patching...
Breaking: Obama and Christie to Visit Jersey Shore on Tuesday »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Mayor to Ask Council Members to Reduce Salaries

Tuesday night meeting shaping up to be a show-down

 

Brick Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis will ask township council members to halve their salaries, eliminate health benefits and give up stipends for waiving health care benefits at Tuesday night's council meeting.

Council members are paid $8,000 for their services; the council president receives $9,000.

It was not immediately clear Tuesday afternoon which council members currently receive health benefits from the township.

For township council members who do not receive benefits, there is a $4,000 waiver incentive in place.

Acropolis said in an e-mail to Brick Patch that he will propose ordinances and resolutions at tonight's council meeting to cut the council salaries in half, and formally eliminate health care benefits and the health care waiver incentive for council members. He will also ask for the mayor's salary to be reduced to $1 from its current payout of $52,000. Acropolis said he does not take health benefits from the municipal government.

"The new council majority ran against higher taxes in Brick Township," Acropolis said in the e-mail. "It is time to follow through with their promises."

"We should lead by example which is why I pledged to take only $1 in compensation and why I already have waived taxpayer funded health care as Mayor," Acropolis said.

Council President John Ducey could not be immedately reached for comment.

The township council meeting will take place at 7 p.m. at the township municipal complex.

Related Topics: Health Benefits, Township Council, and brick nj news

Dennis

3:29 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Grandstanding! Dont he have health care from TRMUA?. Stevie, please resign tonite. Do Brick a favor and save face at the next election.

Reply

bths06

3:36 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Dennis, I don't think he takes health care from TRMUA but I do know for certain because he has said it he takes health care as part of his wife's plan, and guess where is wife works: Brick Township Schools...So in the long run we are paying for his benefits.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis

3:39 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

We get it either way from this clown.

Comment_arrow

BW

4:57 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

He does not take Health benefits through townhall or Toms River. He gets about 5000 from EACH NOT to take them. But we are still paying his health care because he has them through his wife who work as a teacher in the district.

I know

3:42 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Is this what we can expect from Steve for the rest of his term? Here he goes, right into bully mode. Did he miss the reorganization meeting on purpose? Shame on him. Will someone close to him please tell him he is acting like such a baby. Everyone knows that his health benefits are paid for by either the Twp BOE (his wife's employer) or Toms River (his other full time position)...my question is did HE ever take advantage of the incentive waiver? Reducing the mayor's salary to $1 is a joke and a gimmick. The Council should cut the salary back to what it was before Scarpelli increased it to 52K, one dollar is a joke and political grandstanding. Come on Steve... act like an adult and work to get things done.

Reply
Comment_arrow

AJ

4:17 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

They should leave the 52k salary alone if you are a full time mayor and set up a figure for a part-time mayor.The one we have now is not worth a dollar.

I know

4:09 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

does anyone remember back when Steve was council president and he would not let the mayor (Scarpelli) speak at council meetings? I wonder if Ducey will do the same to him? he's used to running the meetings and talking whenever he wants. this could be interesting!

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:08 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

I hope Pres. Ducey goes over and sticks a Big cork in his mouth to shut him up once and for all. The mayor should just resign now, move out of Brick and let the rest of us forget about his awful tenure in office.

Comment_arrow

Mickey

10:16 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

the mayor took a shot at the TC both D's & R's. I think we've just seen the last of party line voting in Brick for some time to come. the mayor just created a block of 6. while most seem to feel the mayor doesn't deserve a full time salary, I don't think they begrudge the TC theirs. especially if they work for what's best for all of Brick.

Comment_arrow

John C

11:12 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Bully Scarpelli???? That's real funny. Former mayor Scarpelli was well known to be a bully in his own right, and the cost of crossing him was mighty high, so don't act like ole "Uncle Joe" was a poor little man sitting there being abused by the big bad council president.

Zerosignal

4:39 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

How about trimming the overpaid police forces salary??? Brick cops don't deserve $90,000 for this town.. I'm sure we could find PLENTY of people willing to take those jobs at $60,000. Also sell 10-15 vehicles that never move from behind the municipal building..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Ann Fuller

6:12 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Zero, I don't agree with you either. Who am I to say what one's position is worth? I for one know of administrative assistants who make more than 60,000/yr.

Taxed to death

4:58 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

And please don't forget to rescind the 24% municipal tax increase

Reply

BW

5:05 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Zero I disagree with you on that one. SOME of our police officers do deserve their salaries. There are some however, that do not. Police pay should be done on merit, and their ability to do their job. If you sit in Dunkin Donuts all night, you dont deserve it. When you do your job and catch the ba guys, and help the piblic, by all means you deserve it.

There are many things that can be cut in this town, starting with Juan " lets spend the surplus" Bellu. Why does an assistant need an assistant? Exactly what does childhood friend Dave do in parks to warrant a 5 figure raise? The list is ENDLESS.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Bob

6:56 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

you realy don't want the police being paid on merit. How many more will get tickets or arrested for them to make an extra buck or two

Comment_arrow

BW

7:00 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

True Bob but not exactly what I meant by merit. I mean paperwork, actually patroling, not 2 or 3 sitting for hours in a parking lot bsing. Things like that, actually performing their job.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:14 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

These employees and the positions mentioned above should be fired IMMEDIATELY and those positions eliminated permanently. I'm sure no one will miss them. Didn't the mayor's friend Patrick Doyle hold 1 of those positions before the fatal auto accident on Jordan Road?????????

Joseph Lamb

5:11 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The mayor is just trying to take heat off the $3.6 million in spending that was approved with the old council on the way out the door.
The $3.6 million spending should be rescinded. What doesn't the mayor understand?
I thought he said that he heard the voters in November.
The mayor will no doubt put a valiant effort on small items to deflect attention from the $3.6 million spending.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Dennis

5:20 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Hearing is one thing, understanding is another.

Comment_arrow

Bob

7:12 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Sorry Joe but this is pure politics. He is going to introduce two budgets - one with the 24% and another without it and throw it onto the laps of the new council, Then they willl be the bad guys either way come two years from now. They will either vote to keep the increase thus endorsing it or they will be the one responsible for cuts and layoffs. Either way he wins. Didn't you or any of the others wonder why 8 months ago the Democrats never endorsed or campaigned against the increase? Now they will have to make a decision and take the heat for it.

Mark Story Jenks

6:36 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The meeting will be entertaining. If nothing else.

Reply

BW

6:38 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

wish they were broadcast live. I could watch it while at work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Ann Fuller

6:49 am on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Me:
live broadcast sounds like a great idea. Especially now that they will be held weekly, I hope the meetings will be posted on B20 sooner than Thursdays. It will give anyone interested in the Township's goings on to view the meetings more frequently.

Comment_arrow

John C

3:00 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Betty the videos of all council meetings can be viewed on the Township Web Site as well when ever you want. I am not sure how soon they are available after the meeting though

Robert

7:06 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

this guy is such a phoney.............

Reply

Dave D.

7:23 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Acropolis is such a joke. I always said he was the worst mayor in brick history and he proves me right all the time. I would like to know how much he pay's Art Sholty to put him on a high pedestal. Oh has anyone noticed that the R's election trailer at foodtown is gone now. thought they had nothing to do with it. they waited a month to make it look good.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:15 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Just noticed this evening that the "trailer/billboard" for the Shoppes at the pond is gone. Does this mean no banquet hall is going up after all???? Just put the old foodtown back, all will be happy and the folks will be dancing in the streets!!!!! LOL

Gary

7:58 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The bottom line is if its fulltime then keep hours on this clown.....Between Brick and Toms River this guys is making all of us look like clowns....He is stealing, and should be charged.....This clown would not be asking for a $1, if he didn't have Toms River.....The FBI will get to the bottom, and he will be at Fort Dix soon enough.....crook!!!

Reply

disgusted homeowner

10:17 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

@Gary, that crime is called "STEALING TIME FROM THE EMPLOYER". Several former co-workers of mine years ago were prosecuted at a plant i worked at for just that. MMMMMMM......

Reply
Comment_arrow

John C

11:23 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

no disgusted, elected officials that hold other employment typically either have an agreement with the employer or a contract that allows them time during the day to attend to the official functions of their elected position, and the agreement/contract allows them to work flex schedules (ex. going in early or staying late) to make up the time that they "owe" their full time employer. I am stating a fact so please lets not get into the full time mayor or the double dipping debate on this post that is not the intent of what i am trying to say. The majority of NJ Government positions, regardless of how you feel about them and the compensation and benefits given, are considered to be part time jobs, and those that hold them all have a business, some type of law or medical practice or another full time position either in the public or private sector.

Kevin Koch

11:03 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

I truly believe if a recall attempt was put forth against Acropolis, the town would again speak and we would be successful. He showed his character yet again by not showing up on Sunday when our new council members were sworn in. Now all he can do is stomp his feet like Herman Muenster... Darn, Darn, Darn... Steve, please, in the best interest of our town, just resign. You are doing an injustice to this town and the people who reside here.

Reply

Sam Foster

11:16 pm on Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Mayor Acropolis did a lot of talking tonight about how he asked for a reduction of the mayors salary months ago. But what I wanted to ask was why didn't he speak about reducing the salary of the mayor to $1 before he accepted the $93k job at the Toms River MUA? Keep in mind this is the same mayor who said that the reason he was taking the job at the T.R. MUA was because he couldn't support his family on his $50k salary as mayor. I Can't wait until he is out of office.

Reply

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:14 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

I think the Mayor's reasoning for requesting that Councils’ salaries and benefits be decreased is because the newbie members don’t appear to be as financially well off as the Mayor and existing Council members. He wants to hit them in their personal pocketbooks. This is a case where the rich get richer or remain rich and the "poorer" who may want to do to do something good for the Township and truly fight for the people really could use the better salary and benefits. – Greedy versus truly needy.

Reply
Comment_arrow

morrissey

1:24 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

of course he is........but they shouldnt have lied to get voted in......they will lose all respect in only 3 days.......that might be a record

Gina

2:39 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Regarding Acropolis calling on the Council to reduce their salaries...

A change to the Council's salaries is not comparable to changes in the Mayor's salary. The Mayor took the job as a full-time job at full-time pay of $52k. After becoming Mayor, he took ANOTHER full-time job. SO - the Mayor's salary should then be reduced to what it was as a part-time position: $15,000. Not a dollar, not zero.

The Mayor trying to bully the Council into reducing their pay shows his weak leadership and has nothing to do with why he is being called upon to reduce his. If my boss is overpaid for his job and his salary is adjusted, why should he ask me to take a pay cut too if I have had the appropriate pay all along? Would it save the company money if everyone in the company reduced their pay? Of course, but this is about appropriate rates of pay. I don't ask my company to cut my hours in half and pay me the same and if they don't pay me the same to start cutting other people's pay when they still do what they did all along.

Reply

Denny D

3:04 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Nobody had to lie to get voted in. The Democrats in Brick were dead(flatlined) since the Scarpelli days. The Town Council was all Republicans. All the jobs in town were given to Republicans. All I can say is the Republicans must have been pretty awful to get blown away by a bunch of "unworthy, unknown neophytes". I can certainly understand the bitterness of the losers. It has to be embarrassing to get your a$$es kicked by a bunch of unknowns. For people like John C, instead of acting like a baby why not round up the party faithful and start in a new direction? Stop all the attacks(the electorate is sick of that crap). That's why Obama is going to win re-election. The Karl Rove theory of slinging crap has run its course. Why not try finding something positive to build on?

Reply

Brick Citizen

5:05 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

I agree with Concerned Brick Citizen. The four Democrats may need the benefits or the extra salary. It's not for us to judge. We are not in there shoes for the next four years. They will be away from there families for long periods of time. That alone is worth something. Give them a chance to do the job that they were elected to do. The rich mayor is sitting pretty with us paying his benefits from his wife on Bricks dime. So he need not preach that we the people of Brick aren't paying his health care. For him to give up the mayor salary. He still is living LARGE from TRMUA.... Enough already with this petty stuff. We still were strong armed into 24%!!! Good Luck to the new Dems in council..Let's focus on the debt that Brick has. Instead of some small time health benefits. You people act like they hit the lottery!!! They have a lot of hard work ahead of them!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

morrissey

7:25 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

than they all should have said they plan of taking health benefits.......they didnt say that and now they cant take them !

Comment_arrow

Steve Barnes

10:04 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

They campaigned on not taking health benefits, basically accusing their opponents of milking the system, and now that they're in office, they're second-guessing their promise to not take the benefits. I think that's what people are upset about.

Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

7:40 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012

The four new council members CHOSE to run for office to serve the people of Brick. If the main goal for them was to get free health benefits and an extra salary then they do not belong there. There are many people serving their community spending long hours away from their families that do not receive benefits or salaries, they do it because they care about their community. If what they receive is based on need, maybe I should run for council because my husbands health benefits suck and It would be nice to have a second income in the family! It is supposed to be about what you can give to others, not what you can get from them.

Joseph Lamb

5:56 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

Maybe I don't understand. If the Acropolis Team was so financially well to do, why all the bankruptcys, tax liens and taking government jobs because no one in their industry wants them?

Reply

Betty Ann Fuller

6:09 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

@ John C:
Thanks for the comment. I do know council meetings are on the Brick website as well as B20. My question was......since the new council announced that meetings will now be held weekly, WHEN will the videos be available. As of tonight, yesterday's meeting is still not up on B20 or the Brick website. So I guess that means we still have 5 days to hope we catch the council meeting at just the right time. Then those of us who have computers can watch the archived meetings on our PC's, unlike some of our elders in the town who don't.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Betty Ann Fuller

6:01 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

ok, it's now 6pm Thursday. Still no video on the Brick website of Tuesday's meeting. I hope it will be up by 7pm so I can see it on B20.

Denny D

10:48 pm on Wednesday, January 4, 2012

The Republicans lost the election because they lost the trust of the voters and the vicious mailers. Stop twisting the 5000 dollar issue. The Mayor taking 52K per year and not showing up didn't help the Rs either. You guys should be pissed off. You got beaten badly by a bunch of nonames. Stop acting so tough and start using some diplomacy(if you have a clue what that means). The more meetings you go to and try to act like you are still in control the more voters you will lose. Give it up. You lost and it was YOUR OWN FAULT. Are you that idiotic not to realize that? Geez

Reply

BW

9:02 am on Thursday, January 5, 2012

All of coming down on the new members for not answering an making asumptions, you know what they say when you ASSUME.

Under our form of govt, the Mayor has NO SAY at council meetings unless INVITED to speak. I do not blame them for not answering, the question was nothing more then GRANDSTANDING and CHILDISH BEHAVIOR on the part of Stevie.

Reply

Joseph Lamb

1:06 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

Bob, I don't see it that way. The 2011 budget showed a reduction in Miscellaneous Revenue of $7.6 million. This was due to using $4.4 million from the state refund for Traders Cove in 2010, tapping out the school deferral tax of $2.7 million in 2010 and selling a liquor license in 2010 for $500,000.
The mayor has robbed Peter to pay Paul. This is his budget, no one elses. You can't add at least $22 million to debt and not feel the consequences. Believe me, this is a fight the new council and I want. The mayor will be digging himself a bigger hole. I can't wait for the mayor to detail the 24% decrease. How is that possible without rescinding all the pay raises he gave to political cronies? How is it possible to rescind at least $22 million of prior debt? How is it possible not to discuss the shortfall from 2010 that he, the council and the BA knew they were carrying into 2011.
How is it possible to be paying your legal counsel more than twice what the previous counsel was paid and there are no financial repercussions? We're talking $1.728 million over 5 years.

Reply

morrissey

1:11 pm on Thursday, January 5, 2012

the BA is a liar......FIRE SCOTT PEZARRAS

Reply

wild bill

6:40 pm on Tuesday, January 31, 2012

the mayor has been involved in local politics for way too long. too many friends of friends. Acropolis should either resign or stop acting like this is a game . He's not doing anything to make life better for us. He's saying ""oh, oh you embarassed me so now i'll show you how much power I have" School yard BS and meanwhile the duly elected council has to put up with this. Whats this business with him not allowing the former mayor to speak when he was council pres. In my 50 years of working for a living "full time" was 40 hrs/wk and 2 full time jobs was 80 hrs/wk Some how I dont think the mayor looks like he's banging out 80 a week. So who's he screwing?? Didnt the town of Brick ever invest in a time clock??? Does he account for his hours on either job?? And pls no BS about how he may have to go out in the middle of the night for an emergency. The last thing a firefighter, police officer, or medic needs is the mayor strutting around at 3am in the middle of an emergency. Mr Mayor pls stop going on tv and speaking to the people of Brick like we're all stupid children and your the Great Teacher. No more lectures on the form of government. Resign or accept the will of tthe people as expressed at the last election, learn some humility, lick your wounds and start doing your job. Or maybe just GO

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks