Red Light Cams Shut Down Over 'Yellow Light' Length Concerns
Brick among 21 municipalities ordered to suspend ticketing
Brick is one of 21 New Jersey municipalities that was ordered to suspend the issuance of summonses from its red light enforcement cameras Tuesday.
The state Department of Transportation made the call based on video evidence provided by cameras placed at intersections, officials said.
The decision to suspend the issuance of summonses was made because the legislation that authorizes the cameras under a pilot program requires a formula to determine the proper duration of the yellow light in a traffic signal that differs from the formula most state roads already use.
Two of Brick's camera-armed intersections include a state highway.
State officials said most yellow lights follow the legally required engineering and safety standards in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, which requires a minimum duration of the yellow light to equal one-tenth of the posted speed limit on the approaching road.
For example, where the approaching road has a posted speed of 40 mph, the signal must display yellow for a minimum of four seconds. The DOT rounds up to the nearest whole second, so in instances where the approaching speed limit is 45 mph, the signal displays a yellow light for five seconds.
The formula in the legislation that determines camera program eligibility, however, requires an analysis of vehicle speeds as they approach the intersection where a red light camera installation is proposed.The formula requires a yellow signal of at least three seconds if at least 85 percent of the approaching traffic travels at speeds of 25 mph or less.
For each increase of 5 mph in vehicle speed above 30 mph, the minimum duration of the yellow light must be increased by 0.5 seconds, according to the legislation.
This requirement, officials said, is there to ensure that the traffic signal is timed properly to provide motorists with sufficient time to avoid a violation and fine by entering an intersection when the light is red.
Township Business Administrator Scott Pezarras has told Brick Patch in the past that the Brick Boulevard-Hooper Avenue intersection had its yellow light length increased by a half-second before the cameras were installed.
Brick's intersections also went through a previous review, he said.
"Because they're county and state roads [where all of Brick's cameras are located], all had to be reviewed by the DOT to make sure anything that was going to be done was not going to impact traffic on their roadways," Pezarras said.
Brick current has three intersections where red light cameras are present: Brick Boulevard and Hooper Avenue; Route 70 and Chambers Bridge Road; and Route 70 and Brick Boulevard. The Route 70-Brick Boulevard camera just began issuing tickets June 6.
Under the state's directive, municipalities must conduct traffic analyses and submit certifications to the DOT by Aug. 1.
If the analysis shows that the duration of a yellow light meets the minimum duration as required by the legislation, a municipality will be permitted to issue violation notices for violations that occur during the suspension period, and continue issuing violation notices.
If the analysis shows that a signal does not display a yellow light long enough to meet the formula in the legislation, that intersection will be removed from the pilot program.
BW
6:22 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
"If the analysis shows that a signal does not display a yellow light long enough to meet the formula in the legislation, that intersection will be removed from the pilot program."
Which means Brick would have to issue refunds for all fines at that intersection. Where is that money going to come from?
Daniel Nee
6:24 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Our info from the state did not specify as to whether fines would have to be returned retroactively. The NJDOT info just came in to us within the last few minutes. I'll send them a question on this issue and see if they've determined an answer yet.
Daniel Nee
6:24 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
And of course, I'll report back if/when I have it...
SoylentGreen
6:24 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Guess NJDOT dropped the ball on this one.
Vincent Muti
6:26 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
WOOO HOOO LMAO
Ed
6:35 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Nice! Another BS revenue generator shut down, I only wish it was permanently!
Joseph Woolston Brick
6:38 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
If these lights have been non conforming since day one, then why shouldn't people be eligible for refunds? If the timing had been set correctly, they wouldn't have gone through a red light now would they? Get ready for, well if we have to give refunds to the people, well we will have to get rid of garbage collection and you'll have to get your own and various other threats.
Bowie Thelonius
8:46 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Good. Brick owes me $85.00. If I had stopped as suddenly as the light required (on a rainy, slick-road day), I would have caused an accident. The yellow light was VERY short. I want my money back. Another thing. I didn't get the ticket in the mail until it was too late to do anything but pay it.
gurl
7:06 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I knew something was up with the brick.blvd.light....I've been driving through that intersection for years and I totally noticed recently that the yellow was super fast.
