patching...
Breaking: Minutes From Seaside Heights, Sandy's Destruction Still Apparent »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

If Referendum Fails, Layoffs Could Begin May 13

Notices went out to township employees Tuesday

 

The township has notified 171 employees that they may be laid off May 13, officials confirmed Tuesday.

The layoff notices went out Tuesday in order to comply with a state civil service law that requires notice to be given 45 days before layoffs can start. In a plan submitted to the state Department of Civil Service earlier this month, township officials said that if a planned referendum allowing the township to exceed a 2 percent tax levy cap does not gain the support of voters, all 171 employees will be laid off in order to meet the cap. If the referendum passes, no layoffs will occur.

If the referendum – which will appear alongside a separate ballot measure April 27 asking voters to approve next year’s school budget – does not pass, some employees will most likely be let go on May 13, but some will stay on for a few weeks as the township reorganizes its operations.

“Many, many people will probably go on that date or around that date,” said Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis, referring to May 13. Some employees, he said, such as those who handle trash and recycling pickup, will continue for anywhere between two weeks and one month. During that time, Acropolis said, the township council will most likely pass ordinances mapping out how residents will handle using private haulers to undertake sanitation services.

John Menshon, leader of the local branch of the Transport Workers Union - which represents the bulk of the township workers –  confirmed layoff notices were handed out Tuesday to employees, including himself.

Acropolis said that although the exact number of employees to be laid off could change slightly due to retirements, large-scale township services such as trash pickup and recreation programs would not be salvaged unless the referendum, which will seek approximately $8.4 million in excess of cap from voters, passes.

“There are some people who think that if the referendum fails, Brick will pull a rabbit out of its hat and we'll actually keep the programs. They say it’s a scare tactic,” Acropolis said. “Well, I'm not a good bluffer. I don't play cards.”

Related Topics: Budget, Cap, Layoffs, Referendum, may 13, and notices

C

6:54 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

8.4 million in excess of cap????? Really? How long was it going to take you Mr. Mayor to realize the town was over it's head & overspending? &&&& why should the taxpayers burden your mistakes & the mistakes of past administrations. I will still vote "NO" & don't threaten the taxpayers of Brick with your cute reference to card playing. Maybe you & all your friends in council should take the first cut in salary of the deck of cards!

Reply
Comment_arrow

John Menshon

7:33 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Mayor made it clear ,there is no scare tactics here this is our reality.I find it difficult to understand why anyone would vote no after be educated of the situation. When asked for alternatives they offer nothing, no one wants taxes to go up however in this case it is neccessary.These services and programs are what makes Brick the community it is today .

Comment_arrow

Think

10:56 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

If you NO people are right and this is a ploy to get more money to spend, I lose $400.00. If you are wrong, I pay $400 for garbage, pay for recreational services, don't know when a private snow contractor will plow my road and lose 29 police officers.

Good luck to you if you vote No and you are wrong.

I will not take the risk, I vote yes for the referendum. However, I can't wait to November elections.

Comment_arrow

Think

3:06 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

We all know how the town wasted money.We know that years of not raising taxes has also done damage. You know that the Mayor and Council are not going to give back money. How do you suggest we fix it. Tell me how to realistically fix it, without raising taxes and I will vote No. Stop writing that they have to give back raises, because it is not going to happen and it is not enough money to fix the problem anyway.

May 13 th they lay off 29 police officers. The crime rate will soar and then we will be screaming for police service, however they are layed off and not enough left to address the problem. What then? How do we get them back? The answer is you can't, the referendum was knocked down and no other cuts can be made. We can't vote again in 6 months to fix the mistake.

Bloods, MS13 and other gangs are here. Ask the residents of MapleLeaf park, how the like living with that problem and how much they want the police around. Be realistic and take your anger out on those you think deserve it in November.

Who cares about garbage, we have more serious problems.

Comment_arrow

Vasco Regula

2:23 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Look, bottom line... Brick spends way too much money. I couldn't feel more safe having 29 police officers laid off. The Burden for the common person of brick is being tailgated by big blue just because they spend all their day in their car bored out of their minds. I never can recall one time a officer actually did something that "protects" us. I would gladly pay for WM to take my trash over give Brick an extra cent of my money. Use what money you have the right way and stop blowing it. Its the same ideology of giving a gambling addict more chips to play with hoping they will make a sound investment. I get taxes, but I just don't get wasteful spending.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

3:10 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Vasco,
According to the recent Police Audit, the Police are only available 7 minutes out of an hour to do proactive police work; the Police downtime is less than 34 percent and the national average is 50 percent.
You can not truly believe they, the Police, are sitting in their cars bored out of their minds when the average police call start to finish takes 84 minutes to complete, this is outside of the neighbor disputes, motor vehicle crashes, traffic complaints and the other minor calls for service. Please read the Police Audit published on the Township's website and you will see that Brick P.D. responds to more than 80,000 calls for service yearly. People believe the Police Department employees 170 officers when in face they only have 123 officers. This is down from 133 in 2008 when they last hired. According to DataUniverse approximately 12 Police Officers are eligible to retire this year alone - again no one has been replaced or hired since 2008. Please be informed before you make accusations. Everyone's opinion is welcomed here and everywhere, just please just present accurate factual information.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

3:16 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

As far as your "protection" comment. Most people see Police only on a motor vehicle stop because most people in this world are good. The Police Officer, who may have stopped someone for speeding, drunk driving, not having insurance on their vehicle is not protecting you? Don't you have the right to drive on the road in a safe environment? All this goes without saying the crimes being committed outside of just traffic offenses. The Police just took a gun off someone in a parking lot of a local 7-11, is that not protection? We do not hear and see many of the call types the Brick Police handles. When we do, as of recent, people question, "Are they just releasing this because of the upcoming vote?" These are things that happen everyday but they do not release to you because they want Brick Township to have a good reputation. They must be doing a good job of because everything thinks "nothing happens in Brick."
How you wish to vote is something no one can take away from you. However, please do not take away from the job a Police Officer does, especially when you do not have the facts. You live in today's "good" society because other people are there to enforce the law. If you think laws are silly, necessary, or restrictive, remember, people like you and I made them.
Just to reiterate, I did a comprehensive analysis on the Police Audit for a graduate college class of mine. I am a taxpayer and I just want people to know the facts.

Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

3:25 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

all well and good.....although people need to get out of their police state of mind feeling of security......bottom line, is they have outpriced themselves out of a possible job.....end of story

Vote NO ! and let the Mayor figure out where to make up the $8 million deficit that the overpaid police force has contributed to

Comment_arrow

Vasco Regula

3:33 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

So then, tell me the magic number when its too much? is 500 too much? How about 300? Nobody is arguing there is no crime--of course theres crime. A "crime free" down needs few police. How many times has an officer had to draw his pistol a day? For every cop I have met, not to state it represents the majority. most have said they never had faced in incident where the weapon was needed to be drawn, which leads me to the inductive conclusion that most crimes are petty, and don't need a brigade of police to handle. Why does a traffic stop yield 3 squad cars sometimes? It's insane. Of course there is crime, we don't need road fairies though guarding the roads like soup nazi's. look at all the damn cameras we have too. its too much.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

6:10 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

To judge the level of crime by the amou.t of times Police draw their weapon is absoluetly outlandish. Most police officers I know and who I have interviewed pride themsellves on how they have been able to resolve a dangerous and violent situation with their effective communication skills. Statistically, the most routine and deadly call for an officer is a traffic stop. To have three officers for possibly four individuals in a car still leaving the officers at a disatvantage. With this being said, you can debate this all day. I will conclude my responses to this post with this: once you lose your town to a criminal element, you will never get it back. No amount of money can fix that problem.

Pam

7:03 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

If there is one game I hate to play...it's politics. However, I hope that the residents of Brick realize that we must agree to this referendum so that Brick remains status quo. Private garbage is expensive. Ask any relative who lives up north. Less officers is just one thing I do not want to think about. We have enough stress in our lives to now worry about the safety of our children, our families, our neighborhoods.

Reply

Regina

7:30 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I agree with Pam, we need law enforcment especially now in these times when there are so many drugs in and out of this town, I for one DO NOT want to pay for private garbage and I would love to see all the recreaction programs stay, my children have used many programs and they are awesome !
Please voters think about all the facts before you make a hasty vote ... I'm sure we will be sorry if this does not pass.
and I'm sure the Mayors job is a hard one, so maybe the Nay Sayers can run for Mayor and see if they can do any better I LOVE this town and I think everyone does the BEST they can for the good of BRICK ............
Pam, we will spread the word to vote YES !

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

8:03 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

In a budget crisis like the one Brick seems to be in, Recreation programs and any other programs nonessential should be cut first! For example, why don't we start charging a small fee for Summerfest? This can't be a money maker for the town espec. when out of towners come, too free of charge. How much does it cost the town every week they have it to run the buses, pay the bus drivers, pay extra police for that day, have fireworks, & pay for the entertainment? Think about it.

localexpert

8:38 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Think Snow and Vote No.. Our services ,my God they couldnt handle Snow.... We were paying for that municipal service,How Did That Work Out.. Vote no.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

Kathy Bottone

10:41 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

But what would happen next winter if we get the same or more snow? Would there be anyone to plow or would there be any trucks to plow with? Or would it all be private plowing? Would you have to pay for plowing? Just wondering....

Comment_arrow

HOFFA

5:23 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The excuse was that BIL JIM trucking was hired for snow removal. But, the Garden State Parkway offfered more money, so they bailed. I have no idea if this was true, but I heard it fron 5 different people who do not know one another......... I was snowed in for three days. I was not happy!

Resident

8:39 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Why hasn't the mayor sent an official explanation to each home in Brick to explain EXACTLY why they need the 8+million in excess of the 2% cap? Thats alot of "excess". The mayor has a reputation for being a bully at meetings and now uses two of the towns basic needs, police and sanitation, as his continual bullet points to threaten voters. Where's the million from the traffic cameras going? Put up a few more! So he is saying he is going to fire all these people and stop services and our taxes will still go up, something doesn't smell right and we are only being force fed police and sanitation as a solution? How much in oversized salary raises were given to his inside cronies as he cries for more tax money? How about a rollback in rediculous raises to save some of the police positions or public work staff? Time for transparency and an end to his bullying tactics.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

8:31 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I agree totally! We deserve answers to the exact questions you asked and we need an explanation NOW! &&& to Regina who said the mayor has a hard job. If it's too hard for him, he should step down so we can elect someone who can do it better. No wait....when his term is up & this passes, he won't have to step down...he'll be voted OUT!

Comment_arrow

Mike

10:17 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

OK lets also remember we were all reassesed usually doubling our property value, so to me that is 4% 5 years of that and i will be paying over 2k more the mayor must go!

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:48 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

79: They are absolutely permitted to explain. In fact my neighbor gave me this "fact sheet" that they put together. However, I have no idea if they intend to mail it out. There's is nothing to stop them from explaining any of the details.

Pam

9:00 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I am beyond tired of hearing everyone's complaints about what should be done, not done, or who is getting paid what salary. WE did not create it...this was created a LONG time ago. I wish I was smart enough 20 years ago to seek a government job. The reality is that I would rather pay a few more dollars during the year, than have another monthly payment due to some private corporation who can charge and tax whatever they feel will expand their pockets. My main concern is the safety of my family. I am beyond tired of gang activity, drug activity, and every thing else that makes you cringe as a homeowner, a parent, an individual.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Resident

9:28 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I can understand your frustration regarding the complaints, but is simply agreeing with the excessive demands of a broken system that was created LONG ago as you stated the solution or simply a continuation of the status quo of the very problem with no fix in sight? Stop and think for a moment that the very govt jobs that you wish you seeked years ago IS the broken system. A system that was never fully thought out for in its long term effects on property taxes etc, without some resolution the problem will compound year after year after year, hense the fiscal status of most of the country in a unsustainable system.

Comment_arrow

parkway

8:09 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Pam I agree, This is not personal this is for the safety of the families in Brick and also the many who will lose their jobs, those making these nasty comments like think snow vote no really irk me. Where were they when the workers were in blizzard like conditions for 16 hours at a time doing the best they could with the equipment they had to work with. Or the paramedics who were trying their damnest to get to those in need. Before you can make negative comments try doing the work.

Virginia

9:12 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Now is not the time to cut back on law enforcement. A lot of drugs and gangs...yes gangs are here in Brick. Ask any high school student, they know more of whats going on in the streets than the average resident.
Our sanitation and recycling service is excellent. If anything we should be able to cut back on the recycling pick ups to once every two weeks.
Cutting back on our safety and health is ridiculous. Cutting back on some of the recreational programs or charging enough to cover the cost for them (including the overhead for the building) would be more reasonable.

Reply

disgusted homeowner

9:13 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Very shortly, Mayor steve will announce a new "self serve" menu for brick's services. You'll burn your own trash, shovel your own street, catch your own crooks, do your own building inspections, etc. But he'll continue to line his pockets with your hard earned tax dollars for sure !!!! Right Steve?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Virginia

2:17 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Instead of posting this kind of nonsense why not post a suggestion that might actually do some good

localexpert

9:43 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

People WE ARE BROKE...And all they want is to Increase, When is enough ,enough..We Are Broke.When does that sink in.......

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:02 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Local Expert, no matter how many times you say that in this town, it just doesn't sink in. We are broke, $130 million dollars in debt and climbing !!!! And most folks don't understand we have to cut, re-organize and re-prioritize Brick's true needs. Then and only then can the township get back on track. Thank you

Jose Deer

9:45 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

do not let this snake get away with it.........VOTE NO and then get rid of this lowlife

municipal UP and asking for MUCH MORE
schools UP
county UP
Property taxes UP

WAKE UP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Gary

9:48 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The vote has to be no, and from there we can figure out what we can afford as a town. There is no reason why we as a town must be told what to do. They are out of control with the spending, and it needs to stop. As for the cost of private hauling, I can tell you that the rate will be the same for every resident in town. The cost will be about $300. a year, and don't compare North Jersey prices. The bottom line is after the BIG layoff, and the smoke settles, we can see exactly what comes in and what we can afford as a town. Remember we will be cutting out all these pensions, and other benefits, stop worrying about the 150 , think about your family. We need to look into very close, not just vote. This is your change to fix the problems in Brick, we have a lot off money coming in, now lets see where its going. Please think about this carefully, thank you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

parkway

8:11 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I bet you would be so quick to say that if it was your job or one of your family

Comment_arrow

C

8:34 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

You put it in perspective, Gary.

Deborah

10:02 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Please stay calm about this and really think it through. No one wants to pay more taxes. However, the reality is that due to inefficient fiscal management (as well as less State aid) the money is just not there. Do you really want to pay an independent contractor for garbage? Remember when your cable bill was only $35 a month? The cable company slowly inched the cost up 5x. Do you want less police officers patrolling this town? I drove through Lakewood last Saturday night about 9:30 and it was very scary.. I am never scared to drive around Brick. I personally will be voting yes, yes to our wonderful town that I am very proud to live in and want to keep it that way. This decision does not come lightly. Like everyone else, it gets harder and harder to keep a roof over your head. However, my personal choice to vote “yes” will come with a pay-back for the town government in November.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

10:31 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

its people like Deborah who are the PROBLEM.......allowed the government to make her AFRAID and is willing to pay whatever protection money they want to take from us.....stop being a sheep and try living FREE from the nanny state

Comment_arrow

Doug

7:40 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Deborah, keep in mind that this current administration just gave Comcast and unheard of 15 year contract to be the sole cable provider to Brick. 15 YEARS! These idiots have to go and as soon as possible. Giving 15 years to a company, you know someone is lining their pockets well.

Comment_arrow

C

8:42 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Do you really think by voting "yes" the mayor, like the cable company, won't be slowly increasing taxes again & again & threatening our services? This is not the end of it, it really isn't. Just please don't be fooled to vote "yes" out of fear. We have to take a stand against these type of fear tactics.

Mr. Smith

10:03 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Job. He wants private trash. Sure he wil be a manager for TR Hauling. We have left the future of our town in the hands of a guy who could not make it as a financial planner.
Our mayor made a statement that he takes no benefits from Brick. No medical no pension. Well mayor your wife is a teacher here in Brick and you get your medical benefits through the BOE? Last time I checked ed that is oublic tax money.

Reply

Mr. Smith

10:05 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

We have a mayor who is to busy running the water department in Toms River as he sells off all fee generating departments building inspections for one to his friends in TR. Half olf whom work here for the town and got big raises. That was right before he got his 80k plus job in TR. Maybe he should be here in Brick all day for the 52k we pay him for a parttime

Reply

disgusted homeowner

10:06 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

GARY, please read my post above. I couldn't agree with you more. Everyone must look at their own finances before they vote.. Don't vote yes and start crying when your monthly mortgage/tax payment goes up 6 months later when your lender analyzes your escrow account for those homeowners whose taxes are rolled into their mortgage payment. Because it will be too late then to do anything about it. I really feel this potential tax increase will push many homeowners over the proverbial cliff.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

7:44 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

If this continues, I and my family are out of here. This is an administration of nothing but crooks who treat our tax money as free and open check book. The BOE is on an equal plain. Forget the students and the schools, let's just make sure we don't pay into our benefits and get 4.2 % raises in the worst economic times since the Great Depression. 85% of the School Budget is salaries. What does that tell you? Back to the Town Administration. $50,000.o0 raises to and assistant business administator with the same top notch benefits package to boot. Hiring new administrators to answer calls (who is never there) for our part-time mayor with a full-time salary and benefits.

Time to make this place a ghost town and a thing of the past.

brian 1

10:24 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

gestapo tactics won't work. this budget MUST MUST be defeated. Stop spending our money, cut the real fat!!!! And don't dare try to charge us for garbage, either, u idiots. we voted that down big time. the jobs that will be eliminated? those that the current mayor and council hold. VOTE NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We need a boston tea party here!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

10:37 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Brian1, and we need that tea party NOW !!!!!!!

Deborah

10:41 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Wow, I leave a comment about how it was scary driving through Lakewood and never scary driving through Brick and get dumped on about how the "town" has made me afraid.... really, it just couldn't be that the officers of this town make me safe?

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

1:18 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Deborah, all the folks in Lakewood wearing the black and white clothing certainly should not scare you. they're just fashion conscience and trying to save money on their respective wardrobes. Thank you

Brick Resident

10:48 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

If you think these are tactics, why did 172, if not more workers received notices stating their last day will be May 13? This vote is real simple and it should not be speculated as more than the following: If you wish to continue to keep services in house such as, Garbage and Recycling Pickup, Road Maintenance, our own Township Dump that you do not have to pay additional for, Police responding to any other crime "not in the act", motor vehicle crashes with injuries, along with senior services, recreation, parks and land, for a price less than the private market vote yes.
If you wish to send a message and vote no, you are in fact actually sending the wrong message. Cost wise, you are going to pay more just to have your garbage picked up then all of the services mentioned above combined. This is not to mention that who would want to move to a town with fewer services? There are two things in this world you are guaranteed to do; you are going to pay taxes and die. Taxes will go up 10 to 15 dollars per month, regardless of a defeated referendum. The real question is can you tolerate them going up an extra 15 to 30 dollars per month and maintain your services? If you vote no, you will essentially be paying more in the long run. We are getting a "bulk" discount here because we are all footing the bill to make our town a town where people want to come. Once you lose your quality of life, you will never get it back. If we lose our services we will never get them back.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deborah

10:52 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

You are so right. Its a little unsettling the comments on here. Its like children throwing temper tantrums. I fear the referendum will be defeated and what will happen then --- they will all be complaining that they have to pay for their garbage . This is a lose-lose situation

Comment_arrow

brian 1

3:04 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

i pray the referendum will be defeated, i know it will. and the clear message to the mayor and council is to get a balanced budget with proper services and no additional costs, or they are history come the next election!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! if they insist on following through with their threats, it will only last until next election, then the taxes will be rolled back! The mayor and council have sealed their own fate, being voted out of office. GUARANTEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

parkway

8:17 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

These workers will be laid off and for the person who said save the pensions you work 20 21 22 23 24 years and then be told you will be laid off without medical or pension and see how you feel. You are a bunch of egotistical idiots. Who will you call when your garbage is all over or you need to dump lots of bulk, dispose of wood or large garbage, not to mention when you have a heart attack and die because the police could not get there in time.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:42 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

parkway, no one ever said life was fair.

shore family

10:49 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

On the township website, there was an audit done in 2010 on our town's police force. It strongly suggests Brick needed to add more police officers. How much was that audit that is now being ignored? I was also surprised to see how much the officers get paid in this town. More than NYC officers on the average? We aren't a high crime town. What happened to the police union negotiations. Weren't they looking to bargain over giving up some benefits to save our town some money? My biggest question is what happened to the money from our increased tax assessments? Ocean County Freeholders and the BOE are also asking for tax increases. All together, I see my taxes going up another $500+ for the 7th year in a row. Sorry, not willing to vote for it.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

11:11 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I respect what you are saying, and trust me I feel the same way. My taxes have gone up more than I would have liked them to. If there was no 2 percent cap, I would also vote no. However, the Township was handcuffed with the 2 percent and limited exceptions to the cap so I do not feel the time to vote no is now. I appreciate what the Township employees do for us and I love that the Police are on the street and my garbage is picked up. With that being said, any referendum within the next 4 to 5 years I would vote no to because as the Mayor said "this will put us on good ground for the next 4 to 5 years." I wish people would make an informed, educated decision, not just based on emotions or party lines. This is a trying time for all of us in Brick - Lets all make the right decision and vote yes. Besides, who wants to move to a Town with no services and medium taxes?
In theory, if we lose our services our taxes should go down - however I highly doubt they will; this is what the November vote is for. If they somehow do go down, it will not be low enough to offset the cost of private garbage and snow removal - you will have to shovel your own street. There will also be no senior services, crossing guards to get your children to school safe. Lighting for sports, grass being cut in parks, garbage and recycling pickup at fields will be a "pay to play" for everyone involved. If you do not think you will be affected by this, please let me know how you are not.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

1:22 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Shore Family, there's many folks saying the same exact thing as you. And they just can't afford to vote for a bloated budget. It's a shame the powers at be just don't get that message. As long as our mayor can gas up his big boat and collect those 3 public paychecks off the taxpayer's backs. No less give everyone under his own roof a cushy public job also. Shame on the mayor.

Comment_arrow

brian 1

3:06 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

RIGHT ON SHORE FAMILY!!!!!!!!11

George

10:56 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

If the taxpayers of Brick wanted to do something big they would recall the entire Mayor and council and take back their govenment from runaway spending which has gor us to where we are at today.

Reply

79

10:59 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

What's the usual cell phone bill a month $60 PLUS ...... what's the usual cable/satellite bill per month $100 PLUS+ per month ...... what the usual Internet connection per month $70 PLUS per month ...... what's the usual water/sewer bill per month $60 PLUS per month ....... etc.

What WILL the average cost be for a homeowner per month to keep services and the ranks the way they are NOW .... $29 PLUS a month.....

PLUS and additional $20-25 (still unknown AND may be more with the gas prices today?? but the usual in other towns) IF the increase IS voted NO ..... and that's NOT tax deductible at $224 - 300 dollars per year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:07 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

79, Please calm down and take some zanex or something. I'm concerned about your blood pressure........

George

11:34 am on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Disdusted we need to organize and take back our community from these current elected officials.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

1:24 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

George, i'm surprised that no one has started a recall petition yet. We successfully petitioned to stop the ice palace purchase. and it worked.

shore family

12:56 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

In response to Brick Resident (sorry, it wouldn't let me reply to you directly), whatever the outcome is from the election will affect everyone--we'll all have to pay something. Some say we'll pay more for privatization of services but I say we will continue to pay more in taxes (as has historically been the trend). Our increased tax assessments were supposed to tide us over for a few years. Who could predict that the Govenor would put a cap on state aid or that we had record snowfall and overspent our money? Next year, some other unpredicted shortfall will happen and we will be asked again to either raise taxes or cut services. The Governor is going to cut pension and benefits for state workers and aid in education. He is asking employees to contibute an extra 8.5% in benefits. Those getting pensions for the past 10 years will have a rollback of 9%. Add this to the 3 tax increases previously mentioned and privatization is the lesser of two evils for me. I don't want any services cut either in Brick (especailly police force-who wants that), but I have to look at the bigger picture in our state which is affecting us in our town. I'm not convinced that the town hall has not scrutinized itself enough by cutting its costs to reduce our town spending so we can salvage some of these jobs and services. I also agree with you about your point for November, but unfortunately we have to deal with this sticky issue now.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

2:08 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Shore Family,
Thank you for your reasonable response. I would like to respond with some of the topics you discussed and I will also add some additional views. We can both agree, whether this referendum passes or fails, we will all be affected. Whether it’s getting garbage picked up or paying to have garbage picked up – please keep in mind that all garbage companies pick up on different days so you will have garbage cans outside on your street almost everyday. Also, according to a homeowner in Jackson (where there is private garbage) they pay $110.00 a quarter for once a week pick up, for a yearly non tax deductable total of $440.00) – more than the referendum increase. This does not include bulk pickup or leave pickup, which is incurred at an extra cost. In order to get rid of large items that do not fit in the companies can, you would need to load it in your car, drive to the dump and pay to have it disposed off.
Yes, the tax increase was supposed to keep up for the next few years if no budgeting changes were made. However, there is a “new normal” in government and there are 2 percent caps along with different exemptions. If the cap was originally 4 percent with the same exemptions, would we not be where we are today – this can not be dispute. Taxes would have risen, but at a normal rate. Unfortunately, this new cap could not be controlled and the burden is being placed on the voters, hence a vote.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

2:09 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Government is changing; there is no doubt about that. People’s voices are being heard and we are tired of all the taxation, this is why the 2 percent cap was enacted. This cap was a “shooting from the hip” to a tax problem, there was no thought to it. Brick Township is accustom to the service it provides and that is why Brick Township is a great place to live and work. Brick Township is safe because of the Police Department and because people care about their town.
Police make good money, there is no denying that. They also deal with things you would never want to be exposed to- people killing themselves, people hurting other people, Police fight with people who threaten to kill them, they have weapons pulled on them, and operate their patrol vehicle at a high rate of speed because someone called 9-1-1 and they needed help; ultimately exposing themselves to harm due to the emergency driving. This is just a few things Police encounter on a daily basis.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

2:09 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

How do you think the 29 Officers feel who received layoff notices? There days are limited, but they are still on patrol exposing themselves to vulnerable situations. I wonder what would happen if one of them gets hurt and then gets laid off. Do we say thank you and brush them off for their service? Police Officers are the same people who live in town and can respond in a moments notice if needed or act in an “off duty” fashion if needed. They live on the same street as you where you approach them to ask question or if you think someone maybe lurking in your backyard if they will go check it out. They are the coaches to the team your son/daughter may be on. Police Officers are not only are the scrutinized for their job, they are scrutinized for what they do, what they should have done, what they didn’t do, and what they do on their own time. If you hold Police Officer to a higher standard, then they need to be compensated for it, if they are not, you will attract less than acceptable candidates.

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

2:13 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The private contractor may be your way and I respect that. I am not sure if you are aware of what contractors call snowfall; they call it “white gold.” Contractors charge exuberant amount of money to push snow around. A small parking lot could easily be charged $700.00 to $1000.00 for up to so many snowfall inches, anything in addition to that is an extra charge. Now imagine what the price of an entire street would be with their driveways, multiple that by 2 for at least 2 plowings then divide that by the neighbors who choose to pay for it.

Shore Family, I apologize for this is long winded. Not all of my comments are directed towards you, but just putting factual, realistic information out there.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

2:47 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Brick Resident, hello there. About private trash, folks have to make phone calls. Just yesterday i visited a family friend in jackson. She is a jackson township employee no less. She told me she has private trash and had just switched carriers. She showed me her quarterly invoice. Much lower than your quoting. $64.00 pe quarter for once a week trash and recycling. Jackson still has their muni. dump open all year for lg. bulk items. She told they only will do curbside pickup for bulk 4 times per yr. Doesn't sound impossible to me.

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:45 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I wish everyone would understand that there are other creative ways to deal with trash and recycling as well as the local police. All one has to do is look at other states like West Virginia and PA (Where my parents live on a two acre property in a nice house and pay approximately 2K annually for all their services including trash and education.) -- They have lower taxes and most towns, have privatized trash and recycling. I find that the people in Brick are mostly afraid of change. Yes voting no will mean a change, but change is not always a bad thing. As a waterfront property owner on the South (poor) side of the Metedeconk River whose family has been here since the 1940’s and non-wealthy working class, our property is being stolen out from under us due to “Exorbitant” taxes. There is no reason that I need to pay 5 plus times the taxes of my neighbors who are not waterfront, but have similar sized property and sized houses. Why can other states and towns offer lower taxes? What makes Brick different? – Change is needed. (cont.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

shore family

3:12 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

In addition to your comment about other towns outside of NJ, even within NJ and our surrounding towns, they are not asking for increases above the 2% cap. Point and Toms River recently reported on this (and I also believe Belmar and Wall). I agree with your assessment of being taxed out of Brick and we are also looking to buy outside of the town. We don't want to move, as my husband was born and raised here as are our kids, but when my house is the 2nd highest assessed property on our street, is not on the water and is in an older neighborhood on the "poor" side of town, I cannot help but think the town is mismanaging our money. This isn't just contained to our current Mayor, our previous one also raised taxes as well. This trend has to stop because the economy is not in the same shape. The change is we aren't building as much (in essence, growth is almost void), but our taxes keep going up and not worth what they are assessed at. Our town is becoming much less attractive to buy real estate in.

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:46 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The Mayor thinks that all waterfront property owners bleed money including the wealthy who live on “prestigious” Princeton Ave. I would vote yes if there is more equality regarding taxes across the board. My wife and I are proud of Brick and I improved our property to help my local neighborhood, yet now I’m being financially penalized for being a good citizen. Some may ask if you can’t stand the heat get out of the kitchen. That is exactly what my wife and I are doing. Our property has been for sale at the Township “ASSESSED” value and no one is even biting.
I’m tired of being bullied, yes bullied and threatened by the Mayor, Council Members and other Township employees who are grossly overpaid. All you have to do is watch the Town Council meetings to see how demeaning they are to many of the local residents during the public Q&A portion. Watching the town hall meetings can actually be a hoot and downright embarrassing! I wonder if the Mayor and other Council members actually watch themselves. (cont.)

Reply
Comment_arrow

brian 1

3:11 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

THE MAYOR HAS 2 JOBS he gets paid for at public expense, he will just find himself a third public no show job to pay taxes . and a while back his approach was simply not pay his taxes. lol lol lol lol

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:46 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I do have respect for the police and other service employees, but creative changes in other areas can be made, which can retain employment. Most of us have been faced with making our own personal budget cuts. I’ve managed to cut costs by shopping smart buying generic brands, not going with prime cell phone service, other unnecessary conveniences, driving the same old car, only purchase regular gas, etc.
If people vote yes, my taxes will increase another $1,100 as well as almost 1/3 of the homeowners in Brick. That is a lot less money that I and others will be spending with local businesses. – How about that as a bullying tactic.
Don’t think the local taxes will stay steady for the next 4 years if the vote is yes. I will bet anyone that the taxes will still continue to increase. If the Mayor and Council have sold you on voting yes, I have a bridge to sell.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

4:14 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

C.B.C. / so what you are saying is .... "If people vote yes, my taxes will increase another $1,100 as well as almost 1/3 of the homeowners in Brick".

The Township has stated that IF you have a $350,000 home your taxes will increase $350 per year if the increase IS approved ..... so the value of your house is OVER a MILLION DOLLARS with an increase of $1100 figure AND similar people in Brick OR "almost 1/3 of the homeowners in Brick" ...... have over MILLION DOLLAR homes??? Then MY conclusion IS 1/3 of the town and including you WILL get a bargin. OR are your figures off a LITTLE??

OceanCounty

2:07 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

As I suggested on a similar article, the Mayor owes the taxpayers an information paper on what concessions "ALL" township employees have made to save their jobs. I remember 2 or the 3 unions have made some type of concessions, but the PBA was the hold out; also not sure what if any concessions the non-union employees have made.

I would think this is information the taxpayers/voters need to make an invormed vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

brian 1

3:13 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

a lot of those jobs can be saved by cutting other waste, as well as getting more concessions. they are threatening this to strong arm people, we will not fall for it, we will vote no

Joseph Woolston Brick

2:10 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Mr. Acropolis, your employer (the voters of Brick) hereby give you notice that you will laid off as of 2013. I'm sure this will give you appropriate time to secure a new job, Hopefully not another one feeding at the public trough. In the meantime, thank you for all the threats, you would make Gaddofy and Mubarak proud. Have a nice day, as for the referendum vote MINE IS NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

8:51 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

No..... he will be fired as of 2013!

shore family

3:30 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

To Brick Resident-I agree that laying off the police officers will be painful. However, the Mayor put this option on the table for us to decide. It was previously reported that the police union was negotiating to cut benefits to save jobs. I'm not sure if it was ever resolved, but if not, now is the time for them to decide to cut their benefits (like many of us) to save jobs or take their chances that the constituents in the town may save their jobs, which is not a sure thing. I work in a company where we laid over 100 people, so I know the pain of layoffs. Those of us who are still employed have to do part of their jobs without pay increases and also have been asked to pay more towards our benefits. My husband is a state worker and will be affected by the Governor's cuts previously mentioned. We've made alot of sacrifices and have buckled down with our cost of living expenses because at any time, we don't know if we'll lose our jobs. Raising taxes just seems to be this town's politicians way of "fixing" things, when in fact, it continues to hurt everyone--and now our police are included.

Reply

79

3:49 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The average cost PER YEAR will be only $350 or a little over $29+ per month increase, which it "IS cheaper" then putting an alarm system on your house AND waiting for the Police to show because of cut backs. PLUS, the monthly charge for garbage PU has not bee established and will probably be $20-25 PLUS dollars a month and all of the other Public Works related trash drop off or pick up WILL change or be removed. Just think $29+ per month increase and tax deductible to continue service OR lay off 29 Police Officers and 170+ other Township employees .... the math IS simple VOTE YES

I also hold the Governor of the State of New Jersey and all of those elected officials responsible for an unrealistic amount of 2% on ANY budget, especially when they do NOT govern those areas. Just think 2% cap on Townships AND at the same time remove or lessen prior and future State Fundings which in ALL reality IS Brick and ALL other cities and towns TAXES to the State and their only form of revenue and YOUR MONEY withheld!! PLUS on top of that things like gas and petroleum related and other areas of usage HAVE increased. VOTE YES

Also it seems there are people within this story (comment section) that are will to punish the 29 Police Officers and 170+ other public sector workers....because they hate the Mayor??? THIS doesn't make any sense at all??

Reply
Comment_arrow

Deborah

4:13 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I agree with your comments unfortunately, based on the hostility on this site, it doesn't look good for the referendum. I don't know why people can't think this through logically and see that in one way or another, we'll all have to come up with more money. Wouldn't it be better to put it where it is tax deductible? Its a no brainer for me.

clamdigger

4:24 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Hi Everybody, nice day isn't it? I have to add my 2 cents here. I'd rather pay $500.00 a year to a private company to pick up my garbage than give one more red cent to the TWP who can't get their act together and hold us hostage every single year. This way I at least know where my money is actually going and not have to think about how the Twp is mishandling it.

As for the notices that went out today, that's just a notice that is required by law it doesn't mean anyone is actually being laid off.

As for the loss of services & jobs if any actually do happen, jobs and services can be returned at a later date once the town has at least gotten itself back to being stable.

We're $130 million in debt....just THINK about that number. Cut the town to the barebones and pay down the debt it's that simple.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

5:38 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

You are right, Brick Township is 130 million in debt. That debt is under the capital budget and has absolutely no bearing on the operating budget. You can lay off every employee (which affects the operating budget) and it will not reduce our capital budget (outside of capital budget items that have over a 7 year life span.)

Jose Deer

4:29 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

why cant i read the replies today ???

please reply as a seperate post and NOT as a reply to my post

Reply

79

4:36 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

There is even a person writing within these comment section saying his taxes will increase $1100 per year and this will affect almost 1/3 of brick homeowners AND people WILL believe this without thinking and shooting from the hip in return. IF that figure WAS or IS correct as stated and with the figures the town has projects in an increase, that person owns a MILLION DOLLAR home PLUS and 1/3 of Brick homeowners, ALSO own MILLION DOLLAR homes????? and people will believe this ??? ..... the same people say the town talks scare tactics, yet what the heck IS that???? Facts are facts and the increase will be about $29 a MONTH ( you pay more for a cell phone??) for a $350,000 home and guess what LESS if the value of the house is less .... and there are a lot of them.

Reply

forthekids

4:41 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Didn't the taxpayers vote to keep garbage pick up two years ago when Steve first got in office? They voted overwhelmingly to keep garbage pickup in house. He proved his intentions were to privatize garbage pick up. He now is in a win win situation, he either gets his garbage privatization plan or more taxpayers money to mismanage. I hate to say but this a R vs D, the root of this, hence him wanting to privatize collection since he assumed the Mayoral role. R wins either way the vote goes, this is prime example of why the two party system is corrupt and invisible with regards to dealing with taxpayers money. Don't know which way to vote. Will pay for collection but don't want police force reduced, he's backed the I's into a corner. Don't like this either"" During that time, Acropolis said, the township council will most likely pass ordinances mapping out how residents will handle using private haulers to undertake sanitation services" Now he plans to pick and choose the companies who are "allowed " to offer pick up???

Reply

George

4:49 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I am surprised the whole Mayor and Council haven't been recalled your Mayor gave the town a bad check for his property taxes the first month he was elected what a disgrace .

Reply

HOFFA

4:52 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The cold hard truth:
>Governor Christie contributed to this problem by cutting state aid.
>President Obama would rather fight wars in other countries, instead of handling his battle in the U.S. A leader would fix his own country first. How many U.S. lives were ended in Iraq? Is the $$$ number spent really one trillion dollars, so far?
>Ocean County residents are picking up their food stamps, while driving new vehicles.
>BRICK is a great place to live, do you want the following:
-Garbage piled high seven days per week, on your street.
-Illegal GARBAGE dumping to skyrocket.
-Private garbage collection, which is not cheap by amy means.
-Private snow removal, which would absolutely cost more,
(ever see an AMBULANCE, FIRE TRUCK, POLICE CAR try to get down an unplowed street)
-LESS COPS= "Seriously?" Residents of Brick have about a 5% idea of what the police do on a daily basis. You are safe, O N L Y because of their efforts. Ask someone who the bloods, crips, la mugre, latin kings, nietas, pagans, hells angels, breed, and others are? They are GANGS people. They live in your town, their kids go to your schools. This is only the tip of the iceberg. Calls for service are increasing daily. If I call a COP, I want him/her there, without delay.
-We are not too shy of the 100,000.00 population number, which would declare Brick a city.
>Quality costs Money-There are ways to cut spending, but NOT THIS WAY!

*Its tax deductible*

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:38 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

HOFFA, there's not 100k people living here, there's just about 73k residents according to the 2010 census you're over by 25k "residents". You must have gotten your info from the Brick PBA website.

your statement:
>Ocean County residents are picking up their food stamps, while driving new vehicles.

this proves to me that people cannot live within their means and do not understand the concept of a budget and sacrifice.

>Governor Christie contributed to this problem by cutting state aid.
The state is broke how is he going to give back money when the state has it's own bill to pay?

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

2:32 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

HOFFA, you gave me a great idea. I came up with an alternate solution... As a waterfront homeowner I have a hidden dump right in my back yard. Toss the stuff in the water and the next day it will have floated away! Not my problem any more (Just like when Acropolis leaves as Mayor he can fall back on his other full time job.). Plus with the other service cuts there will be no one to enforce illegal dumping. -- FREE SERVICES for the over taxed waterfront home owners! About time I gained an additional benefit for paying higher taxes. - Lower tax contributors will have trash piles similar to last December's blizzard. Talk about stinky neighborhoods. -- Just funn'n.

Comment_arrow

HOFFA

12:53 pm on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

clamdigger,
Maybe we are shy of 100,000 but you need to consider the ILLEGAL Mexicans and evan ILLEGAL Polish, Russian, and Italians, coming in, to get an accurate number. I have no problem with anyone who lives here as long as they pay TAXES. You are right that NJ is BROKE, but we failed to ensure political oversight, in order to avoid corruption. From Florio, to Whitman, to McGreevey, to Corzine---all CROOKS. Also, does Christie really need a 95,000.00 expense account (this is public record). For me, the tax increase would be cheaper than paying for garbage.
Let's face it! It's a bad situation to be in, especially when we are dealing with a mismanaged, corrupt state.

Concerned Brick Citizen,
I truly understand your point because I have a goal in life to live on the water, which has now moved to the idea of Florida retirement. I cannot afford the taxes on the water in NJ, I see your point. But, thats why waterfront property is so valuable. I know you wouldn't ditry your waterview, but those who will try to go to remote spots at night to dump in the water face a DEP $5000.00 first offense fine. Just sayin.
But at least the high taxes keep the riff-raff junk collector off your block-hopefully.

Oceangal

5:03 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I did the math and based on my homes assessed value my taxes will increase $158.00 a year. From what Ive heard I will not be able to hire a private garbage hauler for that amount of money. For that amount I get to keep my garbage getting picked up by the town as well as the other services including the police. For me it's not rocket science. I'm with out a doubt voting yes because it's common sense. Any messages that need to be sent to politicians will be in the November fight. Everyone should figure out what it will cost them then decide if its worth it. Just my opinion.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

2:38 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

There should be a reduction in the taxes for the removal of this service so you could easily afford a private trash hauler, but I doubt that the township will reduce your taxes by those hundreds of $$s. The money that was once used to pay for these services will be used to pay for another pet project, local government employee salaries and benefits.

john

5:11 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

It seems the same people continue to pass bogus information on this site every time I turn on my computer. Do not make this a November question, this is about keeping the quality services in Brick. If you have a bone to pick with the current administration do it in November not April. While nobody wants to see taxes increased the truth is you will either pay for in property taxes or out of pocket. Like the tv commercial a few years ago stated you can pay me now or pay me later, but YOU WILL STILL PAY

Reply
Comment_arrow

califwino

5:18 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

So why wait to November, he wants to lay off people lay him off now too. You got a big bunch of complainers on here sitting at their computer complaing. Get out from behind it and start a recall petition NOW.

Comment_arrow

bths06

10:08 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Al:

How can we lay off the mayor now? I would believe that it takes a couple of months to get a recall petition going. Let me know if you know of another legal way of going around to get rid of the mayor. I am all for it, but this voting no may not be the right way. Each person has to tak a look at their taxes now and see how it would effect them. If your increase is anywhere between 260-440 then I would vote yes if it is more I would vote no.

79

5:20 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

My entire life I have made a choice NOT to get involved in politics in anyway and what I am about to say "does NOT place me on any ones side". The REASON for the VOTE in April is for an increase in the budget above the 2% cap and IS for one reason and one reason only. The lack of money the State of New Jersey has cut back OR eliminated from going into and part of the Brick Township Budget and as expected AND in the mean time the Governor and those that follow his path place a 2% cap increase on the budget in New Jersey.

I would think most would think that 2% IS an unrealistic amount for ANY person OR town anywhere. The cost of living over the last year has increased more then 2% ....... AND then at the same time the Governor took away NJ Tax Revenue monies that ALL in New Jersey pay through many ways and should have continued to go into the budget .... thus NOW there IS a shortfall in the Township Budget and a VOTE to increase ...... BUT a lot of people blame the wrong person(s) for these problems and take it out on those that surly are NOT the problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:15 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

After having dinner with some of my neighbors that i met up with totally unplanned, we decided that "79" should go back in his original direction and stay the hell out of politics. He works for brick and we all know who he is right down to his employee #. He's only looking out for his own interests and position and never gave ahoot about anyone else.

Comment_arrow

peteypete

11:23 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

you are a liar. every person on our street, pinewood drive, despises you for being the nosy crybaby you are.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:45 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

PETEYPETE: Listen carefully
Hell hath no fury stronger than for the sinner like you who casts the first stone !!!!!!

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:25 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

79 - based on my current assement and if the 13 cent that was kicked around at the last Town Council meeting is the number, $1,100 would be correct. -- Sorry but this is not fair to me or other highly assessed homeowners. To be honest I don't know if the 1/3 figure I used is correct. There are a lot of us out there who pay way more than their fair share. I happen to be one of them. -- Every home owner should pay equally for garbage and police.

Why should someone pay less for the same service? -- Million dollar home or bungalow shack. My neighbors who pay a quarter of the amount in taxes I pay have two filled trash can every week versus my one. They also have two children in the public school system. Our family only put one through the system. Tell me what is fair... I VOTE NO!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:37 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

"Concerned Brick Citizen" ...... thanks for the courteous reply and further explaining your case. I feel for you like anyone that get any increase in anything. We all live in hard times. Thanks Again .... and I have to respect your choice, even though I feel it is wrong.

Comment_arrow

Gary

8:35 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

For being so smart on hear, some are so dumb. Taxes are paid on the dwelling, street footage, bedrooms, and baths. The reason is footage to maintain the street, and bedroom/bathroom to figure school tax. The return will come on resale, you live in a big house you pay more. Its the way it is, so easy....fair there is no fair.....

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

11:11 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Gary, I know how well the tax assessment system works. It is broken and in dire need of fixing. I’ve spent hours looking at all the waterfront properties in my neighborhood and surround communities. Assessments are broken down by land and improvements. I noticed that the land pretty much remains consistent while improvements are all over the charts. First of all I know our house is over assessed by comparison to other similar or larger houses in my community. From my property I can view a much larger property (4 times larger) and house (over 1,000 square foot larger) owned by former council person and local business owner. That house was improved when our house was improved yet the assessment of the improvements is $200,000 less versus my property while their land is assessed higher versus mine and the house much less they only pay approximately $200 more in property taxes per quarter. There is a new house next to that one which is much larger completed approximately the same time our improvements were done. Again that property is approximately 4 times the size as mine. Those properties are located in what I consider the same neighborhood but different community (by name) which is right next to mine. Right now my tax appeal is pending, and I hired a lawyer because we need professional help to win this battle. (cont.)

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

11:12 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The big flaw in the tax appeal system is that you cannot use or compare other property assessments. You can only use recent sales of similar properties and houses. The Burdon of proof falls on me. The “catch 22” in my situation is that there are no recorded sales of similar properties in Brick. The facts I quoted here can be backed up via the township website and datauniverse.com. And by the way Gary our frontage on the street is only 60 feet. Versus well over 100 for the other properties I mentioned. Even the Mayor’s house in under assessed… His waterfront house and property is larger versus my neighbor whose house is about 200 square foot smaller. The property is smaller also. – This is why I’m so unhappy. If you were in my shoes you would be also. Gary, I know I live on prime property have a great house and expect to pay more in taxes, but I’m paying more than my fair share versus other local residents in similar houses and properties – The Asbury Park Press recently had an article stating that many NJ taxes payers are being over assessed by the tune of 1.6 Billion. I’m certain that I am one of them. I will vote no on any tax increase until the assessments are corrected so that all residents of Brick contribute their fair share.

Jose Deer

5:34 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

VOTE NO !.....let the "geniuses" figure out the rest....isnt that what they are getting salaries and benefits paid by the taxpayers for....anyone can raise taxes unlimited and balance a budget ....may as well elect a monkey

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:46 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

There wouldn't be an April VOTE .... and the budget would have been balanced .... IF there two things happened OR didn't happen. The State of New Jersey and the Governor and those following him (1) imposed an unrealistic 2% increase CAP while ..... (2) Stopping or decreasing money to the Township of Brick with the "usual and project State Funds" ..... "balanced budget".

Comment_arrow

79

5:48 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

....AND again I'm NOT sticking up for ANY one "only viewing the facts at hand".

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:17 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

THINK SNOW AND VOTE NO !!!!! just love the sound of that......./

forthekids

5:37 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Try Nov 2013 not 2012, so throw your Nov. theory out the window.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:39 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

That's for NOBAMA :-)) .... November 6th 2012

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:18 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

79------ SAVE THE DRAMA FOR YOUR MAMMA AND VOTE FOR OBAMA!!!!!!!!!! and if not him vote for my girl hillary clinton !!!!!!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

79

9:18 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

You voted for NOBAMA and "MY girl Hillary" ..... now I know YOU are a "one eye". First of all NOBAMA is taking the country in the wrong direction AND will be a "one term President" like Jimmy Carter .... AND Hillary is NOT really a girl ..... that's why she wears two piece suits to cover the ..... well you should know?? your girl?? AND Christie .... he is just an all around "liar" and only looking now for the Presidential run in 2012 ..... his win went to his stomach, I mean head". I trust NO politician and your opinions are .... well again YOU know the answer.

theerie

6:48 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Listen Plain and simple the town just doesn't get it. No is the only way to vote and I'm here to tell you why... over the last three years i have been downloading the brick town budgets you can do this yourself, almost everyone got a RAISE last year I did not. the town wants to spend 31 million dollars on a solar farm. hhmmmmm thats a lot more than the 8 million were short isn't it but yet they still have plans on building this thing. The town has budgeted 1.5 million a year for recreation improvements. Maybe we should cancel those as well. Somehow I don't think tai-chi classes for seniors and chair exercising was what the founders had in mind.
PS as I left the town meeting last time at around 10PM I noticed that the lights were on in all of the deparments that had already gone home for the night I don't know but it seems to me we could start by turning off the damn lights...

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

8:57 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Chris you are 100% right, they don't even feel the lights mean nothing. The bottom line is the town needs to start fresh. Layoff 150 and go private and we will save alot. It will cost less then 400 a year......I DON'T CARE ABOUT 150, what about the 80,000 residents.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:20 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Brick is a cost over-run nightmare !!! No wonder so many people here can't sleep at night.

George

6:56 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Chris there is alot ways to balance the budget but they take the easy get rid of help and services pretty soon we won't need them either.

Reply

Brokernj

7:30 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

What happens if the vote fails and my neighbor doesnt pay his private garbage collector and his garbage piles up at the curb?

What happens when you need a police person and theres not enough to respond quickly?

Ask yourself, how much is your security and garbage collection really worth? Im voting YES

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

7:42 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Most seniors have there property taxes frozen so it won't hurt them and they are the ones who always vote so it looks like it will get passed.

Comment_arrow

Gary

9:01 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

First thing is you will be required to get your garbage removed, that would be a code voliation, and the police will come quick enough, unless you call them for every little thing.....in brick since 1958 and had to call the police twice,,,,,,this isn't north jersey, crime is low

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

4:29 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

George you are incorrect. Not all seniors have their property taxes frozen and there are specific rules and regulations. My rates would be frozen if this was fact. The maximum deduction a senior may take is $2,000 depending on income. The required form is PTR2.

Ken

7:42 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I don't care what they do, I can't afford to live in New Jersey or Brick anymore. My Business is failing and I'm broke. I just don't give a shit. As for my garbadge I'll just throw it out the window as I drive passed the municipal building. As for any gang members I'll just shoot them if they come near my home, Alot of dead pieces of shit will be in the street

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:24 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Ken, it's sad to say that many more people will be pushed into the same situation you're facing because of our illustrious mayor. Maybe he can take us all on a boat ride on his yacht after we loose our homes!!!!!!! I'm a small businessman also and this economy is very tough to make it in. Good luck and hope your business rebounds for you.

Concerned Brick Citizen

8:00 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

79 - Your comment/opinion and courteous nature is what makes living in the USA great! We can agree or disagree. My circumstance is different because of my high assessment. I'm no better or worse than any other Brick resident. If you knew me you would see that I am involved with the community and I get along with everyone... I'm not a snob. I just don't think it is right that I have to pay more than my fair share and what I pay should be on par with my direct neighbors. Flat fee for Police and flat fee for garbage. Paying more for the same services is usury and bias. We were among the last to be plowed out because we live on a tertiary street. The last to be plowed yet we pay higher in taxes? People and businesses on primary streets should be taxed at a higher rate because they were free one or two days prior and secondary streets were next. -- The way Brick taxes/assesses homeowners is broken. This needs to be fixed. I would vote yes only if I was treated on par and taxed as an equal. If you fix this first Mr. Mayor you will get a yes vote. -- But at this time I vote no and urge others to do the same.

As a waterfront home owner I cry foul and discrimination. YES DISCRIMINATION! I don't get the same treatment or services for my money. MR. MAYOR WHERE IS THE JUSTIFICATION!

We need to reassess PERIOD! - Tax appleal pending... I'm tired of being taken advantage of...

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:26 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

79 is a brick employee, nothing more than a wolf in sheep's clothing, and a propaganda minion for mayor steve. We got your number 201........

Comment_arrow

really?

12:41 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

DH, you are obviously a POS, YOU ruined Pinewood Drive. LEAVE!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

79

7:08 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

"disgusted homeowner" has nothing to say BUT throw mud and call names at people that do not agree with "IT" ....... and it's called a "WINGNUT" ........ must be nice living off 88 WEST on Pinewood Drive AND having ALL your neighbors hate YOU. Get the hint yet ..... YOU are not liked!!!!

Comment_arrow

79

7:11 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

....and by the way "disgusted homeowner" I am not an employee of the town BUT I know where YOU live :-0

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

8:32 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

79 and PETEYPETE, I will be here long after your gone, with the same smile on my face that my parents and brothers had on their faces all the years they lived here !!!
PETEYPETE, I must have missed the election when you were voted spokesperson.!!!!

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

8:36 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Didn't know the voting in this popularity contest had started yet. LOL But i see a big NO vote sunami headed this way !!! Brace yourselves you're in for a bumpy ride.......

Comment_arrow

79

8:57 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

"...... I will be here long after your gone, with the same smile on my face that my parents and brothers had on their faces all the years they lived here !!!"

I guess that makes YOU a "ONE EYE"

Jonnyboy

9:57 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Ok, everyone on here has a legit sense as to what they believe. Some believe if they vote no, they will regret it if the private collectors charge more than what is paid now, also the same as less cops, more crime. Then there are those that say yes, to avoid all this (that's what they want - Mayor and Council). Also, some are afraid, with all involved in getting their piece of the pie, i.e. town, school and county, they will not be able to afford to live here anymore. I do agree 100% that one way or another, Steve wins, he either gets his money or he will privatize. You know he wants both ! But, right now he can't have his cake and eat it too ! Now there is the question, if we say yes, will it happen again in the future? If we say no, and we loose our services, will he still raise out taxes again in the future? And, I did a chuckle out of Ken's post !!!! Now here's my question, since the only choice we are given is to eliminate garbage (all public works services really) and police, which I think are essential personel (did you read his colume in the Brick Times about everything PW does?) I don't recall hearing about other things in town that have been eliminated now, before the vote, till we get down to the bare bones, meaning PW and police, it's what other's have mentioned in the past, like Trader's Cove project, the energy farm, Winward concerts, pay cuts at Town Hall and some services that are more like privliges more than necessaties. (Continued)

Reply

Jonnyboy

9:57 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

You know what I mean, cut all the little stuff before you go for the jugular. The thing I don't like most of all is that we voted these people in to run our Town, and when they have failed us, now they are saying basically is it's either this or that, the balls in your court (our court). Mark these words though, if it doesn't pass, and what they say happens, you will here at a council meeting Steve say: Don't blame me, you people voted it that way. As for me, if I were in Steve's shoes, I'd show the people of Brick that all my campaign promises, all what I said about becoming Mayor, to be true and set the example, since he makes more money in TR, I'd give up my Brick salary, have all my council members that have FT jobs give back their pay and benefits if their spouse's have benefits. I'd start there as a show of good faith, but then again, I'm not a politician, I’m just a silly humanitarian.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:28 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Johnnyboy, your thoughts are very sincere and there's nothing silly about them.

JB

10:00 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I've been back in forth over the last few weeks. I'm going to have to VOTE YES. These people are our neighbors and our community. I do not any town employee personally, but I have to guess most of them live in Brick. It's going to cost me nearly $400 extra. I don't have it, but I'll find it. I'm on one salary, family of 4.
I blame Acropolis and the Council and the Governor!
Mismanagement.....they didn't see this shortfall coming.
I used to vote Republican. There are so many Christie supporters around here. Wake up! He's giving all the breaks to the corportations and the rich!
Vote YES for the referendum and take it OUT on the Mayor and Council in the November elections the next few years!
They ALL better GO!

Reply

parkway

10:09 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

JB you are correct. I personally did not vote for the Mayor but the majority did. He wins either way , but because of that why punish ourselves. I do not want to worry about having my garbage picked up and figureing out what to do with all the bulk. If these people thin this will be cheaper not true the rates will increase every year just like everything else

Reply

bths06

10:17 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

I think this is pretty easy each person needs to look at their research on private garbage and see if that price per year out does the number of increase the mayor is saying. If private garbage is more I would think it would be a yes vote if private garbage does not out weight the taxe increase it would be a no vote.

From what I have seen private garbage can be anywhere between 250-440 per year. I would think for us it would all depends (price wise) on who the mayor has an in with and what kick back he will be getting from the deal. I would think that a deal is already in place.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

7:25 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Does anyone on here ever pay more at a store, just because they like to shop there, or eat at a restaurant and pay more because you like the food. This garbage thing is the best thing ever, and the cost to me is not the point. Every year taxes go up, township, county, and state...something gos up. Now Brick is trying to get you to vote YES, and saying if garbage cost more you need to vote yes. Lets use this to fix the problem, I am glad this is for real, and feel the NO vote is going to win. Someone stated they were going to vote YES to save the 150 employees, and to me thats insane. Think about your family first, and the other 80,000plus residents. ITS TIME TO CLEAN HOUSE IN TOWN HALL.....Do you realize that the one man garbage actually cost you more over the years; let me explain First THEY DON'T PLOW....and Brick has no plowing equipment, so during a heavy snow what do the employees do??? Second the cost of the trucks.....and this cost peoples jobs to..Its sad when it snows and roads don't get plowed and the Mayor says things like it was a lot of snow....good one, please vote NO, the little bit more it cost will be worth it.....thank you!

JB

10:26 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

On top of looking to privately haul your garbage, my concern is the bulk items.
These will be tossed in any wooded lots that are left in town, or worse yet, left on your neighbors properties.
This is a problem. I'll find the money to pay this year, but Vote everyone of these fools OUT!
Acropolis, DeLuca, Toth, Mathews, Scutarro, Sangiovanni, Thulen......did I miss anyone?
Whose up this November?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

7:29 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

JB please don't worry about a bulk item to decide. Read my comment above..thank you!

apples&oranges

11:22 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

When Our Governor makes his surprise visit, you will see who is the first to go!'

I Have 5 NO NO NO NO NO.... No Mayor, No boe ,,,, NO

I will not sit here and let steve steal my money and run. You Steve made this decison. You Steve will have too many family memebers employed by me. I will make sure our Gov have the honest correct information.

If a concerned taxpayer vote yes.. This is like saying Yes Steve, I will give you another 500.00 a year. Minimun that is. Allow steve to keep Bellu? Allow Council President work for Lakewood DMV? Who is zoomong who?

NO NO BOBO, NO NO BELLU.. Steve 79 you present yourself with a new screen name, Why is this? Are you Ascared of the gangs in your area?

I am not afraid. This is such old news. Gangs.. Are you kidding me, there has been gangs for decades. Get a dog if you are so afraid. Better yet, do as another resident stated., Get a gun, Blast the robber, throw your garbage on top of him!
so NONNONNONONONONONNONno it is!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

7:33 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Apple and Oranges is a 100% right, just leave out the gun part....lol We need to fix the problem, not just balance this budget. If this is just balance the budget, we can get a computer to figure that out every year, buy a new one every year at walmart for $249.00 We need people in office to find ways to save.....this town is out of control, and this will start the fix......thank you

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:29 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Apples and Oranges,

if officers are laid off, issue 12 gauge shot guns and 00 buckshot to all registered homeowners then pass a shoot first ask questions later ordinance, Now that's a deterrence!

apples&oranges

11:26 pm on Wednesday, March 30, 2011

> VOTE NO ON april referendum NO @!\
>VOTE NO ON SCHOOL BUDGET, WE NEED MORE TEACHERS, NO MORE ID CARDS FOR BUSSES. MORE GARBAGE.
>vOTENO..... ANY INFO ARROGANT STEVE IS SPEAKING OF IS A SCARE TACTIC.
hE WILL SERVE MORE TIME THAN SCARPELLI! FUN FUN! bAD BOY.. tHEY GONNA GET YA!
NO JUst say NO

Reply
Comment_arrow

really?

12:35 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

You may be the stupidest person ever

really?

12:26 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Apples, I mean Joe Joe, I mean DH, I mean disgusted homeowner, just because you are are a disgruntled homeowner, stop punishing us all. We all deserve Public Works, Police protection and the future of our children... If you don't like or agree with it, move out. No one cares about Pinewood Drive. Leave the rest of us alone...... With all due respect.

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

9:07 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

REALLY? I really don't think anyone in brick considers any street ruined. The town has many positive features. Your comment is extremely morbid in nature. Please................ And who may i ask is punishing you? Were you "drawn and quartered" yesterday??? Or did you miss out on your beauty sleep??????

really?

12:33 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Really, I come to this sight to try to educate myself, but all I see is political nonsense. The Republicans are out of control and the democrats are stupid! What is left but the INDEPENDENTS!!!! Please take back OUR town...

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:26 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Really?

Now is the time to take back our gov't you are 100% correct. Now IS the time to VOTE NO on exceeding the 2% CAP. Now is the time to vote out those on the BOE and their budget increase.

Then in November will be the time to vote out those of the council you believe should go.

This IS the opportunity for a triple play to get the message across loud and clear we demand our Township get their act together and do things "for the people" as they are suppose to. We will still have police officers on duty. Everybody is scared (probably as expected) that the police dept will crumble to pieces and be nonexistent.

IF any services are canceled and/or officers are laid off they can always be returned at a later date, they are not gone forever.

Everything should be a vote of NO this April and in November vote your conscience for the council. Give it 1 year to settle in and work itself out.

Believe it or not this IS our time, The TAXPAYER"S time to as you put it "Take back our town"

really?

12:42 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Where did you all go? Are you scared to be called the truth?????

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

7:40 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Really sounds let you are worried about your job....I am thinking of my family and my children who should be able to live here in years to come. The problem is people do the simple thing....lets stop and think, 150 vs 80,000 resident um! % wise not a big deal to me....I really thing the vote should be and will be NO.....the Seniors will have it easy anyway....they can setup dumpsters, and the schools Why am I paying for the school garbage.....

theerie

5:45 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Bottom line numbers for 2010
school tax $97602538.00
Coutny Tax $41265937.73
Municipal budget $56384058.15
And this year you need $8.4 million more?????
No way!! and you better pick up my garbage or we should all just dump it on town hall after all they say there gonna fire the cops too

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

7:20 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

"Chris Koch" IF that is you name? ...... according to tax records for the Township of Brick nobody with that name owns property in the Township of Brick. So (1) You have NO place in this discussion or (2) You are a phoney and all the figures you write ..... mean nothing.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:16 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

And people wonder why nobody likes to use their names on this site.

I don't recall seeing a "79" listed as a homeowner or tax payer either.

bob

7:12 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

It really shows the Mayors inability to manage and think outside the box, Ok I can't pick your garbage up weekly, I will issue you every household an additional Garbage can, I will now pick up garbage every nine days, The public work employees who remain will really work 8 hours a day not five then go home when my route is done. I will follow a floating schedule and no longer pay OT on saturday to make up for that non holiday pick up. I will do my best to provide services instead of trying to scare you into paying more taxes( remeber buy the ice rink or someone else will, I know whats best and the rest of you will listen and obey, Oh yeah the same owner stills has it, the other buyers are still satnding there drooling waiting for the town to blink). I can do more with less but that means I will have to manage , wonder how he runs the Toms River water department? I agree with Chris lets all bring our garbage to town hall and dump it!

Reply

79

7:13 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

What's the usual cell phone bill a month $60 PLUS ...... what's the usual cable/satellite bill per month $100 PLUS+ per month ...... what the usual Internet connection per month $70 PLUS per month ...... what's the usual water/sewer bill per month $60 PLUS per month ....... etc.

What WILL the average cost be for a homeowner per month to keep services and the ranks the way they are NOW .... $29 PLUS a month.....

PLUS and additional $20-25 (still unknown AND may be more with the gas prices today?? but the usual in other towns) IF the increase IS voted NO ..... and that's NOT tax deductible at $224 - 300 dollars per year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

9:13 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

79,

I'll take the hit on what is not deductable. i'd rather "pay" for a service and know that my xx $$ every quarter is going directly to my garbage pick up. I'm tired of giving money to the Twp only to learn it's not enough but "people" are still being hired.

I look around at the town and I see baseball fields, football fields, soccer fields, I don't know who pays for the upkeep of those, but it shouldn't be the township. Fees should be charged to those clubs that use the fields exclusively. The Drum Point athletic complex is huge with acres of soccer fields, who pay for the grass cuttting,fertilizing and watering of those fields?

The baseball fields at that same complex are pristine, who picks up the tab for the maintence /upkeep there? The question goes for Pinewood Park off Route 88, there's more fields there which seem exclusive for soccer use. Who pays for the upkeep there? Do those clubs reimburse the Twp for cutting the labor of lawn care and fertilizer and water usage?

How about the lights at those complexes? Who foots the bill?

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

9:25 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

clamdigger,

Here is an excerpt from a news article just published by the "Cliff View Pilot" regarding things you pay for but don't use. Here is the link, but currently it is down http://http//www.cliffviewpilot.com/editorials/op-ed/2230-me-first-heres-how-much-you-really-pay-for-police-fire-in-nj

"Indeed, there’s a lot going on out there that our taxes pay for that we don’t get to use or agree with. Many of us will never set foot in the White House or the Governor’s Mansion. I will never drive a tank or fly a fighter jet. I probably won’t skipper a battleship or engineer a locomotive or take a journey on Air Force One.

As for police, you may never have a use for their services, but it is nice knowing they are there if needed and that you and your loved ones have that kind of protection if necessary.

You might say “I don’t care.” But what if you’re being mugged or having chest pains or hear someone rattling the doorknob downstairs and the nearest officer is 10 minutes away or more? What if the only available officers are all tied up on calls?

I read recently that Camden had a 19% rise in violent crime since half the police force was laid off. How long do you think numbers like that will affect your community, as more police statewide are being laid off?

Say you decide as a community to do what Camden did. You then are paying 82 cents a day for HALF the protection you had before."

Comment_arrow

79

9:28 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

"I look around at the town and I see baseball fields, football fields, soccer fields, I don't know who pays for the upkeep of those, but it shouldn't be the township.................................................." and

"Who pays for the upkeep there? Do those clubs reimburse the Twp for cutting the labor of lawn care and fertilizer and water usage?"

"How about the lights at those complexes? Who foots the bill?"

Seems like YOU have a lot of unanswered question??

My answer IS ....WHY NOT they own them and provide something recreational for ALL ages?

....then I guess your option are to move ..... ARE you sure you live in Brick?

Comment_arrow

79

9:39 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Brick Resident .... VERY well stated and the "truth" which some here want to fabricate too make the point.

Facts are facts and "should BE at the point of THIS story". Some ARE drifting away from THIS story because of there "political hatred" for those in office. 29+171 employees WILL loose their jobs IF voted down ..... AND all for $29 a month on a $350,000 value assessment on their house ..... BUT will pay $20-25 a month for private pick-up ..... call 911 when the big one hits and pray someone get there in time OR many other township services LOST.

THESE ARE THE FACTS .... STICK TO THE ISSUE and THE FACTS

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

10:04 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Hi 79, Let me get it out to you this way....as of this moment,if the vote was today I would be VOTING NO and unless something drastic makes me change my mind between now and 4/27 I will still be VOTING NO.

BTW that was a "touching" little article you posted but to tell you the truth, it didn't move me in any way. I live 4 minutes from the hospital if i have chest pains and will be puttin in a surveillance system w/ cameras so I'll have evidence that the person lying on my floor in a pool of blood was indeed breaking in.

As you wrote if you like being nickeled and dimed to death then go ahead and vote yes and we'll see what happens next year or the year after when the Twp or BOE needs even more money and threatens w/ the same or other excuses. We are not a socialistic entity, if people lose their jobs at "XYZ Inc." no one gives a crap, but whe it come to public works or other gov't jobs it becomes unfair and we as taxpayer should look out for the hard working employees of the twp and pony up more tax money.

Services and jobs can always be returned, they are not gone forever. We need to give this a chance and stand up to the increases until the Twp gov't shows responsibility.

When the BOE is no longer getting 60% of our tax money and 83% of their budget no longer goes toward payroll then maybe I'll change my mind. The Twp over extened itself by trying to do too much for the "residents" and now they're caught w/ empty pockets w/ their hands out and a warning.

Comment_arrow

Doug

10:09 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The link to the article is incorrect. Remove the second //http and you will get to the article

JSR

7:25 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

All kidding aside it is time for the Governor Christie to bring his people to Brick, look into the operations of the municipality and the municipal utilities authority, research the job classifications, the people that occupy them, their connections to the politiicans holding office and finally the enormus salaries they are being paid. Sure they will try to draw your attention away from it, but the time has come to end pay to play, double dipping, patronage and the outright abuse of our tax money. How much more can be taken from our pockets before we all reach financial destruction, NO has to mean NO, no more tax increases, no more water rate increases and absolutely no more pay increases for them, and all the people that back them for their own benefit.
It comes as no surprise that when you bring up their mutiple jobs and their enormus salariesand lucrative benefits they shift the attention to other topics. If Mayor Acropolis and his posse really care about the people they represent, the arrogance must stop, no more, means no more, until you give it up, we should give nothing.
It also comes as no surprise that the Director of the Brick MUA recently signed a five year contract paying himself 151,000 dollars a year with the remaining four years raising his salary two percent each year, in a time when 171 employees in Brick could lose their jobs, you talk about insulting hard working people. Could it be possible they feel Governor Christie is on his way here already?

Reply
Comment_arrow

bths06

10:05 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The Governor should have someone check out what is going on in Brick. But, I highly doubt that will be happening anytime soon. OC is republican with Gilmore at the head, and Gilmore is a supporter of Christie. They keep their own safe.

Comment_arrow

Resident

11:17 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Clamdigger, seriously, you are complaining about who takes care of the "pristine" ball fields?
I would be complaining if they weren't pristine! Atleast we know our money is being spent on workers that are actually doing something right and good for our kids and other adult leagues.
How many times have you seen town trucks with workers not doing anything or my favorite during the snowfall having TWO town supervisors in seperate trucks watching a plow clear a snow bank!

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

1:38 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Resident hi, Whne I have time to kill I enjoy a walk around the complex it has a nice walking path. There have been several times I've seen kids playing out on the field and chased off by the members of the "mens" league who yelled/cursed at the kids that "this is their G.D. field" and to keep off and not come back. So if the field " belongs to the mens league, why shouldn't the shoulder the expense of maintence. Same goes for the soccer fields. Those seem to be the property of the 2 soccer clubs here in town and enjoy exclusive right to those fields. Shouldn't they be required to pay toward the cost of field maintence?

Again with the snow.......Brick has Sucked forever at clearing snow over 24" anything under that amount it's not a problem but anything over 24" is like watching paint dry....s l o w.

Gary

7:46 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Chris relax...lol, Everyone better wake up fast, think about your FAMILY first, the 150 employees they will be just fine, the figure will be a little lower because a lot of the 30 plus employees are getting out. Thats the ones the 150 should be yelling at, 30 year plus employees....and this Mayor its sad how this works....he can't sleep well at night. The NO VOTE will fix the town, and save us alot of money.....thank you

Reply

Gary

7:52 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The "HILL" is a money making, but it does not need to be open 6 days a week. It should be open Fri, Sat. and Sun. and going to a 4 day work week would save the town a lot, give them off Mondays since that where all the holidays fall. Lets cut back, after the NO vote.....Fixing Brick, thank you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:53 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

That's an excellent suggestion! It doesn't have to be an all or nothing deal. But that's the decision the twp. is forcing us to make. So, if that's how they want to do this, then NO it is!

Herbertsville

8:24 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I'm not a fan of this package deal, I voted no to privatize garbage pickup and yes to hire additional police in the last election. One question went my way overwhelmingly and the other was defeated. I certainly don't appreciate my vote being a waste of my time and invalidated because the mayor didn't like the outcome. I voted for the mayor, that won't happen again, and unfortunately I can't vote for this referendum.

Reply

theerie

8:28 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

i wonder if 79 knows that more than one person can live in a house?? and sometimes only one name is on a property?? let me call you by your first name 7 is it? those figures came straight form the town hall website 2010 Annual Financial Statement download it then read it on the home page click budgets tis to the right of events like these which I am sure cost nothing to go to
Other Events : Calendar
3/31 Chair Aerobics
4/1 BALLROOM DANCE
4/1 Tai Chi
4/4 Arm Exercise
4/4 Art Water color,oil, acryllic class
but im sure my garbage pickup has to be cut first

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

8:51 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

.....and YOU are right am I getting a little "cozy" :-0

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:16 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I've been to the senior center and those services are under utilized. Local churchs offer the same programs at little or no costs.

disgusted homeowner

9:45 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

It's this simple: 79 equals Steve Acropolis.............. you're not fooling anyone !!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

10:06 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

OK ....... DW "one eye" WRONG and repeated again ..... nothing to contribute ...... and has NOT contributed =s nothing. just don't call 911 for the big one ??!! ......"with all do respect" ....give ME a break what a loooooser.

CShorShell

9:45 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

The proposed referendum question if it were to pass would increase our LOCAL property taxes by 25% ! The number was derived from the Brick Twp. Referendum Question Fact Sheet that my neighbor passed on to me. The sneaky part about it is that you have to do the math to figure out the 25%. The mayor has stated that should the referendum pass our services will remain the same. But what he has not stated is that this is FOR NOW, JUST THIS YEAR. What people need to be aware of is that should the NJ Supreme Court rule Christie's decision to reduce funding to the Abbott School Districts as unconstitutional, then next year Christie could end up cutting ALL funding to local municipalities completely. Now given that the NJ Supreme Court is not a Christie supporter, this is likely to occur. No one wants to see their services reduced. No one wants to see the township police department staff reduced, but the writing is on the wall. The state is a disaster and Christie is taking measures that I fully support to rectify the situation. Go and listen to Christie on NJ 101.5's Ask the Governor. Listen to recording from when he was last on the radio. He's not lying about the numbers. Go watch the Brick Twp. council meetings posted on the twp. website. Listen to what our local politicians are REALLY saying. Nothing about this referendum question is simple. (TO BE CONT'D.).......

Reply

Joseph Woolston Brick

9:54 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I see a lot of you are buying into the fear factor. I want you to turn on your TV and start watching commercials, notice how many are based on fear. Help I've fallen and I can't get up! Buy GOLD! Your money is going to be worthless! Have you checked your credit score, join us to protect your credit score and your identity! FEAR SELLS! Why do you think it's used so much on TV and radio ads? Vote NO! Put some fear into Mr. Acropolis who is vastly afraid he will be a one term wonder. I'm afraid he will get a second term. See fear works!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:21 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Bullying is today's big buzz word. Bullies put fear into others and intimidate or should I say at least try. Bullies exist in government at all levels yet they don’t get punished for their poor behavior. So sad… Ignorance (by true definition) keeps these same people voted in office. Unfortunately during the last Mayoral election not only were the Republicans poor candidates but the Democratic ticket was even worse. It takes intelligence to know when you are being bullied and courage to stand up against bullies. Don’t fear change by voting NO. It is important that we turn the corner and move forward in a different light. It is time for change and change can also be good.

CShorShell

9:56 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

How does the township go from asking to HIRE +/- 8 new police officers last fall to saying they are faced with laying off 28 or 29 officers. The council members are blaming the funding that they are no longer receiving from the state and how "Christie hasn't provided the tools for the toolbox" so we can't fix this without the tools. Either these guys are really inexperienced or they are lying to us, b/c Christie put his "tools" before the legislature for approval and the LEGISLATURE REFUSES to do anything with them. The mayor himself in a council meeting several weeks ago also stated that should the referendum NOT pass, he'd have to "re-evaluate everything again" to see where to make all of the cuts. Ummm....anyone see a problem with this. Why didn't he finish evaluating where to make cuts NOW and then ask the taxpayer for less of an increase in the referendum question? In one breath, it's this is what you will lose, but in the next it's, well we'll have to re-evaluate the situation. I'm just saying that people need to make an informed decision. And my best word of advice would be to watch the council meetings on the website. Either way, my decision based on the homework that I've done is a big fat NO!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

6:58 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

I agree with everything you have said. Now I wish all the people on this site will listen to your comments and vote "No" for all the reasons you have given. Thanks for trying to explain things in simpler terms.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

2:16 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Thank you Carol! I like to explain things simply b/c we all know it's difficult to ever get a straight forward answer. I've only been a tax paying homeowner for a year and a half. I'm making it my mission to be informed and I wholeheartedly believe we all need to get informed. Politics is at the root of how the entire state operates. That's why the decisions we have to make are simple, but not all at the same time. Every decision we make has consequences and we have to decide what we can live with and what we cannot live with. Some decisions will be painful to accept initially but could provide to beneficial in the long run. That's why I am choosing to vote NO on April 27th and accept the burden of a new household bill, b/c I truly believe that in the long run this is better for the finances of our town and the taxpayers. The less the services the town has to provide for us is actually better. Because it gives us more control over our own money and where it goes.

CShorShell

10:02 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Here's the township website:

http://www.twp.brick.nj.us/default.asp

On the right hand side of the homepage, go to "Council Meeting" and click on "Meeting Video Archive."

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:34 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I’m really surprised that TV and internet access to these meetings have not been discontinued. They are a total embarrassment. – Does the Mayor, town council and all involved ever watch themselves? -- Tune into Park and Rec. Thursday nights on NBC.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Concerned Brick Citizen: You are right. They should be embarrassed. Publicly bashing Christie too. That takes some....you know what. Council meetings should be unbiased, PROFESSIONAL meetings; not a high school locker room. Oh! And the council trying to persuade a little old lady into voting for the referendum was priceless! I quote the council president, " it will only cost you $19 per month, so if I were you I would ....." Disgraceful!

theerie

10:04 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

its nice to know that when you try to enter in the debate and express your opinion you will be quickly Threatened by the powers that be, at first I thought Ishouldn't use my real name, hey this is america right, but I guess printing actual numbers is too much for 79 to handle. I will cave under the threat you have levied. and will stay out of this and all future debates.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

10:25 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Sorry if you lost my point I was trying to give you.... it's the numbers (though maybe true) are not the real issue of this story and you appear to place them there for what point ?? .... AND the average reader SEE big numbers only ?? ...and there are 'NO threats intended Chris". I have placed numbers that the average person can understand AND they are reasonable and the true facts of this story" NOT to bring in budget amounts, and the politicians .... just the facts of THIS story :-)

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

10:26 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Agreed. I wish I could use my real name, but I have friends and family who would suffer serious consequences for my opinion and comments.

Jose Deer

10:15 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

SO MANY WORDS ON THIS THREAD , IT CAN MAKE YOUR HEAD SPIN.......ITS SIMPLE

VOTE NO !

Reply

theerie

10:50 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Ok last reply from me.. the numbers are the story I can only earn so much money a year.. if its not enough then I'm spending too much someplace.. also if its not enough I don't plan on spending more the next year.. there are ways to get the 8 million your looking for that don't involve raising taxes. and as faras the "No threats intended" comment, you made it very clear to me that you 1) know who I am and 2) know the name of my business. Why would you feel the need to broadcast that to me if there was no threat involved??? its disheartening at best and a scare tactic at its worst. simply said even if the solar farm generated 1million dollars in electricity a year at a cost of 31 million dollars it would take 31 years to pay off. plus the best available solar panels are only 19% efficient, in five years if they are say 35% efficient do we uprade for additional cost??? or do we not spend the money in the first place.. 40,000 people ride the free bus to the beach, what does that cost us??? if you charged everyone who rode it $20 for a year long pass I'm sure the $800,000 generated could pay for the bus and maybe provide some more income for the town. there are ways that don't involve us not picking up the trash.. continued

Reply

theerie

10:50 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I'm sure everyone would agree that no Recreational type service should be provided to anyone in this town unless a fee is charged to those who actually use the service to cover the service such as the ballroom dancing, contest and the tai chi classes and the bus to the beach. just closing town hall on Fridays would save money. maybe re-negotiate the contracts so that if you don't use sick days they go away at the end of the year 28,274 days accumulated is ridiculous. That’s 7.2 million dollars right there but I digress thanks for hearing me out

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

12:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Thank you! Everyday I think to myself that it doesn't take a rocket scientist or a genius to determine the solution to all of our financial problems. In fact there are countless ways gather the funds. I feel completely surrounded by people who just don't get it. So again, thank you for saying all the things I think and say each day. And in regards to the solar panels, I have finally found someone who agrees with me! They are a colossal waste of money! I am a professional in the construction industry and people are always going on and on about LEED certification, solar panels, and going GREEN. It's all special interest group propaganda and marketing ploys. The cost of solar panels outweigh the savings and LEED is nothing more than a piece of paper that means absolutely NOTHING.

CShorShell

11:00 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I was reading through the responses and I am going to repeat myself, particularly in response to BRICK RESIDENT's post......

This is a 25% local tax increase!!! That's a RIDICULOUS number!

The twp. explained in their 'fact sheet' it had a roughly $ 6 millon reduction in state aid and a $3.3 million decline in other revenue. As a result they asking the taxpayer to fix the budget gap of $8.4 million.

My first question is....how did we lose out on $3.3 million in revenue? What else are they not telling us.

Bottom line is....if the state reduced our aid and they are no longer getting $3.3 million in revenue that we previously were getting and are therefore asking the taxpayer to fork up $8.4 million, it sounds to me like the township is not making any cuts and just passing the buck on to the taxpayer. Granted they claim they are making cuts, which makes me suspect that they wouldn't have had enough money to operate even if there wasn't an $8.4 million shortfall. Just to reiterate and further beat the dead horse, the writing is on the wall. Vote NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

judy

2:51 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Hey Chris Koch & CShoreShell - do you even know what you are talking about? I have solar on my house it was the best thing I ever did. The system paid for itself in 3 years and I am earning over $700 per month on SRECS and I am not paying an electric bill besides. I think you better do some more research on solar before bashing it. Try it - you might like the results!

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:10 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Judy, that may be working out for you, but the amount of money the twp. wanted to spend on solar panels would have taken them 66 years to pay-off the loan, not including the time it would take to pay the interest. By the time they paid the damn things off they'd be obsolete and need to be replaced. Someone else told me that "but they have a lifetime warranty." To which I responded, " I wouldn't count on the company that sold you them or the contractor to be around in 60 years. So what good is your 'lifetime warranty' then."

I have also heard of very few people who have had the success you have had.

Gary

11:07 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Really Jose could not agree more, this is a no brainer. The NO pulls everything in place, and like starting from the starting gate. We really don't need more taxes for the same service, which by the way is not the best. There is a lot of waste in town hall, and I would like that cleaned up first. Every taxpayer should get the best service, and nothing less. You should not be talked to like an idiot from these public officials. They use to laugh at comments like "I pay your salary" but they are not laughing today. And frankly I don't care about 150 people, as a tax payer I am concerned for the 80,000. plus residents. This is something this Mayor forgets, and now the people will be speaking loud and clear. There is no reason to use your real name, and go to town hall meeting. All you have to do is go in and vote NO, and nobody will no what you did. Who cares, back and forth with numbers, budgets, and threats....its crazy.

Reply

Gary

11:10 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Unless you live under a rock, you have to be a idiot to use your owe name on this site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:26 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Speaking of using real names... Where is Scott Pezarras? I figured he would at least make a comment.

Resident

11:23 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I find it funny that people are blaming Christie for his 2% cap as the reason for all this when in fact all his 2% cap does is give the towns voters the right to vote on a cap overrun with the reasons for it. Otherwise I bet the mayor would have just shoved it down our throats in his bullying way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

11:37 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

It is so much easier to point fingers of blame than to take accountability. When has the TC or BOE ever taken accountability for their ridiculous spending habits with our money? Never! They blame Christie and lack of State aid and blah, blah, blah.... Are they doing anything themselves to lead by example such as a pay reduction, removal of Primo benefits that no one in the real working world has at their disposal, cleaning house within with all of the 'extra' administrators and assistants to assistants to assistants? NO! They are not! They are putting on us to continue their ways. Threats is all that they know.

judy

11:29 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Please vote YES! We can't afford NOT to have our town protected by our police force. What happened to us! We used to be one of the safest town in NJ! How can we take the chance of having the gangs and crimes take over our town by laying off our police officers. I don't believe we have enough of a police force to protect us anymore as it is! Weather the mayor is joking or not how can we take that chance! Cut somewhere else! And as for our garbage collection - I don't want to have to pay for private pick up! There has to be a way to cut spending in other areas! What about parks, recreation, Traders Cove? I'd rather see cuts there! Have more community & buisness involvement with adopt a spots to clean our parks & streets. Don't take away our police!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

1:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Police cannot stop crime from occurring. They can only pursue those that commit crimes. Unfortunately, they are not going to cut in the areas that you would prefer them to, b/c they want you to pay for the things you want to keep instead. It's a scare tactic. They are playing on your emotions.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

1:52 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

CshorShell, that is 100% correct which is why I will be putting in a surveillance system complete w/ cameras. Why should I wait for a patrol car to drive past my house at the exact same time an intruder may be lurking, that's like hitting the lottery.

This whole topic of laying off people,cutting trash removal is a political manuver. Sure people may need to be laid off this year and possibly next year too, but it's time to cut the fat. Prove to us the taxpayers you guys at townhall are doing things in our best interests and maybe in 3 years from now we'll change our attitudes. Face it our taxes are going up 2% this year no matter what and they will go up 2% next year no matter what. Live within your budget set by the law. I have to live within my budget, as a Twp so do you, unless it's ok for me to go next door to my neighbor and demand some money from them also or I won't be nice to them or loan them stuff when needed or watch the house when they aren't there.

Comment_arrow

Gary

10:34 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Judy; at this point if this doesn't pass the layoff will happen, how many that depends on how many retire. The best thing we all can do is vote NO, this way the layoff will happen, and the budget will come in below the needed figure. And then they can figure out what services we can afford. The private garbage is not the end of the world, I have been in Brick since 1958. Years ago Chambers Bridge Road was dirt, two lanes...garbage was picked up in a dump truck, we had septic tanks and well water. Some houses were all electric, and no cable.....and state police....then it happened change.....Water/Sewer, Township Police, Cable....WOW!
Now we have paid EMT's and now PRIVATE GARBAGE......Not a BIG deal! life gos on.....

George

11:54 am on Thursday, March 31, 2011

VOTE NO DON"T GIVE IN TO THE BULLY MAYOR SEND HIM AND HIS COUNCIL A MESSAGE.

Reply

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:03 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Just got a call from a survey company out of Florida regarding this very topic. They wanted to know what services I think should be cut, my approval rating of the Mayor and Council, etc. Who hired this company? How much is this costing the tax payers? - I still have not changed my mind. NO, NO, NO! They asked me what I think should be done differently. I replied that raising taxes is not the “only” answer, only an easy immediate solution to larger problem. Our politicians need to be creative put their minds together and come up with alternate solutions instead of threating the public with service cuts. If other towns and even states can offer much lower property taxes and continued services, Brick should be able to follow suite.

When I moved to NJ in the early 1990’s I was surprised how residence of Brick don’t speak their mind (if they do they never follow up) and allow themselves to be walked upon and don’t get involved. – Brick residents just seem to take the continued abuse and punishment the local goverment dishes out. - WHERE IS OUR MONEY GOING?

Reply

Brick Resident

1:39 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

First off, I would like to relate this response to something simple so everyone can understand - food. Let’s say you need to order a sandwich and you walk into the sandwich shop. The only requirement is that you have to make a sandwich purchase. The sandwich shop has a special, for $5.00 you get your choice of any sandwich, any toppings, chip and a drink. There is also an option to get the same sandwich without toppings, chips and a drink, however it will cost you $7.00 dollars. If I were a betting person, I would say nine times out of ten, the person would buy the special (because you are getting the same sandwich) with other perks for a cheaper price. If you still have not drawn a parallel, the sandwich was garbage pickup and the additional services provided by the Township were the toppings, chips and the drink.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:33 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Sorry, I don't see the parrallel. If the police and public works get cut the sandwich should be $3.00 due to the money saved and the cost for the toppings, chips and drink is an extra $1.50. With the proposed cuts our taxes should decrease not increase. But I'm pipe dreaming.

Brick Resident

1:39 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Continued

Next, people are saying taxes have gone up 25 percent or they are proposed to go up 25 percent. Numbers can be manipulated, let me provide an indisputable example. If something costs 3 dollars, and the price is raised to 6 dollars, it has gone up 100 percent. Sounds like a lot huh? However, 25 percent of 3 dollars is 0.75 cents which is a lot more tolerable. Please keep in mind that the municipal portion of the budget is the absolute smallest. If people are outraged about their tax bill, look at the break down of your bill which is usually included with a tax statement. We, the taxpayers of Brick Township are getting a high level of service for our taxes. This referendum allows us to continue to have that high level of service. If it is voted down, we will still have services, just not at the level you had them (for example, no trash, no plowing, no leave pickup, no “hill”, no senior services, and most importantly no proactive police work.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

6:45 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I did the math off of the Brick Twp. Referendum Fact Sheet. Assuming your property value is $330,000. You currently pay $1,641 (I might be slightly off on the last two digits, b/c I don't have the #s in front of me) and they are proposing a $416 increase. That works out to a 25% tax increase. These numbers are also only the LOCAL portion of our taxes.

Brick Resident

1:40 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Continued

I for one do not condone taxes going up unnecessarily and I certainly do not want to pay anymore than I have to. I am willing to pay for something that I know will be beneficial to everyone overall but most importantly myself. Needless to say, regardless of the referendum, your taxes will go up by at least 2 percent of your municipal taxes. You will be paying to either have your garbage picked up by the town or to have someone else come in and pick it up. Either way, you are going to pay. Some people who budget in their houses usually have two accounts to make payments for things: one for house related material and one for spare change (this does not include a savings account). You can pay to have all of your services through the house account or you can pay to have a portion of your services through your house account and spare change account. In the end you will be paying.

Please do not try and scare people by manipulating numbers, provide facts and the entire scenario like I always try to do.

I respect what everyone has to say and I appreciate the reasonable responses to these posts.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

3:00 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

getting rid of the salaries , health benefits and pensions will save much more over time

VOTE NO

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:46 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

If I recall one of today's survey question correctly, they asked me if I was willing to pay $35 per month to retain the police and garbage services. If this is correct the average homeowner will be paying $420 more per year. When you add on the increases for the fire departments budget which was approved during a sneaky recent Saturday election when only about 200 plus Brick voters turned out. Then add on what the Board of Education wants. Guess what folks? Don’t live with blinders on… Your taxes are going to increase big time unless you vote NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

2:55 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

dont forget the COUNTY !!!!!!!!!

Comment_arrow

Herbertsville

5:11 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Uneducated Brick Resident: How is a an election for fire districts that has been held in February for decades a secret? I was under the impression a responsible voter is aware of all elections and when they are held. It's apathy on your part if you chose not to vote.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

8:28 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Herbertsville it is and easy election to accidently miss when no ballot sheets are mailed and the election is held on a Saturday. I agree apathy on my part... the first election I missed in many, many years. No excuse on my part, but you have to agree that the voter turnout was really poor.

George

2:12 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Concerned I am voting NO and voting all incumbents out in November to send this group a message I hope everybody else does the same.

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

6:46 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I sure do hope you are right.

Jose Deer

2:53 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

VOTE NO AND GRIP !!!

make every voter a TERM LIMIT against career politicians......doesnt matter R or D...when you fianlly realize there is NO difference between the 2 gang of thieves , you will have truly been WOKE UP !

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

3:47 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

This 79 character is going to burst a blood vessel if he doesn't calm down shouting all his phony,baloney figures at everyone. Take 2 zanex and go to bed. you'll feel better in the morning. Then i will send you my bill. Thank you

Comment_arrow

79

5:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

James or may I call you Jim ..... it's not nice to screw with the Easter Bunny ..... "with all due respect" ...... HA HA and the extra property tax when the YES is passed for you, dropped from $350 for the $350,000 home by 1/3rd to about $240/250 .... for the lesser appraised value home .... see ya already saved $100 for the home you have ...... yeah. Also if you paid your through the roof taxes on time, YOU wouldn't have to pay those interest fees HA HA ..... more money into the township bank account.

Comment_arrow

apples&oranges

7:21 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

How many times are you going to cry about the Ice palace Steve?
WHahahha Whaaaaaa.. Baby Baby... No body likes you! Ahahahahhahhh

Christina Weaver

4:39 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Once again, I am agreement with the points raised by Oceangal. I have a house assessed at $227,000. The portion of my taxes that relate to the school budget will rise less than $40. The quality of the school system is intertwined with the value of one's house. I know this from experience; my brothers and I own a house on the market in Rahway where the school system is not good.
With regard to the municipal budget, I SUPPORT it. The math is easy: my taxes are not going to rise as high as it would cost to hire private trash pickup (it's $320 per year in Jackson, not including pickup of recycling). Taxes are deductible for federal and state tax purposes. The cost of private pickup is not. Voting YES means that there won't be the anticipated police dept cuts. Crime rate also affects property value.
All of this is a quality of life issue. Cut out cable tv if necessary, but vote YES for both budgets. It is a relatively small amount of money, money well-spent, an expenditure that IS tax deductible.
Corral your disatisfaction with the council reps and mayor by focusing on the November election. Don't cut off your nose to spite your face. That is, don't vote against the budget because of anger towards the council and mayor. There is too much at stake.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

4:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Christina Weaver ...... nicely spoken and from a clear head AND do NOT bring the politics in the town into this VOTE or discussion ...... for it will NOT affect them one bit with the outcome ..... the citizens of Brick and the people that may loose their jobs ARE the ones affected.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:53 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I could only wish my increase would be the same as yours. Christina your comments reflect the diversity of this town. My house which is newer but modest at just over 2,500 square feet and assessed at well over 4 times your assessment. I pay a lot more in taxes just because I touch water. If I were in your shoes I "may" vote yes unless I wanted to send a message that I'm taxed enough and to stop the increases. Even at your modest $227k assessment you are still being over taxed. It is important that people who are assessed at the average or below understand that they are still facing a large tax increase. Vote NO to stop this ongoing nonsense.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:00 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

In the long run, private garbage pick-up will be cheaper than twp. pickup. And this is why....

Twp. pickup: Employees make $20. + per hour, plus health insurance, and retirement. If the equipment breaks down or has to be replaced, they pay for it through the purchase of bonds (in which interest is paid out like a car loan) or it gets billed to the taxpayer. There are also double digit supervisors on staff. And as insurance rates, wages, and retirement contract agreements go up each year, so do our taxes.

Private Pick-up: Employees will make LESS than $20. per hour, they will pay for health insurance out of pocket or the company will pay a portion of the policy, retirement (if even offered at all) will be in the form of an IRA where the EMPLOYEE makes regular payments and the employer may make a contribution (but this is becoming increasingly less common.) When the private companies equipment breaks, they purchase new equipment. The cost is already built into your contract rate. They will also carry SIGNIFICANTLY less supervisors to keep their overhead down.

Right now we have no actual idea how much garbage pick-up is costing us, but you will know if we go to private. The bottom line is the PRIVATE garbage collection is a much more cost effective route. The private company is in the business to make money, so they work hard to be efficient. The township is not a business and could care less about being efficient, b/c 'hell it's not my money.'

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

8:05 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Sorry Christina, but you just don't get the big picture here! Nor do you understand that this is a temporary fix to a longer term problem.

Christina Weaver

4:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

since [Mayor Acropolis] makes more money in TR, I'd give up my Brick salary, have all my council members that have FT jobs give back their pay and benefits if their spouse's have benefits. I'd start there as a show of good faith, but then again, I'm not a politician, I’m just a silly humanitarian.

Dear Jonnyboy,
With respect to your March 30 post above: I believe the journalist, Dan Nee, told us that none of the council reps get benefits. He also said that one of the council reps gives back his salary.
I entirely agree with you that the mayor gets fulltime pay for two "fulltime" jobs. This is unconscionable.

Reply

disgusted homeowner

5:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Some people on this site really should calm down and take a nap or something. Maybe they need a sedative, there's gonna be a rash of high blood pressure !!!!!!!!!

My personal favorite::: Think snow vote no !!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:03 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

James or may I call you Jim ..... it's not nice to screw with the Easter Bunny ..... "with all due respect" ...... HA HA and the extra property tax when the YES is passed for you, dropped from $350 for the $350,000 home by 1/3rd to about $240/250 .... for the lesser appraised value home .... see ya already saved $100 for the home you have ...... yeah. Also if you paid your through the roof taxes on time, YOU wouldn't have to pay those interest fees HA HA ..... more money into the township bank account.

john

5:10 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

I think maybe you should call yourself "disgusting homeowner". your comments are no more than that of a babbling idiot, you contribute nothing to the debate. While I don't agree with everyone I will listen to the people who do it in an intelligent way. You should find a hobby.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:17 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

John ..... exactly MY thoughts and prior words and YES for the VOTE and YES for the "disgusting homeowner" ..... even his neighbors say the same thing.

Comment_arrow

apples&oranges

7:19 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

WOW 79 you sound EXACTLY like STEVE? WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA Cry Baby! You want to come on over MY house? I am having a Bon fire party!
Come on Down Steve.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:05 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

john, it's still a free country and i will respectfully say as i please. if you don't like it, then skip over it, the same way i will skip over any more of your ignorant postings.

walt tupycia

5:43 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

what crime do you guys have in brick.serious stolen bike

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:58 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

A little less then Toms River ..... they steal two at a time there .... BIG time

Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

6:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

they are being robbed by their town government more than they have ever been or will be robbed by a criminal !!!

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

7:12 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

LOL!....That was awesome Jose, b/c you are right we are being robbed by our own gov't. Shhhhhhh....I hear someone chuckling, "Suuuuuckers."

apples&oranges

7:16 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

VOTE NO!
What happen to Daniel Nee? Daniel why do you let 79 pass threats? I have not noticed one of his posts deleted. It is ok to say "Screw with the Easter Bunny?" Dan?
We all know the personal attacks Steve gives his employer.
You have no support in Brick " Easter Bunny" . You have no support in Toms River " Easter Bunny"
I am so upset, I am waiting for the Easter Bunny to come, You screwed with the wrong taxpayer " Easter Bunny". Talk about the biggest baby.. WHAAAAAA Steve... You did not get the Ice Palace! WHAAAAAAAA... Too Bad. You tried to zap Scarpelli.. Look in the mirror.
Whahhahahha WHAAAAAAA... NO NO NO NO NO NO NO NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

7:46 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

"I am so upset, I am waiting for the Easter Bunny to come ......"

I expected you to say "I get NO respect"....... but instead you wrote NO NO NO ..... keys stuck with rage?? Your BUDDY "disgusting homeowner" deleted his bunny thing ..... and I deleted what I told him ... PROBLEM??

My fear is the cut back in the school system, because it surly has affected your train of thought and writings?? I haven't seen such writing since they release this guy from the YOU know the .......ward.

George

7:42 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

VOTE NO AND VOTE OUT ALL INCUMBENTS SEND A MESSAGE TO THIS GROUP.

Reply

JB

9:55 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

How does the Mayor predict that with this referendum passing Brick will be in good shape for the next 4+ years?
I do like my garbage picked up by the township, so does the rest of us seeing it overwhelmingly passed keeping Twp. garbage in November elections. They should save $$ and close on Mondays.
I don't like the idea of laying off police officers, although there are way too many cops in town making big bucks ($100,000+ count them). They should take pay freezes for the next 2 decades.
Vote YES for Referendum and SCHool Budget!
Vote NO on Mayor(when is time comes) and ALL Incumbent Council Members!
They have FAILED US!

Reply

Christina Weaver

10:06 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

JB I agree with you:

Vote YES for Referendum and School Budget on APRIL 27
In November, vote AGAINST Mayor Acropolis by voting out the current councilmembers

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

10:23 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

A good start is to vote out 3 of the current BOE members on April 27th. Another bunch of crooks. This is where we need to begin our quest to oust the greedy and try to get some folks who actually care about the kids and their education. Next on the list is the family and friends regime on the Town Council. I never see any ideas for working within our means, only asking for more. Not one of them have offered to give up benefits, second high-paying jobs, pay freezes, a stop to ridiculous raises, hiring more adminstrators and the list goes on and on.
Start with the BOE on April 27th. Terebush OUT! Enough of the bullying of the citizens and taxpayers!!

Jose Deer

10:07 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

i like to play chess (and im actually quite good at it) so you always have to look 3 moves ahead and apparently the Mayor likes to play chess as well (but isnt that good at it)

IF you are foolish enough to vote yes , you are voting for the mayor to be relected because come relection year the Mayor will have your taxes raised to a high enough level where he will not have to raise or cut anything and use that as his campaign slogan the entire election, while everyone will have long forgotten about this important fight......than of course as soon as he is relected he will use the same tactics against you........rinse and repeat

so you do all the hard work for him and than he takes all the credit !!!!

anything but a VOTE NO is a vote for relection of the Mayor

Reply
Comment_arrow

john

5:56 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

That statement makes no sense. Talk about November in November.This is about services you will lose not your disdain for this administration, lets not confuse the two

JB

10:13 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

No way Jose! I won't forget his dirty tricks..........I'm keeping my quality of life and I will remember what I had to pay to keep them. OR If I have to pay for Private garbage collection and feel the hit of less cops and more crime in town, I still will NOT forget!
The Mayor is going to be shown the door either way.

Reply

George

10:35 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Wake up people you are being strong armed by them Mayor and Council send them a message VOTE NO and vote out all incumbents and mean it.

Reply

Gary

10:49 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

If you vote yes everything stays the same, and the increase will be about 25% easy......and next year another increase, and another in year three.......so if you make a lot of money and like spending it like a fool...vote Yes............But if you are like me, and care about your FAMILY, and your CHILDREN and where you will be living in three years.....you will VOTE NO.....we need to see what the township can afford, the yes vote just stays the same....balance budget DONE.....Please think of your CHILDREN, CAN THEY LIVE IN THE FUTURE BRICK.......Thank you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

8:21 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

GARY............YOU say ".........and the increase will be about 25% easy......and next year another increase ..............."

SO if MY taxes are say as a example $4000 a year, for MY lets say $350,000 home, they will go up $1000 a year "when" the YES is voted in. Geeeee YOU have really opened my eyes to the "real truth" showing me that I will be paying $5000 a year for my home. I AM truly glade that WE have people like you writing and telling the "real truth behind this VOTE" ....... "April FOOL" day for you for sure!!! Ya know they say there is a fool born EVERY day and you are one of them IF you believe your own writing ..... the problem IS the majority of those that read your stuff are NOT fools. Just common sense would clear that up??

VOTE "YES" all around and that IS for the "REAL TRUTH"

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

2:27 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Yes, Gary, your prediction is absolutely correct. The referendum would mean a 25% local tax increase for THIS YEAR and people read back through my comments from yesterday, would could be facing a much larger tax hike next year.

79: I'm sorry to say that it is YOU who is the fool. They have you hook, line, and sinker. Voting yes, will most certainly not get you any "real truth", whatever that actually is.

George

11:02 pm on Thursday, March 31, 2011

Absolutely Gary we have to send this group a message and vote no and vote out all incumbents.

Reply

Jose Deer

12:01 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

i changed my mind ........VOTE YES

APRIL FOOLS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

6:24 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

All these scare tactics and bullying. People act like the world is going to end the day after the referendum vote. Totally ridiculous. Sometimes folks CHANGE is for the Better !!!! Think about it.

Joseph Woolston Brick

6:04 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

I'm amazed that people on here are saying the police department will disapear! That simply is not true. Even if it did back in the day the State Police patroled Brick and did a good job of it. Then people are freaking out about the garbage pickup to which I have a question. If we were forced to go private pickup. Will all the trucks the township own be sold? All the one arm bandits, all the old trucks? How about all the one arm bandit collection containers? I will make a bet, if the vote turns out to be a resounding NO, that all the threats will stop and monies will be magically found. Acropolis may be a bully, but he's not stupid.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

6:58 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Joseph; if the vote is no the layout will proceed....this is not the Fed. we don't print money in Brick. The only thing is the number may be less, but I think the garbage is going. The time has come, we just cannot afford this. One reason is the Police dept. is very over paid in this town.
A patrolman after 5 years average $109,000. plus benefits...this is very high.

Comment_arrow

79

8:43 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

GARY......................"A patrolman after 5 years average $109,000. plus benefits...this is very high".

25% INCREASE and now THIS ...... ANOTHER "LIE"

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

9:55 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Gary,
Please fact find before you throw numbers out there, you lose credibility when you are proven incorrect. A 5 year patrolman with the Brick Township Police Department makes anywhere from 75K to 83K base salary not the 109K you are talking about....you are off base by anywhere from 34K to 26K. In addition, a patrolman who has been on the department for 19 years does not even make that much.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

2:30 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Joseph, you are absolutely correct. In one of the council meetings the mayor ever so carefully hinted at exactly what you are saying. That's why I won't be a fool and vote in favor of the referendum. You have to listen ever so carefully to what is being said during the meetings, b/c well it's politics and things are rarely presented clearly and effectively.

disgusted homeowner

6:05 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

"What a tangled web they weave
When first they practice to deceive".

Reply

Gary

7:07 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Toms River balanced there budget, Brick always compares it self to Toms River....um!
This is the time to fix the problem, and if it means the loss of 150 this is a small price.
Private pickup will be good, and in the long run save the township from a lot of money.
What is the big deal, everybody makes this out to big bad, why? This year I got Verizon
Fios installed, it felt good to change after having Comcast for 30 plus years with no choice.
Now I will get a change to pick my garbage, I am going with the company that will go in the yard to get it....how cool is that, Change and Choice is Good...Vote NO, THANK YOU

Reply

disgusted homeowner

7:20 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Folks, people change their cell phone carriers and the world doesn't end. They change their car insurance, change their cable and computer providers. Remeber when you only had 1 choice as to your tv/cable provider in each town??? Now that has changed. People can now even change their electric suppliers. It's called choice. Change many times works out for the better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

9:57 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

People change because of promotional rates usually. This is the same as garbage that your friend showed you the $64.00 bill. We are getting a promotional rate every year by keeping the garbage in house. The government is a not for profit agency.
If I remember correctly you said that she just changed to the new company. I know people who are still with the same company with at paying a little of $100.00 a quarter for trash and recycling pickup.

forthekids

7:22 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Steve's strategy since he came to power is very clear, he wants to get rid of all the Dems that Joe put in place over his many years in power. Guarantee this LAYOFF list doesn't include his ever growing friends and family club, the ones who all got raises this past year. This is the way the two party system works, he will lay off all of the "OLD" regime and start rehiring the "NEW" regime, meet the new Boss, same as the old Boss, isn't that how the song goes. Corrupt dirty politics the NJ and American way, and the taxpayers suffer as usual.

Reply

Gary

8:25 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

I really feel the Mayors days are numbered, if this vote comes in NO....So not to worried are his power. And when this is complete, many people will be watching this town closely. The time has come to fix this problem, and the only way is a NO vote. Anybody that thinks a Yes vote will fix it is a fool. The only thing that will do is continue the problem in the years to come, hoping for State money. Wake up people, this is what this town needs, stop thinking about the 150 layouts....Start caring about your family and children......The Township and PBA have the public brainwash over the garbage, and crime....its not that back. Everybody remember the Brick safest city story, that was all a little over the top. The crime is the same, and most of the real problems are in the Condo city area from the 70's "North Brick" and an easy fix if the cops started doing real street police work in these areas......Brick you better wake up, or your taxes are going to force you out................VOTE NO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

8:49 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

GARY your "LIE" and fabrication ARE out of hand.

(1) "A patrolman after 5 years average $109,000. plus benefits...this is very high....."

(2) "If you vote yes everything stays the same, and the increase will be about 25% easy......and next year another increase, and another in year three.......so if you......."

TWO LIES and if this continues you and Pinocchio WILL look a like. BOTH are lie so far other there they can't be seen. The majority of people that write within this comment section "tell the truth" BUT YOU???????

Like I with a few of your comments the ONLY fool here on this April Fools Day IS YOU.

Comment_arrow

Doug

12:08 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Hey 79, It might serve you better to stop attacking people on this site. If you think someones facts are wrong, than show proof and/or explanation, not your absurd comments of Pinocchio and calling people fools. It comes of as childish and no one is going to take you seriously at all. Try and remember these are folks that are residents and taxpayers that are very concerned about their future as well as their children. The TC is not open and has not communicated well at all as to why we are in this situation, there justification for absurd raises, new hires, second full time jobs and the list goes on and on. Get a grip on yourself and try to have a meaningful discussion. Making statements like "I know where you live" is just another reason for people to believe that you are Steve. Those bullying tactics have been seen before. You need to stop attacking everyone that doesn't have the exact same foresight as your own.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

2:58 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79:
Sorry to burst your bubble but Gary is NOT lying. Patrolman make over $100,000 a year plus benefits after 7 years to be exact. This was the EXACT wording on the November ballot. Perhaps you need to get up to speed on the FACTS.

As I stated yesterday on the "fact sheet" created by the township a property value of $330,000 pays $1,692 in township property taxes. This property owner would pay an additional $416 in local property taxes, should the referendum pass.

Now, since you are going to be nasty to everyone else I shall do the same to you....please get your calculator handy.....

416 divided by 1,692 = 0.245 , now multiply that by 100 to convert this into a % and you get......drum roll please....... 24.5 ...... yup that's 25%

So now who's lying 79?

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

3:50 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Was away today but about the police salary debate. I personally know two brick police patrolman. I just visited the APP data universe site and punched in their full names and info. one is on the force 6 yrs , the other 7 yrs. $91,000 and $98,000 respectively is their base pay WITHOUT overtime. I think gary's numbers are much more accurate than some others i just read.

ps, though i do agree with many of Gary's posts, i am not Gary and Gary is not me. I was out of Brick on business today.

George

8:43 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Just vote NO if they want their council seats they will find a way to work this out send a message.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:31 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

That REAL good .... sacrifice 29+171 peoples jobs and professions that will be lost along with a LOT more and THEIR families income and thier futures for "send a message" ..... VOTE YES

Concerned Brick Citizen

8:48 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Don’t you realize that the taxes have to be raised because Brick is such an expensive place to live? The employees who live in this town depend on that increase from taxes to pay for their increasing taxes! – Paradox?

Reply

George

9:05 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Concerned they need to get rid of the dead wood in town hall anmd the hidden luxuries they are hiding Vote NO stand up to them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:13 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

What does that have to do with the 29 Officers AND the 171 other town employee that may loose their job ...... YOU are mixing POLITICS with REALITY??? save your hatred for that specific story OR go to town meeting and speak out??? ..... doesn't has a place within this story GEORGE, sorry?!

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:02 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79: You are confusing politics with FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY. The problem with the system is that there NEVER should have been this many people on the township payroll to begin with. The sad and unfortunate truth is that politics is so ingrained in the way our state and town operates that is had become reality.

79

9:08 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

I was reading a story that is similar to the one here of a Town in the northern part of New Jersey. In that town the average property tax for a $350,000 house/property IS $10,000 per year for property taxes. Which is far above the amount here in Brick.

As they, "someone has to be largest and someone has to be the smallest". Unfortunately, New Jersey IS the largest just about ALL around. New Jersey has the highest property taxes ...... highest vehicle insurance ..... highest sales tax etc. in the country. Probably the ONLY thing that IS not the highest IS the price of a gallon of gas, which I can't understand because some pumps your gas for YOU and in other sates YOU pump your own gas. Hope they don't figure that one out ..... give them time AND the Politicians WILL.

If you feel safe in your community and enjoy your serices the way they are and are able to pay the $30 extra per month for a $350,000 property along with a slight increase in school taxes ...... VOTE YES

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

12:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

We don't have the highest sales tax in the country. If you are going to continue to abuse posters about getting their facts straight, then get your own straight

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:04 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79: State oil refineries are what keep our gas prices down in comparison to the rest of the country.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:06 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

BUT, if you want to decrease government spending, decrease government control aka corruption, decrease twp. payroll, become more fiscally responsible, and simplify the way the township operates.....

then you vote NO!!!

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

12:23 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

79 can't you see the end game here? We've been told that the avg taxes are $7,200 the powers that be want to get our taxes more in line with the state avg.

To do this they are trying whatever they can except they could be putting that same effort into keeping our taxes low and still provide service to the residents.

Gary

9:11 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

A lot of employees don't even live in Brick....
And 79 why don't you correct me with the exact figures "fool"
What does a cop make in Brick after 5 yrs. ?
And if we vote yes what will the increase be?
Waiting for your answer...........?
The bottom line this town is broken.......thank you!

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:07 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Gary:
Please see above when 79 responded to your initial comment. I was more than happy to set the record straight. ; )

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:13 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Here! I copied my earlier response for convenience....

"79:
Sorry to burst your bubble but Gary is NOT lying. Patrolman make over $100,000 a year plus benefits after 7 years to be exact. This was the EXACT wording on the November ballot. Perhaps you need to get up to speed on the FACTS.

As I stated yesterday on the "fact sheet" created by the township a property value of $330,000 pays $1,692 in township property taxes. This property owner would pay an additional $416 in local property taxes, should the referendum pass.

Now, since you are going to be nasty to everyone else I shall do the same to you....please get your calculator handy.....

416 divided by 1,692 = 0.245 , now multiply that by 100 to convert this into a % and you get......drum roll please....... 24.5 ...... yup that's 25%

So now who's lying 79? "

George

9:17 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 the scare tactics aren't working we are voting NO to send those in power a message and we will go with GRIP in November till it stops bottom line.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:20 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

......... first THEY don't have to and second about $75,000 "FOOL"

Facts ARE facts and YOU write "LIES" and the ONLY scare tactics ARE people like YOU ..... most readers WILL read through YOUR "smok in glass".

79

9:24 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

".....And if we vote yes what will the increase be?"

I don't know YOU tell me you have ALL they false answers?? That FACTS have been drawn "MANY times" about what it WILL be, with a value amount ..... did YOU read those parts or breeze past that??

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

12:14 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

And the total overall increase works out to roughly 25% with the county, state, local and BOE increases. That number is close to accurate. Then there will be next years request and the one after that. When does it end? When we get these crooks out of office.

79

9:27 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Ya know GEORGE I'm not going to waist my breath or fingers with you anymore with this story. Facts ARE facts and YOU surly do write this. Everything that I have written is a FACT ....... those reasonable thinking readers out there will weed through it ALL. You have good intentions but the facts are off.

Reply

George

9:29 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 it is still NO a simple 3 letter word we are going to exercise our power.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:39 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Well take the 3 letter word for a score of "3" and give youself "3 more" for the word "our" in your sentence AND that gives you a total of "6" .... and the total amount of people on your side. VOTE YES and GEORGE thank you for voting and being allowed the liberty to do so here in America ..... even though it is the wrong decision, I can only "respect that vote" but NOT agree for what it is.

George

9:36 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 NO IS THE WAY IT WILL GO WE ARE SENDING A MESSAGE .

Reply

disgusted homeowner

9:39 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

There was a factual mistatement on here this morning about NJ being the "highest" in so many categories. Our 7% sales tax is not. New York 8.25% on everything including food and clothing, Missouri, the show me state, 8% on everything including food and clothing. There a few others down south and west that follow suit. So please give NJ some credit when credit is due.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:46 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Thank you D/H for bringing up what I wrote and that YOU say about the sales tax and IF they are wrong, I am sorry for that misrepresentation to the readers. BUT unfortunately the other facts are true ...... love IT or leave IT.

Jose Deer

9:39 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Take every one in your household who is of voting age and make sure they VOTE NO

Tell every neighbor and friend to VOTE NO

VOTE NO, Then GRIP and Watch them GO !

Reply

George

9:44 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Absolutely Jose NO is the way to go.

Reply

Brick Resident

10:11 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Gary,
Please fact find before you throw numbers out there; you lose credibility when you are proven incorrect. A 5 year patrolman with the Brick Township Police Department makes anywhere from 75K to 83K base salary not the 109K you are talking about. You are off base by 34K to 26K respectively. In addition, a patrolman who has been on the department for 19 years does not even make that much.

CShorShell,
Police do if fact deter crime. There mere presence simply deters crime - do you see drug dealers dealing when a Police Officer is in sight? If you read case law, most drug dealers are caught by plain clothes Police Officers. Drug traffickers are caught by simple motor vehicle stops.

There is no way to accurately determine how much crime Police deter because there is no way to tell if a crime was going to be committed. Same thing goes for speeding. People speed, but when they see a patrol car they slow down. Do you ever see a car go faster when they see a patrol car? Why do you think there are now terms called "counter surveillance" and "look outs"? People fear they will be caught. Even when police are not around, there is a psychological term called "ghost police (I am unable to find a hyperlink at the moment to provide an example)" People are wired to think that Police are everywhere. Why do people look around and scan the area before they do something wrong? These few examples name just a few reasons why Police do in fact deter crime.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

10:20 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

"Brick Resident" ...... AS usual WELL stated and the FACTS and the TRUTH that ALL should be writing !!! MY decision would be YES based on those principles.

Thank You

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:27 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident:
You are correct plain clothes police officers...my cousin is one of them. However, Brick disassembled (for lack of a better term) their gang/drug task force that was VERY successful to put them on regular patrol. This is one reason why we are seeing an increase in drug and gang activity. So there, I just made an argument for the need or more police officers; HOWEVER, we need to re-evaluate their contracts before doing that! Police only deter crime for that moment that they are in site and in a particular location. So as soon as the officer leaves a location, here comes the perp.

Okay, now you're grasping at straws on the effectiveness of police officer presence. Remember today's attitude is 'just don't get caught.'

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:29 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Oh! And in response to the officers salaries....

The November ballot question clearly stated that new officers would start out at $50,000 per year and make over $100,000 per year after 7 years. Right about now I wish I still had that piece of paper!

localexpert

10:19 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

VOTE NO.. Every year the powers to be ask for more and more.This is the time to draw a line in the sand.Of the 278 comments 90% are NO,stay with your gut and dont change.Brian D. GETS A PINK SLIP from Merril Lynch,but the political club gets him a government job running the D.M.V. in Lakewood..Why not make cuts in town hall,rec and family before going after the two things we cherish the most. This move will backfire on them twice,once this month and in Nov. Same with the B.O.E. just keep asking for more...WE ARE BROKE,VOTE NO,THROW ALL INCUMBENTS OUT...

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

10:25 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

SEE another lets vote no for "POLITICAL reasons" and NOT the people like YOU and I that it WILL affect. Shoot from the hip comments are NOT FACTS and bringing POLITICS into this VOTE and it is WRONG.

......... and the 278 comments at this time ARE repeat "offenders"

Comment_arrow

Brick Resident

10:29 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Localexpert,
90 percent of the votes on this are not no. Although I would not like to admit it, I did in fact count the votes on this page yesterday by taking my time to scroll through the posts. At that time, not including duplicated votes the yes vote had it by 14 to 9. Out of the 281 comments, I would only estimate there is about 35 different people on here - some post way more than other.

Comment_arrow

Doug

12:20 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I totally agree. ALL incumbents must go. Starting with 3 on the BOE this April 27th. They have done a great disservice to our kids and their right to an education. We can't turn the clock back and these kids only get one go-around to get that education. The current incumbent BOE has failed them miserably while lining their pockets and pet projects with our tax dollars. Bye-Bye Terebush!

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:32 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79:

What does being BROKE have to do with politics? It's called being FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE. At this point given how much you want everyone in town to pay for services so badly, my gut tells me you are not good with finances.

George

10:27 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

localexpert that is the way to go VOTE NO SEND A MESSAGE AND VOTE GRIP in November.

Reply

Brick Resident

11:07 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Gary,
A lot of employees do live in Brick. They probably live around you unless you live on the water. In my development, there are about 10 Brick employees.

Originally, I provided exact numbers in a response, but it somehow deleted itself.
If your house is assessed at 300K (300,000 x .000823 = you refendum increase) you are looking at approxamitely $342.00 tax increase, or 28.50 a month total for all three budgets. Next year your taxes will go up about 60 to 90 dollars or 6 to 7.50 a month - again for all three budgets. There will be no referendum question next year if this one passes.

Although I already answered a Brick "Cop" does not make 109K in 5 years. It is more like 75 to 83 - it depends if you consider if year 1 is a year or not.

I have noticed that one poster stated that their house was assessed at four times of 227K. This is not including that their house is "touching" water. Naturally anyone with a million dollar house on the water, would vote no, it is counter productive and not cost efficient. It is however possible that a person may, although I am not accusing anyone of this, will try to get people to vote no because it is in their best interest and not to a person with their house assessed lower than 350K.

Please vote on facts at hand and cost savings. The time to be angry with Politicians and to send them a message is in November. Please make an informed decision.

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

11:53 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident, you say: "Next year your taxes will go up about 60 to 90 dollars or 6 to 7.50 a month - again for all three budgets. There will be no referendum question next year if this one passes."

I don't know where you got the info that there will be "no referendum question next year" this is the first time I'm hearing about this, if it's true then this is just another reason why people MUST VOTE NO this year.

This is the time to get out and vote and VOTE NO, I can only use the triple play comparison so many times but this is the year that people in Brick can stand up and be heard loud and clear about the mishandling of our Twp funds, the BOE and those that are up for reelection and the Nov. vote for council.

Opportunities like this do not come around very often. *IF* what you say is true that WE WILL NOT GET TO VOTE NEXT YEAR to exceed a budget CAP then this is with out a doubt the year to put it to bed and get get down to business.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:03 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I would vote yes if the way taxes are calculated would be more fair. I would be very happy to pay $28.50 more per month to keep the current services. But I know this is not a reality for me and many others. I could never sell my house for over a million in today’s market yet I’m taxed as though I live in a million dollar plus home. - The point I’m trying to make is that every house should pay an equal amount for trash, schools, fire and police. Then calculate/add in the property and improvements. Why the sliding scale? I’m not receiving any better services versus the person whose house is assessed average or below. I’m most cases I receive worse service. I was among the last to be plowed out this winter. For what I’m paying I should be first. I should be receiving gifts and thank you cards from local families because I paying a lot more than they do for the children’s education and other services. I’m also responsible for keeping "YOUR" tax rate down because I pay more.

Regarding the police force, I wish I had my camera after coming home from food shopping. There was a police cruiser stopped in the middle of the right lane with their lights flashing and three officers standing there watching of all things and duck sitting in the middle of road on Mantoloking near the intersection of Old Hooper. – At least the ducks are safe.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:42 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident:
You are apparently not up on some of the state issues that could ultimately result in Christie giving townships NO aid next year for 2013. So if you think that they aren't going to come back with a referendum question next time around, you are in for a rude awakening. The only reason the BOE didn't ask to exceed the 2% cap is because they knew it wouldn't stand a chance with the current referendum question being put on the ballot.

I have absolutely NO idea where you think you're getting a cost savings. Yesterday I posted the difference between the costs involved in a public vs. private trash collection operation. Please go back and read it. PRIVATE COLLECTION IS CHEAPER.

Yes, you are correct that it works out to be a very little tax increase on a monthly basis. But, some of us, just don't want to give the township one more dime! It has nothing to do with the politicians. It has everything to do with the need to DOWNSIZE GOVERNMENT and lessen then number of public employees......There I said it. I know I sound like a cold heartless individual, but the bottom line is that the town and state cannot keep this many people on its payroll. It's just not sustainable!!!!

George

11:19 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

Gary April is the time to vote NO to let the politicians know we are tired of fiscal mismanagement which got us where we are today.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

2:10 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Hey DW / AKA Gary ..... politics should NOT be here it's NOT part of the title of the story ..... wrong story ..... duh

clamdigger

11:38 am on Friday, April 1, 2011

about 10:45am today I was lucky enough to see one of our Twp employees in one of the Twp small white pick up trucks driving on Rt88, turn right on Midstreams Road all while talking on his phone held up to his left ear. i couldn't make out the truck # but it's nice to see that the rules of the road don't apply to those that drive our trucks, maybe this person wasn't to concerned about his job.

Reply

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:45 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I want to add that our town has so many stupid laws. One for example is that you have to pay $5 for a yard sale permit. I always obey the law and purchase my permit. Advertise, put up signs (never on street signs or telephone poles) and collect them every night. I was tired of my neighbors setting up shop without a permit piggy backing on my advertising. So I complained to town hall… Guess what. There is no one from code enforcement who works weekends. I will never pay for this permit again and advise anyone if you want to have a yard sale on Saturday and Sunday on impulse just do it. Why does the town have such stupid laws in place when they don’t enforce them? DUMB, DUMB, DUMB…

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:48 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Oh by the way... time dated photos mean nothing. I don't even think their is a fine amount.

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:56 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Yup, but they were recently driving around to inspect peoples property to make sure it was neat and tidy. I got a letter in the mail 2 mos. ago that I need to remove debris from my side yard b/c I was in violation of the code and if I didn't do it they were summonsing me for court! Ummmm.... my house is under construction. Where should I put the one small garbage can and couple pieces of plywood??? My neighbors house is a pig-sty with crap all over their dirt front property, but I got a letter in the mail to clean up my property that I am dumping tens of thousands of dollars into to turn a dump into a really nice house. The permit sticker is very clearly shown in the window! Seriously, you're going to penalize me for trying to clean up a crappy house? <Beep>

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:29 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

You’re making a huge mistake! Any improvement to your property, will mean higher taxes. I made the same mistake. I greatly improved my property and now I'm paying the price. "We" should receive a tax abatement for making improvements and improving the neighborhood. There are may people in code violation in my area... it seems to be pick and choose. If you don't make waves the township leaves you alone. Make waves and you are a problem.

George

1:01 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Concerned they put more energy into these type laws than they do on the financial problems that are really hurting the community as a whole.

Reply

Gary

1:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

First sorry to get everyone upset...the better line is they do make that much. It may require overtime, but the average cop after 5 years is taking home 109k, and talk to me next year about the 25% increase.....you people are all fools......this is the time to fix the problem and you wish to continue to pay more every year,,,,,FOOLS

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

2:08 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

".......but the average cop after 5 years is taking home 109k"

AND

"......talk to me next year about the 25% increase"

hey "DW" / AKA Gary ..... where do you think the OT will come from "out of the air"?? ..... boy your finances must be in order???????????????

LIES .... LIES .... and more LIES .... you "should" BE ashamed of yourself .... BUT then look at your OTHER comments???

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

3:58 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Forget it Gary! I KNOW you are telling the truth. The numbers were clearly written on last November's ballot question. 79 just thinks that by yelling louder that the rest of us won't be heard. The only problem is that 79 doesn't realize HE is making a fool of himself. Usually those that constantly call other liars, ARE THE LIARS.....it's called PROJECTION.

I'm with you Gary! NO it is on April 27th.

Ann Holmgren

1:42 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I've got a great idea Mr. Mayor! Why don't you take some of the money you earn from your second full time job in Toms River and donate it to Brick, and we wouldn't have a shortfall anymore! If you think you are going to bully the people of this township into voting your way, you have another thing coming to you! I say NO! NO! NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

2:31 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Ann .... I am sure you have good intentions with what YOU have stated and how you feel about the Mayor and how he makes his money ..... but as I have stated to "only a few that comment within this story" ..... "Politics do NOT have a place here". This IS a story about a VOTE that will take place later this month for continued Police ranks and continued other service AND the future of those 29+171 employees "AND" their families AND if you want private garbage P/U if the vote is no ...... nothing more or less. The FACTS have been presented by may AND you should weed through the "liars and fabricators" that write comments within this story. For all I know you live in a million dollar house and that $350 for a $350,000 house/property is multiplied almost by 4. BUT the fact of the matter IS for private garbage PU or an increase in taxes there wouldn't really be much of a difference except for the town loosing 29 fine officers and the security and protection they provide 27/7/365 fro the citizens with the borders of Brick AND loosing services from the rest of the 171 other township employees.

ANY reasonable thinking person would VOTE YES ........... good luck and try and keep politics OFF the table!

Brick Resident

1:51 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

concerned,

Your dispute about you taxes stem from the founding fathers of this country. The way taxes work are based on your ability to pay them. Therefore if you have a million dollar house then you pay the applicable tax. You can not be angry at the current politicians because this has been around longer than your time and mine combined

This referendum will only be for this yeat, this has been discussed at many counsil meetings. This referrndum is to adjust in the transition of the tax caps and changes in tax laws.

Finally, to judge the police by one facet of their job simply is not fair. I didnt hear anyoone complain when they took a gun off of a guy at a local 711 store. Besides, I am sure the police would have responded to another call if,neefed dispite if the ducks were still in the road. The only difference then is they would be labeled as people who do not care about animals. The police in this state especially are never appriciated.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

3:52 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident, I didn't mean to put down the police. I just thought the situation was cute and actually funny. I'm sure they would have responded to an actual emergency. What does upset me is that I've seen people using hand held cell phones and even while passing our police who obviously see them and don't take action. I do respect law enforcement and was an Explorer Scout involved with my local police post/department in early times – But not in New Jersey.

If I were alive back in 1776, I would have fought the founding fathers. It was not fair then and is not fair today. Keep in mind that I’m not wealthy. I’m an average citizen whose property happens to touch the water. The property cost only less than double an inland property at that time. So why today is the land worth 4 times as more? Anyone who knows me knows I’m not made of money, but the Township sure thinks I am. Like I stated before, I’ve made a choice… The house is for sale… for much less than a million. Best buy today if you want a waterfront property. Blows Princeton Avenue prices away!

parkway

2:20 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

well I can tell you the average public works employee is not even making half that after 10 15 and 20 years and for the few who may be lax there are many more hard workers giving back the little raise that they got.

Reply

Concerned Brick Citizen

2:28 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

For the property owners who pay the average or below don’t think this is the end of your tax increases. You need to look at the percentage amount of your tax increase. Why it might seem low at $35 there will be more added to it this year as well as next and so on, maybe by the same percentage, maybe less or more. The point is that if you want to make a statement to the powers that be that they need to control spending better, vote NO. If you vote yes, the abuses will just continue. Even though personal situations are different for every family, are they really? I was always a hard worker but never earned more than what the average police officer is making in Brick, but I knew how to budget. While I may live in a waterfront home, I’m not a recent wealthy buy in. The property was in the family since the 1940’s. I pay almost double in taxes a year versus what the property and house cost. Lofty taxes have cut into my discretionary income. High taxes also hurts local restaurants and businesses. -- I spend less. My personal choice is to put my home up for sale, downsize and enjoy a better quality of life elsewhere. Think about qualtiy of life. You only live once. Why spend it working two jobs with no personal time, or working to get extra income in your senior years.

It was mentioned that other NJ towns charge more in taxes versus Brick. That is because their spending is also out of control. To compare another town in North Jersey with Brick is irrelevant.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

4:22 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

"Concerned Brick Citizen" ...... when you get done with your "Crystal Ball viewings and theory for the Township of Brick, PLEASE get me the Lotto Numbers for next week?? .... AND maybe how this VOTING will go with ALL the incorrect numbers being written out there from those that oppose the YES??

VOTE YES ..... for "TRUTH and JUSTICE and the American Way"..... AMEN ..... whoops, IS that politically correct in this day and age?? Oh well

Comment_arrow

CShorShell

4:28 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Well said! Thank you! You are preaching to the choir here.

I'm sorry to hear that you are considering selling your home. I've looked online to see what the waterfront property homes pay in taxes. It's disgusting! Many properties pay $40,000 a year in taxes. That right there should be a good indicator about just how out of control twp. spending is. Their garbage and services usage isn't any more or less than the rest of us. But b/c people see them as "rich" they feel its okay to take their hard earned money away. That's simply NOT okay. I don't care if someone is a millionaire or an average joe living on the water. Those that pays those hefty taxes are the ones who float those that either do not pay at all or who pay very little. In fact they probably float the majority of this town. That's not right.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

5:38 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 Happy to help... the pick 6 lotto numbers are V-O-T-E-N-O

George

2:29 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 the word is vote NO NO and GRIP in November it is time for a change we are tired of all the excuses we want results.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

4:25 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

....what IS "GRIP" ..... I know the usual meaning BUT?? never mind :-)

79

2:42 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

George ....... which NOVEMBER do you mean?? and what IS you explained meaning?? ...... the only one I know IS November 6th 2012, when one term NOBAMA will be voted out of office??

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

4:43 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Please just stop. I can't listen/read this crap anymore. Everyone here is happy to listen to opposing views and share counter arguments/information. But your non-stop spouting of utter nonsense that lacks truth, intelligence, or any form of well developed thought is just down right disgraceful. So for the love of God, Shut up!

I am going to stop there before I say something inappropriate.

George

2:51 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

79 the four council seats that expire this year and I didn't vote for Obama either.

Reply

George

4:18 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Christina Weaver GRIP is an acronym for Get Rid of Incumbent Politicians OK.

Reply

JB

4:37 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

The bottom line here is that it's a quality of life issue.
It's not just about public v private garbage or 171 more people on unemployment including 29 police officers.
Privatizing garbage means no recycling center, no dropping off brush or bulk items in its proper place.....instead we can dump it in the woods!
No township workers mean no snow removal, no recycling, no park cleanups........who will be taking care of this?
Less cops mean more opportunites for criminals.

I will be voting for a better Brick Twp. by voting YES for the Pride I have in Brick Twp (my hometown), my Kids and their future, and my overall quality of life.

I will be voting NO, as soon as possible, to ALL Incumbents and Acropolis!

Am I happy about the increase? Hell no. I will have to make more sacrifices. No flat screen tv purchase this spring.........still don't own one!

Reply

George

4:41 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Acropolis and the council should be all recalled from office immediately JB.

Reply

JB

4:54 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

I agree. How do we get that started?
He/They have shown a complete failure in fiscal responsibility, poor decision-making, and poor planning.
They have all committed political suicide with this referendum (pass or fail).
And Scaturro has the audacity to run for the Assembly. They completely have no regard for the General Public and are self-serving, egotistical political ----!

Reply

disgusted homeowner

5:14 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

GRIP,(get rid of incumbent politicians) was a taxpayer revolt movement originated by the 101.5 radio station in Trenton a couple of years ago. Don't know how involved they still are in this movement. So don't GRIPE about GRIP !!!!

Reply

Brick Resident

5:41 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

CShorShell/clamdigger
Here are my responses to your various comments. First, I never claim to be the person with all of the answers; however everyone on this forum can understand and appreciate how I provide facts and references for all of my posts.
First you talked about how things may change next year when Christie may or may not cut state aid. We can all assume about things but we know what that leads to. Also, the world could come to an end tomorrow, they day after that or the day after that. We need to simple prepare for the future the best way possible and cross that bridge when it comes –this is regarding the current Governors habits.
As far as cost savings between private and public trash pickup, I have also said it many times how it is cost beneficial – even Concerned Citizen, a person who openly admits he/she will vote no agreed that for $28.00 a month he would vote yes. Unfortunately he/she is not in the same boat and will be taxed at a much higher rate due to his house assessment.

Reply

Brick Resident

5:41 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

continued

Please tell me how you can get private pickup for less than 250.00 a year – how about $300 a year? This does not include other services you may use. Certainly please provide me with an example of how you are going to get your street plowed for less than that including it in your private garbage pickup or even have an officer respond to your home for a burglary. Please do not say how this last years snow fall people were stuck for three days – be happy it was only three days because it would have taken a while for the streets to melt enough to be able to drive on them.
You can refer to your previous posts about your cost analysis, which I attempted to look through, however 300 posts are a lot to scan. If you would please provide me with what exactly your numbers are, I would able to be more thorough debate.

Reply

Brick Resident

5:41 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

continued

I agree with you that the Government needs to downsize, however it needs to be done properly. Just flipping a switch and laying off half of the Township should not be the answer; especially when we the tax payers are going to feel it the most. Transition needs to be made and attrition policies enacted in the town are already curtailing salary costs. I encourage you to submit an O.P.R.A. request on the number of employees from 2006 to 2011. Political appointments are not included in what I just said, but that is something that should be addressed come election time, not referendum time.
Next you talk about bringing up facts and truths. I am not attacking you, but I will correct you in your own statement with regard to officer’s salaries. November’s ballot statement stated they wanted to hire an officer at the average salary of 159K. If you go based on just what you read, that means there are officers, in theory making 318K since 159k is the average. To dispel your suspicion, I will provide you with factual documentation that is easily accessed via the State of New Jersey website. If you wish to dispute me, please take a look at this link: http://www.state.nj.us/perc/

Reply

Brick Resident

5:42 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

continued

Here you will find, by law, a copy of all Public Employees contracts. A top patrolman in Brick Township is compensated for 103K (estimating 3 percent cost of living increases). That is way below the accusations that an officer “brings home” 109K. If an officer is taxed at 30 percent, and allegedly brings home 109K that means, before tax they would have to make $141,700. Yes officers make overtime and quite frankly its probably because they earned it. You see most officers on construction sights right? Well they are usually being paid for by the construction company. So when a drunk driver takes out a telephone pole and cuts power to your house, that patrolman who is on the side of the road ensuring the safety of the work crew is actually assisting in getting you your power back
I welcome an intellectual debate at any time. I look forward to your response and I hope it is reasonable and factual not personal and opinionated. Also, please correct me if I am wrong, but provide a citation so I could verify where I was wrong.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

6:12 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

heres a debate for you Brick Resident....more people will be voting NO than yes......now let them cut the $8 million wherever they must

VOTE NO and GRIP and than watch them GO !

Comment_arrow

john

8:22 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

hey stupid,making 109,000 dollars a year does not mean that is what he brings home, that is his gross pay with ot so before you start shooting off your mouth why don't you at least learn what working and what pay is and taxes are before you make an a-- of yourself. what a jerk

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

10:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Hi john that's either an April Fools type comment or anjust plain ignorance. do you really want to go there regarding a cop making over $100k for a town like Brick and his "take home pay"?

let's see for arguments sake the cop is the soul provider for a family of 4, himself,wife and 2 darling children. If he's smart he's claiming zero depents all year and claiming 4 on his tax returns.

An officer probably brings home (conservatively)$1,700 a week,$3,400 bi-weekly, that's $88,400 take home "after taxes". But the officer not claiming dependents now claims 4 on his taxes and probably gets in the neighborhood of $10,500 - $11,000 from the Fed and appx $3,500 from the state.

So now the $88k + the $10k(Fed return) + the $3k(State return)=$101k not including the health benefits the officer gets and pension contributions.

Catpan

6:11 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

37 in PD make over 100K as of last year. Search Brick. 1=police.

http://www.nj.com/news/bythenumbers/

median Household (not individual) $47k
http://www.city-data.com/township/Brick-Ocean-NJ.html

I don't mean to pick on the police, but how can we justify paying so many DOUBLE what the average household in town brings home? And these guys still have plenty of time to work overtime and a second job. Public workers salaries have marched upward along with their pension and health care costs to the point where the rest of us are about broken. This issue is being repeated all the country in mature areas where growth has slowed or stagnated. I'd trade my job in heartbeat for that kind of salary so close to home.

And don't start with it's dangerous work. I'll bet my 140 mile round trip commute is far more dangerous.

Reply

George

6:32 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident I agree with your figures they don't really reach 100k unless they are a sargent on up.

Reply

George

6:34 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan those over 100k must be sargents on up right.

Reply

Brick Resident

7:27 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpa
Although I can not say I know what driving an emergency vehicle is like with ligjts and a siren, I do know what it is like to drive 70 miles in one direction. I would much rather drive on a highway than in a city, never the less Brick. We do not pay police just for the dangers of the job but by the level that we need them and the exposures they are trained to handle. Police get paid well. They also do a job that most of us would not want to do.
George you are correct, if you look at the most recent Police Audit, you can see that there are over 30 superior officers hence the salaries.

Reply

Catpan

7:28 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Data base only provides a column that indicates years. No rank provided.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

7:39 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan I use data universe too because I know the police officers names also alot of them.

George

7:48 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident and Catpan this is what bothers me with the budget
The amount to be raised by Municipal Taxes is $68,175,396.
The amount last year was $54,866,000.
That's more than a 24% increase!!!!

Reply

Catpan

7:58 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Not sure what the point is about them being sergeants. Bottom line is that the personnel costs are high. Maybe the force is a little top heavy? You can't blame any one officer by any stretch. Who wouldn't do what is best for their family? This is a problem that has slowly developed over many years. And not just with the police.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

8:34 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan if you went through town hall you would come up with a load of waste but mnobody wants to attempt it because of the friends and family club would be screaming.

Catpan

8:18 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Where did you get the 68 million #?

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

8:29 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

That is what has to raised by property taxes not including state aid got it from a CPA who looked over the budget.

Gary

8:32 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan, I can honestly tell use that the cop listed on the app site making 68,000 thousand is doing 100,000 thousand with overtime........the bottom line is most cops in brick hit 100,000k....and the property taxes will go up 25% per house....why does the mayor hide the true fact about the private garbage cost, he knows it; $400 per year average... lets wake up and fix the problem now!

Reply

Catpan

8:52 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Just skimmed over the 2010 financials. That'll make your head spin.

George - not sure how much info the CPA had, but there are so many moving parts when it comes to these budgets, that it hard to comment. But wow 500,000 from red light camera revenue!

Gary - it is safe to speculate that the officers take home more than the amounts shown in the data universe. I was just trying to contrast the officers salaries with the median. Hard choices need to made and it won't be painless.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

9:21 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan nobody ever questions police over time and that add up real quick.

Brick Resident

10:23 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Catpan and George,

The police department has not hired since 2008. Naturally when you have 15 or so officers retire and you do not replace them, their burden gets passed onto the remaining officers causing overtime. The police audit, which was ordered by the town to determine if the police department was running efficently concluded the department was running very efficent and the needs of the department could not be met without adding 6 to 14 officers.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

10:56 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

Brick Resident I agree with you I have been here all my life 66 years even when the state police were here long before the Brick polce was in place.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

12:12 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Brick Resident, is it 6 or 14? Let's get a straight answer from someone. There's a big difference betweeen adding 6 and adding 14. Maybe the magic #is 7 or 9. Maybe it's zero since you say "concluded the department was running very efficent". How much more efficent can you get than a compliment of very efficent, except extremely efficent. Doesn't make sense does it.

Comment_arrow

Gary

7:21 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

They haven hired since 2008 but the cost still go's up and up. Just this year the "Asst Chief" {something I really don't think we need at $150k} retired, so every one moves up, the only problem is the sargent moved up and was replaced with two sargents. Now we are short "drum roll please" 4 to 5 patrolman.

Jose Deer

10:40 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

i would cut EVERY single cop from the bottom all the way up to the top and then offer their jobs back at 60,000 a year .....take it or leave it.....and then open up the offer to any qualified individuals who want it and we could even hire 20 more officers and be safer and still save alot of money.....WIN -WIN

Reply

disgusted homeowner

11:12 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

To all concerned: There is a website www.brickpd.com/roster.htm This site shows you a complete roster by badge number from day 1 of the brick pd. Badge #, name, rank in the dept.(capt,sargeant, lt. etc) current status(ie deceased, retired, resigned, dismissed, demoted, resigned, or terminated). From there you can take anyone's name and go to the datauniverse site where the pay that it shows it the persons BASE PAY GROSS, NOT TAKE HOME OR NET. The figure does not include any overtime or stipends, etc. at all. Currently this site shows badge #1 thru badge #240. I do not know personally if anyone was hired after #240.

Hopes this helps folks get the info they're seeking.

Reply

disgusted homeowner

11:15 pm on Friday, April 1, 2011

PS, If the person is not currently actively working in brick, they won't show up on data universe payroll info. list. sorry

Reply

Gary

12:38 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

What is the new van thats at townhall the lettering on the van is Brick Township Wireless Communication Division...? Are they joking down there......all I can say is now is the time to fix the problem. All this waste has to stop, I need to see townhall working at bare min. I NEED ALL TOWNSHIP DEPT. STRIPPED TO NOTHING..............Thank you!

Reply

Brick Resident

4:35 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The ignorant few who continue to try to convince others to vote not should MOVE OUT of Brick. The fact of the matter is this; Brick Residents still pay 20% less in taxes then the average tax payer pays in the entire state of New Jersey. These people could care less about what this town will look like a year from now, and they will be the first ones screaming when and if the town goes to crap. Believe me residents ARE becoming informed and these few are the MANORITY not the MAJORITY they have nothing better to do with their time, just look at what they do all day, they are here posting false and biased information while the rest of us work for a living. Fortunatly another resident started an event page on facebook for Brick VOTE on April 29th and they already have hundreds who are voting YES. So for those of you who are on here bashing your town, your wasting your time. Intelligent people will vote YES and keep our town one of the best places to live in New Jersey.

Reply
Comment_arrow

clamdigger

8:37 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

BrickResident;

Just because we do pay less than many others in the state doesn't mean we (the "ignorant few" as you so eloquently put it) want to catch up to them anytime soon, why can't you get that concept? If there's room to cut, make the cuts. Why should we run the town on more than necessary? I've gone back & re-read some of your postings & the more I read the more you sounded like a politician.

I'll tell you this much I'm beginning to feel like I'm being pushed and pressured by the Twp and if I continue to feel like I'm getting pushed further I may need to help spread the news.

Just the other day I discovered a small lunch bag in my driveway w/a few small stones in it & a homemade advertisement & it dawned on me, if this guy can do this for his business, ANYONE can do this to help get out the news regarding the VOTE.....CAN'T THEY!!!

Someone can buy a ream of paper for about $2.00 & a couple boxes of ziplock sandwichbags grab a few small stones for weight and fling them all over town, especially the Greenbriars those older folks really take to someone that shows initiative. There's plenty of time and plenty of neighborhoods, even if someone just lands one on every other driveway, that's getting the news out to VOTE NO ON APRIL 27. VOTE DOWN EXCEEDING THE 2% CAP AND VOTE AGAINST THE BOE TAX INCREASE AND VOTE OUT THE INCUMBENTS OF THE BOE.

Brick Resident says all those VOTING YES, the Vote is APRIL 29th

All those VOTING NO, THE VOTE IS APRIL 27!!

Comment_arrow

George

11:09 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I agree with you clam digger I have lived here all 66 years of my life.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:26 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Brick resident, telling folks to "get out" as you stated on 4/2/11 at 435am isn't really ever going to make this town attractive for anyone to live in. It's not akin to putting a welcome mat out. That's for sure. ( I don't know if it was the "Brick Resident Imposter or not)
Furthermore once again all residents should be reminded that according to NJ Dept of Community Affairs, 60PERCENT of the voters have to approve any measure to exceed this cap; NOT a simple majority. Mistatements about this have appeared several times on this site.

Furthermore i still believe there are other avenues to cut and balance this budget, but the powers at be seem to be somewhat uninterested in looking or becoming "innovative" to save the taxpayer some bucks. Not exactly my idea of "taxation and representation".

Gary

7:33 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Brick Resident, really ...I am tired of all this, how did this happen???? Un answered questions. And you are just going to vote yes because we pay 20% less then other towns. What are you an idiot, move out of Brick, are you really a complete moron. You give them the money and everything stays the same. And what about next year, answer me that, another 25%....Are you for real, how could anyone making less then $50,000 live here. Its only a matter of time and a lot will be moving. But for now I am here and enjoying life in Brick, I don't have any real problems, like you! But the vote will be NO, and you and your 100 on Facebook will see. There is over 100,000 in Brick in the summer, and the vote will be No, unless you live under a rock. Thank you!

Reply

George

11:02 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Brick resident we don't want the taxes going up high like North Jersey where alot of the present group came from because theycouldn't handle the high taxes.

Reply

Brick Resident

11:21 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I dont know how someone else is posting under the name as me but I for one was certainly sleeping at 435 am. Can someone look into this for me? Also, I will be responding shortly to previous comments.

Reply

79

11:37 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

CEDAR VILLAGE : 225 HOMES

GREENBRAIR 1 : 200 HOMES

GREENBRAIR 2 : 600 HOMES

LOINS HEAD NORTH : 330 HOMES

LOINS HEAD SOUTH : 600 HOMES

The PAVILLIONS : 250 HOMES

PRINCETON COMMONS : 400 HOMES

SEAVIEW VILLAGE : 289 HOMES

WEDGEWOOD PLACE : 149 HOMES

WINDING RIVER : 255 HOMES

(10) 55+ SENIOR COMMUNITIES IN BRICK / 3298 SENIOR HOMES IN ADULT COMMUNITIES IN BRICK, NJ

Geeeeeee ...... I wonder why the "median income IS so low???

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

11:38 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

As of 2000, there were 76,119 people, 29,511 households, and 20,775 families residing in the township.

The "median" income for a household in the township was $52,092, and the median income for a family was $61,446. Males had a median income of $44,981 versus $31,020 for females.

Comment_arrow

79

11:48 am on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Oh and by the way I was looking up a guy I know that is on the Brick Town Police force 15 YEARS and his salary still has not crested the 100K mark ....... and yet people "still publish false and misleading information" ..... plus they get paid what "some call BIG BUCKS" for a job most (1) couldn't do (2) wouldn't do and (3) will never do.

Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

12:04 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

GEE, Kind of like How the average house is ONLY $330,000 and the average property tax is $6100

We can all make averages work in our favor.....

tuna stick

12:00 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I do not understand why so many emplpoyees (171) including many police officers would be laid off if they 2% cap referendum fails. The #'s just don't add up. How much does the mayor want to spend? If the cap was 4% would that mena only 85 employees (1/2 of 171) would get laid off? If the police lay off 27 officers then literally, the lives of some people are at stake. Seems to me that there should be some real intense scrutinization of this budget, by a un-biased team. There's way to much talk and political posturing going on, and very little intelligent dialogue.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

1:11 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Ask 79 he's got all the right answers.....only problem is he lives in Moronville....

MGray

12:12 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

It really does amaze me at how people make such uneducated comments on a public forum and attack others for absolutely no reason. It seems that despite everyone knowing that politicians and those in charge of running the government are the ones truly responsible for the financial problems of the state people continue to follow them like sheep and believe every word they say. Who reading this with any shred of common sense believes that teachers and police are the reason this state and the country is in a financial mess? Its the people that run the financial sector (The same wall street investors that "speculate" on oil and get rich on stock), the politicians who squander money to further their special interest groups so they can get elected, and government mismanagement of money that have brought us here. NOT your son's third grade teacher, NOT the cop who just responded to a suicidal person threatening to slit their wrists, NOT the guy who picks up your trash..seriously people! Every politician chooses a scapegoat to blame for government failures, and the public eats it all up! Now the scapegoat is public workers, are you serious??? A person, an individual is smart. However people as a mass are ignorant. Please don't blindly believe a politicians (or their followers) talking points!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:38 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

MGray .... well stated

Comment_arrow

Gary

1:19 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Explain to me what needs to be done.....explain now! Mcgray, 79....give me the answers...because frankly you have none. You both must make a lot of money and just like spending, and spending and spending.....with no reason......a yes vote just continues the problem......I wish to hear your answers, and others will see you done have any....well I do and that why the VOTE is NO.....we need answers.....

George

12:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Most politicians seem to get involved because they all the money in it for them at taxpayers expense.

Reply

MGray

12:26 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

As far as the referendum 2 points. First of all for the vast majority paying the increase through property taxes will be cheaper than paying a private collector. Period. Its tax deductible that way, a private company is not. A private company can change their rates on you every year (and they will - look at your cable and phone bill) and you'll have to either haggle with the private company for a new "package" every year or switch providers every year. Personally who wants to go through all that hassle each year, just to end up paying more anyway?? Seriously, common sense. Yes if you own a 1 million dollar home then private trash is the way to go, but I don't think many of us here own expensive pieces of property. And if you do... then why are you bashing that public workers make too much??? What do YOU do that you earn so much money? Maybe YOU are the one that the company should fire every employee and then offer to rehire them at half of what they are making! Because that would be absolutely fair to you right??

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:38 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

MGray .... well stated

Comment_arrow

parkway

1:22 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I would say most of us do not own 1 million dollar home, As far as firing the emplyees and rehireing them the majority of public works has not seen a raise in years ok maybe the 2% wich they gave back because they need their jobs, They make forty to fifty thousand Live in brick and manage your bills on that, especially if you only have a one income family. I want to see all you people who keep trashing the public works guys and the police do their jobs. As far as I am concerned the police deserve their saleries, Look at that poor officer killed in lakewood well tell me you risk having a gun put to your head evey day. If this does not pass Brick will be a bigger mess then it is now. Where are your brains

Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

3:43 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Dear MGray,
It's nice to have you enter the discussion with your well-reasoned points. I agree with 79. I appreciate the bases you raised in SUPPORT of a YES vote.

George

12:29 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Most politicians seem to get involved because they see all the money in it for them at taxpayers expense.

Reply

79

12:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

No matter what the outcome is the citizens of Brick "WILL PAY MORE" one way or another and that's a FACT ..... win or loose they WILL pay. The shame of the matter IS the Property Taxes in the State of New Jersey ARE the highest in the country. I would hope that ANY reasonable thinking person would do the math and see that to keeping the services as they are, YES the taxes WILL go up $350 per year OR $29 (rounded) per month / for $350,000 property/structure AND less for a less valued property AND more for a higher property AND again that's a FACT. The increased amount of property taxes you pay, can be written off on your yearly taxes ...... garbage pick up (which will be probably +/- $280 per year OR $24 per month (rounded) and that as best a FACT that can be gotten.

There ARE few here that still continue to bring POLITICS into the VOTE and that is wrong. It's like a Police Officer that pulls a motorist over for a violation and basically had the intentions of only giving the driver a "verbal warning" .... however, upon talking to the driver that was courteous and respectful the "back seat passenger starts to mouth off to the officer .... AND the officer now being upset "issues the driver a summons for being upset with the passenger"??? That IS wrong AND similar to the posts in this comment section. Don't be mad at the 29+171 for your dislike of the politicians in BRICK ...... VOTE YES

Reply
Comment_arrow

CShorShell

1:22 pm on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

79, I presume I need to repeat this point again. You are only looking at this issue at face value......DIG DEEPER. The root of the problem IS POLITICS! To say that we need to keep politics out of this is ignorant.

MGray

12:36 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

And second point enough with bashing police already. Again its ok for a manager at Walmart to make 100k a year salary so they can sell you merchandise, and for the shareholders of Walmart to be millionaires because they succeeded in selling you merchandise that you don't even need, but its not ok for a police officer to make 100k a year. Are you kidding me? The manager at Walmart NEVER has to arrest a crackhead strung out on drugs, never has to chase someone who stabbed another person and is now hiding behind a shed (which happened in a nice part of town just days ago as reported here!), never has to forcibly take an HIV positive person to the hospital for a pyschiatric evaluation because they want to kill themselves.. the list goes on. There are no public forums out there bashing graphic designers for making 200k a year and doing nothing but working on a computer and taking 2 hour lunch breaks! God people!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

..........AGAIN to "MGray" .... well stated

Comment_arrow

parkway

1:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

MGray finally someone with some sense

Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

3:46 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Dear MGay,
Thank you for your support of law enforcement. Thank you for your well-reasoned points in SUPPORT of a YES vote.

MGray

12:43 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

This town, as any town with a population of around 80,000, has a large criminal element that is growing. Gangs are surging here as they are in Lakewood and Toms River. An officer tragically lost his life patrolling the streets of his town but a few months ago... yet he made too much money? Disgusting that anyone would demean what those people do on a daily basis. Literally disgusting. Our department is smaller now than it was 3 years ago, and the problems in this town are increasing. Anyone who wants to save money on their taxes at the expense of a strong police department are fundamentally ignorant. If you want cheaper property taxes move to Keansburg or Asbury Park. Taxes are much cheaper there! Oh wait, you don't want to live there do you! Guess what Brick will look like in 5 years! Remember that you get what you pay for, you want a smaller department, staffed by people that will work for the cheapest salaries, with the least amount of education and experience? OK, go for it!

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:59 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

AS PER "MGRAY"........"An officer tragically lost his life patrolling the streets of his town but a few months ago... yet he made too much money? Disgusting that anyone would demean what those people do on a daily basis. Literally disgusting".

That officer was a friend of mine and the memory of the tragic killing will live with US all for a lifetime ....... BUT is a good example of things that happen in any town OR city, north, south, east or west New Jersey or the next town over. AND for the record he made just a "little above the median average income in Brick".

Comment_arrow

79

4:19 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

"If you want cheaper property taxes move to Keansburg or Asbury Park. Taxes are much cheaper there! Oh wait, you don't want to live there do you!"

Speaking of Asbury Pary ......

Asbury Park getting $10.3 million in state aid

http://www.app.com/article/20110401/NJNEWS/104020309/Asbury-Park-getting-10-3-million-state-aid?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|Frontpage

The city will receive $10,375,000 in special transitional aid this year, just $200,000 less than requested, City Manager Terence Reidy said after getting notification from state Department of Community Affairs Commissioner Lori Grifa on Friday.

With the aid amount known, it appeared unlikely the city will need to exceed the 2 percent cap on property tax increases, an option open to municipalities if they place the increase on the ballot for a vote later this month.

City officials still have to finalize this year's $43 million budget and what the new municipal tax rate will be.

Brick Resident

12:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Clam,

In response to the number of officer that the Police Audit mentions I would like to clarify and try to make it make sense for you.

First, the audit stated the department was running efficiently however the operative wording is and. The audit concluded the department is running efficiently, as if it is managed correctly. Some examples that it is running efficiently is that there is the correct supervisor to patrolman ratio, and there are correct divisions within the department. Now, moving onto the operative word and. The department is running efficiently and (operative word) it needs additional personal to maintain the demands of the department. If you look at page four of the audit, under the Executive Summary you will see the following: “There are staffing needs in the Department that cannot be met without adding new personnel.” Also, if you continue onto page five, you will see this: “Staffing in Patrol should be increased by 6 positions (assuming SET and DARE continue to be used to meet Patrol needs). An additional Sergeant and four officers should be added if finances improve allowing for SET to be reinstituted.” On page 7, the audit recommends an additional Detective for staffing needs in the Detective Bureau.

Reply

Brick Resident

12:45 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

These recommendations, which were made by a neutral third party adds up to 11 positions, which is just shy of my 14 number. However, this audit was done last year, and according to the Brick Communicator, they have had three people retire within the past few months alone bringing the 11 up to 14.

As I previously mentioned, I do not know how another person with the same name as me is posting. The post at 435 am was not me. The easiest way to see this is simply just click the name posted before the post and you will see the posts associated with that name.

To address Clam saying that he things I’m a politician specifically in your post “I'll tell you this much I'm beginning to feel like I'm being pushed and pressured by the Twp and if I continue to feel like I'm getting pushed further I may need to help spread the news.”

I can rest assure you I am certainly not a Politician. I am sorry if you feel you are being pressured by the facts I present. I also present my facts with citations how I was taught to do in my college classes. As I previously stated, I am a college student and I am actively working on my graduate degree in Public Administration so I can offer a lot of information to help the public make an informed decision.

Reply

Brick Resident

12:45 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Other than one or two posts where I definitively say vote yes, I am simple just trying to keep Brick the Township I grew up in and the Township I want to remain in. If the services decline and the taxes do not go down, I feel I may have to move out of town and possibly out of state.

Finally to clam, I respond to you because you form a reasonable response and present it in an intellectual manner. I do not know who also posted under “Brick Resident” and his post is ignorant in its own. No one should be told to move out of town if they do not like it – the ability to debate is why our nation is the best nation to live in. Government is supposed to be for the people by the people. If you no longer want to debate about topics, that is fine with me and I will no longer respond to your posts. Please do not feel as if I am pressuring you. I am here, as a concerned taxpayer of Brick, and I want what is best for my community. Also, if I can make one request, please do not insult me and think I am a politician along with threatening you may help spread the news. You can make assumptions, however, as I previously stated, we all know what happens when you do that.

I feel I am a reasonable, level headed person who makes the best educated decision I can. I would welcome the opportunity to safely meet with you to prove that I am not who you think I am.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

4:03 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Dear Brick Resident,
I appreciate your focusing on the Brick police audit for your college course and then taking the time to inform us of your educated analysis. You have based it on a thorough examination of the facts. This is a LARGE part of why I support the passage of the referendum.

Brick Resident

1:08 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

As far as the imposter “Brick Resident” here is a link to his postings: http://brick.patch.com/users/brick-resident

I, being from what I know as the true “Brick Resident” here is a link to my postings:
http://brick.patch.com/users/brick-resident-2

Reply

JB

1:14 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I have to agree with a lot of what you say MGray. I fear the less Brick has to offer and the more we cut, the cheaper it is to live here. With the Jewish population taking over Lakewood, knocking down dumpy house and building bigger ones, many of those losers who rented those dumpy slums are coming to Brick and surrounding towns. As we continue to lose service, Brick will no longer appeal to hard working people and families, something this town was always noted for.
There is nothing wrong with cops making $100,000+ a year. But can they work 15+ years first? Most of the cops in town make $80,000-$100,000+ /yr + overtime. + working sites, + school events, etc. I respect them and what they do, but don't you think if the salaries were between $60,000-$90,000, wouldn't the town still attract plenty of good policemen? Plus they can still gain overtime and work events at schools and sites................
I will still be voting YES!

Reply
Comment_arrow

MGray

1:30 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I'm not informed enough to be able to say how long it actually takes an officer in town to reach 100k a year. I believe that they reach that base salary in approximately 10 years of service, which seems reasonable, you're talking at that point about an officer who has responded to 10 years worth of calls and now has a tremendous amount of experience and training in the field. I worked in retail district management before for several companies and will state as a fact that my company hired managers at 6 figure salaries from day, and again not a hazardous or dangerous job in the least. My supervisor in charge of the region after bonuses made close to 500k a year. The guy worked maybe 5 hours a week, literally. Thats why I really keep peoples salaries in perspective, I'm sure 5 cops have done more to make a small difference in the world than my old supervisor..yet they would be compensated the same. And I did learn that when you see cops stationed behind Verizon or JCP&L or any other construction zone they are paid for by that company, not by the town. That money is not counted towards their pensions, and it is not done during time they are scheduled to work their shift. Ive heard people make uninformed comments about that before too.

Comment_arrow

79

1:41 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The Patrol Section of BTPD has increased in O/T for the last few years, because officers retiring, are not replaced. There is a minimal manpower requirement on all 3 shifts not only for the safety of the officers working, BUT the public. When you see the officers at a sporting events, road construction etc. that is paid for by requesting outside authority and that is addition to their normal working days. The first officer killed in Brick was working at just such a work site. Back when the sewers and water was being installed throughout the town in the late 1970s, an officer "was paid more from those construction companies putting the pipes in the ground" yearly then the "officer's regular salary".

YES their salary has increased throughout the years when those in the private sectors made 3-4 times more then the officer ..... BUT .... I say "until YOU walk the walk you really can't talk the talk " ..... another-words what they go through on a daily basis MOST would NOT and could NOT and have to see, hear and smell ...... have too live with the rest of their lives with some of those senses embedded.

George

1:26 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The way to go is VOTE NO and VOTE THE COUNCIL OUT IN NOVEMBER send A Messsage to this Group.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lo

9:21 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

MGRAY,,,,,, Your boss that your talking about paying six figures to his workers, hello are you stupid he's paying them,,, their private workers paid by their bosses.
Were paying the township employees salaries, we the people of Brick we are paying every salary..
A private employer pays his workers from money he makes with his business, aka Verizon, Comcast, McDonalds etc, etc, the difference is public workers are employed by us tax payers they work for us and we can't afford there high salaries and their hiring too many cronies that they know. Police are not in this issue, they should be in full force and we need alot to keep us safe. I don't mind paying taxes for safety, but we don't need to waste our taxes on friends of friends being hired just cause they can get away with it. The mayor needs to clean house and start cutting jobs that really aren't needed.

Gary

1:32 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I AM VOTING YES NOW! I hope my taxes double this year I would love to pay more 10,000 a year....loving it.....This is the best town around , here is my bank account take as much as you need.....enjoying it, harder please......you all sound like idiots........VOTE NO

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

2:54 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

10K a year? I wish... try 16K plus and counting... Love'n IT!!! I have nothing better to do than pay taxes and make comments on Brick Patch. I'm a loser... either way.

MGray

1:37 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Thank you to some people that have agreed with me on my comments. Again I didnt come here to get into arguments with anyone, I was just frustrated reading some of these comments and wanted to express my opinion in a way that didn't attack anyone. You are free to disagree with me, but I won't respond to any belligerent posts or someone blindly regurgitating mindless talking points that have already been debunked. Hope that everyone can make a smart informed decision when the time comes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lo

9:23 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I Don't agree, we pay their salaries, this town is broke

George

1:39 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

People need to stand up to this town and VOTE NO and VOTE OUT ALL COUNCIL INCUMBENTS send them a message.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Brokernj

1:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

George, I will agre with stand upm but vote yes and then vote out the council

Comment_arrow

79

1:53 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

George I truly respect EVERY thing that you have written and I feel for all of the citizens of Brick .... but your reason for your VOTE as no is something like I have stated many times with this story ..... your are mixing politics with 29+171 ...... YES you have the right to "your political opinion" .... BUT that no vote "when they run for would BE correct if you feel that way" ..... the no vote for continued services and the 29+171 IS what this VOTE reason ONLY IS all about!!!! .... and NOT politics ...... that another vote at another time !!!

Comment_arrow

79

1:54 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

"....................and VOTE NO and VOTE OUT ALL COUNCIL INCUMBENTS send them a message".

TWO SEPERATE VOTES and TWO SEPERATE ISSUES

George

2:17 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I hate say it but anyone who gives in to this current Mayor and Council is asking for more trouble in the future because your Mayor is being told what to do by George Gilmore the county Republican chairman who he answers to.

Reply

George

2:27 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

On the towns website under agendas, they posted a summary of the budget for Tuesdays meeting. Acropolis is asking for 24% yes thats 24% tax increase!!!!!

Reply

califwino

2:41 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

To 79
....2 things..you are entitled to your comments and that is fine but please get rid of the "caps".
They are very annoying.
Second (and I may be wrong) the way I read the article the 171 layoffs include the 29 police officers, not 171 + 29 as you keep posting. Like I said I might be wrong, you might want to check on that. I will stand corrected if need be.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

3:08 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

AL .... yes you are right .... "lay off 171 employees, including 29 police officers and many workers within the public works, parks and building......." sorry about the CAPS :-0

......... As presented, the tax rate will rise between 12 and 13 cents total, or approximately $360 per year for most township residents if the expected referendum were to pass. Under that scenario, a resident who owns a home valued at $330,000 – the township’s average – would pay $6,207 in total taxes, including school district and county tax bills. "80% of Brick Township's Homes are assessed at $350,000 or lower".

Goo Ber

2:47 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Im voting yes...not out of bullying, or politics. I just believe its the right thing at this time. Mathematically it makes more sense for as majority of the residence to vote yes.. For the people on the water and in newer homes..I understand their frustrations and concerns....Lets make the change in November.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

4:11 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Dear Goo Ber,

I agree with your reasoning. I, too, support the referendum.
We must maintain the safety and beauty of Brick. November is the time to express dissatisfaction with the current council and by extension the mayor.

George

2:52 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Vote No it is the way to go don't l;et this current Mayor and Council bully you.

Reply

George

3:05 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Anybody who votes yes to give this administration 8.4 million dollars without any detail as to how it is being spent has to be crazy.

Reply

Jose Deer

3:15 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

here are few thing i never hear anyone talking about....

1. if you vote yes , your property tax will increase AND IT WILL also increase more every year after 2011 , as now the 2% cap is 2% on a higher tax balance.....so by voting yes you are agreeing to go over the 2% cap for infinity !!

2. if you vote yes, of course your property taxes will increase......if one day in the future, you can no longer keep up the theft of your money and the depreciation of your biggest asset , they will kick you out of your house and put your name in the paper as a tax deadbeat
if you cannot pay you garbage invoice, they can not do anything and you still have a roof over your families head

why would anyone EVER give the government that kind of power hanging over your head.....VOTE NO!

Reply

Goo Ber

3:23 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

whats to stop that private garbage company to stop raising their prices annually? nothing..so for now it makes more sense in voting yes...ill vote for a change in november

Reply

George

3:26 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Go Ber whats to stop the town from raising your taxes in the future.

Reply

Goo Ber

3:34 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Your right george..nothing. But for now.. the avg tax increase wil be approx. 250 -500 a year with keeping the services. Vote no the taxes will increase anyway and pay for your own garbage.. So for now.. for me.. im voting yes.. come november ill vote for a change. it is frustrating the council wants the blue collar people to make the sacrafices.. but he hides "his" people.. but ill deal with that come election

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

3:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Goo Ber they still have 7 months to do plenty of damage send them aessage now.

jag

3:39 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

new to the thread.....neighboring towns like point boro schedule furlough days to cut expenses, does anyone know why that would not have been a viable option as opposed to laying off so many?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

3:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

it doesnt scare the sheep as much........they are very scared of criminals and smelly garbage , so they will agree to any thing not to upset their fairy tale bubble they live in

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

7:39 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Jag, the subject of using furloughs to save money has been asked by myself and others on this site and has never been seriously answered. The business administrator once commented that something like that would be subject to contract negotiations. Well damm then bring the idea to the table. I'm sure some of the township unions would listen............ asopposed to having so many members get laid off.

Jose Deer

3:41 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

here is something no one ever talks about .........hidden inventory of houses for sale .....just read the chart ..and New Jersey is #1 ( even worse than florida, nevada and arizona !!!) .......this is the next wave that is going to crash the value of your houses another 30%.....they can not hold it back much longer......and you dummies want to vote yes......bunch of ignorant fools, keeping their heads in the sand...have no idea how much the world has changed , so you will eventually learn the hard way.....when your houses are underwater , your pensions are busted and your dollar is worthless

http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/why-the-housing-market-is-three-times-worse-than-you-think.html

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

4:59 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Dear Jose Deer,

Kindly refrain from insulting others. It detracts from what you are trying to say.

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:35 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Ms. Weaver, and i wish some of your supporters would stop making outright "threats" which 1 of them seems to do regularly. I don't think the editor Mr. Nee should allow it and the party who is doing it should be barred. Doesn't really say much for the debate on here when a certain supporter of yours threatens. And i don't think those threats are idle ones either Ms. Weaver.

Goo Ber

3:44 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Jag...not sure...anything should be considered to save money and jobs

Reply
Comment_arrow

jag

3:49 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I would think that any and all options should be considered as opposed to putting 170+ people out of work.

Comment_arrow

George

3:55 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Jag and Goo Ber this Mayor could care less remember He has a 6 figure job at the TRMUA.

Goo Ber

4:11 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

hey Jose i have my opinion..you have yours...calling me a fool and dummy is only showing your lack of class and education. So shut your ignorant mouth..you belong on 101.5.. if you dont agree with them...they hang up on you..your showing the same narrow mindness.

Reply

George

4:12 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Vote No send this current administration a message now.

Reply

Goo Ber

4:18 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

we should all vote no then and dump our garbage on joses' lawn

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

4:25 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Could make for a greener lawn !!!!!

disgusted homeowner

4:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Been sitting here for over an hour reading today's postings. The best 1 yet is the case of identity theft regarding " Brick Resident" here on the patch. An imposter has snuck in the back door. I too would like to know how this can happen on the site.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

4:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Ask the website administrator .... probably allowed two with the same name .... if you look at the info for both the so called phoney has a -2 ..... may have been done with no intent by the person. The real "Brick Resident" also has been around the block more then the other .... so he was the first.

79

4:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Gov. Christie recently complained about his high property taxes. Blaming "outrageous" public employee salaries. His 6700 Square foot home in Mendham Twp. on 6 Acres was assessed at $1.9M. His property taxes are $36,453.00 annually. In Mendham, 18.3% of that amount, allows the Township to function in all areas, salaries and benefits of... all employees included. In essence, he paid $6561.00 toward that.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

5:25 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

i heard that blowhard Lou Greenwald complaing about his even more

it is funny how all of the politicians seem to live in $1 million + houses .....i guess thats why that fight so hard to remain public servants

Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

11:38 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Be careful folks. You don't want Chris Christie coming to town. He's been known to throw his weight around and from what i have seen that could cause a quake of epic proportions!!!! Be careful of what you wish for.

George

4:32 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Christie usually picks on the small guy because the big boys will jump him at the country club.

Reply

Think

4:46 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Joe Lamb,

You said you would debate anyone. Why don't you post what you think needs to be done. I would like to read your idea to fix the problem.

Reply

Think

4:47 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

We all know how the town wasted money.We know that years of not raising taxes has also done damage. You know that the Mayor and Council are not going to give back money. How do you suggest we fix it. Tell me how to realistically fix it, without raising taxes and I will vote No. Stop writing that they have to give back raises, because it is not going to happen and it is not enough money to fix the problem anyway.

May 13 th they lay off 29 police officers. The crime rate will soar and then we will be screaming for police service, however they are layed off and not enough left to address the problem. What then? How do we get them back? The answer is you can't, the referendum was knocked down and no other cuts can be made. We can't vote again in 6 months to fix the mistake.

Bloods, MS13 and other gangs are here. Ask the residents of MapleLeaf park, how the like living with that problem and how much they want the police around. Be realistic and take your anger out on those you think deserve it in November.

Who cares about garbage, we have more serious problems

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

5:26 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

the crime rate will soar ........LOL

asre you a criminal with inside information ?????

Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

5:27 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

why rob anyone with a gun, when its much easier and more lucrative to do with a pen

Think

4:49 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

If you NO people are right and this is a ploy to get more money to spend, I lose $400.00. If you are wrong, I pay $400 for garbage, pay for recreational services, don't know when a private snow contractor will plow my road and lose 29 police officers.

Good luck to you if you vote No and you are wrong.

I will not take the risk, I vote yes for the referendum. However, I can't wait to November elections

Reply

Goo Ber

4:58 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Perfectly said Think...same here

Reply

Jose Deer

5:32 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

way too many public workers in Brick, NJ and USA.......they need to be cut

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

5:50 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I GUESS that covers "just about everything"?

Comment_arrow

parkway

7:56 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

considering 30 plus lost their jobs 2 years ago and there was not enough manpower during the snowstorm I am sure layoffs will help the problem

Comment_arrow

Lo

9:39 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Parkway, your kiddin right, your blaming 30 lost jobs two years ago,on how incompetent Brick was at handling the snow....LMAO
We need to cut more jobs that are filled by people that don't know what their doing and hire someone that can actually run this town.. I voted for change well didn't want the change we getting...
I will think real hard about who I vote for next time.

George

5:58 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Time to Vote NO Next and send a message.

Reply

Gary

6:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Yes the way to fix this is simple, layoff the employees we don't need. The township is spending money they don't have, you can't say that not true. We are short 8 million plus, its from mismanagement and failure to plan. The township grew to fast, and we had the wrong people in control. The Governor met with all the mayors, and explain what was going to happen. The towns that did there homework were able to balance there budget "Toms River" was one. The towns that didn't plan for this failed , Brick is a failed township. Anybody can fix the problem with cash. How is that going to fix it in years to come, explain that to me. Because frankly there is know right or wrong answer heard.....Vote yes for higher taxes and your services, and Vote no for lower taxes, and changed services. Stop thinking about the 150 employees, think about your families future. Thank you

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lo

9:26 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Couldn't say it any better

79

6:39 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Loophole allows Essex County Executive DiVincenzo to collect full salary, pension

Last August, the 58-year-old politician quietly put in his retirement papers and the pension started to flow. But he continues to serve in the same position, drawing a full salary and wielding influence from Newark to Trenton as he campaigns to reform the pension system.

http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2011/03/loophole_allows_essex_county_e.html

Reply

parkway

7:57 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

79 I just read that and that is a bigger joke

Reply

Jose Deer

8:02 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

i hope all of you nervous nellies do not play poker......your opponent just has to say ALL IN and you will fold everytime.......sometimes you have to CALL THE BLUFF !!!......and this lowlife mayor is BLUFFING YOU

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lo

9:27 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

He's not bluffing, he's threatening which is worse. VOTE NO

George

8:02 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

79 it has nothing to do with Brick really.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

8:16 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

BUT politics does for the VOTE George???

clamdigger

8:07 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

To all; This thread has begun to make my eyes hurt as well as become to tedious to keep up with who is who so I leave this thread on this note. Brick Resident you seem to be intellectually inclined & enjoy your research,I'll accept the fact someone hijacked your screen name but I do not buy into your decisions or your presented argument for me to not VOTE NO on the proposed referendum to exceed the cap. It was not your presentation that made me feel pressured,it is the that from the Twp.

As for Jose Deer; I still have yet to read any where regarding the 2% cap,if it is approved the consequences for following years. Please provide some additional info so I can read up on it I thought I was up to date.

As for the the rest all I can say is, if the vote was tomorrow I'm voting NO. I said it before,I'll say it again; I'd rather spend $500.00 a year on trash to a private contractor than give one more red cent to the Twp until they get their act in order. I will not stand by & vote yes when I have the chance to stand up & voice my opinion against something that goes against my principles. That's what this has become,a matter of principles. I wish we had a law that provided the taxpayers approve every budget regardless. BTW none of this will matter after 12/21/12, the world is going to end anyway, just like it did for the turn of the century. Oh,BTW before they fire any DPW people,can someone trim the shrubs in front of that sign at townhall it looks like crap. See photo

Reply
Comment_arrow

disgusted homeowner

8:31 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

BRAVO, CLAM well stated. Thanks for your input.

Comment_arrow

parkway

10:19 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

considering there was not enough manpower to plow all the snow I am sure there is not enough to trim the trees furthurmore if the vote fails then there will not be anyone to do it. So for the person who made the comment that I am blaming a loss of 30 guys 2 years ago I am saying that between that and retirements there is a shortage. As far as I am concerned vote yes vote no do what you feel is right. It is just a shame that the homeowners will suffer either way

disgusted homeowner

8:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

A brief note........

They've stacked the cards in the deck,
So we will all write out a bigger check;
Brick politics has hit an all time low,
So just go in the booth and vote NO !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

8:51 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Agree Disgusted NO is the way to go send them a message they need it.

Jose Deer

8:45 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

clamdigger.....its just simple math

here is an example if your tax today is $100 and VOTE NO and increased $500 if you vote yes
........with just a small 2% increase, which we all know they will never pass on, you can see how the spread starts to get higher each year into the future (and you are going to be paying with deflated dollars and eventually will lose all your equity and then lose your house)

2011 100 500
2012 102 510
2013 104 520
2014 106 530
2015 108 540
2016 110 550
2017 112 561
2018 114 572
2019 116 583
2020 118 595

Reply

Lo

9:24 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

MGRAY,,,,,, Your boss that your talking about paying six figures to his workers, hello are you stupid he's paying them,,, their private workers paid by their bosses.
Were paying the township employees salaries, we the people of Brick we are paying every salary..
A private employer pays his workers from money he makes with his business, aka Verizon, Comcast, McDonalds etc, etc, the difference is public workers are employed by us tax payers they work for us and we can't afford there high salaries and their hiring too many cronies that they know. Police are not in this issue, they should be in full force and we need alot to keep us safe. I don't mind paying taxes for safety, but we don't need to waste our taxes on friends of friends being hired just cause they can get away with it. The mayor needs to clean house and start cutting jobs that really aren't needed.

Reply

what's going on in Brick

9:33 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

I just got a phone call from Joseph Lamb regarding the referendum vote, who is he? I'm not very political and I've never heard his name before.

Reply

George

10:10 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

Vote NO make the Mayor and Council famous for taking awat your services.

Reply

Gary

11:04 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

The old 3 man garbage trucks use to plow, the new 1 man trucks don't plow snow....Brick does not plow its own roads. The private hauling is a great idea, and will save the town a lot of money over the coming years. What is the big deal....we need to clean house! For you few that don't get it, its math; no pension payments, no benefits, and no health insurance payments. VOTE "NO"

Reply

parkway

11:46 pm on Saturday, April 2, 2011

gary do you happen to have benefits a pension and health care because if you do and want others to lose theirs you are a hypocrit

Reply
Comment_arrow

Gary

8:14 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

No self-employer and actually working for all my benefits, and paying into my retirement. Look I did not cause this problem, and other town are not having these Giant Layoffs....don't be attacking me.....150 people "which will be less" is not a big deal........I am looking forward to the vote, and the Mayor looking silly, and the private garbage.......and on the day don't blame me!

Comment_arrow

79

9:28 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Gary IF you throw rocks in the middle of a debate at people that have done their jobs and are victims of GOVERNMENT employment and it's finances and just because you are self employed and possibly you are envious of what they make in salary etc. "expect rocks to be throw back at you". No you did NOT cause the problem, BUT going after 171 people (and using them to stop the problem) rather then the politicians "you say caused the problem" IS wrong. So expect to be hit at times with some rocks.

Think

12:02 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Vote No you will pay in the long run. How many shootings in the last year or two? Let's see
CVS Brick police officer shoots man with gun
Waterside Brick police officer shoots man during drug raid
Hispanic on Hispanic Gang shooting behind Boston Market
Blood Gang on Blood Gang shooting Cedarbridge Ave apartments that initiated several murders in Lakewood.
Hispanic on Hispanic Mantoloking first aid building.

Try spending more time on Google than posting on this site. If that doesn't make you worry for your family and friends, vote no

Hmmm, we need less police, you people are so mad at the administration, you can't see what is best for the town. Good luck It is not the same Brick Town, I'll spend $400 to save the police, garbage pick up and the value of my house.

For those who say we need less police , wasn't there recent study that says we need more. I guess you are so smart you can figure out how many police officers we need. What was your formular, one police officerstopping in Dunkin Donuts means we need 30 less. Nice why don't you run for mayor

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

9:40 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Well stated "Think" ...... most reasonable thinking voters WILL look past the administration and the politicians issues .... BUT there are only a "few" within this story/comment section that "WILL punish" those who's hands are tied and affected with this month VOTE, rather then VOTE YES now FOR THEIR FUTURE as concerned citizens and the 171 that may loose their jobs and do what they need to do at a later VOTE.

Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

6:33 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Dear Think,
Thank you for the facts about the crime that's going on in Brick. I agree with you, along with the in-depth examination of the police audit done by the real Brick Resident.
That is a large part of why I will vote YES.

Gary

8:22 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Run for Mayor thats funny, not enough money.....Do you really think more cops is the answer?
I think we have enough cops, the problem is the court system sucks. These plea deals are the problem...

Reply

localexpert

8:27 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

We understand that our services are in jeopardy BY the MAYOR and COUNCIL.. WHY????? They could have reduced services and employment in other areas,but NO ,They want to play hardball with us and two essential services for the taxpayer.The police and DPW. should be mad at the Mayor and Council,THEY know what areas can be done away with,but instead they are mad at us,the taxpayer.Think Snow and vote NO. Great way to take care of us then. WE ARE BROKE,ENOUGH ALREADY....

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

9:20 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

localexpert there are lots of other areas they could back but they picked police and DPW because they know everybody would scream and make alot of noise and would want them back and vote yes but we need to stand up to them and vote NO and send a message to them.

Doug

9:12 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Why is it that the police and DPW are threatened to lose their jobs, but not Juan and the admins to the admins to the admins in Borough Hall? We have so much freaking overhead that have top salaries, excessive benefits packages etc... and none of them seem to be in the crosshairs for losing their jobs. This is a blatent and obvious visual into the horrible mismanagement by our elected officials. When we are told that they need more money, it screams mismanagement. When they threaten layoffs and focus on services and not overhead administration, it screams mismanagement. What is so hard to understand about this? They can't manage the money they have now! How is throwning another 8.4 million going to solve this problem? The problem isn't the amount of money. The problem is the people responsible for managing that money. OUR MONEY! OUR TAX DOLLARS! It is treated like a free checking account for these people. I would love to be able to pay my bills, make investements, take risks and chances with someone else's account, so that when it fails or I made a bad decision on a risk, no big deal. It isn't my money, so I wouldn't care. Aren't these facts obvious to everyone? Don't get bogged down with details, dollar figures that people are quoting here etc... and fighting each other instead of focusing on the real issue which is the political blunders that are supposed to be managing our tax money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Red

11:48 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Borough? You aren't even a Brick resident if you are calling it a borough.

Doug

9:12 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

The BOE and the TC are both doing a horrible job. WE need to make the change. WE need to take a stand against this problem and fix it the best we can.

Reply

George

9:39 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

You are on the right trail Doug but we all have to stand up to them and vote NO to send a message and give them the label of taking away our essential services.

Reply

George

9:41 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Doug they can't give us a detailed financial plan of where they are going to spend this extra money if everybody panics and votes yes that sends up a red flag in itself.

Reply

Jose Deer

9:49 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

cant afford the HIGHER property taxes , they call you a tax deadbeat and kick you and your family out of your house
cant afford the garbage bill, nothing happens.....

PROTECT YOUR FAMILY........................VOTE NO !!!

Reply

disgusted homeowner

9:56 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

To me personally, the scariest thing about a yes vote is that the taxpayer/voter has NO garuntee how the 8.4 million dollars(or whatever the final figure is) gets spent. The administration could still use the funds however they deem necessary( i.e. police or police cars, recreation, hire friends in town hall, etc) and down the road still scale back or eliminate DPW and trash service. This to me is an extremely dangerous line to walk when you are talking about the sum of money we will be asked to approve.

Reply

Gary

10:04 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

79, what is your answer to this problem, because so far you talk alot and nothing about what to do.
So I guess you are weak, and just pay and pay and pay.......I wish you could fix this problem, but instead you continue to add nothing.....Why are you so worried about 150 so people....when the town is broken.....the mayor should have been working on this years ago, when the Governor told all these mayors what was going to happen....but no not our Mayor, he waited and now the problem got bigger......the problem is the township government, not the people.....Give me an answer.....nothing. Thats why the vote will be no, people are tired of all this waste........

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:15 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Gary you answered your our question in the first sentence......"79, what is your answer to this problem, because so far you talk a lot and nothing about what to do".

YES Gary I DID talk and explain and give facts WHY this referendum should be voted YES and MANY times. Again I will state and give my answer to the problem FIRST to VOTE YES (for ALL reasons prior stated) and SECOND if you have a problem with the Mayor and or the Administration in office at the time, rally the troops at that time they run and get out the VOTE too remove ..... that's the America way OR should be. Your no vote at this time "because of your dislike of those in office" at this time FIRST it is wrong and SECOND will cost the citizen of the Township in more way then saving (maybe) a few more dollars per month then voting YES ....... what happens after this referendum WILL be in the hands of the voting public.

Comment_arrow

79

12:17 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

.....and Gary I gave THIS example of why POLITICS should NOT be a part of this VOTE this month:

"There ARE few here that still continue to bring POLITICS into the VOTE and that is wrong. It's like a Police Officer that pulls a motorist over for a violation and basically had the intentions of only giving the driver a "verbal warning" .... however, upon talking to the driver that was courteous and respectful the "back seat passenger starts to mouth off to the officer .... AND the officer now being upset "issues the driver a summons for being upset with the passenger"??? That IS wrong AND similar to the posts in this comment section. Don't be mad at the 171 for your dislike of the politicians in BRICK ...... VOTE YES"

Comment_arrow

George

1:41 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

79 you are such a phony keep it up

George

10:15 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Gary don't expect much out of 79 he is part of the problem.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

12:40 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

George NOT nice to say ??? Other then YOUR continual one liners and your NO NO NO and nothing more then that ..... I surly am NOT the problem and YOU are if anything because you have nothing too contribute that will change anyones mind that reads the comments?? I accepted your no vote as the American way .... but me the problem. I am NOT. Look in the mirror George.

Comment_arrow

George

1:24 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

79 where is your overwhelming fan base on here I am waiting to see it?

Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

6:39 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Dear George,
When you insult someone else, you negate what you are saying. I am part of 79's "fan base". His isn't the only opinion I agree with. Brick Resident has done a careful analysis of the Police Audit done by an independent third party.

Stephen Mader

11:14 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Thanks for all the opinions. I am now more confused than ever!! It's a curse when you can see both sides of a story without formulating a concrete opinion. That being said, you cant get money out of a stone. If we turn a blind eye to our problems they will not go away! A reduced police force results in increased crime, that will effect our property value. It's like pay me now or pay me later. It may make sense to except a property tax hike, rather than loose even more property value. I could be wrong and I admit that. Its a crap shoot, and only time will tell if the correct decisions were made. Perservere Brick, better days are coming.......I pray!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

1:19 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

nothing will hurt your property values MORE than foreclosures (which there will be more of with higher tax bill) throughout Brick and higher property taxes (the new buyer will include the higher taxes in their lower offer to you the seller).......please understand , letting 29 cops go, will not lower your property values (it may actually increase it)

George

11:18 am on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Stephen they are looking to exploit whether the taxpayers are weak or strong and if you are strong you will vote NO send a message to them they won't risk losing their elected seats.

Reply

Think

12:17 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Voting No is wrong, it will fix nothing. The time to fix the problem is every time there is an election. The best part of Brick is that we trust we live in a safe community. Why don't you talk to a police officer and see how much it has changed and how much worse it will be if we reduce the police levels. How proud were we to say we lived in the safest community in the country. Realators say it increased home value, have a few murders, shootings or robberies on your block and see how your value goes down.
Voting No does not elimate bad decisions by the politicians. Unfortunately voting yes, will not change their future bad decisions. What it will do is keep police officers on the streets and continue to protect our community from criminals.
In Ocean County, gun violence has become a norm. Lakewood has shootings all the time that you don't hear about. Brick is now experiencing some of that. I want my family safe. Although, unrealistic I want a police officer on every block. Simply, I want my family to be protected from these thugs and I am willing to gamble that my $400 will help to do that.
A No vote will put less police on the streets. I wonder what the age of the average police officer will be when they lay off all the young ones. Do you want 40 to 50 year old police officers chasing or fighting a 20 year old that just committed some horrific crime? Goood luck, you my friend are penny wise and dollar foolish.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

1:15 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

the police have outpriced themselves out of a job......the RESET button needs to be hit hard.....the money is just going to benefits and pensions (that most people who are paying the tax bill dont get by the way !!) ........if ITS REALLY ABOUT SAFETY and we need more police, get rid of all of them and then rehire at half the costs and you can almost DOUBLE the numbers.....simple solution !

although of course this is unheard of in the public union world, thats how its done in the real world.....its time these "heros" join the rest of us (who pay the outrageous benefits) in the real world of 2011

Comment_arrow

79

1:38 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Jose Deer ..... ".....its time these "heros" join the rest of us (who pay the outrageous benefits) in the real world of 2011" AND "....... and we need more police, get rid of all of them and then rehire at half the costs and you can almost DOUBLE the numbers.....simple solution !" AND ".....the police have outpriced themselves out of a job"

YOU are just another minority individual that probably hates ..... no I am wrong not probably, "you do hate the police" .....for whatever reason (and I wouldn't get into my thoughts about that) .... and it really doesn't matter because YOU are "a minority in Brick". AS I have stated before and will state again " When YOU walk the walk, then YOU can talk the talk". YOU like every other resident of Brick since the inception of the department in 1972, have had the opportunity to join the force "IF you qualify" ..... maybe you tried but were not qualified in one of the many areas of qualifications?? who knows only YOU?? The price that IS paid to ALL of the officers THEY HAVE EARNED MANY TIMES OVER. They do a job "MOST will NOT and could NOT do" and IF they are paid a salary that you disagree with .... OH WELL.

Comment_arrow

George

1:46 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

You can see the politics heating up with 79 but he says politics shouldn't be used in the case of this issue.

Comment_arrow

79

2:00 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

George ..... first there is no politics in what I wrote above 110% no in any prior comments. However, maybe you should get you eyes checked first ?? and second if you have a reading comprehension issue, have someone else read it to you and explain the meaning .... also you appear to be getting tired?? Please write something of substance and more then the "one liners" .... the comics can get away with that, BUT your "one liners" aren't funny.

Comment_arrow

George

2:10 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

79 you stand out as a sore thumb as a politician LOL

Comment_arrow

79

2:31 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Whatever you say "George" LOL

George

12:37 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Think thjere are no detail;ed numbers to support this issue mbut you say I should vote for a figure without details to back it up.

Reply

Think

2:09 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Jose, I am embarassed for you. Do you think that they can fire all the police and replace them with new hires at a lower rate? You live in a dream world and have no real solution. Unfortunately, right now there is no solution. So understand the dilemma, vote yes and then get the politicians out.

Reply

forthekids

2:12 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

The reason why the mayor and the council are going after the PD and the DPW is because that is where they can get rid of the most people who had ties to Joe S. This is clearly a house cleaning by the R's , they don't care about the taxpayers, the citizens of brick, all they care about is feeding the corrupt Rep machine run by Gilmore, the more they feed the machine the more jobs/money for their friends and family, see TR MUA/Juan Bellu/Jim Lacey/DMV/Brick MUA/ dirty dirty politics as usual. This is blackmail the corrupt machine win no matter what the outcome of the vote.

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

2:43 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

"forthekids" AND "for the record" YOU are 100% wrong with ..... "....The reason why the mayor and the council are going after the PD and the DPW is because that is where they can get rid of the most people who had ties to Joe S. This is clearly a house cleaning by the R's ......"

EVERY position IN the Police Department IS "civil service" regulated AND the majority of the other positions ARE the same with few exceptions. YOU can NOT get a job as a Police Officer without fulfilling ALL of the required things along the way AND knowing someone does NOT place that person at the front of ANY line for employment AND I stand up for NO party. It is a shame that people write something that IS on their mind, that carries "NO truth" with it. I would hope that YOU would look up the website related to the qualification for even "being first qualified" and then "the continual hiring qualifications" that ALL of the Officers met along the way too being hired.

Comment_arrow

79

2:45 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

..................politics do NOT belong here AS I have stated many, many times.

Comment_arrow

George

2:49 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

79 your politics are standing out like a Sore Thumb keep it up

Comment_arrow

79

3:36 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

George, obviously YOU have some issues with "reading comprehension, cognitive skills and "flat out" NOT knowing the meaning of a specific word".

To help you with the "last issue" here is a site and as far as the others I told you what you might want too do:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics

...and try to write more then the one or two lines and IF there IS a spelling problem that's holding you back, install a Google spell check??

Comment_arrow

George

3:53 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Whatever you say Mr. Polotics (79) you are A great wind bag.

disgusted homeowner

5:36 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Now all the pigly wigly's are in the frying pan for sure this time. Let's see if they can really take the heat. I think some are going to get burned this time for sure !!!!!!! If not burned, a little "overcooked" for sure.

Reply

localexpert

6:21 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Pdlease do not take us for fools.. The Chief of Police is the Father -in-law to the MAYORS son.Brian D. is let go by Merril Lynch,but gets a job at D.M.V.Lakewood.How does that happen?Mrs.S works for Ferguson Plumbing,same as Cielsa.How many relatives are working in town hall,rec,D.P.W. Board of Ed. employees.Give us a little credit for not being naive.We are Broke,this is a commuter town,no more taxes.VOTE NO,THINK SNOW

Reply

Gary

6:39 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

I really can not see this fixing itself with a major layoff. Even if its voted for with a yes vote, what happens next year? We need to have forced retirement "out after 30 years of service" , pensions need to stop for new hires and offered 401K's, You cannot collect on pension til you are 60 year old, Pay 10% for your health plan. ......A no vote can save this town..............

Reply

Think

7:20 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

I think you both should marry the tooth fairy, move to Camden or Newark and live off her money. I think tooth fairies are exempt from real estate taxes. I don't think either of you are smart enough to even find the voting booth. You are embarassing yourselves.

Reply

judy

7:45 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Do you peopple ever sleep I keep seeing the same names going back and forth 24/7 geting nowhere! Are you insane? I am sick of reading all of the negative comments about our mayor, Govenor & township officials. The matter at hand is for us not to lose our garbage and police force. I am voting YES! I enjoy having my garbage picked up by the town and I do not want our town to turn into Camden or Newark by not keeping enough police officers on the road. How many of you would put your life on the line & deal with all the horrible things our police officers encounter. You couldn't pay me enough to do the job! Even off duty they still have to be aware of their suroundings in case there might be someone out there that they recently arrested while they are out to dinner with their familys, or if they see a car accident and offer a helping hand. My sister is married to a police officer in another town - I know first hand how much she puts up with! The emotional roller coaster ride when her husband comes home after seeing a child get hurt or killed, suicides, gang activity, not knowing if she will see him again when he hangs up the phone in the middle of a conversation on the way to a shooting, etc... You try it! Having a job as a police officer means the whole family is part of his job 24/7 - in my opinion they don't get paid nearly enough! Think about it! If the town is bluffing or not it does not matter. I am not willing to take the chance - WHATEVER THE COST MY VOTE WILL BE YES!

Reply

parkway

7:55 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Judy I agree , My nephew is a police officer not in Brick and I worry about him. As far as I am concerned they are underpaid for what they have to do.

