State officials are continuing to debate, internally, how property tax reassessments may work in the aftermath of Superstorm Sandy.
But residents whose homes are unliveable or, in some cases, destroyed, continue to pepper officials in Brick and beyond about the ramifications of paying tax bills on properties whose improvement values may now be lower.
In Brick, where both mainland and barrier island sections were hit hard by the massive storm, temporary revaluations could spell budgetary issues, at least on a temporary basis.
Business Administrator Scott Pezarras said Monday that he has participated in conference calls and meetings with county tax administrators and the state's Division of Taxation.
Pezarras expects state officials to outline how municipal governments should proceed in handling requests for reassessments in the wake of the storm.
"I'm hopeful that by the end of this week, we will have clearer direction," said Pezarras, explaining that officials are in talks with the Christie administration.
Some predicted the state's answer could come by way of a legislative solution of an executive order issued by the governor.
If a large enough group of property owners request reassessments, it could affect the township budget or residents' overall tax bills, though likely for only a short period of time – perhaps as short as one quarter – as the majority of homes will be repaired before the end of the year.
Reassessments will only take into account the improvements on a lot, Pezarras said. The assessed value of the land itself will not change.
As for long term implications, Pezarras said that in areas of the country previously affected by hurricanes, property values near the water actually went up over time, since homes were repaired and rebuilt using modern materials under updated zoning laws that require more storm-resistant construction techniques.
Oceanfront real estate, heavily damaged in Brick during Sandy, was an area where prices rose in South Florida, for example.
In Brick, the barrier island portion of the town represents about 12 percent of the township's overall ratable base.
http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2012/11/red-light_cameras_lead_to_more.html
Time for them to stop pretending and actually do something fair for the homeowners effected by this storm. The idea that it will even a battle is adding insult to injury. My property value may never be the same after this, why should I be asked to pay taxes on some sort of fictional value that may have been optimistic even at the height of the market? They sure know how to re-assess upwards...time to go the other way folks. If my home and insurance premium increases are "my" problems...then their budgets problems are THERES! Don't ask me to pay that too.
Our community has not been swept since the storm for 100% sure. There is so many nails and broken glass that my rental car got a flat tire. I think the town needs to go to the state and the fed's and make up their budget there. I, for one, do not believe I should pay the same taxes on an unlivable home as I did on a totally 100% home...it is common sense and PS in the meantime I'm paying rent on an apartment that I'm not even sure the insurance co. will end up coving any part of. That's my proof that my home is not as "valuable" as it was three weeks ago before the storm!
Mike, know one knows for sure how the fire started...there are a lot of stories out there...no one knows. Could have been the gas or the transformers. It is awful and I am devastated.
Some predicted the state's answer could come by way of a legislative solution of an executive order issued by the governor. "Reassessments will only take into account the improvements on a lot, Pezarras said. The assessed value of the land itself will not change." No one wrote anything in stone as of yet. Though reassessments will be on the actual improvements. So let the assessors in to see the damage or the improvement. If values on the land show a decline then there is your answer. So who is going to be the first one to sell and for the lessor amount? I believe that when you sit with the assessor he or she will compare apples to apples. If they don't then you know you have room to appeal that issue. As for now it sounds like they are willing to work with you. They are looking for the solution. There has to be officals that were affected by "SANDY" and are just as bitter as the next person.
Talk and intentions are cheap, Brick waterfront tax rates are not. Sorry if it sounds bitter, but all the good wishes in the world are not helping me restore my home. They are not paying my additional rent while I make my home habitable again. Step up Brick Township! Show me my feelings are misplaced.
My own town, Brick, otoh, is going to make me drive 1.5 hours to seek them out from my new temporary home without any certainty at all that anything will come of it. Real heroes! This is regardless of the fact that they seemed to be able to re-assess during Christmas week a few years ago...but that was in the upward direction. Lots of manpower that year. Hmmm...I guess it is MY responsibility to seek them out now since they seem to lose our addresses when there isn't more money in it for them to collect. Sure we all need to be more familiar with our insurance policies, but on the other hand, it is very VERY unlikely that they would cover all the expense we will incur over the next months (our vehicles are sure going to cost us I'm finding) and I'd hope the town would be most empathetic ...and quick to react to show they are trying to do at least something for us. I will with hold final judgement to see what they do, but I will not be too surprised if it is a day late and a dollar short by the reaction so far.
Recovery will not be measured in week or even months. In the case of my neighborhood, I'd say a couple of years and looking at photos of LBI, I'd bet five years. Also, anyone who has been to New Orleans both pre-and-post Katrina can see that some places may be changed permanently. Yes, there are some places that should not re-build most likely...but others where matters of finance and short supply of skilled labor will really stretch things out. One quarter is a callous approximation on the repairs anyone on the water is about to undergo with few exceptions. I would bet in the town of Brick, there is barely a single home on the waterfront that didn't sustain any damage. My home never flooded before in 35 years...so asking for a quick action by taxes and a bit more participation in recovery by JCP&L and/or FEMA is not out of line. Our taxes are some of the highest in the whole country by all accounts, now is the time for them to ACT and not just consider as homeowners are struggling with 10,000 other details. I have to rent a car each time I want to get back to my home right now...is it truly so much to ask that they address us with some immediate solutions without each owner going through a timely appeal process with uncertain outcome as the best scenario. (and status quo soon replaced by even higher property taxes as a worst out come.)