patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Letter: Acropolis Should Heed Voters on Referendum

Transport Workers Union members 'will continuing working hard for Brick residents'

 

To the Editor:    

In reference to the Nov. 8 election here in Brick and the April tax cap referendum:

Mayor Acropolis was recently quoted saying “this election nullified the referendum.” So the mayor believes that the people’s voices have been nullified, which is the equivalent of saying "residents your voices are now VOID and your votes have no value or consequence."

Now he says in hindsight they should have made the decision to cut services. Does he understand Brick voted to keep their services? He also said we now have to look at every department and reduce the size of government. You may recall the mayor said there would be no layoffs or cuts in services if the April referendum passed. Now we must ensure Mayor Acropolis keeps his promises of no layoffs and that we keep all our services.

I heard the mayor on the radio telling the public he is directing the business administrator to craft a budget rolling back the 24 percent tax increase. Does this mean he is going to ignore the referendum results? Cut services? Lay off police and other public employees? Or is he forcing us to get private garbage collection; will we be losing the very services we all voted to keep?

The mayor is disappointed in the results of the election in which four of his Republican councilmen were swept out of office. There were many different reasons voters wanted the incumbents removed. Mayor Acropolis interprets the council election as a nullification of the referendum. That is a colossal mistake.

The people have spoken in both the referendum and this last election. The votes reflect the will of the people. We need to tell Mayor Acropolis that the voices of the people do not get "nullified” and should be given the highest consideration when making any governmental decisions in the future.

By passing the April referendum the taxpayers of Brick sent a message to the mayor and council. They said yes, we want to keep our sanitation department, and we want our police department properly staffed. Brick voters made it clear they did not want private garbage pickup and were satisfied with the services provided by the Brick workers. I have been told by the township business administrator that a layoff plan is being prepared to submit to civil service. Upon hearing the news some of my membership broke out in tears.

The T.W.U. membership will continue working hard for Brick residents; delivering services the best we can. You have voted for us, and we will not let you down. On behalf of the Brick T.W.U. membership I want to thank all of you for your support and wish you and yours a very healthy and happy holiday season!

John T. Menshon

Chairperson, Brick Section

Transport Workers Union

Local 225 Branch 4

BW

6:36 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

This is Steve's way of saying, "you want to screw me by voting out my minons? Then I will screw with your way of life and make you sorry".

To translate " I am taking my ball and going home and I am going to tell my mommy on you!"

Reply

morrissey

6:44 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

why do you think he is taking $1......you union guys are screwed......he is doing exactly what he should have done last year.......i guess he listened to scott pezarras and now realizes that was a dumb dumb mistake.......better late than never, but he is a dead man walking (politically)

FiRE SCOTT PEZARRAS

Reply
Comment_arrow

KC

12:33 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

I am puzzled by your anti-union sentiment. Are you against collective bargaining or just workers' rights? Maybe you should move to China.

Comment_arrow

morrissey

1:06 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

just against PUBLIC unions......there is no need for them (there is not enough space to list all the reasons why)

JAM

8:05 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Leave our DPW the way it is! They do a fantastic job in this town. For those who have not had to deal with private haulers, perhaps you do not realize how good we have got it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Big Daddy

9:11 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

I can only speak from personal experience, but I've had private pick up for the past 20 years here in Point Boro and I have no complaints about service at all!

Comment_arrow

John Menshon

8:22 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

I agree,We represent about 185 men and women,they work hard everyday to help make Brick the best it can be.

Comment_arrow

Big Daddy

10:34 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

@John Menshon, you'll represent them on their way out the door like you did the last layoff.

BW

8:13 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Ok didnt Steve tell us just last week or 2 weeks ago he was buying 3 garbage trucks from Rumson? Seriously Steve get your stories stright before you OPEN MOUTH AND INSERT FOOT!

Reply

disgusted homeowner

8:15 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

The people who voted yes in April apparently didn't understand how many times this mayor has lied and deceived the voters, especially the public works employees. Just because the referendum passed, doesn't legally bind the mayor from changing his mind and still layoff people, reduce a department, cut hours, etc. It gave him an extra 8.6 million to spend over the cap. There is nothing to legally stop him now from doing what he THREATENED us with in the first place; take aim at our trash collection. This is just another example of how downright SPITEFUL he really is. I can't wait for 2013 to vote him out once and for all !!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JAM

11:20 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

Are you saying he can legally override a referendum?

Glenn

8:49 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

First job to be cut, MAYOR.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Alex W

11:45 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

And the 2nd Job , The Chief of Police!!

lisa

11:19 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

no the people didn't speak, the senior citizens in this city were terrorized by being told they were going to lose all services and since they already pay low taxes in their developments they didn't care...so yes roll back taxes and cut departments. i really do not need to see two cops sitting in cars window to window chatting up a storm in the parking lot of the funeral home on hooper...if they have nothing to do than send some of them home.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TimeForChange

12:29 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

He isn't going to roll the taxes back. He is just going to go back on his promise to the voters. The increase stays, but they can still go forward and have layoffs and cuts. The Referendum was not a guarantee to that "if it passes, the services are guaranteed". All of us that were up here trying to push the NO vote, pointed this out. They can probably just move the money over to Operation Capital. What they are saying is "we now have the money, now create a budget without the increase" This guy is THE WORST. Now, he is going to threaten people with the layoffs anyways? What an ass!

Comment_arrow

Hollowman

7:54 am on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Just some food for thought. Police have to write reports, on computers, after nearly every call. Staring down at a computer screen while seated in a car is a very unsafe position for a police officer to be in. Many police have been attacked/killed while working on their computer. The lakewood nj officer, and the 4 officers in washington state, were all distracted by computers when their killers atacked them. Since Brick officers dont ride with 2 man cars, its simply a matter of safety and tactics when you see that type of thing going on.

Not like it matters, im sure you will continue to assume whatever completely fabricated police protocols you think you know.

morrissey

11:40 pm on Saturday, December 3, 2011

sure, now that point has gone and messed up his and pezarras master plan.....get ready people, 2012 is going to make 2011 look like a walk in the park

Reply

morrissey

1:11 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

could be poetic justice for all the public employee yahoos.....they banded together here at the patch (and elsewhere) and scared, bullied, lied , etc.......to get the referendum passed to save their jobs at the expense of the brick taxpayer (which most of them are as well).......now they may still lose their jobs and be stuck with the 24% municipal increase on their property tax bill ...............OUCH !

Reply

Mr. Smith

1:48 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

What is wrong with you people? Uncle Stevey is no longer Mayor he has elected himself Ruler of brick. It amazing to me that he just does not get it. We the voters have spoken we want our garbage collections and we want our police. What we do not want is a double dipping lying worth less arrogant excuse for a Mayor. He did not offer to lower his salary till his friends lost the election and the dems where going to do it for him. Remember when he took the job in TR told us he does not take medical benefits form the township. What he did not tell you was he gets them from his wife a teacher in Brick. So I guess we the tax payers are paying for them anyway huh Uncle Steve. This vote in town was not a vote for the Democrats as much as a vote against you Uncle Steve.
Morrissey the mayor and council lied to you not the public employees or the TWU. The people who work for this town work hard for the people of Brick. Wait till the next big snow storm or hurricane TRY CLEANING UP WITH NO PUBLIC WORKERS !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

common sense

10:58 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Where were the workers during last year's big storm?I could not leave my driveway for days!Even during light snow storms I have to use my snow blower to clean the street in front of my house(not just the bib,I mean 20ft into the street) so I can get out. During normal weather I can't even get my garbage can fully emptied.It's half emptied every week.I heard a story that we own a street cleaner,yet it has been years since it cleaned my street,and I have curbs!The county cleans Princeton ave once a month,so is it to much to ask my street be cleaned once a year.Public works and their union should shape up or ship out

Comment_arrow

Mickey

12:58 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

where were the workers during the snow storm ? they were sent home to avoid paying them overtime and then stuck in their homes like the rest of us, with 34 inches of snow in their driveways & streets.

califwino

6:42 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Ya know, I'm old and feeble and can't get out too much. Sometimes make a small comment on here,But to all you constant loadmouth complainers I have one word for you.....RECALL......Who amongst you wants to start it. If you have time to make all these comments, you must have time to start it. Go for it should have no problem gathering signatures.

Reply

scott

7:05 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

so sanitation has a union, well, there is the problem...collective bargaining for public employees. not enough money or space to fill in the why..however, apply common sense...starting with unions, rape tax payers without concern for the people or consequence.

Reply

walt tupycia

7:17 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

if you looked at the ballot a no vote became a yes vote the way it was layed out.So the referundum really failed.

Reply

knarfie

8:00 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

The Mayor knows he has one foot on a banana peel and one foot out the door after his "team" He should do something decent for Brick and resign. He is the most unpopular Mayor this town has ever had, including Scarpelli even when he was in jail.
Time for a recall.

Reply

aatheras

8:25 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

the results of the April referendum election were flawed for many reasons that have been publicly stated. the most obvious one being the greater number of those who voted for the school budget over the highly publicized referendum. the larger turnout and results of the general election was a referendum that the people of Brick are tired of paying higher taxes and were not happy with being one of two towns who exceeded the state cap. The union boss will cry that his people deserve their jobs no matter what the cost to the residents. In my opinion we missed the boat in April. it was our chance to privatize public works/ sanitation and rid our town of the constraints of the union which we all know are preimer health benefits, vacation time, sick time and pensions that the private employee doesn't get in there job or the average citizen can't afford. if privatizing didn't work then we could have then restructured these departments in favor of the taxpayer not the union. Privatizing these departments have been tested in other towns and have worked. Its obvious the TWU official doesn't want to see his people in the private sector and be like the rest of us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

3:51 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Somewhat surprised by the above post since the poster himself, a former board of ed. member graduated with our "esteemed" mayor in class of 74 or 75. See folks Steve's classmates didn't even like him. What does that tell you. His only friend is ART SHOLTY!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Tired of the BS

9:28 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Thank you aatheras....I've been saying that since the referendum bullsh*t started, & boy did the TWU & PW employees got on here & basically called those of us "NO" voters stupid. Now I wish someone will publish a picture of all these clowns when they lose their jobs & we still have the increase!!!

Reality

9:42 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

And, we should not be paying someone more than $63,000 in salary, plus the exhorbitant benefits you mention in your post, to collect garbage!!

Reply

Lori Morrison

10:23 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Prior to any election, the residents receive a sample ballot. The purpose of this is to have the information in advance to make a informed decision when casting your vote. Votes were cast and the decision was made. The Mayor is an arrogant and vindictive man who has lost control of the council. His days are numbered, and before his term ends he will look to take down and punish everyone who did not bend over and kiss his feet. Public works employees have made many concessions every year to keep their jobs, and he is still out to get them. Next time we have elections, take a good hard look at the sample ballot, make your decisions and do not push any buttons to cast a vote until you READ what is on the screen. If the screen is too confusing, ask for help. If you missed something because the screen was confusing, it was nobody's fault but your own!

Reply

concerned citizen

10:30 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

I think a lot of people are forgetting what unions did for this country. First and foremost, they made the work environment a safe place. They gave people a LIVING WAGE. They inspect our food quality and I could go on and on. What the government wants is for people to go back to sweat factories making $1.00 an hour. Wake up people!!!! Different days, different times. If these idiots in office can make hundreds of thousands of dollars AND leave with a pension, why shouldn't a working man earn a fair and decent wage?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

morrissey

10:58 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

NOT public unions.......and anyway this isnt 1920 ........the people can no longer afford them as they have killed the golden goose

Comment_arrow

TeachR

11:50 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Public unions did not cause the economic crisis of today. The health care industry is raping employers and employees alike. Administrators are taking home record salaries. All this as the middle and working class find their salaries shrinking and the cost of living increasing. Anger towards unions trying to protect blue collar workers is misdirected at best.

Comment_arrow

morrissey

12:05 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

teachers are not blue collar.......with that said, there is NO reason the private sector should have to pay those ever increasing health benefits for themselves AND the public employees .......why do public employees (and part time politicians) think there is any reason why the taxpayers should pay for health benefits (and defined benefit pensions which are long gone in the private sector) just because they are public servants.......better wake up

concerned citizen

10:32 am on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Knarfie....I would take Scarpelli back any day over this one!!!!!!

Reply

Art Sholty

12:31 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

To most of you protestors,
You are all leaving the electoral door wide open for Bullet Dan Toth, (R) to be able to RICOCHET in and seek the position of mayor as an INDEPENDENT or even a DEMOCRAT. He likes to change color like a camellia does to avoid his flubs and abstentions. You have been forewarned. He knows how to change parties and has a good teacher who went from (R) to (D) as a Brick council person. Take heed what I'm saying. Keep your eyes open. A lot will happen in a few months concerning the Bullet Man.
Art Sholty (real name)

Reply
Comment_arrow

BW

12:50 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Art you have some serious issues, my friend. Your hatred for Dan is quite obvious. Your blind devotion to Steve is frightening. When the day comes, and Steve plunges that knife into your back, you will understand everything. You are confused, like a cow being led to the slaughter. You have my sympathies.

Comment_arrow

Mickey

12:55 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

I'm no fan of Toth, but your obsession with him is disturbing. you have always played the attack dog for this Mayor, regardless of his actions. from the reviews you always receive after any of your postings, your crediblitiy with readers is nill. for you to think you actually connect with honest Brick residents, is delusional.

Comment_arrow

Mark Story Jenks

1:13 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Art Sholty (real name). Mr; you might consider seeing a doctor. They have pills for what ails you.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

4:05 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Art, forget about Dan. You don't know a whole lot since you haven't lived here 40.50 or 60 years like some of us, and those of US who went to school with our esteemed mayor and his brother George. But then again you fled a north jersey county and came here after loosing your public job under somewhat of a cloud, didn't you ART??????????? Maybe we should dig into your closet and maybe find some "dirty laundry" on you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Denny D

11:47 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

Art Sholty(real name),
Exactly what is your personal issue with Dan Toth? You seem to be petrified of him. BTW, a camellia is a plant that bears tea leaves. I think you may have meant chameleon. Anyway enjoy this festive season to the best of your ability. I hope if I ever become as miserable and nasty as you are someone puts me out of my misery. Denny D'Andrea(real name)

concerned citizen

1:06 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

I think Brick residents are tired of paying ridiculously high taxes and receiving nothing for their money. Time for a change!!!! Hmmmmm, I think I have heard that before.
These politicians are all alike but someone new would be a welcome change.

Reply

concerned citizen

1:22 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Mark....that comment was disturbing. EVERYONE is entitled to their opinion!!!! Even
Idiots like you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Story Jenks

1:29 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Is that what you are concerned about?

Comment_arrow

Mark Story Jenks

1:04 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

There is always a chigger in the wood pile, who goes off calling names like "idiot". Funny thing is, it only goes to show the lack of intellegence by the name caller themselves.

JAM

3:47 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

The problem is less the unions and more the leadership of this town. Keep the hardworking DPW and get rid of the vindictive mayor!

Reply
Comment_arrow

morrissey

4:27 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

get rid of them ALL and lower the damn property taxes !!!!!!!!

KC

6:13 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

morrissey!, not enough space to tell you how wrong you are about unions. Read history, esp. the nineteeen thirties. We at least had a Roosevelt duiring the last Depression, and that is not a knock on Bush or Obama. It is just a horrible, horrible time w/ the politicians, bankers, and powers that be locally, nationally and abroad. At least it ends w/ abroad.

Reply

morrissey

6:41 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

KC read your history !!!!!!!!

Public sector unions were banned by law and for good reason.

JFK lifted the ban by executive order because he saw how they would help the Democrat party.

FDR spoke out against any unionization of public employees for obvious reasons.

Private unions work in favor of the employees, public sector unions can only get what they want by demanding higher taxes. An obvious conflict of the interest of the people

Reply
Comment_arrow

TimeForChange

6:52 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Couldn't agree more! There absolutely NO reason for public employees to be unionized. The unions work well for the private sector for obvious reasons. Public employees being unionized will only send everything upwards as the demands continue to escalate (benefits, pensions etc...).

JAM

10:17 pm on Sunday, December 4, 2011

Can they in fact do that?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

7:29 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

Yes, they can. Just because the referendum passed to exceed the cap does not guarantee there will be no layoffs or elimination of services.

Comment_arrow

Gina

1:38 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

I hoping someone out there can present us with information/facts about property tax referendum.

It seems to me that in order to present a referendum asking for a tax increase, the governing body would have to present the reason/cause/intended use for the money. Otherwise, how would voters decide which way to vote?

So now if what we're hearing here is true (that he is going to decide to layoff workers that the town's majority voted to keep) that would seem to be a violation of the reasons why the town's voters passed the tax increase. They gave the reason for the increase so that we could make an "intelligent" voting choice, and then turn around and say "I decided I want to lay them off anyway." Something is wrong with that picture, but does anyone know if there is a legal wrongdoing within that?

disgusted homeowner

7:57 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

@JAM, they sre can. The actual vote on the referendum authorized the mayor and council to spend $8.6 million dollars OVER the gov's 2 percent property cap. It does not specifically earmark those funds for specific things. If you read the sample ballot there was not a list or menu of things to vote on. Just the authorization of the 8.6 million over the cap. Nowhere on that ballot was there anything about keeping 29 policemen, and not laying off other municipal workers. If the administration changes their minds on how to budget that money and use it for something else, it's perfectly LEGAL!!!! That was my biggest reason for voting no. I didn't TRUST them with the extra 8 million and i thought the purpose of the funds would ultimately go for something else. My reasoning back in April seems to be coming true since the mayor and BA are supposedly crafting a new layoff plan right now. I told so many folks they weren't to be trusted with that money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tired of the BS

9:42 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Couldn't agree with you more. I voted no for this exact reason. However, if you listened to John Menshon when the referendum was going on...he said all the facts were in the referendum sheet. He was so mistaken.

Concerned Brick Citizen

8:50 am on Monday, December 5, 2011

Where was the promise of job security worded in the referendum?

Bottom Line: The tax increase only made it more difficult for people to live and local small businesses to thrive here in Brick. -- This is why people are upset with the current government. It is going to be very difficult for the current administration to dig themselves out of this hole.

Reply

Joseph Lamb

1:00 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

On the very night that Acropolis said the newly elected Democratic Council members should roll back the 24% tax increase, all 7 Acropolis Team council vote for a $5.9 million bond ordinance that includes $3.5 million for Traders Cove. It wasn't bad enough that they were increasing the debt but they tried to sneak it through without letting anyone know it was taking place. When Councilman DeLuca asked Scott Pezzarus what the ordinance included, Scott said "the largest item was $650,000 to refurbish the firing range". Absolutely no one corrected Scott. Not the Mayor, not any of the 7 Acropolis council members. Yet the Acropolis Team will put the word out that the Acropolis Team is divided. If that were the case, how come they all voted for this money pit increase to almost $18 million? How come not one of them corrected Scott? Because they are all Acropolis Team players, not Brick Taxpayer team players.
Later Councilman Thulen said there was $10 million in a separate account to pay for this. I don't want to make a comment about Councilman Thulen's state of mind. There is no such account.
This is exactly why taxes were raised 61% in 4 years. Mayor and Acropolis Council, you can't roll back debt!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Roseann

1:08 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Mr Lamb, is there now serious concern about Garbage Collection & the reduction of cops in Brick? It seems like ages ago, but wasn't that the main reason for the referendum vote? If so, how are they proposing to maintain the same staffing & services, without these funds ?

Comment_arrow

Scott Pezarras

7:53 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Joe

If you listened I said the most significant item in that portion of the ordinance was the firing range upgrade. In the B&G portion of the ordinance it is. Parks improvements is in the recreation section of the 15 yr ord.

Comment_arrow

Art Sholty

9:49 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

There once was a man named Lamb
Who spoke like an intelligent man,
'till his questions became moot,
the dem's gave him the boot
and now he's annoying anyone that he can.

concerned citizen

6:30 pm on Monday, December 5, 2011

Hey Markie....Waiting to hear from you....publicly!!!!!

Reply

BW

7:31 am on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Art seriously? You are acting like a spoiled 5 year old. You attack, you attack people you dont even know because they believe differently then you. Remember Art, God said, just not lest ye judged. I feel bad for you, honestly, I cant imagine living through my senior years so alone and filled with hate, May God Bless you and free you from your pain!

Reply

Joseph Lamb

1:15 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Sal Petoia, this is for you especially. The interesting thing about a recall now is that less signatures will be required than what was necessary for the Ocean Ice Palace petition. I believe 15% of the total vote count in the last election is the amount needed.
A recall election is different than the regular partisan election. The election is conducted like a Board of Education election. There are no party lines and running mates are not grouped together. Even in a non partisan election running mates share the same line. Not in a recall.
The candidates for the office of mayor and council, if they are recalled, can get 50 signatures from any member of any party. The candidates draw for positions on the ballot individually. So the mayoral candidate can be A4 and the three council running mates can be B6, C10, and D7.
There is no runoff election. The highest vote wins, even if it’s only 20%.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

11:30 am on Wednesday, December 7, 2011

If the people are as angry with the remaining members of the council and the mayor as what appears in these comments, perhaps a recall is in order to avoid the wait until 2013. But people need to be reminded that petitioning for any referendum is a lot of hard work, as we know from the Ice Palace referendum. While it would be refreshing to "clean house" completely, the people would need to be reassured that candidates vieing for the vacancies represent new thinking that reflects the concerns of the public. It would be fruitless to have a successful recall, only to end up with new faces but with more of the "same old, same old" politics, e.g. appointing supporters to key board positions rather than best qualified; appointing professionals based on political affiliation; nepotism, etc. The first obstacle is mounting a successful petition drive; the second is coaxing good people to seek office; and the third is to get them elected. Who wants to begin?

Joseph Lamb

1:21 pm on Tuesday, December 6, 2011

Roseann, that's just it. There is no concern about available funds for either 2011 or 2012 or the future years. The added debt will increase our taxes above the 2% but debt is not subject to the 2% CAP.
If the mayor decides to layoff people than he will have to cut services and reduce our taxes. The residents want the mayor to go, they are tired of his tactics. A recall would be easy to obtain. The council joins him, then they should be recalled as well.

Reply

walt tupycia

3:21 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

if the will of the people voted for the referundum why did they vote out the republicians who made this referendum.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark Story Jenks

5:39 pm on Thursday, December 15, 2011

Walt, I think maybe it was something similar to sticker-shock. It can be tough to pin down the ifs and the whys.

Jessica

12:49 am on Saturday, February 18, 2012

Those who have clearly demonstrated they can't be trusted need to go, and we the people should make that happen SOONER, rather than later.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks