patching...
Breaking: Bayville Man Stabbed Saturday Night in Seaside Heights Has Been Released; Suspect Still At Large »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Seaside Heights Motel Raid Results in Two Arrests

County detectives, local cops raid Sumner Avenue motel, arrests pair for drug distribution

 

A Seaside Heights couple were arrested Thursday after authorities conducted a raid on their motel room, officials said Friday.

Denise Manco and Rondell Moore, both 34, were arrested on drug charges after police raided the room at the Seaside Sands Inn where the pair had been living, according to a statement from Ocean County Prosecutor Marlene Lynch Ford.

Detectives from the Ocean County Prosecutor's Office and the Seaside Heights Police Department raided room 106 at the motel, located on Sumner Avenue, after obtaining a search warrant, Ford said. Once inside the room, police seized approximately 122 bags of heroin and a small amount of marijuana.

Both Manco and Moore were charged with possession of heroin, possession of heroin under one half-ounce with intent to distribute, possession of heroin with intent to distribute in a recreational zone and possession of under fifty grams of marijuana.

Superior Court Judge James Blaney set both Manco and Moore’s bail at $75,000 cash.

Related Topics: Denise Manco, Rondell Moore, and seaside heights

suz

8:00 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

Oh boy...section 8 people I bet! Come on SSH...get rid of the trash and section 8 motels. Give us all a christmas gift, huh?

Reply

maryellen reilly

8:34 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

this comes down to the greedy landlords of these motels, hotels. they get paid for housing these people. how about returning seaside as a place for families, etc.

Reply

Carolina Shores

10:27 pm on Friday, December 16, 2011

The "landlords" are from India, who had a major law suit against the town, Mayor, Council and Administrator to keep a percentage of the rooms for welfare. They said they couldn't survive the winters without them. There needs to be a bigger game plan Mayor Aikers. It's obviously a great little town with a lot of potential.

Reply
Comment_arrow

.

6:28 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Years ago, the owners of rental properties and motels survived without all of this trash. Seaside Heights was the place to go when I was a kid. It is a real shame what has happened to it.

Mattie

8:44 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Please don't demonize ALL section 8 people (or poor people in general) because of the likes of these two and some others. My cousin owns rental properties in Toms River, Bayville and Forked River, and he ONLY rents to section 8 tenants for the last 25 yrs. Only 2 times was he very unhappy with the families he's had in his homes. The rest were all respectable, hard-working people with kids who just needed some assistance. Some stayed in his homes a year or two, some much longer than that. He always made sure his homes were nice on the outside so they were on par with the neighborhood homes around them, and nice on the inside so the tenants appreciated where they lived.
The problem with Seaside isn't new. They had section 8 issues 30 yrs ago! But that's because decent, fair-priced rentals were *always* at a premium in Ocean County and winter rentals in Seaside were cheap.
Most of the places for rent there are beat, downtrodden dumps, too.... having been used and abused by hundreds of people over the short $ summer season $. Most section 8 people get stuck living in some real dirty dumps, because there's no choice. It's no picnic being poor, you know, have some compassion. And remember that even neighborhoods with million dollar homes have crimes and criminal activity going on in them. Bad people and bad things happen amongst all classes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Carolina Shores

8:55 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Mattie,
You are way off on this. I lived in SSH for a short while. You drive down the streets during the winter (day or night) and you are always being flagged down by dealers. Maybe a few of the Section 8 are trying, but the majority are dead beats. I've seen it and dealt with it first hand. Most of them in SSH are BAD NEWS!

Mattie

9:14 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I've known Seaside Heights since 1965. (I was 9 yrs old then). I grew up in Toms River only a mile or so from the bridge. I had family that owned summer-only rental properties there on Carteret, two, and four blocks back from the beach for more than 40 yrs. (Granted, they didn't rent out in the winter).
I even lived in Seaside Park, year round for a few years, when I was first married (mid 70's).
Carolina, I'm not saying it's NOT 'bad' there, but I just have an issue with people thinking it was a regular "family paradise" just a few years back, and ALL the issues there are now about "section 8 losers" ruining the place. There's ALWAYS been drugs there, ALWAYS been a criminal element there, and there's always been poor people shuffled over to live in crappy motel rooms there, in the 70's 80's and so on.
It was never a true "family town", even back in the 70's.
It was a party town- bars, clubs and more bars. That's why it attracted people (single, party people) more and more and the families disappeared. But whatever, I'm not saying you're wrong... just that it's not fair to blame any ONE thing or ONE type of person for what Seaside H, Seaside P, Ortley Beach, etc has become.

Ever try living in a cheap, dirty run down 2-room "efficiency" motel room with a couple of kids? Not fun. I've known people who've done it. (no, not me).

Reply

Joe Cirile

9:18 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

greedy landlords who have no community tie to this area are as bad as the bums they rent to.
only way to get rid of the bad elements is tocrack down hard more raids and maybe even better than that start breaking a few legs here and there these bums would soon get to know this beach area does not want them.

as for the landlords start enforcing the code laws in town they will smarten up real quick

retired l.e.o.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

9:24 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

That certainly plays a role in it, too Joe. Good point. Most of the landlords of those places don't give a crap about keeping those places nice. They want to invest as little $$ as possible, while bringing in the big bucks on summer rentals per week, and "decent" rental money per month in the winter. What people don't realize is section 8 people don't have a CHOICE, they go (to live) where they are told to, and where there is available housing.

Comment_arrow

Spinnakers Narc

1:57 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

You of all people know the governing agencies fail to do their job knowing who is who and what is what in these towns. Most of these scumbags are habitually released and avoid prosecution due to shoddy write ups and corruption running rampant throughout the departments on every level.

Ken G

9:33 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I hear the Aztec has had alot of Drug problems also

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

9:44 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

They always did, Ken. And just two summers ago, a 15 yr old I know was caught by her family drinking at the Aztec -- more than once. 15!! Gobbed on a bunch of make-up, some cute, sexy clothes and waltzed right in there along with a few 30-35 yr old men. Happens all the time. Drugs are for sale there on the boardwalk, off the boardwalk, in the bars, everywhere. This is not new, this is not all about section 8 people or anything. This is just the type of thing that happens in a touristy 'resort town' - not regular, family oriented neighborhoods, well at least not on this scale...

Joe Cirile

9:55 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

LISTEN THE BABY BOOMERS IN THIS COUNTRY ARE FED UP WITH CARRYING THE LOAD FOR ALL THE REST OF THIS COUNTRY,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

I WORKED HARD FOR WHAT I HAVE BUT IT SEEMS THE THE BLEEDING HEARTS IN THIS COUNTRY ARE DETERMINED TO GIVE AWAY THE SOCIAL EQUITYS WE HAVE WORKED FOR,,

LOOK AROUND YOU EVERY BUM WHO CRIES POVERTY GETS HIS RENT PAID
GETS HIS FOOD STAMPS GETS HIS FREE MEDICAL CARE AND THEN ON TOP OF THAT THIS SAME BUM WILL COME ONE NITE TO ROB YOUR HOME AND MAYBE KILL YOU ,,,,,,

IS THIS TO BE OUR FUTURE WAKE UP PEOPLE WE NEED TO START MAKING BIG CHANGES AND TAKE CONTROL OF THE SITUATION AND START MAKING LAWS TO PROTECT THE MIDDLE CLASS AMERICA

Reply

Ken G

10:56 am on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Believe it or not, I feel safer in Asbury Park than I do in Seaside. Two years ago I was there every night, then this past summer, I was there the night of the gang brawls. Me and my friend actually decided to get on the sky ride to get away from all the violence. As in we were SCARED. After we got off, we FLED to my moms car. I do not enjoy Seaside at night anymore. Don't get me wrong, in the day it's fine, but at night it's new story. This past summer, somehow the Jersey Shore cast was more behaved than the other people on the boardwalk! We also can't play the Benny game on this one, although tourists bring havoc every year, these were locals who were causing the trouble this year.

Reply

TR GIRL

12:39 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

If your on welfare and get caught with or doing drugs, STOP the welfare payments ASAP!! Do drug testing and check out what is going on at these shore motels and houses! I'm sick and tired of paying for these jerks to get high and break the law and laughing at all of us taxpayers! Enough!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

1:23 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Nowhere does it say these two were on welfare, or section 8. No mention of kids, so chances are they are NOT receiving welfare or section 8 assistance. Not impossible, but not probable.
It just irks me that so many people assume ALL crimes are committed by druggies, and ALL welfare/section 8 people are druggies. Nothing like a little class warfare spun into politics...
Ok, so let's just say some one receiving food stamps or public assistance smokes a little weed now and then... You would rather see their children (children with no choice or control in the matter) go homeless and hungry as punishment? Yea, that works. But once again, they can buy booze and stay drunk 24/7 and that's ok? I don't see any testing being demanded for that. why?

Greg

2:37 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Come on Mattie you are really sounding like a REAL BLEEDING HEART LIBERAL!!! You should know that there is NO WAY that the ACLU would ever allow that to happen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

3:26 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I have no problem being called a bleeding heart liberal. Rather be that than a closed minded bigot who thinks the answer to *all* our society's problems is PRISON!! Deportation!! LAWS!!
I know I can never convince most of you, but this bleeding heart liberal always holds hope that people can show understanding and compassion for ALL fellow humans, regardless of their class or bank accounts. LAWS are not the solution for drug addictions. Persecution and stripping away civil rights of people just because they are POOR is not (supposed to be) the "American way." My taxes pay congressmen and women, why don't we drug test them? All of them! Random drug tests, and that means for prescription drug use as well as illegal. 12 cents of the tax dollar is spent on "welfare" programs. 12 cents. No one's Constitutional civil rights should not be sold off because of the 12 cents out of anyone's pocket.
I'm proud to be a liberal who believes that we should really be as free as possible in America... not treated like ciminals just because we may be poor.

Comment_arrow

Mattie

10:40 am on Sunday, December 18, 2011

Correction. That should read:

* No one's Constitutional civil rights should be sold off because of the 12 cents out of anyone's pocket.

RCL67

3:02 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

If you want to do drugs, go nuts, but do it with YOUR OWN money. Go get a job, and go spend all your money on that crap. If you are receiving tax payer funds, no way. It's amazing that people cry poverty, yet they have money for drugs, booze and cigarettes.
I think people are just sick and tired of our taxes going for welfare and they are not helping themselves. You cant have 3,4 kids with 3,4 different fathers, and expect society to feel bad for you. Meanwhile people are losing their jobs , through no fault of their own. I got laid off. I am pinching my pennies. Yet I met a girl who is on her 3rd child, not married, getting public assistance like I've never seen.
Merry Christmas to me....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

3:49 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

RC, Did you know that the *majority* of people receiving assistance in some form or another DO WORK?? (apparently you didn't).
You claim you are out of work and pinching pennies... so without assistance how do you survive? Spouse still working? collecting unemployment? Well, lucky you.
What happens if that source should disappear?
As some one who might some day need assistance in some form, I hope you won't complain when YOU are treated as a criminal or a parolee and are required to pee in a cup or take a blood test every month so you can get your below poverty level monthly stipend... I hope YOU won't mind when people assume you are a dirty, low- down loser stealing the tax dollars from hard working Americans. I hope you can stand being treated and viewed as "garbage" based on your depleted bank balance...

Comment_arrow

RCL67

4:03 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Mattie - how I do survive? I had to cut back on things. Cant spend the money I use to. Movies, books, leisure activities, groceries. I am not married, so it's just me on my own.
Lucky me? Believe me, I'd rather be working! It sucks not working.
Unfortunately , with my experience with the people who I know on assistance, DON'T work.
I know we are all 1 paycheck away from assistance. Believe me, I never thought I would be not working. So no, not lucky me.
What you are seeing Mattie, is that society has just had it with towns , that were once wonderful family communities, going downhill.

william sackler

3:03 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Seaside is an open toilet, a bleeding wound, but due to the money made from the sale of alcohol,it will always stay that way. And anyone who is suprised that drugs are all over that type of area must have been born last night. Are you people that naive?? for god sake, wake up!! its a getto, gangs,drugs, prostitutes,pmps 8 goes either way, some really need it, others scam it, drug test them and that problem is solved, RANDOM TESTS. Joe C, your anger is real, but your suggesting aggravated assault, by saying maybe break a few legs, with one sentence, you lost your moral high ground, your ideas are no better than the problems were talkin about. And violence leads to violence. You need to calm down, that action is one that carrys an 8year prison term. You say u worked hard for what you have, dont lose it in a civil case cause u either sent someone to, or did yourself "break a few legs" Toms River is a city, Seaside is Harlem, always will be, for every drug dealer that gets caught, 9 others do theyre thing scott fee.BAN BOOZE, in Seaside for one full year, the place would change alot.Then it could be billed as a clean, safe, non alcoholic beach town. Then I might wanna bring my sons and wife there for 2 weeks in the summer, and spend a couple of thousand, in the local economy.Not drive to Maryland, or Delaware an give them my Benjamins. New Jersey is the nicest place, just needs some adjustments.

Reply

1stcav

3:16 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Mattie: we cry that the Government has to much say ( control) in our lives, now you want them to check and see that there NOT buying booze and cigarettes with there Gov'mt $$$$ & being upstanding parents and pillars of society..they had those kids and it is there responsibility to raise them ...NOT the Village !!!! But some can't even do that & can't be bothered and theirs are running the streets , mugging and car jacking the villagers..SSH is the pits to all these losers and the out of town landlords could care less, it's all about there money .. to send back home , so theirs can live as well as these people..Those in the USA don't know how good hey got it compared to other countries where there are NO HANDOUTS !!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

4:06 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

I don't want ANYONE tested for booze or drugs, unless there is a real and present danger involved and/or some other type of real, tangible reason for testing. I'm against testing POOR people so as to punish them by withholding public assistance they may be getting or need to get. Public assistance is based on INCOME /FINANCIAL NEED, period- not on morals.
What next? All public assistance people have to attend church every Sunday? Read 2 chapters of the bible each week to their kids?
Can't wear make-up or smoke cigarettes? No sex outside marriage?
You're absolutely right, their kids are their business, and as long as those kids are fed and clothed and NOT abused in any way, there's no reason to punish anyone because they "mispent" a few welfare bucks on something YOU or I don't approve of.
If you think more than a very very few hard-core addicts are spending all their assistance money or trading foodstamp (SNAP) funds for drugs while their kids are naked and starving... you're drinking too much of the corporate-class-warfare-blame-the-poor kool-aid. That does happen, but VERY rarely.
The vast majority of assistance recipients are struggling just to put ANY food on the table and gas in their cars to continue working. Honest. It's just not the horror story you think it is. Go to any welfare office in Ocean County. Look around... mostly white, mostly families, and MOST of them are working as much as possible.

Pat S.

3:36 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

There was a drug bust at the Thunderbird Motel on Kearney Ave. on Thursday. Four arrested, one a convicted felon who was released on July 18. The owners of this building are not Indian, but they are no better than some of the lowlifes they rent to.
Seaside needs to clean up its act and make sure that these slumlords follow EVERY ordinance on the books, or close them down.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

5:15 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

The economy has a lot to do with this as well. If you recall, before the "crash" there were a good number of planned projects for upscale condos, shops, etc. in SSH. A couple were actually built and look quite nice, at least from the outside. Personally, if those efforts were to reignite in the future, I'd love to buy one of those condos before the prices get driven up to outrageously high levels by second-home buyers (see: Brick/TR barrier island, LBI, Ocean City, etc.).

Comment_arrow

Tina

3:53 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

Daniel those condo's are still going up. There are tons already done.

Bobbielyn Harrsch

9:33 pm on Saturday, December 17, 2011

Mattie, it is nice to see someone else on this site who does not have blinders on when it comes to Seaside Heights. I have lived in this town for the better part of 26 years, raised 2 boys here, neither of whom got involved with drugs or gangs even though both are here and have been since I was coming here as a kid. Do you honestly want to know what the difference in SSH is people? Things now make the news! Because of the internet we know more about what everyone is doing. There have been less drug bust this year in SSH than the first year I lived in the town, just more make the news. The police stopped 'hiding' the blotter from reporters, and think about it yourself, 26 years ago if you saw something that happened you talked to your friends about it, and that was it, now it gets posted in video on the net, everyone has Facebook and it all gets posted so nothing can be hidden anymore. When I first moved to SSH I lived across the street from the police station and before I'd get to 7/11 for a morning tea I'd have 6 people asking me if I wanted to buy drugs. the only thing that changed is now you know about it people! Mattie has the voice of reason here.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

10:37 am on Sunday, December 18, 2011

You're right Bobbielyn, that is a huge, huge part of it all.
Now we hear about almost every little thing- whereas just 10 yrs ago, you either had to be on the scene or hear about it from someone else who was. The Asbury Park Press never covered anything in our area unless it was a very slow news day, or whatever happened was a very big deal.
Seaside hasn't been the "quaint, seaside family town" for about 40+ yrs now. Heck, maybe it never was.

gene smith

6:12 pm on Sunday, December 18, 2011

mattie, when a heroin junkie breaks into your home and wrecks your home, and ruins your sense of security, you won't be singing this song anymore. Don't worry, ill save a spot for you on the "we hate junkies who in turn, steal, rob and murder to support their habit" side. lol!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

6:41 pm on Sunday, December 18, 2011

and "Merry Christianmas" to you too.

Tina

9:14 am on Monday, December 19, 2011

@Mattie - Thank you for the kind words for SSH. I live there year round and have for almost 5 years now. We NOT a section 8 or welfare family. However we did move here because of the lower rents, since every where else in this state is SO high. Plus I love being near the beach. NOT all of the ppl that live the in hotels that are welfare ppl abuse the system. Some do fall on hard times and need help. But those that abuse the system and then sell whatever they do on the side it what is making SSH so bad and have such a bad name. No matter what they do they will still come in. I heard in one article that they wanted to do away with the welfare hotels all together but then I think that may hurt most of their business in the winter. Yeah there may be those that want to live at the hotel and are paying out of pocket but maybe that number is down. Who knows? All I know is I am quite tired of defending SSH to all the nay sayers. Maybe there are some bad elements here, but there are some great ones too. The beach, the Boardwalk, the attractions, and most will deny that they don't frequent it but they do at one point, they had visited it. I love the summer here, with all the ppl (not so much the bennies, some are nice actually), and Fall there are some great street festivals. And we put on some great Parades too!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

9:33 am on Tuesday, December 20, 2011

I loved living in SSP when I did. I loved the off season there, without tourists, without traffic. It was quiet, clean, and the beach was and always will be beautiful.
I still love the beaches, especially Island Beach S. P.... NJ has the most awesome beaches. But I don't get there much anymore. I'm more of a pool person in my 'old age'. ;-)
As far as getting rid of the hotels, I don't think that would solve the problems there. It's the BAR scene that brings in the "undesirables". If you could eliminate ALL the drinking establishments, maybe SSH and SSP could eventually become a nice, family-oriented destination again. Maybe.

Arlen

11:38 am on Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Very Interesting views going back and forth. One thing that I must agree with is drug testing folks that are on welfare. I work for a large company and yes, I am very grateful that I am working and able to support my family. But, I had to take a drug test and a criminal background check to get my job. I pay taxes and I am ok with the government helping folks that really need it. but if my money is going to help the needy, shouldnt they have to follow the same rules I had to? by far, not all people on assistance are bad. But If its good for one, why not all?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

1:00 pm on Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Here's another way to see your point, Arlen:

Unless your job entails a real, physical "danger" such as operating heavy equipment, using dangerous machinery, driving large trucks and or vehicles which transport other people or children, (or driving anything, really), or has the responsibility of protecting human lives every day (train or airtraffic controller, etc), there is * no need whatsoever * to be drug testing you, or anyone else, just to get - or maintain- a job. It is an infringment of your constitutional rights as a legal citizen in the USA.
There is no reason in the world why an employer needs to know what you smoke, drink, eat or do on your off time away from the job. He is your employer, he doesn't OWN you. His only concern about you should be when you are on the clock, and how you perform on the job. Period. Drug testing always used to be considered a method of "search" by law enforcement and judges. It used to be there had to be a REASON to get someone drug tested. But then we allowed that reason to be ignored...

So because you submit to that infringment and unconstitutional act (drug testing) you think everyone should? I feel that we need to take back our personal lives and time from The Corporate Masters across the board and eliminate government sanctioned intrusion (like employee drug testing) into our personal lives behind closed doors.

Arlen

1:22 pm on Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Mattie, I work for a large insurance company. no driving, no heavy equipment. That is there requirement for employment. I submitted to the testing because It was a requirement for employment. what is wrong with that? would you want someone handling your medical information thats hooked on crack? I wouldnt. I really "get" what your saying, but the times have changed and unfortunatly, this is necessary.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mattie

1:59 pm on Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Believe me, if you were "hooked on crack" you wouldn't keep that job (or any job) more than a week anyway. You would not be able to function anywhere close to normally or perform your duties accurately. However, if you smoked weed on the weekends or on your off time, why should that concern me? It doesn't. Why should that concern your employer? It shouldn't.
It will not affect your job performance as long as you don't go to work under the influence. Just like alchohol which they can't and don't test for!
And just like (legitimately) taking prescription drugs to sleep better at night, or pain pills to deal with pain. That is no one's business but yours and your doctor's.
I totally understand you took the test to get the job, as I have in the past as well... But I have also passed on jobs that required certain target groups of people (blacks, people under 40, etc) to take drug tests for employment, but yet they didn't test everyone; like Walmart, for example.
Unfortunately, we have come to accept this nonsense regarding employment drug testing, but in actuality it is something we never should have allowed to become standard operating procedure. It's now something that we need to change, IMO.

Arlen

5:06 pm on Thursday, December 29, 2011

Lets just agree to disagree. Its my right as an employer to drug test. If people dont like it, they dont have to apply. If Walmart is doing that, they can face charges for picking and chosing who to test. No company will check for RX drugs, they are looking for the illegal one's. You would be suprised on how many Ivy league folks do drugs, I dont want them handling any of my PHI nor should you.

Reply

charlie

3:43 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

A pure case of greed. Business owners rent to section 8 trash to keep the $$$ flowing in the off season and as a result the area becomes a crime ridden sewer where no honest people will go.

Reply

Tina

4:03 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

how did an article about a fire turn into this. SMH!

@Charlie where do you expect the Section 8 ppl to live? Section 8 familes live all over the state. Its not just SSH. And they live here all year round not just in the off season.

My husband and myself, we are HONEST and hard working and not section 8, moved to SSH because quite frankly couldn't find a decent priced rental that we could afford. Not everyone in SSH are trash. I am proud to live here. I am sure post full time residents would say the same. For the most part its pretty quiet. And most of the stories you hear about Seaside its someone who is coming from the outside causing trouble.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks