Voter Guide: School, Township Referendums Up For Vote Wednesday
Guiding readers through a vote which could change Brick Township
Brick voters have a lot to consider before entering the voting booth Wednesday.
As residents of all of New Jersey's 566 municipalities go to the polls to choose their school board members and decide whether to give the OK to their school tax levy proposals, Brick is one of 14 municipalities whose residents will also get to decide whether to allow their municipal governing body to exceed a 2 percent cap on tax levy expenditures.
Though the questions appear on the same ballot, the referendums on the school tax levy and municipal cap exception are for two, distinct spending plans. The Board of Education has adopted a school tax levy to be presented to voters and the township council has decided to place a municipal referendum on the ballot. The budgets – as well as the bodies which presented them to voters – are completely separate, though both make up a portion of the total property tax bill residents pay each year.
In all, voters will have the opportunity to approve:
- A $136 million school budget supported by a $96.5 million tax levy. If approved, this would amount to a tax hike of approximately $58.55 for a property owner whose home is valued at $330,000, the township's average. A simple majority is needed to pass the referendum.
- $8.6 million in spending above the state-mandated 2 percent cap on municipal tax levy expenditures. The $8,655,056 would translate to a tax hike of $441 for the average homeowner in Brick, when combined with expenditures that are within the cap and exempt from it. The $8.6 million figure represents a budget that exceeds the cap by 12.69 percent, and a total increase in the municipal budget by approximately 24.5 percent. A simple majority is needed to pass the referendum.
If The Referendums Fail
If voters defeat the school tax levy proposal by voting "no" on the ballot question, the levy will go to the township council for a review. The council can choose to leave the levy as proposed or decrease it by an amount they choose. The township council, if it orders cuts, is obligated to suggest areas from where the cuts can be applied, however the Board of Education has the final say in how to apply the cuts. Legally, the township council only has the binding power to certify a revised tax levy. A board of education can appeal a municipal governing body's decision to cut a budget to the state Department of Education, though instances of this happening are extremely rare.
If voters defeat the municipal question to exceed the state's mandated 2 percent cap on tax levy expenditures, Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis and members of the township council have said up to 172 employees will have to be laid off since the budget must then be revised by May 17 to stay within the 2 percent figure.
The layoffs, according to a plan filed with the state Civil Service Commission, include 29 police officers and enough public works employees to force the township to stop providing trash and recycling pickup. Additionally, the recycling center on Ridge Road would most likely be shut down to residents. Park maintenance operations will be eliminated and clerical personnel within a number of departments will be laid off. Additionally, a number of inspectors, officers and clerks within the Land Use and Community Development department will get the ax.
The layoffs on the municipal side will most likely begin May 13, according to notices sent out to township employees. Garbage and recycling collection will cease within a few weeks to one month of the vote, Acropolis has said.
Polling Information
Because of its large size, Brick Township has many voting districts and, thus, many polling places. Residents from multiple districts usually vote in the same location, however. The state provides a polling place search online, but the easiest way to find your polling place is to consult the sample ballot mailed by the Ocean County Clerk's office last week.
Polls will be open from 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. because Brick is including both a school and municipal referendum question. Some media outlets may report different times since municipalities that only have a school question can set different hours.
Brick Resident
8:46 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
The time has come and hopefully everyone goes out and votes. We all know what is at stake. Make the decision that is best for you.
willy
8:55 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Yes get out and support our childrens education,they are our future.I am also voting Yes on the referendum I am completly convinced that this will save us money in the long run.Private sanitation is way too risky.Many horror stories out there.
JB
8:56 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
YES on school budget, YES on referendum!
Keep Brick the great community it is!
Support public education for once in this town!
Doug
8:02 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Keep the constant tax increases coming and this will be a sinking ship and not such a great community.
Bob
9:08 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
whatever your fellings.........VOTE! Too many people have died or suffered for our right to vote. So, Please honor their sacrifice and vote
Jim
10:36 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Voting No against both budgets. Stop squandering tax payer money!
Lo
2:40 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Jim,Everyone I know will be voting NO TO RAISING OUR OWN TAXES!
Think
11:19 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
I am voting Jim off the island
Daniel Nee
11:28 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
A quick anecdote as we enter "judgment day..." A few years back, there was a hotly-debated school referendum vote in Brielle, the public discussion of which spurred almost everyone in town to put "Vote Yes" or "Vote No" signs on their lawns. One clever resident had a huge "Vote Maybe" sign made up and put it right outside his house, which was on a main road. And with that -- I'll just say we will be there tomorrow evening to cover everything - yes, no or maybe.
Cosmo
11:53 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Too bad maybe wasn't on the ballot. that would have been my vote.
Joe merola
11:52 pm on Tuesday, April 26, 2011
To the people of brick get out and really think before you vote , don't vote your services down just thinking you are getting back at the mayor , that starts in nov on how you want to change things or not . Just think and vote
Doug
7:56 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Mr. Merola, I don't think that it is about getting back at the Mayor. I think that it is more about the fact that we live in a state with the highest property taxes in the nation. Our home values are plummeting and this town is consistently asking for more money. The taxpayers did not target the vital services. VOTE NO! and get this town back within spending limits that it can afford.
willy
6:39 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
YES TO BOTH ITS BEST FOR MOST Money is not always the most important factor when making a decision ,sometimes you just have to do what is right and best.Vote YES to both.
Mickey
6:53 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Regardless how you vote today. In Novemeber don't forget the incompetent, self serving, disconnected elected officals, that placed us in this position and vote them....OUT OF OFFICE. To anyone thinking of running for an elected position. Be honest and up-front in the beginning. Please don't start your campaign with "I want to give back to my community" if all you plan on doing is take, take take.
Gary
7:21 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Spend , Spend, and Spend.....everybody just loves to spend on this site. The school broad with all these supervisors that don't teach. Its crazy, no money for paper, pencils, and books. But loads of money for AC conventions, and crazy supervisor jobs. The township should be fine with $90 million.....really, and as for the Township bill, this garbage needs to go private to increase other services, like police, recreation, and senior services.....so a no vote helps all!
Doug
8:00 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Vote NO and stop these outrageous increases to our taxes. We are already the highest in the nation and this is the reason why!
Brick Resident
7:33 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
We have a loss of service at hand and its cheaper to keep them in house. Vote yes to maintain our services and keep the quality of life where it is
Mickey
9:39 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Why not vote NO and demand they make them fit? Unless you haven't been paying attention, there's a lot fo waste that can be cut.
clamdigger
7:50 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
There were quite a few time I remember some folks say "compare us to Toms River" for this thing or that thing, well in an article this morning in the APPress, Toms River, apparently they can run that town on $98M, they will have a 1.9% increase this year.
http://www.app.com/article/20110426/NJNEWS15/110426066/Toms-River-council-adopts-98-million-budget?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage
At this point it's too late to argue whether or not to vote yes or no, I'm sure by now anyone who will be voting has already made their own personal decisions. Let the chips fall wherer they may, I know how I voted and in the end that's all that really matters.
clamdigger
7:51 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Oh and BTW just for laughs, what is OUR Twp. budget?
79
9:34 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Brick Township is the 3rd largest Town/City in Ocean County and used to have the 13th largest Police Department in the State of New Jersey. The highest to lowest order of Police Officers used to be Toms River, Brick, Lakewood. Toms River has always had a much higher amount of officers from way back in the 80s and has not really increased that much since then. However, since 2007 there have been "dramatic increases" in the population in Lakewood and the property tax revenue increased dramatically with the population increase. Everybody has to remember that Toms River, AKA Dover Township IS basically the "Capital of Ocean County" AND the other "very large amount of property tax" paid with your taxes. A lot of that so called county property tax goes to ... "Toms River" and truly benefits them. Not to the Township directly BUT adds too and boaster their Township expenses that the Township "might have had too pay". The moral of the story is you can't have growth, without a monitory expense that has to be shared by all. It would be a shame to take a stand on an issue that "I and most agree on" ONLY to loose services that "you will never be able to recoup" in the future. IF you have a problem with this administration DO as you will do today VOTE . BUT keep the politics and the future of YOUR Town two sepearte issues. Your home and the surrounding community is your future. and "clamdigger" as ALWAYS good story and a good point by you. AND you never threw a rock more importantly.
clamdigger
2:23 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Hello 79, what you wrote seems to make some sense,even though I have friends who live in TR and they've never mentioned anything such as what you say, but I guess anything is possible and it well maybe true and kind of clear up a few things. As for you rlast 2 sentences, I'm not sure how to take that if it's a "dig" or some back handed compliment. Well anyway what's done is done w/ this vote and I hope it opened up peoples eyes.
Lori Morrison
7:52 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Today is a very important day for all residents of Brick today. Before you vote, think about this. In 2008 the mayor laid off DPW employees. Many of them appealed, won and got their jobs back. They also received all the back pay they lost while on lay off. Then we had a major snow storm December 26. The mayor went public on Fox News and slammed the DPW for 11 employees that called out sick. What he failed to mention they were calling for help to get to work because they were snowed in. In the end it was 3 people who did not report to work. Did the Mayor admit he spoke without having all the facts? The Mayor wants to eliminate the DPW, and if the referendum fails he will be jumping for joy because he can make them all pay for making him look like the arrogant bastard he truly is. He can make the residents pay because we did not want the Ice Palace/community center. Place your vote based on what is best for you, your family, neighbors and friends. Or you can vote yes if for no other reason than to screw the Mayor over without having to give him a kiss! Good Luck to all today.
Mickey
10:11 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Lori, why does it have to be one way or the other ? Why can't we vote to stay within the budget and cut waste elsewhere. It seems the fact is lost, that this is administration is disconnected from the will of the tax payers.
joseph bavaro
8:52 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
I see Brick Township is installing more red light cameras. The powers that be insist it is not for the money. Take the money made and apply it to the taxbase for tax relief. My taxes have tripled since living here.
Cosmo
12:05 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Funny how the budgeted revenue equals the budgeted expense for red light cameras. Seems like they are re-investing the proceeds in more cameras.
David Nolan
9:11 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The best thing about our town is the Wall of Heros thats in town hall. All the folks that are serving their country are posted. Dave N
79
9:43 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
A little foot note to what you wrote, is one of the 29 Police Officers that MAY be affected and there may be more, is presently in Afghanistan, serving his/our country AND the Township of Brick and the Brick Township Police Department, as MANY officers have done since 2001 and some more then a few tours. Thanks for the reminder David.
Mickey
10:27 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
79 please don't go there. I'm sure we all wish all our soldiers well and a fast,safe return. Correct me if I'm wrong. Did this individual get drafted or did he elect to join the Guard, knowing he would have to leave his family & job. Also, doesn't he receive pay from the township as well as being paid by the Government. While I certainly have no intention of trying to downplay any of the Guards heroic efforts or intentions. Most joined for compensation, monthly checks & a small pension down the road. Unfortunately in these dangerous times, they're upholding their end of a committment. This particular officer is an excellent cop and an asset to this community. IMO it should have no more part in this discussion, than any Guard members that have been laid off by the township before.
79
10:42 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The intent was "not to go do that road" as YOU wrote .... ONLY remember those that serve for which I guess "you really don't care". IF I wanted to make a point of it, I would have written it weeks ago.
Mickey
11:37 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
79 if your intent was not intended to go down that road, then I accept that. For you to "guess" about my intent, means you are assuming and we all know that little rhime that goes along with that. If you had brought it up weeks ago, then you would have been out of line then, IMO. Again I ask, why the need to take on larger debt, rather then insist on cutting so much "real waste" visible to all ? By "real waste" I certainly am not referring to the township police officers or most township employee's.
OceanCounty
9:26 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
I'm very disappointed thet the Mayor, Council, and PBA did not feel the need to make any concessions like the other two unions did. Apparently they feel very secure.
Brick Resident
9:36 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
OceanCounty,
TWU gave concession and they have layoff notices for it. I would be willing to be dollars to donuts (clam we are the same people) that the PBA will give concession if the vote fails. Negotiations 101
bob p
9:32 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
As a lifelong resident of Brick enough is enough. I cannot vote NO quick enough. All the concerns about trash pickup are nonsense. When does the overspending stop? This is todays economic things and the job will get done with less employees. The superiors are in place to insure the job gets done.
