Would-Be Contractor to Brick Council: Reconsider Traders Cove Vote
VP of Stoneridge Aquatic Construction says company already invested in project
The vice president of the company that was awarded a bid to complete construction of a splash park, pump house and bathrooms at the Traders Cove site says the company has already invested money in the project, and urged council members to reconsider a later vote that rescinded the bid award.
Randolph Seitter, vice president of Stoneridge Aquatic Construction of Feasterville, Pa., penned a letter to council members last week asking them to reconsider a Jan. 3 vote that rescinded the $643,200 bid awarded to the company Dec. 30. A Republican-led council awarded the bid Dec. 30, but a Democrat-led council rescinded it a few days later after being sworn in and taking a majority.
Councilman Dan Toth, a Republican, put forth motions Jan. 3 to rescind not only the bid to Stoneridge, but a larger, $3 million bid to complete construction on the larger park site. Only the smaller bid was rescinded, however. Township attorney Jean Cipriani said at the time that rescinding either bid could lead to litigation.
"We did incur costs and had expected to be awarded the project which would have allowed us to recover some of those initial costs," Seitter said in his letter.
Seitter said his company's bid was "considerably lower" than other bids for the same project, and included the construction of restrooms for the park, which are required to be installed before it can open to the public. He also said, as township officials have asserted for some time, that the splash park could generate revenue for the township.
"I think that they jumped the gun," said Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis, referring to the council's action to rescind the contract.
Acropolis said Toth, by offering up the motion to rescind, "rushed to undo a legally binding contract."
Toth said that for him, voting to rescind the splash park vote had to do with the troubled economic times.
"In these troubling economic times, it would not be financially prudent to take on another project that 'may' be a revenue stream," Toth said in an e-mail. "Even so, what many fail to speak about when they talk about revenue streams are the sometimes-greater expense streams, which can easily throw a project into the red."
Toth said the talk of no bathrooms being at the site was "grocery store fodder" and bathrooms are still planned for the park. Grant money is available to assist in paying for the bathrooms to be constructed, he added.
Acropolis maintains the subtraction of the splash park was wrong move.
"I thought it was the right time to do a splash park," he said. "That was the revenue component."
But Toth said for him, it also came down to the fact that he did not see support for the splash park in the community.
"If economic times were better, the majority of the taxpayers may have been more receptive to a splash park, but most are more concerned with their local officials being able to keep their taxes stable so they can afford to live in Brick Township, especially after the recent referendum and revaluation drastically adjusted property taxes throughout town," he said.
Council President John Ducey also agreed that abandoning the spray park idea was in the township's best interests.
"The difficult economics that we have are forcing everyone to make difficult choices," Ducey said. "During these trying financial times it would not be fiscally prudent to build a waterpark at the taxpayer's expense."
Frank Fatovic
7:06 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
I guess the mayor was looking for another full time job at the publics expense. Let's see what is he qualified to do at the splash park.....Hmmmmmm
Arlene Carmody
8:11 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Who wants a splash park when our water is known to be in very bad shape?
Marie Thrunk
9:29 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
I do and so do many of my friends and their families. Aparently you do not want to go fishing, or crabbing in a nice area. Or let your children play together in a safe enviroment. Its comments like this that screw it up for everyone else.
BW
8:26 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
The contract had not been signed when they voted to rescind ,so therefore it was not a legally binding contract. As far as the company losing money, that is part of doing business, there are certain expenses that go along with the biding process. When you put in your bid, there was no guarantee you would win (or was there?)
If the contractor files a lawsuit (which they will lose) the people to blame are the clowns who were voted out. They DID NOT have to vote on the contracts and could have left it be for a week and let the new counci handle it. But instead, they decided to set the new council up. So mature of them and Steve.
George
8:44 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
I agree with you ME.
Maureen K. Mitchell
10:09 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
I also agree.
John C
12:49 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
only half true
George
1:37 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
So what part was untrue John tell us all.
Jerry Belle
8:29 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
The original vote awarding the bid was passed on 12/30/11 (a Friday) and the vote was rescinded on the very next business day 1//3/2012 (a Tuesday) after the extended New Year weekend. What monies could possibly be invested in a project by this company - Stoneridge Aquatic Construction (a swimming pool construction company - web: http://www.stoneridgeinc.com) in so little time? Randolph Seitter may be a master plumber in NJ, but he is trying to pull a fast one here. If that company "invested" any monies with former councilpersons, that should not be reimbursed, but rather investigated. If they drew up a sketch of the "project" give them a few bucks towards the drawing and let's be done with this issue in this economy.
C
9:07 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Great points!
John C
12:54 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
How about leasing construction equipment for the job, placing supply orders just to name a few
JHill
1:47 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Agreed Jerry. Should we have to reimburse eevryone who bid and didn't get the contract?
Just the cost of doing business--learn to plan better if they jumped the gun and spent money on a job they hadn't secured.
CShorShell
1:49 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
John C...
I am in the construction industry and deal with public bids on a regular basis. If the contractor was only awarded the project on the 30th, only to have it rescinded the following day, the only costs he would have had incurred would be the cost of bidding on the job. Which might I add, EVERY contractor that bid on the project that lost the bid would have had to absord the exact same costs. This is all part of the risk a contractor takes when bidding on a job. Some time you win, sometimes you lose. That's the nature of the beast. There is absolutely NO way he could have begun to order supplies....and he he had that was his own stupidity.
Mickey
8:31 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
1) when the Republican council voted initially on the contract Toth voted...how....before making a motion to resind the project ?
2) did the township attorney advise the council on their Jan 30th vote of the position they could place the town in, before the new council took office?
3) why would the old council on their last day in office again put the township in this situation, knowing the position of the incoming council members?
the very reason they were voted out of office, they continued right to the very end.
Art Sholty
8:36 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
"Grocery store fodder," " No support for splash park in the community," The community that Bullet Toth speaks about is non other that the blogers here on Patch. He is allowing the negative blogs control his voting status. This is a project that he voted for months ago but now since the administration has changed, he wants on for the ride. In my opinion, Toth is being controlled by his step mom who employes him as an agent in her real estate business who also, by the way ,is the broker for the old Foodtown property. Toth is wrapped up in self serving politics just to promote himself and nobody else. Did the business have a friend on the council? I wonder? Dan Toth knew exactly what he was doing by convenient abstentions and voting at the right time. Is there any wonder that the Bullet wanted to keep the Cadillac Health Plan for himself and not give it back? We musr RESCIND Bullet Dan, now.
Mickey
9:36 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
didn't realize the connection to FoodTown or his initial vote on Traders Cove, that's why I asked. I think most would agree he has been self serving. I think most would also agree, that you not mentioning this years ago or any number of the countless "self serving" positions taken by this past administration.....you have a self serving agenda also. while your hatred for Toth is between you and he, most find your ramblings of little importance.
mandy_Reeves
8:59 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
The park could possibly create some jobs for the area, unless they get filled with the foreign exchange students like the boardwalks do.
BW
9:05 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mandy the are already filed with family members and friends kids. Nice thought though.
brick mom 61
9:58 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
mandy, I know this is straying from the topic, but Jenkinsons fills jobs with mostly local kids. Two of my 3 teenagers have jobs there, along with many of their friends. They are all offered the job for the following year if they want to return. They work at different places, 1 at the stands, and 1 in food service and there are no foreign exchange students there. They are very fair to the kids and provide a great experience for them to enter the work enviornment.
John C
1:04 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
An active Marina and Park will attract people that will go to the local businesses on Mantoloking Rd, providing jobs at nearby gas stations, restaurants and stores.
George
1:17 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
That's a big maybe John there is no guarantee this will happen.
JHill
1:45 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
No thanks. We have enough township employees and we don't need anymore salaries/benefits/pensions to pay.
Concerned
9:32 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Everyone seems to forget that all this voting on Dec 30 th took place on a Tuesday 10:00 am with no one around. The township lawyer wasn't present. Her asisstant was. This is shady business. Brick is in debt. It's all did to the Mayor and his past Council. Now the new council coming in. They are gonna play clean up... We do not need to spend money that we don't have right now in this economy. But the good ole mayor thinks its a great thing. That's because he has 2 jobs. Some families don't even have employment right now. This is ludicrous!!!
Lori Morrison
9:36 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Construction of the restrooms is required before the park can open to the public? Can someone please clarify what that means? The first time I heard anything about public restrooms being installed depended on the spray park was last week in a posting from Scott Pezarras.
Scott Pezarras
7:24 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Lori
The public restroom facility for the Township park was inside the bldg that would house the pump for the spraypark. By rescinding this contract, the council in essence eliminated the public bathrooms at the marina. We have to address permanent public/ada compliant at the marina/park site. It will have to be bid out again at a later date, perhaps when we get more grant funding.
PS the bathrooms at the County Park are not sized to accomodate the Twp's park and marina operation.
Brian
9:38 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
I hope Toth doesnt look at the handful of frequent negative posters to Brick Patch and think that is reflective of a lack of community support. This has been a foucs of discussions in my community and the overwhelming majority were outraged to hear the new council rescinded the splash park. The park could be a great, unique focal point to the project. We are talking about a water splash play area for toddlers, not a water slide park. It is a fee based attraction that would also help fill the marina slips (boaters have families too) both of which are income generators for the town. Should have skipped the sod and put in the splash park. I hope the council reconsiders their decision.
George
9:53 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Anything like this the government involved in usually ends up in a never ending debt that nknows no end,
Art Sholty
10:19 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Brian, a splash park is wonderful, especially for the little people, no slides, just sprinklers. When I was a kid in Brooklyn, a fire hydrant was perfect, now we can have a better location instead of being hit by a speeding vehicle. Dan Toth was wrong, I know it, he knows it and I'm sure we all know it. Rescind the motion once more and rest in the rooms provided for.
Marie Thrunk
9:34 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
I'm with you Brian, we need to get as many people together and fight this. It is not fair. Most of us are just finding out about this. I know 100's of people that were looking forward to this park this summer. It makes me sick.
Concerned
9:59 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Really. Do you know the money that us involved. Our taxes just went up 24%. The mayor wants a waterpark with your money. It's not gonna generate income. The income might have paid maybe for the high maintenance up keep. We don't have the money in Brick. Never should have bought the property to begin with. We are a township fighting to stay alive with all thus debt the previous council gave us and the Mayor. We are not realtors. This is crazy. How people spend other peoples money!!!! Our taxes. Schools should be the most important!!! Not a waterpark!!!!!!!! So sad!!!
Marie Thrunk
9:39 am on Wednesday, February 29, 2012
I believe we received a grant from the state for most of the park. Yes I agree that the schools need updated, but this park could have been a wonderful asset for this town. Adding value to your home. What is wrong with you people? I think its wonderful that they Mayor wants to make our town a better place. And how easy is it to always blame the previous council? Your like a child blaming someone else. Taxes go up, so does the cost of everything else.
Concerned
10:10 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
I hear ya George....That's the truth...
Art Sholty
10:11 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
@Mickey...............why then do you continue to read my blogs. Does the truth bother you so much? At my advanced age of 81 I have learned truth from fiction therefore I pass this good and honest info on to people like you, I have told you about the faults of one council member and my opinion of him, now it is up to you to abstain or vote him responsible for his actions. Remember what the FBI person said. Finally.............To abstain means a no decision and a decision means a decision not to make a decision, therefore Bullet Dan is useless as a council represetative, a person who can govern your pocket book. Nice day, Mickey.
Mickey
11:45 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
at your advanced age...you're beginning to make less & less sense to most on here. you claim your info to be real & honest, yet show no support of it's content or origin....other then your word. you have been proclaimed your undieing devotion to this mayor in all your writings & posts. you have an agenda, which I believe is obvious to all. may I ask when are you planning on confronting Toth face to face at a council meeting and share your wisdom for all to see or do you plan on continueing to snipe on here ?
knarfie
10:20 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Being low bidder on a job never guarantees a contract. Unless there was at least a letter of intent, the contractor was foolish to assume it was a done deal. Not the townships problem. Unless there is more to this than we know, I would be interested in how the town attorney felt the township was open to litagation.
knarfie
10:21 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Sorry, typo, "litigation"
Billy
10:22 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
oi
Minimew726
10:46 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Wasn't it a sealed bid? If so how would this contractor know so matter
of factly that his bid was "considerably lower " than all the other bids? Something stinks here. Within 5 days if awarding a bid, during a holiday weekend this contractor spent money in this job. Someone needs to investigate this whole matter. Too many questions right now
BW
10:53 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
You are absolutely correct.
Concerned Brick Citizen
10:58 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Seems there is more to this story...
John C
1:15 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
once the bids are open the information is public all he needs to do is request the information which he or his lawyer probably did in preparing the letter he sent to the council and started the preliminary work on potential litigation which will more than likely cost more than $650,000 if it drags on.
George
1:20 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
They should have never had the meeting during the day to shut out the working person who pays taxes in Brick perioid.
CShorShell
1:56 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
In a public bid, the day of the bid opening each bid is read out loud. At that time you then have an "apparent low bidder." The bids are then reviewed in detail, making sure that the all the bids are comparing apples to apples, review of the contractor's qualifications occur, etc.
Gary
11:02 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
This whole project is a joke....and who really cares about this, unless you owe a boat. There are more important things to worry about then this project. Nothing moves fast in this town......the water park think sounds so crazy, and a waste of dollars....And they talk bond money like its free....We have Foodtown property sitting? We have a shopping center township owed with empty stores....Hopefully the new set of clowns will be better.....lol
Concerned
11:13 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
Gary. They are new to Council. How about we give them the benefit of the doubt. Before you go and refer them to clowns. We are suffering from the last eight years of the mayor and previous councils free spending if our money!! Now its let's play catch up and blame it on the new people. No way!!! I think we finally got some honest hardworking people in Council. Finally!!!!! So unless you get to the meetings and volunteer. You shouldn't call people clowns. So glad that this is funny to you...
George
1:15 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Amen Joe
Concerned Brick Citizen
11:22 am on Monday, January 16, 2012
"We did incur costs and had expected to be awarded the project which would have allowed us to recover some of those initial costs," Seitter said in his letter.
It would be great if we knew what these "costs" were. It could be the cost of time and paper, postage to place the bid. The typical cost of doing business.
If construction materials were purchased... Why would they do that without a signed contract? -- Unless the company has materials left over from another job and they are trying to recoup the expense from Brick.
CShorShell
2:05 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The contractor is most likely talking about the costs he incurred for bidding on the project. This is normal. Every contractor that bid on the project incurred some sort of cost. Honestly, it couldn't have been a lot of money.....and I say this as someone who's in this industry. The contractors have to buy the construction drawings and specifications. So what we're talking about anything from $100 - $1,000. The contractor gets prices from his subs.....at NO expense. I really can't understand what this contractor is complaining about. Long before a contractor even begins to order supplies, he has to submit the shop drawings and product submittals for the architect's (if there is one) and/or engineer's review and approval. This does not happen over night. In most cases it's a couple WEEKS before a contractor is able to get started on a job. There is a whole process that occurs long before they begin breaking ground or bringing in the bulldozers.
Mike Thulen
12:38 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
The last council meeting of 2011 was held at 10:00am on Friday 12/30/2011. This meeting was posted for all to see at the beginning of the year, just as the last meeting is posted every year. All those interested can now plan to go to the last meeting of the year on the last business day of the year at 10:00 am so that the employees of the township do not have to work extra hours prior to a holiday. This meeting is generally a work session to clean up any accounts and finish the business of the year.
The contracts where bid on Dec. 13th and the purchasing department opened the sealed bids in front of all the contractors in public as required by law. The purchasing department reviews the contract proposals as well as the engineering department prior to going in front of the council. A review sheet is set up and given to the council prior to voting, showing item prices, total amounts and whether the bids are properly filled out with paper work. This takes some time and the council generally gets the paper work several days prior to a council meeting so they can review.
The project of building this park has been worked on for many years and the last council wanted to complete as much as possible prior to leaving. The project has been downsized and put into phases so that the public can comment and see want has been accomplished as it is built. Also grants funding each phase have been received or been applied for as new phase is developed.
George
1:07 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
In other words the meeting was carefully planned to exclude the working taxpayer so there would be hardly any reistance to this Bond issue correct.
Mike Thulen
12:39 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Original Cost of 8 million dollars, to date 6.5 million dollars has been received in grants and funding from other sources to pay for purchase. To date 6 million has been spent for design, bulk heading and fill for site and 5 million has been received for this work in grants. This new phase is 3.5 million dollars for the park area, grading, parking maintenance building and making this a park similar to Windward Beach Park; except with no playground or bathrooms. The second contract for $650,000 would have brought water and sewer in for bathrooms and a pump room to feed the spray park, as well as installation of playground and spray park. Installation only; the pieces of equipment for the playground and spray park would have been bought at a later time under state contract pricing from the manufacturer.
An item not bought out loudly enough to date is a new grant that fits perfectly with the second contract that has been rescinded. There is a new grant for playgrounds that gives $400,000 for every $200,000 spent.
Every grant that has been applied for to date has been received and used to lower the costs for the taxpayers of Brick township
George
1:13 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
So what we have Mike is a major money pit that will keep growing.
JHill
1:58 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
You people talk like these grants and bonds are free money. Where do you think these "grants" magically appeared from? They are my tax dollars and future tax dollars--stop spending my money on stupid crap.
We need a passive park with minimal maintenance costs. Not a banquet hall/spray park (which will require thousands of gallons of water a day PLUS employees)
Buy land for open space and park--fine. Spendings millions of dollars to put lipstick on the pig--not OK.
Mike Thulen
12:39 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Foodtown has been sold. The contract purchaser is in front of the NJ DOT to receive a new traffic pattern entrance to the site. After they receive approval they will take plans to the Local and County planning board to receive approval for specific building plans. As with most developers across the state no money will change hands until all approvals have been granted. The developer has already spent considerable money designing its plans and removing the building, which was a serious hazard for years.
I hope this answers some of the questions brought out to date, I am willing to clear up any misunderstandings if they are, asked in a reasonable fashion.
BW
1:51 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike I have some Ocean front property in the Nevada desert, interested?
JHill
1:59 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
How much did it sell for?
Mike Thulen
2:37 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Contract is for $7 million, after it is built they will pay on a PILOT program. Payment in Leiu of Taxes, this will go directly to township, none to schools, county or other taxing
entities.
George
2:53 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike can we all get a deal like that Mike
JHill
3:32 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Good. The 7 million dollars should go right to paying off the 6 million we paid for it in the first place.
Mike Thulen
3:50 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
yes the $7 million wiil go into an account to pay down the 20 year bond that was done to buy the property. Any left over funds would go into surplus and could be used to offset tax increases in the future
George
3:58 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
So mike the contractor gets free property taxes for what sweet heart deal he got where is ours.
George
1:12 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike how much has this property cost us in expense oviceer and above the purchase price to buy it?
Mike Thulen
1:24 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
To George, this contracts bond issue was done in 2010, if there were any comments they could have been stated all year, even when the resolution for approval of bidding this phase was was done in September. Pleanty of time for public comment.
George
1:27 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike answer the question don't duck around it.
Mike Thulen
1:35 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I believe I answered your question before you asked it in my prior comment. 8 million purchase, 6.5 in grants another funding (Ocean County 1.5 ). 6 million minus 5 million for work to date. New work coming 3.5 with grants still coming in.
George
1:40 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike I am talking about Foodtown not the Traders Cove money pit.
Reality
1:51 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I'm glad the newly-elected-by-a-wide-majority council members have put a stop to this SprayPark. It is a no-win idea for the Brick TAXPAYER. Here's why: If you charge too much, it is basically unaffordable to the average Brick family. If you charge too little, it will be overrun with non-Brick families looking for an inexpensive place to entertain their children. Because of Green Acres regulations, We cannot legally charge a lower price to Brick residents.
And, since previous posters brought up the Boardwalk. Gee, don't ya think the Storinos would have built a SprayPark by now if it is such an income producer?!!!
My neighbors and friends, who regularly vote by the way, are estatic the new members put a stop to this. And, do I need to mention the traffic nightmare?!
George
2:21 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike we are waiting for an answer on the Foodtoiwn property.
Mike Thulen
1:43 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
If your question is with Foodtown, the Township bought it for 6 million during the Scarpelli years with 6 Dems on the Council. We have lost many years of tax revune of over $300,000 per year. The past council worked to get back on the tax rolls, while giving what the public asked for, basiclly a hotel and banquet facilty. Sorry it took so long but public comment was very important to the redeveoplement plan.
George
1:49 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Not a very profitable venture Mike which seems to be the norm these days.
BW
1:51 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I STILL have the picture of Steve standing infront of foodtown in 2005 stating that there would be COMPLETED COMMUNITY CENTER on that site by 11/07. It is Jan 2012 and construction hasnt started yet.
Mike you are no longer an elected official in this town, how about stepping up to the plate and telling the truth? What do you have to lose? Unless of course you had to sign an agreement that you wouldnt squeal on anyone.
JHill
2:13 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
All of the facts you just spewed out have been well known for years.
How much did the township get paid for it???
Joseph Lamb
1:43 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
The company had no legal right to move ahead without authorization. They don't have a leg to stand on.
BW
2:23 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
George I heard they came up with a really cool idea for foodtown, since ballys is relocating.
George
2:34 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
What's that ME is it profitable or a never ending bill.
Mike Thulen
2:27 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I have told the truth, and will continue to tell the truth. Perhaps you should ask the Mayor about the community center. Better yet perhaps you should ask the council members who bought the Foodtown site, why they bought it. When I asked back in 2001 they said it was to stop the Home Depot. We already had property behind Shoprite for a community center.
George
2:33 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
It sure has had alot of birthdays Mike and still not sold yet.
Lori Morrison
2:34 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mr. Thulen,
Would you be able to clarify for me the statement made by the contractor regarding the spray park project? He stated that the restrooms were needed to be able to open the park. Does this mean that the park cannot open without the restroom facilities? Thank you.
BW
2:39 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
The property behind the post office has long been sold, and now our wonderful planning and zoning boards are allowing something like 300 condo to be built there, with the only entrance and exit on Chambersbridge road which will make it impossible to travel that road.
Mike, look I attend meeting, I listen, and I know how to read between the lines. The tax payers are NOT as stupid as the admin thinks they are, and I KNOW you know the real story as to what is going on. We ALL know.
Dominick Rappoccio
2:35 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Many of the bloggers are saying 'Flip flop Dan thats our man'. These people are in for a rude awaking. He doesn't shoot strait. His bullets fly in all directions. Take cover!
George
2:39 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Dominick is that because he votes independitly.
George
3:03 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Dominick we are waiting for an answer.
Mike Thulen
2:48 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
To Lori, I believe any park does need a bathroom. On a temporay basis though I believe porta johns could be used while we are waiting for some sort of permanent answer. If the council were to look again at the contract and the new grants, perhaps we could get the bathrooms, and regular playground done, leaving out the pump room and the spray park for another time. the contract can be reduced 20% without any problems.
Lori Morrison
3:38 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Thank you for your response. I personally do not think the spray park should be built, put now knowing that the ADA compliant restroom facilities are tied in with that project, maybe the council should re-think their decision.
Dominick Rappoccio
3:56 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
George - Dan wants us to believe he is voting independently. Again, that is because he is flip-flopping to save his skin. I gave you your answer, so please, no more questions directly to me.
George
4:44 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Don't worry Dominick I was not trying to single you out just trying to get the facts that's all.
Seen Enough
4:02 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I'm not a lawyer and I can't change the past. But, I sure hope the new council did their homework between 12/30/11 and 1/3/12. All of them! If their rush to make a name for themselves and their intention to divide this township further, causes this town any legal fees whatsoever because they rescinded this contract, then they should all resign immediately. I know legally they probably can't be held accountable, but if there are any legal fees at all to settle any claim I think all of the blind faith backers such as "ME, "George" and "Maureen Mitchell" will be happy to foot the bill for the Brick Taxpayers. In politics, blind faith sooner or later has a cost.
This council has to learn they may not have all of the answers after hours on the job. Being a rookie is no excuse if you act in haste and make a bigger mess. You guys are now accountable!
Mike Thulen
4:13 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
No tax free George, the township gets all the pilot revenue, and does not have to share with any other taxing entities. You are getting all the benefit for waiting so long to the developement the public asked for.
George
4:20 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike will that money go directly to lower taxes Mike?
Mike Thulen
4:31 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
While I was on the Council the money recieved for the property behind the Shoprite was used over several years to keep taxes down. I am not on the council now, so until I am I can not guarantee that this will happen. I will diffnitely tell to future councils that this was done in the past, and should be done in the future
JB
6:10 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Thanks for sharing your insight, Mr. Thulen
Concerned Brick Citizen
5:15 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I still hope the Foodtown property agreement falls through and it is developed as a park. Having a large paved surface adding more pollution the Metedeconk River is not needed in Brick. According to an article in today’s the Asbury Park Press our river is sick. Check out what they have to say about Windward Beach. The only Mistake is that Bob P. mentioned in the article does not live in Breton Woods as stated. He lives in Eagle Point a mile or so down river from Breton Woods.
http://www.app.com/article/20120116/NJNEWS/301190001/Barnegat-Bay-declines-further-scientists-believe
Joseph Lamb
5:24 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike Thulen, then Councilman Acropolis was all for buying Foodtown. I have the newspaper articles to prove it but he didn't show up on the night for the vote. How convenient. I don't care how many times the mayor said he was against it, there were no newspaper articles to say he was against it. If Patch wants a copy, I'll be happy to supply them.
Joseph Lamb
5:34 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike Thulen, what account are you talking about? The $6.7 million will appear in time for Acropolis's reelection and he will use that and the $2.5 million for the solar panel project to reduce taxes so he will look good for reelection.
Where on the balance sheet is this account? There is none.
Mike Thulen
5:48 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
There you go again mixing nubers to confuse the innocent, if the new council goes ahead with the solar panel redeveloper this year $2.5 million dollars will be used in the 2012 budget to avoid raising taxes, because the township adminstrator already has stated his budget will include theses funds. When the Foodtown developer does close and pay the $7 million for the property the funds required to pay off the bond will be put in a rider account to make payments on a yearly basis, while the leftover will go into surplus. I believe this is more than a year away, and could not be used in the campagin year you so boldly spoke of. The last council voted in December to sign the agreement with the solar field developer so it could be used in the budget. The new council can of course not sign and then have to find $2.5 million so were else.
Dominick Rappoccio
5:39 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Joe - From my recollection it was Mayor Scarpelli's who was instrumental in purchasing the Foodtown property to prevent the Home Depot from being build there. Mayor Scarpelli envisioned building a Sport Complex which did have the support of the public.
George
6:01 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Dominick it was a knee jerk reaction to buy the Foodtown property it was not well thought out in the beginning.
John C
6:12 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
A major reason the Foodtown Property was purchased was because a very active and prominent local democrat and supporter of Mayor Scarpelli was a Parishoner of the church next door to the property and was against the construction of a Home Depot and the resulting traffic and activity it would generate next to their church and the former school.
George
8:05 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
John I believe there were alot of complaints from Forge pond residents over Home Depot opening there.
Concerned Brick Citizen
10:23 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
John C. The Church you are referring to is St. Thomas Lutheran Church. I am a member of the congregation and Joe Scarpelli and family where never members. He was however a big supporter of the St. Thomas Christian Academy (grades k through 8) which is located there. The concerns were over noise traffic, pollution and the safety of the children. The first intention was for the property to be used as a community/activity center. Never to become what M&M has planned.
Will Watcher
11:18 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
I heard the church was going out to look for JANETorial services.
John C
4:17 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
ConcernedBrickCitizen, I am aware of the name of the Church, I intentionally left it off the post. Also I did not say that Mayor Scarpelli was a member of the congregation, I said a very active and prominent member of the church was a member, and was opposed to the Home Depot.
And yes George thank you for mentioning that, I am sure the residents on Forge Pond Road were also against the Home Depot.
Dominick Rappoccio
5:42 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Correction - Building a Sport Complex which 'DID NOT' have the support of the public.
Joseph Lamb
5:57 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Mike, there is no account on the balance sheet. Period.
As far as the $2.5 million what a surprise! So instead of the project costing us $21 million, it will cost us $23.5 million. The $2.5 million should have reduced the debt. This is just a political ploy to reduce the taxes at our own expense.
Daniel Nee
6:18 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Joe -- Just as a point of clarity, the debt service on the bonds related to the solar farm is to be paid by the redeveloper, not the taxpayers.
Mike Thulen
6:09 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Joe there you go spinning again, the $2.5 million is not added as debt, the redeveloper knew about this when all the developers bid on the project. There is no additional cost to the taxpayers, unless the new council decides not to go forward with the project. If the council does not sign on they will need $2.5 million to balance the budget without a tax increase from somewhere else.
Dominick Rappoccio
6:19 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Joe - Here is more information on the purchase of the Foodtown site.
+Brick Township Bulletin, Oct 1, 2009 Brick purchased the site for $6.1 million in 2003, during the administration of former Democratic Mayor Joseph C. Scarpelli, to stop the construction of a proposed Home Depot store on the site.
+Brick Township Bulletin, Oct. 8, 2003 - Township announces $6.1 million deal reached in principle, bonds an extra $250,000 for purchase. Administration announces contracts signed Sept. 30, 2003.
George
6:43 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
When they first purchased the it was an interest only loan until it was refinanced a few years later.
Art Sholty
6:52 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
I also think that there was a certain female worker who parked her car in the Foodtown lot, Allegedly she worked for the church and was a friend of ..................
To be continued because ME likes mysteries. Ok Me your're up now.
Concerned Brick Citizen
10:59 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Art... I knew all the Church and School employees at that time. I also like a good mystery. The former Mayor and the Pastor had a good relationship. I don’t think there was anything inappropriate happening between the lone female church employee who was a good friend of mine if that is what you are assuming. It could have only been with a person working for the academy who would have no influence or power. The concerns about the proposed Home Depot was not just about the Church and School. It was also about the environmental impact to the Metedeconk and excess noise and traffic to the residential areas around the church. The employees and church members did and still park their cars there as we were giving permission.
Dominick Rappoccio
6:35 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
George - I agree, purchasing the Foodtown property was a knee jerk reaction and a poor decision made by the Scarpelli administration.
George
6:40 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Food Circus City was the biggest benefactor they grabbed the cash and ran and raised quick cash.
Art Sholty
6:54 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Just forget the KNEE and substitute Scarpelli before it.
George
7:42 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Art we can do without the politics I am sorry you didn't land a job in town hall under that administration.
ShoreSureySure
10:28 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
"Dom, thanks for letting everyone know about the Bulletin archives...interesting stuff on there. Feb 5 2003 "Saying the public was "right on the money" in its objections to the Home Depot application, Stephen Acropolis voiced opposition to the home improvement store plan. Acropolis said he would prefer to see the vacant Foodtown site, on Brick Boulevard and Route 70, purchased by the township and used as the site of a recreation center or a new police station." "Nonetheless, Acropolis said he felt a need to "go public with my opinion, that I am not in favor of [Home Depot] coming here." Last week Acropolis distributed a press release independent of the township’s public information office, which usually handles media relations for the council and mayor. In it, Acropolis criticized other elected leaders for not discouraging the plan." "FEB 12 2003 The move to study potential sites for a recreation center came a week after Councilman Stephen Acropolis called on fellow elected leaders to purchase the property and develop it for that purpose or a new police station. Acropolis has been a vocal objector to the Home Depot application, agreeing with concerns by objecting environmental and citizen groups."
You were saying?
Dominick Rappoccio
6:56 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Don't we now wish that Home Depot had been built on the Foodtown site! Just think of all the taxes revenue that had been lost over the years. The Home Depot at it present location has not caused a traffic problem, traffic congestion or pollution. The site has been well maintained by Home Depot.
Concerned Brick Citizen
11:07 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The current location is much better for Home Depot. It is secluded(doesn't bother anyone) and has three entrances and exits. I think there would have been problems and concerns had it been placed on the Foodtown property. You can bet it was less expensive for Home Depot modify the old Costco building and not have to deal with CAFRA.
Art Sholty
7:00 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
Hello Mike Thulen, I know its hard to teach these protestors anything, especially JOe Lamb the ousted Democrat who dreams up all the numbers. I find you to be correct but it will never fly because Lamb and the others need bare feet to count, add and subtract. Maybe Bullet Dan can help you out, however he seems too occupied with abstaining.
Dominick Rappoccio
11:27 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
ShoreSureySure - Anyway you want to cut it...the fact is that It was Mayor Scarpelli who 'purchased the property' and 'signed the contract'. I was also not in favor of buying the Foodtown site as you can summize from my early post. I then found out that Mayor Scarpelli had his own motive(s) for purchasing the Foodtown site which your evidently are not aware of. So keep on searching and you will come up with the answer. Mayor Scarpelli is the one who got us into the mess at the Foodtown site.
ShoreSureySure
12:29 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
So the former mayor did it singlehandedly? Seems to me that there was no opposition from any council member in 2003 - mr acropolis included. in fact the article is pretty clear that mr acropolis was criticizing the mayor and council for not discouraging the plan. seems the blame for the foodtown should be spread more than you are doing.
Seen Enough
11:34 pm on Monday, January 16, 2012
It time to leave the past in the past. Stop dwelling on the past. Are you really going to sit here and rehash 2003 press clipping? Lets focus on the future.
Roll forward a year or so and John Ducey announces his intent to run for mayor of Brick Township as many of you blind faith backers have suggested. His first advertisement will paraphase the Jim Mora Coors Light commercial --Playoffs, playoffs are you kidding me playoffs don't talk to me about playoffs
Benefits, benefits are you kidding me, benefits I don't need no stinking benefits! Paid for by the Democratic Committee to elect John Ducey
Fred Gee
1:59 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Neither do we need nor can we afford a splash park. We have beaches and playgrounds/parks. Roll back part of our taxes instead!
Jerseyclone
9:27 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The contractor should read his contract closely because if ordered material and equipment prior to the execution of the contract, prior to shop drawing/catalog cut approvals and etc., etc. I hope he enjoys it for lunch because he looses and eats it. He better cancel orders now.
In addition, the cost associated with the operation and maintenance will not be offset by the income, I do not care what "Scotty Boy" says or his side kick Deluca. Nobody talks about traffic nightmare this will create when it is open. Plus the benefit to the taxpayers of brick will be minimal because of its location. The lakewood faction will luv it if it is free.
Will Watcher
11:07 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Funny how the new majority was going to save us. Didn't they approve 3,000,000 in spending on TC? They cut 600,000 great but spent 3,000,000! Just great. Our great democrats.
bths06
11:19 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
WIll Watcher do you mean the $3,000,000 in spending that the former council already approved on 12/30?
Art Sholty
11:25 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
OK Concerned, I take your word, probably the academy.
bths06
11:26 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
From a previous post from Mike Thulen: "...the contract can be reduced 20% without any problems."
Then why not when you were on the council did you not reduce it by 20%? It there would be no problems then why did you not do it, instead the previous council decided to stick it to the taxpayers and make them spend more money then what could have been cut out without any problems.
Mike Thulen
12:04 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The change order would have to been done after the contract was signed. You have seen over and over again change orders appoved by the previous council lowering the amount of the contract when the project was completed.
IGGY
11:49 am on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Good thing we didnt buy the ice rink
Art Sholty
12:52 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Mike T. all these grumblers have an attorney named Joe Lamb, Esq.
Mickey
7:07 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Art, still waiting for your reply if you plan on questioning Toth at a Council Meeting with all your assertions and put him on the spot.....or continue unfounded/unproven allegations ?
George
6:28 pm on Thursday, January 19, 2012
Art did you ever get your job in town hall.
Joseph Lamb
1:09 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Dan, the redeveloper won't be making the payments directly for the debt, the town will. But this doesn't address my point. The point is if the Standard pays Brick $2.5 million, that is built into the stream of revenue to Brick which lessens what would otherwise be paid to Brick. Standard is not paying Brick without taking this into consideration.
Brick incurs $23.5 million in debt. If anything the $2.5 million should be used against the principle so Brick only incurs $21 million in debt.
Don't get me wrong, I'm against this agreement because I don't want Brick to incur any debt. Let the developer take it on. I don't want the Township taking on someone else's risk.
Joseph Lamb
1:16 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Dominick, Mayor Scarpelli may have wanted to buy Foodtown but Councilman Acropolis was for it as well. I have the original articles, not copies from the newspapers.
Joseph Lamb
1:20 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Mike, there is no such account. There is none on the balance sheet. Stop telling people something that is not true. These past payments went into surplus and the Acropolis Team wiped out the surplus.
Joseph Lamb
1:22 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Mike, the budget for 2012 isn't made up yet. Why would you say the $2.5 million is already in the budget? That may be the plan and that will be wiped out as well but we'll have $2.5 million more in debt than we need.
Gary
9:11 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
The Foodtown property is really a joke.....from the time the township got involved to stop homedpot til now.....Homedepot received $1,000,000. to back out, and was promised the old costco property....no problem there, and then this M&M corp. another joke....did the new costco parking lot with bad soil remember that, and then he buys the trailer park....what was his plan there.....and now the same person is buying the foodtown property with no real plan.....I hear all these figures and the bottom line is the township lost money......
Gary
9:16 pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2012
M&M who is this.....? its like Krista-Shay.....remember all those building, poping up all over town......There is alot of crooks in Bricktown....lol....And the jobs they receive....motor vehicle jobs, dca jobs, housing authority....ITS UNBELIVABLE...LOL
knarfie
8:47 am on Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Gary,
Agreed. But it's not limited to the township level. Look at the rip-offs, no show jobs, etc, from County level to State reps.