SoylentGreen
7:15 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Guess you didn't read the article. The yellow light interval meets the state requirements for a regular intersection. With red light cameras, the formula is different. The yellow light timing at that intersection is the same as it was in the past.
Chief Wahoo
8:17 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
If the analysis shows that a signal does not display a yellow light long enough then FIRE SCOTT PEZARRAS
Daniel Nee
8:55 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
It's an NJDOT error, not a township error. None of the roads feeding into any of the cam intersections are municipal roads - they're all either state or county.
Brick couldn't unilaterally modify the yellow light at any of them even if they wanted to.
brick resident
8:23 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
what about citations issued just prior to this action (but not yet paid/processed)? If the proper timing analysis has not been done then the outstanding tickets should be dismissed. Will this be the case?
Brett Middaugh
8:57 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Speaking as an individual who makes their living in the field of traffic control, I can assure you that these cameras are there to do ONE thing. Generate money. If the cameras were turned off because VIDEO evidence shows that the length of the yellow clearance is incorrect then it would be easy to determine whether the controller timing is in spec simply by checking the programmable controllers database which will show you the yellow clearance right off. Very easy to do. For townships and states that actually want to PREVENT ACCIDENTS, I would suggest a device that is made which extends the green timing based on the speed of the cars approaching the intersection and how close they are to the "dilemma zone", which is the are where a motorist makes that split second decision to slow down or attempt to make the light based on their perception of how far they are from the intersection. No one wants to do that in NJ though because it is a FIX and doesn't generate $$$.
Illegitimi non carborundum
4:06 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
Still, the general public isn't going to have access to the programmable controllers database. I suspect it would be a cold day in Hell before something that sensitive were produced by request. You say it's very easy to do? I'll bite...
Tom Cular
10:27 pm on Friday, March 22, 2013
Brett, you've made the only intelligent reply to this issue. You and I both know that timing can be adjusted to extend the amber or delay the green or extend the red in all directions. These red light tickets are nothing more than an Acropolis/Pezzaris fund raiser. The Co. that furnishes the camera equip. has a dummy Co. set up that promotes the camera use. Add the fact that they receive half of the fine money, makes me question their motives.
Kevin Koch
8:57 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I want my refund! And my garbage collection too!
Brett Middaugh
8:58 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
For those with technical expertise, please feel free to peruse this...
http://www.wavetronix.com/en/products/smartsensor/advance
Brett Middaugh
9:10 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
Please excuse my typo in my first paragraph, that should have read "area" not "are".
I am personally VERY cautious at those lights to the point of slamming on my brakes because I know that all one would have to do is change yellow clearance to cause people to "run" red lights. Not saying this is being done, just understanding the technical applications of traffic control. Oh, you can also extend the red of the cross street to prevent accidents from occurring by allowing the cars to clear out of the intersection before the opposite intersection goes green. Again, just ideas on how to prevent accidents, which when you think about it, save us all money.
Tom Cular
3:27 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Brett, I mentioned the UMTCD guidelines a few months ago as well as altering the red duration so that both roadways have a red light for a couple of seconds. As you stated, that would go a long way towards accident prevention, however that would not generate revenue. As you know there's a reason that the "Police Key" on the control boxes only gives limited access for control of the signals. There are times, when due to local conditions the PD needs to manually control signals, but they do not have access to programming the controls.
citizen
9:29 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I hope they look into the toll booths on the pkwy next.
10% Tax Cut NOW
8:12 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The Township would have the ask the State and County for the fees that are sent to them. With that in mind do you think Gov CC would return the revenue received ? I don't think so., That is one of the line's that he is using to balance his budget.
Joseph Woolston Brick
9:43 pm on Tuesday, June 19, 2012
I don't care who controls the red light settings, if it proves that the settings were not right, then it's the towns duty to refund all fines during the time these cameras were not calibrated right. It's only fair.
Lee
9:16 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I agree with you Joseph, the money should be refunded and I would like to have my money refunded also
Maria Cacciola
9:57 am on Friday, July 13, 2012
I couldn't agree MORE!!! I want my money back too! I heard on the radio (94.3) that there was a way for people who had gotten tickets to get a refund because of the fact that the lights were timed wrong. Why should thousands of people be out of their own money because of a technicality. Those camera's were never put up for our safety in the first place it was just a money maker like said in previous posts. I have also witnessed people braking early causing fender benders in fear of getting a ticket when most people would have just gone through the yellow light!
jenny
12:21 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
They will find a loophole to not have to return past fines. They are not going to give up that money.
Kevin Bur
1:00 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I drive thru the Brick intersections almost all day. The 4 second rule at 40 mph is enough to get thru begining at the stripe. If you are before the stripe, but beyond the "point of no return" (meaning there isn't enough room to stop your vehicle before the stripe, you will need more than 4 seconds to clear the intersection before the light turns red. If you are turning left from Rt 70 onto Brick Blvd, you are driving at a slower speed to turn (unless you want to look like a maniac taking the turn at 40 mph), so you will not have enough time to clear the intersection after passing the stripe within the 4 seconds allotted.
SoylentGreen
3:35 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I think the system is set up not to register a violation unless a vehicle enters the intersection after the light as turned red. If you are already in the intersection, it doesn't flash you.
Kim E
1:46 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
This is a mess .Just to night I got blinded by a light flash when I was turning on green near Outback. I drive thru 2 of them every night just to get home.I hate them .
MONA JONES
8:03 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I GOT A WARNING NOTIFICATION WHEN THE RED LIGHT PHOTO ENFORCED STARTED. I WAS SHOCKED. I HAD A GREEN LIGHT WHEN I APPROACHED THE LIGHT ON RT. 70. IT WAS GREEN, YELLOW, RED. ABOUT 2 SECONDS OF YELLOW. I TOLD MY HUSBAND AND HE SAID THE PHOTO SHOWS YOU WENT THROUGH A RED LIGHT. I TOLD HIM THE YELLOW LIGHT WAS NOT LONG ENOUGH. THERE WILL BE A LOT OF REARENDERS AT THAT LIGHT BECAUSE IT IS A CURVE WHEN APPROACHING THAT LIGHT. THEY NEED A COUNT DOWN SIGNAL AT THAT LIGHT ALSO. PEOPLE WALK AND CROSS THAT RT. 70.
Brett Middaugh
8:44 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
http://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/intersection/resources/techsum/fhwasa09008/
JOHN Q
8:49 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
the light on brick blvd going north at the merge of rt 70 has NEVER been set to DOT standards. it was 2.8 seconds and a constant revenue generator for the town. it was an easy ticket for the officer waiting at circle dodge.this entire scam system stinks, officer writes a ticket and then tells you to fight it in court, where he gets overtime for showing up. what do you get even if you beat the ticket? you lose a days pay or a vacation day to be there. maybe if the town had to compensate you for your time and the officer lost his court ot there would be a few less questionable tickets being issued.
Not So Dumb
9:09 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I have no problem with red light cameras. I guess if you obey the law, you wont get a ticket in the mail with the video showing you didnt obey the traffic rules you learned. Every traffic signal timing in the state is set by the DOT. How many of you have pulled off the road and timed the yellow light you tryed to beat to see if is set right.
sharon remtory
10:53 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Thank you, very much. It is simple, isn't it? This is the first sensible answer I came across.....
Mrs. G.
1:26 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
First off, I feel there should be more policemen writing tickets for the running of lights. However, the timing of the lights should be within the regulations - that is only fair. And, that is the whole reason behind this study. I have timed a yellow light whe I visited a realitive out of state. I stopped VERY quicly for it, but could not believe how quickly it changed. So, I drove around the corner and had my passenger video it on her phone. It was a three second change - and if that was legal, it should be changed! I was able to stop, but it really wasn't safe to do so. I was not speeding, but the car behind me could have slammed into me.
Brett Middaugh
9:29 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
You can be trying to obey the law and still get caught in what the FHWA calls the "dilemma zone". I personally do not know anyone who attempts to blow red lights and risk massive liability to themselves and others, I do however know people get caught at that moment of "do I go or do I slam on the brakes". There are technological ways around it other than what is being done. Has anyone who read this, read any of the articles I have posted? You also can't "time the yellow" by your watch, it is set in the controller in the cabinet. Usually on the LCD display you can easily get to the screen which shows your yellow clearance. If you want to get rid of these money generators, press the DOT to install dilemma zone detection.
sharon remtory
10:54 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
could the reason of slamming on the brakes be due to speeding over the speed limit?
I rest my case.
Tom Cular
3:36 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Brett, I know you're trying to explain, but you're talking to dead horses.
jim
10:02 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I want ny money back!!!!!!!!!!
sharon remtory
10:55 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
well, stop going over the speed limit.......
darrell
10:49 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The other day a truck went right thru a red light on Brick Blvd. He was right infront of me, so they do go thru red lights and don't care. This was before they put a halt on the lights.
sharon remtory
11:02 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The second sensible comment...Thank you, very much,
Greg Thompson
10:48 am on Saturday, June 23, 2012
(Truck is a good point). How big was the truck? I ask because larger vehicles need more room to stop. That's physics. There is no determination for weight of vehicles with these cameras. I drive an F-350, weight > 9,999 lbs. If someone in a small car slams their brakes and stops in front of me there could be a problem. I take this into consideration when I travel behind other cars. It's a tough call for me cause I don't know how fast your car stops even at the speed limit. I've had 1 very close call at 70 and Chambersbridge with a little nissan and if I didn't lay on my horn to warn them and they didn't keep rolling I would've hit her. We both stopped for the light although she should of gone through, she was past the line when she slammed her brakes on. We were going about 25 mph. None the less, that camera put me in bad spot for no good reason. You have to know what's behind you when you slam your brakes on.
Paul Swartwout
11:00 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The latest camera at Brick blvd and Route 70 is going to cause accidents. There are no do not walk signs to warn you light is going to change. There is no warning telling you the light is going to change. They should install the flashing do not walk signs.
Brett Middaugh
11:22 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The truck is actually a perfect condition of not being able to stop in time for a yellow clearance condition. The truck has more mass than a small car and therefore is not able to stop in time so the driver in the dilemma zone decides to try and make it. The devices I speak of compensate for that. Yes, some people do speed, almost no one does the exact posted speed limit. The concern is to prevent accidents at the least cost with the most effectiveness. Dilemma zone detection does that. You can also slam on the brakes without speeding. Still wondering if anyone has read the article from the FHWA who sets guidelines on red timing, yelllow clearance, etc.
Brett Middaugh
11:26 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
You could be doing the exact speed limit, be in the dilemma zone and slam on the brakes due to the inability to know and or judge how much yellow clearance the jurisdiction gives to that particular signal. Again the desire is to prevent accidents, not make money, issue citations, etc. The general safety of the traveling public is the most important aspect of all traffic control.
Brett Middaugh
11:27 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
This is what NJDOT should be doing at trouble intersections.
FTA:
Potential Benefits
The Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection system has several benefits relative to traditional multiple detector systems, which have upstream detection for vehicles in the dilemma zone but do not take the speed or size of individual vehicles into account. These benefits include:
Reducing the frequency of red-light violations;
Reducing the frequency of crashes associated with the traffic signal phase change (for example, rear-end and angle crashes);
Reducing delay and stop frequency on the major road; and
Maintaining or reducing overall intersection delay.
Agency Experience
An Advanced Dilemma-Zone Detection system was developed for the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) to minimize both delay and crash frequency at rural intersections.
This system was implemented as part of a study conducted by TxDOT at several intersections using commercially-available equipment in Texas. The evaluation of safety and operational benefits found that the system:
Reduced delay by 14 percent;
Reduced stop frequency by 9 percent;
Reduced red-light violations by 58 percent;
Reduced heavy-vehicle red-light violations by 80 percent; and
Reduced severe-crash frequency by 39 percent.
sharon remtory
2:18 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
and when has any gov't agency done their job?
Brett Middaugh
11:28 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The person who witnessed the truck run the red light may be interested in this:
"Reduced heavy-vehicle red-light violations by 80 percent"
Brett Middaugh
11:29 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I'd like to say that I am in no way trying to put anyone down, but simply pointing out that there are much cheaper and better ways to prevent accidents at potential problem red light intersections.
Sall
11:32 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Wheres my $85 back???
Bob
11:34 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
if they changed the yellow to 10 sec there would still be alot of you that still blow the light and will complain that it was too short. If you read the article it did not specify Brick as a place that the lights where it has a shortend yellow only. Also if you read how they calculate the formula for the length my question is: if that is good enough for red light camera intersection why not for ALL intersections?
Tom
12:57 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
It will take me 0.4 seconds to push the button come election time...
Joseph Woolston Brick
5:06 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Tom, I bet I can push that button in 0.2 seconds. Wanna race?
darrell
2:37 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
The truck that went thru the red light was stopped infront of me. The light had already changed to red, he could have easily stopped as I did. The traffic was lined up at the light to make a left onto Hooper Ave. The amber light had already changed to red when we approached to turn. He just didn't want to wait for another light. Lucky he didn't cause and accident.
Brett Middaugh
3:09 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
So the truck stopped, the light turned red, then he blew the light anyhow? There must have been no traffic on the side street. Of course there's no taking into account that sort of action but for the majority of the people who are just trying to make it through the intersection properly there is better technology than cameras. I think the point I am trying to make is that instead of getting worked up about cameras and complaining, it may be better to approach those putting in the cameras and saying, "hey there is something better out there that doesn't affect the average motorist who is just trying to drive safely."
darrell
7:34 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
I don't care either way really about the cameras, but while they are there I will continue to drive carefully. Also, on a local radio station they said would it be worth the effort to try to recoup your $85. if any of the cameras are not set right. Maybe having to take a day off of work, hiring a lawyer,etc. They said it's unlikely that many of the people who got tickets would persue it. Have to wait and see. Off this subject, did anyone look up their tax bill for 8/1? Better do it sitting down!
sharon remtory
9:26 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
there is a better way. Christie needs to re-instate the traffic officers to catch these people. I do not see any police officers, ever........during the day........and the driving public knows this......
Chief Wahoo
6:49 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
“Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security”
- Ben Franklin
Tom
6:58 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Joseph,
We can race, but if you encounter a yellow light remember slam on the brakes...
Tom
7:03 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
If we surround the town with these cams the moat will be complete around the kingdom.
Ed
7:13 pm on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
Remember when the cops actually earned their money enforcing traffic laws?
Cynthia Taylor
9:03 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Someone should organize a petition to have a referendum on Nov's Ballot for Brick to let the public vote on whether or not to have the Red Light Camera's removed.
sharon remtory
9:28 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
thank you very much. The people need to say what they want..........where do we begin? Anyone motivated?
Tommy
6:45 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
I would hope more then one company will do the certification of the lights in the 21 towns. If not the question of the certification being corrupt will loom. In my opinion those ticketed where it is proven the lights were not set correctly should be refunded for the tickets they received. If not a class action lawsuit should be filed.
darrell
7:39 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
It would probably cost you more than $85.00 and time off of work.
darrell
7:42 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
The suit would be against NJ Dot. Good luck,
Tommy
8:01 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Yeah well lawyer's will jump all over a class action against the DOT. They go where they can get big money for themselves. Let us see if the DOT has any integrity, if a legit finding shows the timing of the yellow lights is not correct. lets see what the DOT does.
Judy Sepulveda
11:39 pm on Friday, June 22, 2012
Judy, Brick. I want my money back too. Yellow arrows at Brick Blvd. and Chambersbridge change to fast on turn onto Hooper Ave. A waste of my tax dollors.