patching...
Breaking: Bayville Man Stabbed Saturday Night in Seaside Heights Has Been Released; Suspect Still At Large »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Jughandle Ban Bill Passes Senate Committee

Measure is sponsored by Ocean County legislator

 

A bill that would ban the future construction of jughandles in New Jersey passed muster with a state Senate panel Monday, paving the way for its potential consideration before the entire body.

The measure by state Sen. James Holzapfel (R-Ocean) would prohibit the planning, design or construction of any additional jughandles on roads or highways statewide. It passed the Senate Transportation Committee Monday.

Holzapfel, in a statement issued after the committee vote, said the bill was inspired by projects on several state highways—including Routes 1, 4 and 130—where issues of heavy congestion and frequent accidents were solved by removing jughandles and replacing them with flyover bridges and modernized intersection designs.

"While jughandles were originally designed to prevent the build up of traffic at intersections, they can no longer handle the high volumes that are now common on many New Jersey roads,” said Holzapfel, in the statement. "Cars get backed up and people often have to wait through three, sometimes four, light changes to get through an intersection with a jughandle."

Holzapfel first proposed the prohibition of jughandle construction in 2003 when he served in the General Assembly, and resubmitted it every two years since when new legislative sessions opened. Monday was the first time the bill saw the light of day in a committee review.

Instead of jughandles, new intersections would be designed with flyover bridges – essentially, overpasses – or with lane structures that eliminate the need to go through an intersection twice and separate traffic entering and exiting a roadway with greater distance, thus avoiding the potential for accidents and speeding up traffic flow in the process.

Holzapfel's bill would not affect current jughandles.

  • Do You Support Banning Future Jughandle Construction?

    (Voting has been closed for this question)
    • Yes
        64 (53%)
    • No
        32 (26%)
    • Depends on the Alternative
        23 (19%)
    Total votes: 119
  • Your vote will only count once. This is not a scientific poll. View Results Vote!
Related Topics: Flyover Bridge, Jim Holzapfel, and Jughandle

John E

4:38 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Two of the worst jughandles I ever saw were both at Rt37 and Main Street in Toms River...always backed up onto the highway causing cars to block the main roads even, plus takes about three light changes before you can even get across the road if using the jughandles.

Reply
Comment_arrow

KC

1:19 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

ALSO, Rte.37 and Hooper Ave. One sits and looks at Monsignor Donavan School for minutes before gaining access to Hooper Ave. only to then catch a red light. Just awful that entire Rte. 37 IMO. I really avoid it when possible, picking and choosing to shop in the area very carefully.

Comment_arrow

George

3:51 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

They both need overpasses (more money than jughandles). So does this one at the TR-Brick border, as another commenter noted: "If any potential bridge should get consideration, it should be one where Hooper Ave (AKA Brick Blvd) crosses Church Road in Silverton to eliminate the major backup that extends almost a mile into Brick during evening rush hour." Worst bottle-neck in the county!

MEB

5:08 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Bring back the circles. While accidents may go up, the more than likely will only be fender benders and not major intersection crashes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mark

9:45 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

I live in the southeren part of the state, and the town in which I reside currently has 6 round-a bouts and Burlington County Freeholders like them so much that they have deiced to place another one in our town. They are called thise verses a circle because there is only two roads that enter them and they are much smaller in size. The running joke is that whenever there is a back-up of traffic anywhere, you will here the comment "maybe if they put a circle (or round-a-bout) there traffic would not be like this". I am for the left hand turn lanes.

Comment_arrow

KC

1:21 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

lol at first I thought you wrote: "bring back the cities". Apart from the urban blight and illegals - the cities were at one time a great idea. Imagine the concept - walking to errands and mass transit. It is a shame that middle class America was forced onto the suburban reservations. And yes, if we didn't want to be victims of crime we were forced.

Jerseyclone

5:38 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Politicians must have found a way to fill there pockets more by trying to be an Engineer.

Reply

shorecorruption

5:43 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Try smaller circles,works great,slows traffic,big trucks can still get around.Don't build them like a race track..

Reply

Rich Smith

6:24 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

The placement of jughandles should be more selective but not completely band. They take up some time but they do contribute to safety.

Reply

jim

6:31 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Everything thats going on in New Jersey, and there big issue is jughandles

Reply
Comment_arrow

tocman

1:27 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

That's like saying we should not deal w/any more issues until every hungry stomach is filled. Solve world hunger first then move to the next issue. Government is like an air traffic controller. You have to deal with many things at once. You have some planes 10 miles away, some are circling and some are landing. You can't deal with one plane util it lands then deal with the next plane. Multitasking is not a new concept.

brick strong

7:55 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

The Sandy Recovery ...needs more attention ! Help these poor people that still haven't been able to return to there homes..Or still no place to call HOME..

Reply
Comment_arrow

KC

1:25 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The state has a truckload of federal highway monies that they need to use so what the heck. If banning jughandles alleviates some of the traffic fatalities we keep reading about, I say go for it. The old circles were basically a hang onto your hat and pray and I am talking twenty five years ago! (memba the old Laurelton Circle?)

Richard

7:56 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Well, that should just about clear up our property tax problems.

Reply

Schu

7:57 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

This jughandle ban bill is theee most important issue facing every single taxpayer in NJ. Glad our brave politicians have rushed this bill to the front desk because nothing else matters.

Reply

Keeping whats mine

8:05 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013

Maybe left turn lanes. That was rough

Reply

M Myers

12:46 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

why not just delay the lights at the jughandles, then traffic will keep moving, make the left turns. I don't want a bunch of overpasses ruining this pretty state we have.

Reply

Quaghogdigger

7:21 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

KC hit the nail on the head....There is a bunch of Fed. DOT money in the sandy bill, and to get it, states are scrambling for a piece of the pie. And while the bill is to eliminate them in new construction, I bet they have a long list of intersections that they can start on now.

Reply

Greg Thompson

7:24 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

They can add circles, jughandles, no right on reds they can add cameras. Fact is 2/3's to 3/4 of the people driving our road ways are inept n can't drive !!! They don't pay attention, sit there when the light turns green which in turn lets 2 or 3 cars through the intersection instead of 10 or 12. They mosey around town like there's no where to be or go. Then add a siren from an ambulance n watch em freeze up again. I had an ambulance behind at the light on Rt 70 with one car infront of me, I honk the horn n the guy rolls forward 10 inches. Well 10 inches isn't enough room for an ambulance. I had to drive partly over a curb to get by this dope so the screaming sirens could get to the hospital. After all that the guy looks at me and gives some dopey "I'm sorry" smile. (Go home n stay there looser !!! ) Maybe it's my fault? "Gangsta Rap made me do it"

Reply
Comment_arrow

jeffrey scouler

10:09 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

LIke your right on point maybe we should worry more aobut the bad drivers not the"bad" roads

Poindexter McSmash

7:47 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

There are no correct choices, but to thin out the herd. Too many people live too close together and cause many forms of mental anguish. It's already proven that city life will be cut short, while living in a wooden area allows a peace and quite stress free environment. Of course unless it's south jersey!
~ Have a nice day! ~

Reply

shorefriend

8:56 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

I am not originally from this area and when I moved down here about 5 years ago from upstate NY, I was like what the heck is worng with Jersey and making a Left I've been here 5 years now and I still don't know where to turn for certain business's on the Left LOL. I hate the no left thing, why can't they just make a left hand turn lane, real simple!! I've seen jug handles the size of parks, such a waste of land, added paving costs and maintenance!

Reply
Comment_arrow

jeffrey scouler

10:08 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

because at a jug handle you dont block the lpassing lane when you have to make a left turn and the lane gets too full cause the lights arent timed you can compensate with the shoulder of the right of the jughandle, also if you miss your jug you go to the next and turn around its that simple if you can't do that then maybe you shouldnt drive.

ray

9:07 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

First of all, your poll is statistically insignificant and no better than pulling answers out of a hat. Besides that, this could be called the "Let's Kill a few More Motorcyclists Bill." If you follow accident reports, the vast majority of motorcycle accidents occur when someone makes a left turn in front of a motorcyclist riding in the opposite direction. Jug handles eliminate this. And, finally, what is the estimated cost difference between a jug handle and an overpass? Surely astronomical.

Reply

Glenn

9:26 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Yes for more flyover bridges, but banning jug handles is wrong. They do have there place. And Ray is correct about the motorcyclist being killed by people turning left in front of them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ross Chatham

10:35 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

OR we could ban motorcycles, a ridiculously stupid and dangerous means of transportation in the first place.

carolyn

9:32 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The problem in NJ is sometimes you can turn left at a light, sometimes there is a jughandle on the right, sometimes a circle, sometimes a suicide lane as on Fischer Blvd. You have to get right up to a light before you know what to do then you are in the wrong lane.

Reply

jeffrey scouler

10:05 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

great lets go sacrafice safety for speed more people in a hurry turn left into traffic do we really live in such a state that the lawmakers cannot seet that this place is crazy! i wonder what family member of the state senate builds and engineers the roads. time to call in a watchdog group caue this will not benefit the newjersey residents only line the pockets of the lawmakers.

Reply

jeffrey scouler

10:13 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

im sorry jusghandles and circles worked i have never seen such a debocle since they removed all circles from south jersey near the ac airport (used to flow smoothly, now no circle nothing but a mess, airport circle used to flow smoothly now nothing but a mess, shall i go on lets just tax the people more give the money right to the lawmakers and change nothing itll suit their needs more then ours and we can cut out the middle man then they dont need to launder the funds through the removal of jug handles ( i am being sarcastic for anyone not picking up on that)

Reply

re-tired

10:16 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Lets fixed all these bad timed lights .Nothing more aggravating than braking for a jughandle turn with No cars cued up on rt 70 .Why can`t we have working sensors in the roads to improve traffic flow and conserve gas and brakes. Jughandles screw up the traffic flow instead of improving it....

Reply

Dolores

10:53 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Left hand turns work, circles and jughandles do not!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

3:53 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Dolores… Maybe you weren't around back then, but a trip around the old Laurelton Circle during rush hour was more than enough to get the old adrenalin going without spending money to buy coffee or high energy drinks! And you didn't have to worry about spilling the hot stuff in your lap!

Jeffrey Scouler

10:56 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

oh yeah ross how bout we worry about risind fuel cost and taxes so that i can afford to drive a car and not ride a motorcycle how bout that better yet we save the money from the jug handle argument put it tward an airplane ticket for each idiot who wants to spend the money that our state doesnt have and drop you imbisciles like ross and go live where you can turn anywhere you want to provide you with the greater good not the greater good of everyone. lets face it people there is no money in nj so lawmakers want to remove jughandles then sell that land that they took with emminant domain and create a new cash cow. LOOK AT THE BIG PICTURE PEOPLE

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ross Chatham

2:26 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

You can buy a little SmartCar, it'll be adorable.

Sal Petoia

11:01 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

"…new intersections would be designed with flyover bridges…"??? Very cost prohibitive, and a lot of land would be consumed. The problem is too many vehicles, not enough road surface and a lack of driver patience. Left turn lanes with dedicated signals work, but there must be enough left turn lane length to accommodate the traffic volume. Only very major intersections should warrant consideration of "flyover bridges", such as Chambers Bridge Road and Route 70. However, this was proposed years ago, but rejected because of the cost, land consumption and interference with businesses. If any potential bridge should get consideration, it should be one where Hooper Ave (AKA Brick Blvd) crosses Church Road in Silverton to eliminate the major backup that extends almost a mile into Brick during evening rush hour.

Reply

Jeffrey Scouler

11:14 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

left hand turns in congested areas cause the passing lane to be blocked do you not all see that or should we all pass on the right too in the blindspot
causing more accidents passing on right time and time again causes more accidents than jug handles

Reply
Comment_arrow

Boose

3:43 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Passing lane... you're funny; everyone is driving in the left lane whether they are passing or not...

Jeffrey Scouler

11:15 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

BY THE WAY PEOPLE DONT YOU THINK A STUDY SHOULD BE DONE OR SOMETHING BEFORE THEY DO THIS AND SPEND THE MONEY WE DONT HAVE? OR SHOULD THEY JUST GO AHEAD AND DO IT AND THEN WE DEAL WITH THE CONSEQUENCES OF MEDIOCRITY.

Reply
Comment_arrow

tocman

5:26 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

calm down Jeff and stop shouting

green

11:43 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

So how are turning movements going to be made without jughandles? Left turn lanes a mile long that back up into the main road? Now you'll get even less green time at the light.

Reply

Martin Vavra

11:45 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

I have always hated going through the same intersection twice. I would like to know why U-Turns at intersections are not allowed. I'm for efficient flow of traffic and as far as "safety" is concerned, in is up to the drivers to operate their vehicles safely. I don't rely on highway design by itself to be my protector.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jeffrey Scouler

11:49 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

BECAUSE SOME CARS DONT HAVE A GOOD TURNING RADIUS SO THEY HAVE TO BACK UP AND DO A J TURN INSTEAD OF A U TURN
] THAT CAUSES TRAFFIC BACKUPS

Comment_arrow

Josh Dubnick

5:35 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Depends on the intersection. Look at the signs. Route 46 East at Route 10 has a sign that specifically allows U-turns (but bans them for trucks).

green

1:18 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Since when did politicians become traffic engineers?

Reply

Martin Vavra

2:15 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

I drive a Suburban. NP with the turning radius.

Reply

Danno

5:31 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The only place in Brick were I think a flyover bridge would work is were Rt 70 and Brick Blvd meet. This way the traffic going west on 70 could keep going and you would only need one light on 70 east so Brick Blvd could enter 70.

Reply

RiverLiving

5:47 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Jug handles work, look what it did at the rt 70 and cedar bridge intersection. They cause less accidents. The only accidents that happen at that intersection are people trying to beat light to make left, or people who cant read the no left turn sign. Where is there space to make overpasses, imagine the traffic at the rt 37 and 166 intersection without the jug handle, the lights will have to be longer to allow people to make a left and cause traffic to back up into manchester. The dot likes to ban the jug handles, so now they have more work to correct them and throw more money down the drain. People are right Sandy relief, should be these politicians concerns not jug handles.

Reply

John

6:06 pm on Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Maybe next they could let us pump our own gas!

Reply

Lisa Frankenfeld

8:59 am on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

I come from a state which has no jughandles, so have experienced both.

Jug handles do NOT work. They are confusing and and inefficient means of controlling traffic.

And because of the yields, jughandles are the cause of MORE accidents.

If it weren't so expensive, I think another bill should be passed which would ELIMINATE jug handles.

Reply

Ken T

4:19 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Big story here, but what about our own Donald Brauckman stepping up the political ladder anyway he can by ousting the 13 year SRO officer in Mooorestown to fit his own agenda? No story here Christina? The Moorestown Residents are up in arms with our Committee Member they see exactly what backdoor deal was made. We see how this Patch works no article written about any committee member doing anything questionable...this entire deal was suppose to happen without any problems or controversy. Parents, teachers and students were the whistle blowers on this one.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Lauren Burgoon

4:50 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Ken, That story is on Moorestown Patch, and has been for two days. It's not a Cinnaminson matter, it's a Moorestown matter.

Kristin

6:43 pm on Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Lauren with all respect that story involves our towns Committee man Don Brauckmann and it is a huge story. I guess this does not show Don in such a great light so no story here. But on the other hand you are ready to write about Don the Moorestown Police Officer when it makes him look good! See you later Patch no time for you!!! Political writing at its' VERY BEST!!!

Reply

Greg Thompson

6:54 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

Left hand turns were deamed unsafe many yrs ago due to drivers turning into traffic causing a very bad accident. That's when the state went to juggies which are also used as drainage ditch's from storm run off. If you can't handle a jughandle stay home ...

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

8:05 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

funny how the rest of the country can manage their roadways w/o the use of these ridiculous engineering disasters. makes one wonder if the those who develop our highways actually live/drive here.

the use of the jug just adds to the cost of construction, the cost of land purchase, land upkeep, road maintenance and so much other "stuff". just think of the thousands of miles "jugs" require that need to be serviced yearly w/ snow plowed/salted, grass mowed, shoulders cleaned.

what's wrong w/ a dedicated left turn lane and the use of left turn arrow signal lights.

Schu

8:07 pm on Sunday, February 10, 2013

It's NJ, we do everything backwards.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks