Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis said he was instructed by Council President John Ducey not to speak at council meetings unless directed, and if the practice continues, he'll hold his own town hall meeting at the same time as the town council's meeting.
Additionally, Acropolis said he will instruct both Jean Cipriani, the township attorney, and Scott Pezarras, the township business administrator, not to attend township council meetings and attend his town hall meeting instead.
Acropolis was silent during the vast majority of the council meeting Tuesday night, except when Ducey asked him a question, and allowed him to give comments. Ducey did not answer several questions from Acropolis during his comment period.
Ducey said keeping the mayor from participating in council discussions is simply a matter of keeping order.
"Just to maintain control of the meetings, pursuant to Robert's Rules, the questions go through the chair," said Ducey. "That's the fair way to do it. If we have everything going through the chair, it's just an easier and cleaner way to run the meeting."
But Acropolis took exception with the notion that he should not participate in the meeting.
"I will not be silenced at another council meeting by you, or any other elected official," he said.
"I have the right by Faulkner to comment and participate at these meetings, and shame on you for not letting me do so," he said, referring to the Faulkner Act, the state law which sets forth the provisions under which Brick's form of municipal government operates. Acropolis holds that the mayor is empowered by that law to participate during council meetings.
"If we can't come to an agreement, we will go to a town hall format of meetings," Acropolis said. "I will have town hall meetings when you have council meetings. We will advertise and invite the public, and we will answer questions from the public."
"We've always let the mayor have something to say," said Councilman Joseph Sangiovanni, the only council member besides Ducey to speak on the subject. "This mayor here happens to be a mayor who has a wealth of knowledge. This fella here knows more about this town than anyone I know, and we should allow him to participate. That's what this is supposed to be about. We're all supposed to participate."
Acropolis has legal footing to carry out his plan. Under the Faulkner Act, only the township council and the council secretary and clerk are required to be physically present to hold a public meeting.
Council members often lean on Pezarras and Cipriani to answer questions they have on matters of policy, as well as to answer questions brought up by members of the public, however. The absence of the pair could have a serious impact on the meetings.
"We can either have a good relationship, or not," Acropolis said.
Get over it. This is the way it works. The mayor gets to speak at the end like everyone else.
You sound like you know who John C is. Could you identify him here? A former councilman? Is John C John Catalano? I'd like to know, and I think that if his real identity were revealed it would make people see if he has a hidden agenda. The way he writes I was leaning toward believing him being someone who was being paid to write favorable comments about Republicans and negative comments about Democrats. It certainly wouldn't be the first time someone accepted money in exchange for blogging about someone or some company online. That's the problem with brickpatch.com. When I tried to find the identity of Bricktonian to see if he/she was someone that might be involved in my pending legal action, and therefore I could use Bricktonian's comments as evidence in court, Mr. Nee could not help me because he said he had no way of checking. I never heard back from AOL on the subject, when Mr. Nee advised me to contact them. BTW, Mr. Nee. I do not mean any disrespect to either you, brickpatch.com or AOL. So please don't be upset with me.
You sound like you know who John C is. Could you identify him here? A former councilman? Is John C John Catalano? I'd like to know, and I think that if his real identity were revealed it would make people see if he has a hidden agenda. The way he writes I was leaning toward believing him being someone who was being paid to write favorable comments about Republicans and negative comments about Democrats. It certainly wouldn't be the first time someone accepted money in exchange for blogging about someone or some company online. That's the problem with brickpatch.com. When I tried to find the identity of Bricktonian to see if he/she was someone that might be involved in my pending legal action, and therefore I could use Bricktonian's comments as evidence in court, Mr. Nee could not help me because he said he had no way of checking. I never heard back from AOL on the subject, when Mr. Nee advised me to contact them. BTW, Mr. Nee. I do not mean any disrespect to either you, brickpatch.com or AOL, so please don't take this the wrong way.
The same way Mayor Kelly and Mayor Scarpelli did. During the council comments section of the meeting. Just like the way council members take part, by waiting for the council comments section of the meeting. Just like the way citizens take part, by waiting for the public comments section of the meeting. Where were you when Democratic mayors were placed under the same conditions for speaking? Did you speak out and say they should be allowed to speak anytime they wanted? I understand that since Mayor Acropolis appointed you to your position on the planning board you must have a sense of loyalty to him. But you could at least try to apply your objections in a fair manner.
It is my belief that honor is a thing not to be bought or sold. Simply stated, it is not honorable to deny anyone from speaking out and voicing their opinions no matter how similiar of different they might be. To deny FREE SPEECH to anyone, especially those you dislike speaks more about your character or lack of. It is WRONG. Should it come from an elected official, we should be outraged because free speech is not a matter of subjectivity, it is our right. The most significant injustice is that of a hyprocrite who hides an act of revenge under the cloak of virtue.
Here once again is a summary of their rule book and the tactic they are using: http://vcn.bc.ca/citizens-handbook/rules.html Rule 11: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, polarize it. Don’t try to attack abstract corporations or bureaucracies. Identify a responsible individual. Ignore attempts to shift or spread the blame.
Suppression of dissent occurs when an individual or group which is more powerful than another tries to directly or indirectly censor, persecute or otherwise oppress the other party, rather than engage with and constructively respond to or accommodate the other party's arguments or viewpoint. When dissent is perceived as a threat, action may be taken to prevent continuing dissent or penalize dissidents.
integrity+consistency in positions+ credibility+electability+ loyalty+ teamwork+ dedication+working selflessly with no personal agenda+ethical conduct in the legal profession=denying free speech Everything before the = sign was taken from http://www.bricktownshipdemocrats.blogspot.com/ Is this the Brick Township you want to live in?
to possiblly salvage a shot at the next election with a popular former politico.
integrity+consistency in positions+ credibility+electability+ loyalty+ teamwork+ dedication+working selflessly with no personal agenda+ethical conduct in the legal profession=Ducey denying free speech just the mayor we need...
Benefits, benefits are you kidding me, benefits I don't need no stinking benefits! Paid for by the Democratic Committee to elect John Ducey
And what really bothers me is that many people are ignoring the fact that Mayor Acropolis IS being allowed to speak, during the council comments section of the meeting. This is when Mayor Acropolis himself decided a mayor should speak when Mayor Kelly was mayor and Mayor Acropolis was council president. Mayor Kelly showed respect for Councilman Acropolis and the position of Council President by following this condition on speaking, and now it is time for Mayor Acropolis to show respect to Councilman Ducey and his position of Council President by complying with this same condition, regardless of how Mayor Acropolis may feel about Councilman Ducey and/or the outcome of last November's election. Also, the mayor does not have any authority to advise the council, as some people seem to want him to be able to do. That's why we have a township attorney, township business administrator and township clerk; to advise the council as to proper procedures regarding a council meeting. That's why Mr. Pezzarras and Ms. Cipriani are there. They have many years of experience, not to mention education and certifications in their respective fields that makes what they say knowledgeable. It is good hearing your comments. I hope to see you at the caucus meeting Tuesday.