Bhomeowner
9:38 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
This is the way to go!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f8qFvo2qJOU&feature=player_embedded
Brick Resident
9:44 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Down the road yes, but sudden change, no. Vote Yes
Jose Deer
11:03 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
so you are saying you going to vote for $400 + tax increase for every year going forward but then want to privatize garbage pick up down the road which will cost another $300 ON TOP of the $400+ you are voting for today........BRILLIANT !
Bhomeowner
9:47 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
That sounds like how we will be dealing with the national debt too. There is no more down the road, we are at the end.
broke in brick
10:33 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
only in new jersey can we complain about paying the highest taxes in the country and yet still have so many people think the best thing for us is to vote to raise our taxes. we are obviously the stupidest people on the planet.
Cosmo
12:25 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Well said broke. The only people who would logically vote to give another 14.6% are the people that benefit from that increase. Its insane to think otherwise.
broke in brick
10:41 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
our town council and mayor have resorted to extortion to raise our taxes. there is so much waste in this town that can be cut without affecting township services, only problem is then we wouldnt need to raise taxes. our town council and mayor chose these services and positions they are cutting for the sole reason that they would affect the citizens of brick the most. i am voting NO to both referendums and they can take my services, but rest assured i will assist in voting every one of them out of office.
OceanCounty
10:45 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
"Just heard that the PBA made a hugh concession. Anyone else hear that."; "A friend said he read it in a local paper."; "Thanks PBA you finally will shut some of these people up"
Have not seen anything on the PBA concessions- It would have surely been in the Patch
Mickey
12:56 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Ocean County; you must be a detective. You posted at 9:26am that you were disappointed that the PBA made no concessions and then amazingly, you & you alone, had heard they had in a local newspaper which you posted at 10:45am exactly "79" minutes later. Could there be a double meaning here ?
OceanCounty
10:48 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
This was the last on Patch, and was dated 16 April:
"“Right now, they are in negotiations with the business administrator and the mayor,” said Council President Brian DeLuca, of the PBA. “I feel good about it, there’s been a lot of progress made.”
If the PBA agrees to concessions, the budget figures could be modified by the April 5 budget adoption date."
Catpan
10:50 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
It's fine for those with little to lose to play chicken with the mayor and his administration, but as a renter with two kids in the recreation program I stand to be lose a nice chunk of my take home if this referendum goes down. I'm going to hold my nose and vote "YES". I refuse to act against my family's best interest for the sake of principle.
I know it's selfish, but who out there is really selfless?
Jose Deer
11:04 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
selfish indeed ......a true 21st century American
Daniel Nee
10:56 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Just a note: Unconfirmed, election day surprise rumors will be deleted. Polls are open 'til 9 p.m. We'll be here all day and through the evening to bring everyone any developments and the eventual results.
Catpan
11:18 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Jose you are obviously voting "NO". What is your motivation? I'm sure it has nothing to do with your own interests. Aren't we all 21st century American's here on the Brick Patch!
Capt O
1:37 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Hey Catpan
His motivation is just to stir up the pot. He comments on the Pt. Pleasant Patch, Berkeley Patch, Facebook and other places. I don't even believe he lives in Brick
willy
11:24 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Remember 80 percent of Brick residents will pay less for sanitation if this passes.Once the private guys are in we are screwed.VoteYES!
Sodapop
11:29 am on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
So the Mayor and council want to take away garbage and recycling. Tell me, what happens to all the income from the Recycling when its dried up. Short minded Politics is why we are where we are. Vote No..
ginny
12:43 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Catpan and I hope your landlord passes that expense on to you because I know I will be forwarding it on to my tenants.
Geoff Dubrowsky
12:56 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Just curious why does this article not state and why people do not mention the fact that the School District Budget is under the 2% cap? It only mentions a dollar figure of the increase where with the town issue it's about percentages.
No hiding with me I voted yes to both even though I am unhappy with the process and do believe that we need to fix Trenton before we can ever fix Brick. As Dennis Miller say, " That's Just My Opinion I Could Be Wrong".
Also glad that we live in a country where we can vote!
Capt O
1:41 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Almost everyone within a 3 block radius has voted already, so far the yes are in the majority. Hope this continues through out the town but I don't expect the expensive waterfront homeowners to vote yes.
Geoff Dubrowsky
1:50 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Some like my friends on the barrier island who now pay 76K a year cannot vote since these are summer residences and they are not able to register in two places. I did thank them however for the donation :)
Catpan
1:45 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Ginny - Maybe your tennants ask for concessions if the referendum doesn't pass. Why you wish that for me? Seems kind of juvenile. State your reason and make your case. I put my situation out there for discussion. I don't like the tactics the mayor is using and I don't find the equity in paying our public employees so much more than the average private sector taxpayer earns in our town, but when I reflect on the situation it seems that it is better to vote for the patch today and look for long term solutions in the months to come.
Catpan
1:53 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
FYI Ginny, if it wasn't for me paying 2k a month in rent there is good chance the town would be collecting zero on the property. My landlord bought the home at the height of the market and then his relationship went south. He is over 50k underwater and without my rent, I doubt he would bother paying the mortgage or real estate taxes. Unoccupied units are a landlords worst nightmare, so when you have tenant that pays on time and takes care of the place, then you don't do anything to upset the applecart.
ginny
2:25 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
FYI Catpan - the state of nj bylaws for tenant landlords clearly states that any landlord may raise their tenants for any additional costs that are incurred including but not limited to property tax increase. If your landlord choices not to do that well good for you, but it is my legal right to pass on expenses and it my tenants right to decide if they want to pay it or find another rental.
Catpan
2:45 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Very good. I'm also a landlord of a commercial property, so I am experiencing both sides of equation. My landlord chooses to keep me happy. Just as I do my best to work with my tenant. I am not a property attorney, but I am rather certain that the terms of the lease govern the lease payments. Your assertion that landlords may raise their tenants rents for additional costs incurred due to property tax increases may or may not be true depending on the lease structure. Anyway, good luck with your properties.
Sandy
4:14 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
You all are nuts if you vote yes- everyone constantly complains about taxes being too high and then you would vote to raise them? The governor finally did something good by putting a cap on taxes. Hello? Why doesn't the township try to live within their budgets than asking the hardworking taxpayers to give them more money so they can spend on things that are not really needed. I work too hard for my money and I am not giving the Township anymore than they get already. Maybe it's time the township try to learn how to work in a budget and stop spending. VOTE NO!
Cosmo
4:47 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Amen!
ginny
4:40 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
You r so right Sandy.
Brick
4:58 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
VOTE YES TO KEEP BRICK WHAT WE ALL GREW AND NOW LOVE IT TO BE... DONT VOTE OUT OF HATRED BUT WITH HEART AND BRAIN
TimeForChange
6:06 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
"DONT VOTE OUT OF HATRED BUT WITH HEART AND BRAIN"
And that is exactly why a NO vote is the right choice!
Give the town back to the people. Take away their power to extort from us. VOTE NO! I DID!
Voted Yes for the School Budget. Voted for Reid, Suter and Kight for the BOE and man, do I feel proud!
Sandy
8:29 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Thanks Ginny and Cosmo - It's nice to see there are some intelligent people out there!
Cosmo
8:50 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Anytime Sandy. Reason should always dominate emotion.
Doug
8:29 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The polls close in about a half an hour. Here is a website that you can see the results. To see the results of the School Budget and Referendum questions, scroll down towards the bottom (listed by town)
http://www.clerk.co.ocean.nj.us/ElectionSite/
Doug
9:25 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
The poll results are starting to show on the sight. I find it hard to believe that Leone has that many votes. This is the same person that was chasing a Code Enforcement truck saying that they were her signs. They were taken down for putting them in places that were deemed in violation of the ordinance. Funny, those Yes signs remained in places that were also in violation. I have pictures of both.
Looks like the NO vote is leading on the Referendum. I am surprised to see that it looks like the School Budget is going to get defeated as well.
80
9:33 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
It turns my stomach if Leone remains in. She does not deserve a seat. She took away too much from our kids. If she remains in, she will be used and abused like she did to the others.
Doug
10:16 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Leone can go pick up the rest of her illegal signs now and go home. SHE'S OUT! :)
Doug
9:56 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
This town amazes me. The Referendum is a 24.6% increase of the municipal tax and people are falling for the scare tactics. The school budget was under two percent and it is being defeated so far. UNBELIEVABLE!
Think
10:04 pm on Wednesday, April 27, 2011
We won