.

NRC to Hold Public Meeting on Anti-Oyster Creek Petition

The public can phone in to listen to the meeting on Thursday, Jan. 3

A public meeting will be held on Thursday, Jan. 3 on the recent petition submitted by anti-nuclear advocates on the impact of Hurricane Sandy to Oyster Creek Generating Station, Nuclear Regulatory Commission spokesman Neil Sheehan said.

The petition, filed in November, called on Gov. Chris Christie to intervene and ensure that “major flaws” at Oyster Creek Generating Station are addressed prior to the nuclear power plant returning online.

Oyster Creek began a regular refueling and maintenance outage on Oct. 22 and returned to service on Dec. 4.

The petition submitted by Grandmothers, Mothers and More for Energy Safety, the New Jersey Environmental Federation and Beyond Nuclear, sought to keep the nuclear plant offline until safety measures were implemented to address certain problems.

During the refueling and maintenance outage, “indications” (precursors to cracks) were found in the reactor nozzle and a pinhole leak was located in the reactor vessel neither of which was related to Hurricane Sandy, according to the NRC. Both were repaired prior to returning Oyster Creek to service.

According to the activists involved in the petition, the following are new safety concerns at Oyster Creek:

  • The intake canal was inches away from flooding pumps key to the cooling system
  • The pre-Sandy evacuation plan fails to address the post-Sandy reality of new population centers in evacuation shelters and other places, clogged streets with debris and construction vehicles, and displaced emergency responders
  • Sandy proved the design basis (how strong a storm the plant can withstand) inadequate
  • The barrier island’s natural physical defenses are now weaker and make Oyster Creek more vulnerable than before Sandy
  • Inspections during the outage revealed new cracks or precursors to cracks in and/or around the reactor vessel and control rods
  • 33 of 43 emergency sirens were inoperable at the height of Sandy

The Petition Review Board met on Nov. 26 to review the activist’s request for immediate action regarding a lack of adequate protection of safety at Oyster Creek.

The activists asked for the following conditions to be met prior to Oyster Creek returning online:

  1. The evacuation plan is updated to reflect the new reality post-Sandy
  2. The design storm for flood defense purposes is update to reflect the recent spate of storms and climate change and, additional flood protection is put in place as appropriate.
  3.  The “indications” are investigated and the public assured through release of additional data and analysis they pose no additional risk of a nuclear catastrophe
  4. Exelon reviews whether the indications were predicted by its modeling and whether it can predict that no problematic indications will develop before the next inspection cycle and proof of ability to predict fatigue accurately is released to the public.
  5. The NRC and the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection’s Oyster Creek advisory panel hold public meetings that satisfactorily answer the public’s concerns.

“The Petition Review Board denied the request for immediate action to take emergency enforcement action to prevent Oyster Creek from starting up from its refueling outage, because there was no immediate safety concern to Oyster Creek, or to the health and safety of the public,” a letter from John Lamb of the NRC to the activists said.

After the Petition Review Board denied the request for immediate action, the activists requested that a meeting be held.

The meeting will take place at the NRC’s headquarters in Rockville, Md. but members of the petition and the public will be able to phone in to listen. A phone number will be provided at a later date.

The meeting is not a public hearing or an opportunity for members of the petition to question the Petition Review Board on the merits of their decision, the letter from Lamb said. Members of the petition will be given the opportunity to provide an additional explanation or support for the petition.

The public is invited to observe the meeting and will be able to ask questions about the petition process after the activist’s presentation is complete. Email John.Lamb@nrc.gov to obtain a telephone number and passcode.

The NRC will transcribe the meeting by a court reporter and a webcast will be made available for the public. 

Favorite Teacher January 03, 2013 at 12:35 AM
2010 population within 10 miles of Oyster Creek = 133,609, increase of 35.8 percent since 2000. The population within 50 miles was 4,482,261, an increase of 10.4 percent since 2000. Cities within 50 miles include Atlantic City, Toms River, Lakewood, Asbury Park, Cherry Hill. The NRC defines two emergency planning zones around nuclear power plants: a plume exposure pathway zone with a radius of 10 miles ( 133,609,people) concerned with exposure to, and inhalation of, airborne radioactive contamination, and an ingestion pathway zone of about 50 miles, concerned primarily with ingestion of food and liquid contaminated by radioactivity. (4,482,261 people)
ed crowley January 03, 2013 at 12:44 AM
The people who moved here should have been aware of the plant. The home you speak of sounds like it was your parents home. You could move elsewhere if the concern is so great.
ed crowley January 03, 2013 at 12:48 AM
As for my comment about schools I was pointing out emergency plans do not account for additional problems. The complaint about the plan is that it did not factor in the storm.
Favorite Teacher January 03, 2013 at 12:55 AM
BS: Laughing? Ten years from now Fukushima will still be contaminated. Hilarious! October 2012, during Hurricane Sandy, Oyster Creek was flooded with six and a half feet of water as a result of the storm surge. The plant, already down for maintenance, lost its electrical power from the grid. Backup generators were used to keep cooling the reactor. Flood waters just SIX inches higher could have knocked out pumps that circulate coolant water through the nuclear reactor to keep it from melting down. We were 6 inches away from a possible Fukushima. March 2011: Fukushima Reactors 1, 2 and 3 experienced full meltdown. Why? Emergency generators powering coolant systems failed, cutting power to pumps. A reaction between the nuclear fuel metal cladding and the remaining water produced explosive hydrogen gas... several hydrogen-air chemical explosions occurred. Concerns about the repeated small explosions, the atmospheric venting of radioactive gasses, and the possibility of larger explosions led to a 20 km (12 mi)-radius evacuation around the plant. Measurements by the government 30–50 km from the plant showed caesium-137 levels high enough to cause concern, December 2011, authorities declared the plant stable - it would take decades to decontaminate the surrounding areas.
Favorite Teacher January 03, 2013 at 01:07 AM
According to researchers at Stanford, when the nuclear industry says that it can withstand conditions “beyond that historically reported,” we should want to know a lot more, Phillip Lipscy, Kenji Kushida, and Trevor Incerti measured the vulnerability of nuclear plants built near water, by comparing their defenses to historical data on earthquakes, landslides, and hurricanes. In the Washington Post, they assessed the effects of Sandy and said their data “suggested that several U.S. nuclear power plants are unprepared for high waves.”" In our database, the United States came in second, behind Japan, as the country with the largest number of inadequately protected nuclear power plants. The 1938 New England hurricane triggered a storm surge as high as 25 to 30 feet, considerably higher than waves generated this week by Sandy. A wave that tall would easily overtake many nuclear plants on the East Coast, which on average lie about 20 feet above sea level, with minimal sea wall protection." Part of the problem is that the United States is simply too young to know much about its physical past, “the risk to plants in this country is probably understated” because American records go back only about three hundred and fifty years.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »