access to a designated wildlife refuge must be specifically tied to wildlife. Six activities are allowed: hunting, fishing, wildlife observation and photography, and environmental education and interpretation.
Some parts of the Forsythe refuge are open to the public, including the Holgate portion, where four-wheel drive vehicles can access the beach so people can fish.
Several members of the audience called on Rettig to reopen the coves while the review process is taking place, a suggestion that she said will not come to fruition.
"If we're allowing the public in there, engaging in activities which we haven't authorized, I'm responsible, and we really don't want anybody getting hurt," she said.
Many members of the public who spoke blasted the agency for disallowing access to 12 acres of the 47,000 acre refuge, which stretches from Brick Township to Galloway Township.
Hypothetical scenarios were discussed that would see the federal government relinquishing the land back to the township in the event that Brick exchanged F-Cove for more environmentally valuable pieces of wetland. Though a long shot, Rettig acknowledged such deals have been made before.
But such a scenario aside, the formal process for gaining back access to the site will include an environmental review and public comment period which will begin in September. Eventually, a determination will be made whether the coves can be reopened to some type of public access, which may or may not include powerboats.
"I actually sympathize," Rettig told boaters. "However I have a management responsibility as the manager of a national wildlife refuge, and this is the point where we are with these two sites."
Creep.
As for this story - I see the traffic stats. Believe me, people care! And for the record, nobody who could be construed as a "benny" spoke at last night's meeting ;)
We are planning on suing Fish and Wildlife in Federal Court in the next couple of weeks. We will be setting up a dedicated web site as soon as possible to keep everyone informed of our progress. Please stay tuned! We have not yet begun to fight. We have all lost a big part of our freedom due to this unilateral power grab by 2 unelected federal officials (specifically Virginia Rettig and her as-yet-unnamed solicitor). This action can not, and will not, go unchallenged. Virginia Rettig has 47,800 acres to manage in her region of the Edwin B. Forsythe refuge (in just Ocean and Atlantic counties). The F-Cove and T-Cove together comprise less than 1/10th of 1% of the refuge. I'll leave it there for now. More information will be posted ASAP!
Better yet, why not open a bar right in F-Cove? That way they get all the nutrition they need. Let them kill the wildlife in there to survive, and drink from the bar for nutrition. Imagine going to the beach in July and actually being able to play with your children again, instead of covering their ears and eyes from the embarrassment of these North Jersey and NY degenerates. If I had it my way, I would set ONE giant roach trap in F-Cove. They check in, but never check out. Ahhhhh, I can dream.
The F-Cove and T-cove are closed because Virginia Rettig and her solicitor unilaterally determined that Fish & Wildlife have jurisdiction over the water that flows in and out of the F-Cove. This is a new legal position. The short version of how this legal determination came about is simply this (I am paraphrasing here): "Because we say so". It is the arguments they internally thought sufficient that we intend to challenge and have reversed. I have spoken to Virginia Rettig. If nobody ever did anything in the F-Cove except pull in a power boat on a Tuesday pre-season afternoon to sit in silence and eat a sandwich on their own boat, that trespasser is harming wildlife and is to be arrested, fined, and possibly imprisoned. Her world view is incompatible with law abiding, nature loving, respectful motor boaters from entering the coves. Furthermore, she cannot envision said boater entering the coves with a paid season's pass with a boat hull registration regime and contractually agreed code of conduct. I might point out to those of you who aren't on the same page with the local tax-paying residents who enjoy the coves in a respectful manner that once this federal power grab sets in, the coves will be off limits as long as the federal government exists. Notwithstanding the Mayan prediction of worldwide apocalypse, that pretty much means forever. I gratefully accept your kind wish for good luck.
Dear Mr Lautenberg, I have been a resident in Brick NJ for 9 years. I pay my taxes and vote. I am extremely upset with the decision to close F-COVE in Brick NJ. This was a wonderful place to take the family on a boating day. It is close to my house and with the price of gas made a nice boat trip and day out without breaking the bank. I would like to know how a decision can be made that significantly effects the quality of life of the local taxpayer without a vote. This area is 13 acres area of many many acres. It is used by the public only during the summer. The new manager, Virginia Retting, has decided this should be closed. Large oil companies can spill gallons and gallons of oil into the waterways for gain and greed. However, the small taxpayer should not be allowed to beach their boat where birds nest. Next door a dreg project for Trader's Cove has done been going on for 2 years no one has closed them down. This is the first letter I have ever written to our government. I am posting it on the close fcove website along with your information. I feel we the taxpayer have no say on what happens to our own local community. I can only tell people to write you and state their displeasure. I for one will show mine at the polls.