Reply

localexpert

8:14 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Hey gang,we want the police,but the Mayor is the One who has put them in Jeopardy.You cant tell me that he could have gone many other ways to save the officers jobs. Furloughs, Forced Retirements,Rolling back some vacation days,Reducing the salarys of ADM. We did NOT bring up the Police HE FOCUSED on them,not us..T ake out anger on HIM ,not us I will still vote NO and bet he is bluffing tragically with fine men and ladies futures.NICE WORK MAYOR

Reply

Doug

8:32 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

My neighbor commented to me this evening after we were discussing this upcoming potential tax increase and he told me that his taxes have gone up 125% since he moved in here. We both moved into our neighborhood in 2002. No more! We need to put a stop to this nonsense of over spending and bad management. I am voting NO! I will not be bullied or threatened by politicians that obviously can't manage their positions. Our taxes is not a blank check for them to do what they feel. The non-stop hiring of friends, but threaten police and DPW for layoffs. Time to stop this BS and then kick them out of office. Once that is done, may the real clean up begin.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

9:24 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Doug the way I feel if you don't send them a message by voting no you are going to get taken for more down the road it's time to draw the line.

judy

8:58 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

I urge you all to read this article http://hubpages.com/hub/Police-Wife-Life-The-Joys-and-Jitters-of-a-LEO-Wife-by-Melissa-Littles. Then tell me if you think our police officers are overpaid! Please vote yes!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Christina Weaver

11:27 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Dear Judy,
Thank you for the citation. I read the article. For me, it was "preaching to the choir", but the law enforcement officer's wife described his job in a way that I couldn't.
No, I am not related by blood, marriage or friendship to a police officer. I will vote YES.

Comment_arrow

Dawn Marie White

11:40 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Thanks for sharing this article. A bit lengthy however it made the point. The reward of a salary is never enough for putting your life on the line everyday. A yes vote, is a vote for Brick Township families and our quality of life

parkway

9:13 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Judy, Anyone that risks their lives on a daily basis is not overpaid, Some of the comments on here have just been ridiculous. I honestly don't think they realize what will be lost if this vote fails. Believe me I am not a fan of the current polititions in office and I did not vote them in, but this is not a scare tactic. The layoffs will happen and the changes will not be for the good of the town. I can only hope that the majority can see that. I moved to Brick when I was 3 years old at that time there was nothing in the town. We used to have to go to shoprite in lakewood. There has been much blame over the years but this is the worst it has been and it really saddens me to see this. It is always the hardest working that suffer and make the sacrifices never those that could actually afford to give back. Having said that I need to do what is best for the town and that is vote yes.

Reply

Doug

9:48 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

For the ones that believe that this is not a scare tactic or bullying by Steve and company, why don't you demand that they layoff the useless and endless administration folks that constantly keep growing. Remember, Steve and company are the ones targeting the DPW and BPD. There are endless ways to cut back to get under the cap, but they apparently refuse to even look at that. If you give in now, it will not end. I would love to know why, and I am sure that the amount of responses just to this article alone has gotten back to Steve and company, they don't come out to the public and make statements, squelch the untruths, talk to the taxpayers, inform us fully etc... No one knows for certain that the layoffs will happen if the vote is no, just the same, no one knows that they layoffs won't happen anyway if the vote is yes. What about next year and the year after that? When will it end?

Reply

George

9:55 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Doug they picked the police and DPW because they know everybody will be scared and vote yes but it is time to draw the line and vote NO and send them a message.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vsox1957

1:49 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

George, are you for real???? The biggest part of the laffoffs will come from DPW and the Police becuse they are the largest departments. Maybe you think they should have said the Tax Assessors Office (6 people) or Purchasing (4 people) or payroll (2 people) or Human Resources (5 people) etc........are you getting the idea yet???? And as for 79 I agree with most of what he or she has to say!! Educate yourself, learn the facts and understand government then maybe you can stop embarassing yourself!

Gary

11:21 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

I can almost guarantee the vote will be "NO".......And can guarantee heads will roll in Townhall. But if items were cut back earlier last year, and a hiring freeze set....we would be in better shape. There is no way the residents of Brick will vote this in, we are not a Township of stupid people. I don't care about paying my fair share, which is $5,400. to date, but I need answers. The 150 employees that may lose there jobs, I am not happy about this. But I feel the Mayor had options and failed us, and now he has to fix this problem. This is no joke; this is not North Jersey, and the crime is what it is. The Blood Gang is not going to take over Brick....the membership guideline is just not here. All you people really need to thing about the future and your families future. $400. to $500. increase every year is crazy. And please explain how the Mayor works fulltime in Brick at $52,000 and in Toms River fulltime at $100kplus this is 80 hours.....all for himself............Very bad.....borderline criminal....

Reply

parkway

11:57 pm on Sunday, April 3, 2011

Gary sadly I agree with you I do not think it will pass even though I do believe it will be worse if it doesn't. I honestly am not sure how these officials were even elected because I knew they were not acting in Bricks best interest. It is a case of the rich get richer which is a shame. The employees that will lose their jobs will be the ones that need them the most and not the ones that should go.

Reply

Gary

7:29 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Lets face it these officials love to be noticed in a big way, this helps them move up the ladder. But to take on to much is very bad for the township. Things like buying retail shopping center property is wrong. Owning strip malls is not needed, and a waste of money. The townhall these a overhaul and downsize, this way we wouldn't be in this position. With all the homes in Brick, we should be able to balance a budget. The small waste adds up, and there is a lot. The Mayor should setup a study group to help him come up with ways to get Brick on track. Also the Mayors salary should be reduced to $26,000 or less. There is no fulltime Mayor, he should have a real job......

Reply

Gary

7:44 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Why is private garbage so bad, please explain. Frankly I think its a great thing, and will be voting no so this may really happen. For some reason you all complain about this, I don't get it. All over the country there is private garbage pickup. And these areas have low taxes.....Some people don't like change....THE TIME HAVE COME ....PRIVATE GARBAGE AND LOVING IT

Reply
Comment_arrow

TeachR

7:58 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

I'd like to give you a possible scenario. As a teacher, I see the many facets of the residents of Brick. Some are very fortunate and have no problems paying their bills. Some of my students' families are just squeaking by and cannot pay their bills. Many of these families will not be hiring a private hauler. There will be illegal dumping throughout Brick. Without a public works and road department, the trash will sit there. If you think it's hard to sell your house now, just wait.

Comment_arrow

Doug

8:09 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

And this is exactly why the administration should be cutting costs and balancing the budget in other areas. Think about this. Is this administration really concerned about the residents of Brick when they purposely target areas like police and DPW? They know the fallout and outcome, but they won't look into other areas where there is so much overhead, excessive salaries, benefit packages that the US Senate and Congress get etc... It is absurd! This is why we (the NO votes) are saying what we are saying. There is no reason whatsoever to target key resources and services like this when there are plenty of areas that need to be addressed and reduced. How is it different monetarily if a police officer (let's say $85k for the sake of argument) is laid off compared to an $85k assistant administrator? They both serve the same purpose of reducing cost.

disgusted homeowner

8:19 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

TeachR, i believe you are correct in that scenario taking place, but just the same i feel many will be pushed into foreclosure with a larger than normal tax increase also, which will drive their monthly mortgage and tax payment higher.
Also, any private business is in business to make a profit. They do so thru cost containment, So that they remain COMPETITIVE. However public entities like towns, counties, etc aren't supposed to make a profit. Therefore there isn't enough emphasis on cost containment in BRICK, and there never has been. Quite truthfully, the only one in this administration who does get that is Scott p. the business ad. The rest of them spend our money like it's falling off the trees behind town hall !!!! They too desperately need some quikie courses in cost containment. I think they should all go to summer school.............

Reply

Mare

8:42 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

The only way to get them out of office is to organize and VOTE!!! There is good reason why twp adiministration cuts the jobs of the middle class and keeps their six digit positions safe... because the taxpayers voted that they would be trusted with that job. It's a hard lesson learned, but it's time to let them know they did not do the job they were voted in to do. Unless they cut some high paying assistant and administrative positions, (which of course isn't going to happen), in the next election they go. In the mean time vote NO and suffer temporarily. Get a gun license, learn to shoot and protect yourself. It's not a radical thought with what the King is proposing (threatening). Your going to need to protection, it's plain and simple. Take his threat as real and prepare for it. As for trash; remember the slogan: "You've got a friend in Pennsylvania" then take your trash to your friends house once a month for a camping trip and burn it! It's free and legal there!!! We've all forgotten how to survive and that gives the king a way to frighten the citizens.

Reply

79

8:52 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

According to the Facebook page related to VOTE IN BRICK April 27th and having over 2207 seperate "Likes" the VOTE tally is 82% YES .... 16% NO and 2% UNDECIDED.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

10:27 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

where did you learn how to count ????........is 79 your IQ ??

Comment_arrow

79

11:15 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

"Jose Deer" if it was my IQ, IS there a problem with that amount OR do you wish you were as smart?? and surly not as dumb as the statement you wrote ..... "........if ITS REALLY ABOUT SAFETY and we need more police, get rid of all of them and then rehire at half the costs and you can almost DOUBLE the numbers.....simple solution ....."

Guess you'd better get off this site AND make some more money to cover the expenses of the vote .... yes or no .... one way OR another. By the way what is it do YOU do, work for Waste Management?? .....WE have enough garbage being thrown around without comments like your continual stuff. AND what I posted above it WILL be addressed later this date .... so hang around for the results and not make $$ ........ also thank you for being so respectful of those that do NOT agree with you .... IT only shows the FACTS you have provided are some what out of being the truth :-0

Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

11:30 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

So Math and also command of the English language are not your strong points

Gary

8:54 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Teach R, first to you and all the teachers, thanks for your service. And as for seeing this in your classroom it is hard. I have children in Brick school and tell me stories let people having troubles, it sad. I can understand what you are saying, but I really don't think its going to be that bad. We are not sure how this is going to work. But I do know one think, they are worried in the township. All this could have been avoided if the local government would have did there homework "as a teacher you must agree homework is important" As a resident of Brick since 1958, I can tell you a lot about to township. But a all government there is waste, and because the budget must balance, spending is needed sometimes. But other towns balanced there budgets without asking for crazy increases. I am not looking for private garbage, layoffs or hurting anyone. But we need to fix this problem, and by approving this will only continue with the problem for years to come. Thank you

Reply

forthekids

8:59 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

“Many, many people will probably go on that date or around that date,” said Mayor Stephen C. Acropolis, referring to May 13. Some employees, he said, such as those who handle trash and recycling pickup, will continue for anywhere between two weeks and one month. During that time, Acropolis said, the township council will most likely pass ordinances mapping out how residents will handle using private haulers to undertake sanitation services.
What exactly does he mean MAP OUT how residents will use private haulers, he trying to tell us we will only be able to choose from certain companies??? Surly companies owned by his friends and family club members. These self serving ego maniacs have gone to far this time, sounds like they already know the vote outcome (NO), but they win either way. Yes and they have their hands in the taxpayers pockets another 24% so they can spend on things like a marina and water park. No and they get rid of all Joe's old buddies and can make money on garbage collection while also depleting out police force, these guys should be wearing masks, only at town hall not when they are at their "other" jobs, TR MUA, Steve & Juan, DMV Brian, etc. Dirty dirty politics as usual.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

5:38 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

My thoughts exactly, forthekids.. THEY will map out what private handlers we can use? Excuse me? I thought we lived in a democracy where we have "freedom of choice."It's too much already.

Jose Deer

10:25 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

TeachR,
i am sure you are not one the public workers, who sees the issues as those who take and are entitled (public workers) and those who produce and must pay (private taxpayers),
so i will give you benefit of the doubt that you are not biased as 99% of your peers are and what you say is true, then please answer, how are your students families going to be able to afford the INCREASE in property taxes , if they cant afford the garbage ???.....

and if they cant afford the property taxes , they will be foreclosed on ( called tax deadbeats in the paper for all to see )and kicked out of their houses, which i think you would agree is much much worse for them than having some extra garbage they cant afford to get rid of....so being the wonderful teacher that you are , you surely will VOTE NO and make sure your unfortunate students families have the safety and security of a roof over their heads

Reply
Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

10:57 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

No to be critical, but many of these families are the same ones you see driving around town texting or with their phone glued to their ear, also their kids have fancy phones to keep up with the other kids. How is it that so many crying poverty can afford all the fancy unnecessary items such as cell phones, which can cost many times more than privatize garbage? – If we were actually going to pay for it. Maybe the town’s plan is to farm out garbage pick-up. Why does everyone think the tap is going to be immediately shut off if we vote “NO”? It just isn’t going to happen.

Comment_arrow

Doug

11:06 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Concerned, I'm not so sure that such a generalized stereotyping statement like that will help to convince people to fight back and vote no. I find it hard to believe that you can determine someones financial status and the cost of their phone simply by passing them on the road with a 2 second window of opportunity to view them. I am fairly confident that Steve has always wanted to privatize and get rid of the DPW. There are many avenues to get to where you to be and he seems to keep finding more and more all of the time. If the vote goes yes, he wins with another $8.4 million in the coffers. If the vote goes NO, he wins and gets rid of the DPW and privatizes the garbage. Now, if that happens, I wonder who will influence or decide who gets that lucrative contract?

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

12:28 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Didn't mean to stereotype. I guess it came out that way. The point I was trying to make is that people don’t know how to prioritize or budget. If this was not the case, so many people would not be in a personal financial crisis. Ironically the same thing goes for the local goverment. They have over spent on things that we absolutly didn't need and you can see the mess it has NOW gotten us into. Now the tax payers are forced to fork up the difference. Voting NO sends a message that we have had enough of government waste and you guys need to clean up your act. Voting YES is the simple short run solution to the problem, but it will not fix the problem. Eventually it will all come to a head. There is no reason to be afraid because police and trash will not be halted. There will just be changes. The situation happened with the building and code enforcement department. So many bad things were going to happen with them gone. Now you don't miss them and actually that department is a little bit better and will be better once a few of remaining long timers are gone.

Comment_arrow

TeachR

4:38 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

JD - the majority of the students in my description are not homeowners, they are renters. Some of our needy students live with extended families. Others own their own home. The number of transient families in our schools increases every year. We have a wonderful diversity of residents in Brick, as I'm sure you know.

disgusted homeowner

11:21 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Concerned Brick Citizen, having been a landlord for a long time, i can tell you personally that appearance isn't always the way it is. Example: many homeowners/tenants will keep the 150 dollar a month cable pkg, their cell phones and other niceties going while their mortgages go delinquent or their rent goes unpaid. They know foreclosure can take a year and eviction can take a few months also. They refuse to downsize their respective lifestyle and pay the most important bills first. Until the sheriff knocks on their door. Then they panick and it's usually to late. Americans have become very used to all these perks and refuse to give them up when their backs are against the wall. Me personally, no cell phone and basic cable. and a 12 yr. old computer that somedays gives even me a headache !!!!!!!

Reply

Mare

11:31 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

No one should have to give up personal items that they have purchased with their hard earned money, especially the middle class who work much harder than administrators and administrators assistants.
I've got a deal for you, if king steve gives up the assistant to his assistants assistant, then I'll give up my lip gloss, cell phone and gourmet spices from Penzeys. I don't think the king is giving up anything
that will change his easy living, waterfront, lifestyle and I don't believe for one minute that he really gives a hoot about the citizens of Brick (btw, I was born and raised in Brick also).

Reply

Think

11:34 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Are you kidding me that the gangs are not going to take over Brick. 5 years ago, there were no gang shootings. I suggest you take a ride through Maple Leaf Park or call their management. Ask them if they think gangs are going to take over.

Early last year or the year before, the police department created a special enforcement team and sent them to Maple Leaf to combat gangs. Late last year, it was disbanded. I would guess the residents noticed the difference. If the police department can't address a small area like Maple Leaf, how are they going to take care of your neighborhood and mine with 29 less.

To you Democrats posting on this board,

Brick Township does not need politics played over this issue. We know that this adimistration has put us in this position. Taxes should have been raised gradually, projects should not have been started and certainly outlandish pay raises should not have been given.

In my opionion, the Democrats will be better served not attacking the current administration over this issue until November.

Remember, we only have one vote on this issue. If you vote, No and are wrong, parts of Brick will become just like Lakewood in a very short time. Ask the expert, your neighborhood police officer, but don't wait till May 13 th because they will be harder to find.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jose Deer

11:47 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

BOOOOOO!

and unlike you who sees in Rs and Ds, i see that GOVERNMENT IS BLOATED AND CORRUPT

if you are really more scared of gangs stealing your money than the politicians , than call in the Guard and get rid of the problem once and for all (but of course getting rid of the problem would not help the numbers of cops needed on the payroll)

Comment_arrow

George

1:39 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Think I am an independent thinker I wouldn't put up with this idea the Mayor and council is trying to ram down our throats. I have been here all of my 66 years and I have never seen such mismanagement as I have seen with this present Mayor and council they should all resign before they bankrupt the community.

Mare

11:46 am on Monday, April 4, 2011

Obviously some of the kings men have taken over the comment section. As a proud, lifelong, REPUBLICAN, I can honestly say, due to the absolute waste of tax payer dollars by this adminstration, I'd vote for ANY other person to oust the king. This is not a Republican vs Democrat thing. This is average everyday people trying to keep their homes and due to the actions of the uber wealthy they can't! I have money, I should pay more for property taxes, but I'm not struggling like some families I see in Brick. Until so many people lose their homes and start sleeping right in the middle of town where all can see, this will never stop. I've said it before and I'll say it again, even with the federal govt. the people are growing increasingly angry at politicians on both sides and it won't belong before there's a revolt of some sort. You can't continually ask the middle class and working poor to clean up the messes of a wealthy few.

Reply

Think

1:41 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Another great answer from Jose Deer,

When was the last time the NJ National Guard was called into an Ocean County community for a crime problem. You my friend live in a dream world. Once again, I am embarassed for you.

As far as your comment on Rs and Ds. Who do you think bloated the govenment. Hey not to insult the hard working MacDonald's workers, but aren't you suppose to be flipping burgers right now. Get to work.

Weren't you one of Muammar Muhammad al-Gaddafi advisors six months ago.

Give answers that will work or go blog about your favorite restaurant.

Reply

Doug

1:52 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

At this point, R's and D's have nothing to do with the ongoing issues in our city. I usually side closer to the ideology of the Republicans, however there are bad politicians in every party, including the major two. Steve fights with other R's including the governor from his own party. This is local politics and it really doesn't matter whether we have a R or D. We just need an administration that actually cares about their taxpayers, citizens and VOTERS! The current administration is either extremely inept, under educated, lack experience and/or in over their heads. They don't have the necessary knowledge to do what is right for the taxpayers. I would vote for freaking alien from another planet, if they truly were concerned about our quality of life and could live within the means of reasonable tax rates.

Reply

Concerned Brick Citizen

1:52 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

For all of you Calypso fans, this message from the Mayor is “double entendre” or double speak. The public has been lead to believe that we will lose police and trash pick-up. Loss of these services with a NO vote has not been substantiated. The issuing of the pink slips was a legal formality. – Saber rattling by the Mayor. The real message I see, is to “trick” the voting public into getting them to vote YES thus the voters are responsible for giving a green light for an increase in taxes. The justification and blame then falls on the voters’ not local government who get to keep their cushy jobs and benefits. I’m amazed at how gullible so many people can be. Don’t you see that the wool is being pulled over your eyes? If the NOs do win the police will still be here to protect and public works will be redefined. – We are taxed enough as it is. Life in Brick will go on. Crime will always be here because we are no longer a small town. Brick will never be like it was back in the 1940’s, 50’s and 60’s.

Reply
Comment_arrow

C

5:33 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Oh my gosh....this is exactly what I have been trying to explain to everyone on this site. A "yes" vote is what they want to TRICK you into. How can you not see through it? You have to vote "no."

disgusted homeowner

2:10 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Concerned Brick Citizen, well said and very well thought out statement of FACT. The taxpayer is really in a lose-lose situation here, but truly a yes vote is akin to putting a bandaid on a cannon ball size wound. It will just keep bleeding till the patient dies. Strong changes are needed Now if Brick wants to save anything that remains positive of its image. Truly a yes vote will shift the blame to the taxpayer. "This is what you people voted for". I can already here that being said in the future at council meetings.

Reply

Jose Deer

2:14 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

i see the public employees (and their families) are getting angry that their entitlements paid by the taxpayers may be coming to an end, because they have outpriced themselves out of their jobs, so of course they resort to name calling and looking down at someone just because they may work at a hamburger restaurant ......so bring it on , just make sure you keep it up for another month, as makes the job of telling people to VOTE NO that much easier, who wants to pay higher property taxes to such ungrateful people

i given you my answer many times, you just dont like it

VOTE NO AND CUT BLOATED GOVERNMENT......Cant get much more direct than that

Reply

Mare

2:16 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

The fact is, taxes will be going up. The question is, will they go up 2% or as high as the king wants them to perpetually. It's a choice that must be made by the people. There's no way taxes are going down, that's settled, but it may also be time to take responsibility for ourselves rather than depending on those specific 29 police officers (God bless them) who will lose their jobs. The king is acting as if the 29 are the only officers who work and they will be cut. Things have to change, they simply can't keep going the way they are. The federal govt. is cutting out funding, the state is cutting out funding, everyone is going to have to take a hit and it should include the mayor and his buddies, but it won't. The mayor needs to cut his staff, his salary and pay for his benefits like everyone else..... never happen! :-)

Reply

Think

2:59 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Jose,

Why don't you give us a recap of your reasons. Bullet them out. I am looking for real answers for now, not a year away. My answer is can only be done in November elections, because obviosly they haven't listened to us yet. And to the restaurant workers my apoligies, bad joke from the 90's.

Reply

disgusted homeowner

4:35 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Everyone has to agree with all the cuts in funding at the federal and state level. Brick WILL receive less money in terms of aid in the future. It's happening all over the country. Brick's overall payroll, benefits, and pensions for the total number of employees we have just is not SUSTAINABLE for the long term. If cuts have to be made, you might as well do it now, because the overall picture WILL look dramatically worse this time next year.

Reply

localexpert

5:43 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Why is it that NOT ONE Adm. or Adm. asst. is on the pink slip list????? One guy gets a 50,000.00 RAISE but we have to give pink slips th the hard working people that keep our community going.....Steve works in T.R.with a big raise,he isnt giving that back.... Brian D. unemployed 1 week,boys take care of him with D.M.V. JOB,HAVENT HEARD A WORD from him saving other jobs... VOTE NO ,and send them a message that we have had enough...They are still working and making big bucks,One in T.R. The other in Lakewood.VOTE NO......

Reply

79

6:09 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Here ARE some writings of people in the "know" REAL intelligent statements??:

"many will be pushed into foreclosure with a larger than normal tax increase also, which will drive their monthly mortgage and tax payment higher".

"All over the country there is private garbage pickup. And these areas have low taxes....."

"they picked the police and DPW because they know everybody will be scared and vote yes but it is time to draw the line and vote NO and send them a message".

"the way I feel if you don't send them a message by voting no you are going to get taken for more down the road it's time to draw the line".

"Now all the pigly wigly's are in the frying pan for sure this time. Let's see if they can really take the heat. I think some are going to get burned this time for sure !!!!!!! If not burned, a little "overcooked" for sure".

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

6:11 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"The reason why the mayor and the council are going after the PD and the DPW is because that is where they can get rid of the most people who had ties to Joe S".

"........if ITS REALLY ABOUT SAFETY and we need more police, get rid of all of them and then rehire at half the costs and you can almost DOUBLE the numbers.....simple solution..."

"nothing will hurt your property values MORE than foreclosures (which there will be more of with higher tax bill) throughout Brick and higher property taxes"

"Run for Mayor thats funny, not enough money.....Do you really think more cops is the answer...."

"I think we have enough cops, the problem is the court system sucks. These plea deals are the problem..."

"it doesnt scare the sheep as much........they are very scared of criminals and smelly garbage , so they will agree to any thing not to upset their fairy tale bubble they live in"

"if you vote yes, of course your property taxes will increase......if one day in the future, you can no longer keep up the theft of your money and the depreciation of your biggest asset , they will kick you out of your house and put your name in the paper as a tax deadbeat"

"You'll burn your own trash, shovel your own street, catch your own crooks, do your own building inspections, etc. But he'll continue to line his...."

"People WE ARE BROKE...And all they want is to Increase, When is enough ,enough..We Are Broke.When does that sink in......."

Comment_arrow

79

6:14 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"We are broke, $130 million dollars in debt and climbing...."

"all the folks in Lakewood wearing the black and white clothing certainly should not scare you. they're just fashion conscience and trying to save money on their respective wardrobes. Thank you"

"Yes and they have their hands in the taxpayers pockets another 24% so they can spend on things like a marina and water park. No and they get rid of all Joe's old buddies and can make"

"In the mean time vote NO and suffer temporarily. Get a gun license, learn to shoot and protect yourself. It's not a radical thought ..."

FACTS and NOTHING BUT THE FACTS and we get the ABOVE ...... and on top of that the labels and names they produce none stop

VOTE YES and let your intelligence show above this garbage.

localexpert

6:26 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Hey 79 you sound like John Barr, Jack Nydham,or maybe Joe S. Whomever you are,you will meet the same fate on April 27,and in Nov. The majority of the blogs are in the "know" and they will prevail on the 27.It shows people are infomed when almost 600 people have their say even if it upsets you..

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

6:50 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"locoexpert" ..... the "in the know small group" IS about as much the truth telling or facts that are being written by them all as the Brooklyn Bridge being up for sale. The VOTE on April 27th will not affect me one way or another, other then seeing people put into a position about loosing their jobs "for about the same amount of money for the private garbage P/U".

The issue that some express with the present administration "has NOTHING to do with this VOTE". I guess you NEVER read any of my examples as to why this IS wrong. But then I guess YOUR mind is clouded with only you point. If you make the choice to vote no, YOU are NO better then the people YOU want out of office. There "WILL be an increase one way OR another and that's FACT" and YOU and your small group will NOT affect the outcome and most that read these comments feel sorry for ALL ..... but real sorry for the "small group mentality" with this VOTE only and do NOT bring in issues that are NOT part of THS VOTE.

Comment_arrow

79

7:00 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

......and IF you count (in the know) them up on both hands YOU might have a few fingers left over to dial 911 .... but don't expect a fast response .... BUT do expect to pay an increase OR more money for additional and added services.

Mare

6:27 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

I must agree, we are broke, therefore the king and all his men should take hefty pay cuts. They should agree to a mass layoff of administrators (most of them sit for a living anyway).
Can you imagine the headline:
BRICK MAYOR GIVES LAYOFF NOTICES TO ASSISTANTS AND WORKS FOR A LIVING!
Fat chance of that happening, but it should. It's about right and wrong, not arguing for argument
sake. The facts are, too many fat cats eating up the taxpayers, too many freebies all around, too many wealthy people calling the shots. The people don't have a choice but to VOTE NO if they want a future in their home and their town.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

9:47 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

LOL :-)
Yeah, that sounds more like an Onion Report. :-) LOL HAHAHAHHAHHA

Mare

7:01 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"YOU and your small group will NOT affect the outcome and most that read these comments feel sorry for ALL ..... but real sorry for the "small group mentality" 79

Kinda looks as if the "small group" people are actually the majority. The way you keep
personally attacking people on here shows your running scared and may very well be a big part
of this administration yourself.
Just think, the voters will vote (NO) and life will go on. It's the way it's going to be when the majority has spoken. The majority of taxpayers in Brick are sick and tired of the current admin. using our tax dollars wastefully and we're going to show it. Period! Now that's intellect! :-)

Reply
Comment_arrow

79

7:10 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Like I said about as many as on two hands and a total of 10 fingers ..... and a I am sorry you are blinded by the truth .... “All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered and the small minds haven't as yet ...... and the point is to discover them AND leave the politics out of the VOTE”.... two seperate VOTES get the "point"??

Comment_arrow

Doug

9:50 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

How do you keep politics out of a referrendum created by crooked politicians? I would hope that you realize by now that the majority says NO to this BS. This will be very apparent on the 27th when you compare the percentages between the yes votes and the NO votes. It is pretty simple actually.

79

7:14 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

.... by the way, what is "Now that's intellect! :-)"

Reply

79

7:25 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

".....The people don't have a choice but to VOTE NO if they want a future in their home and their town".

AND

"The way you keep personally attacking people on here shows your running scared and may very ......"

I do nothing ANY different then so that write within these comments ..... "you throw rocks at me and call names etc. ....EXPECT things back at you" ..... I treat ALL with respect and when the tides turn and those disagree with my FACTS and TRUTH and start with the names, labels and other things .... I will respond.

Do you and the other small group members "read what you write first .... OR just shoot from the hip first AND expect others to agree??

You know I agree with a lot about what has been written about the administration and their faults ..... but it is clouded with the hatred towards them AND this VOTE April 27th .... two different issues and votes.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Doug

9:54 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

I have to disagree with you here. I have been following this thread since the beginning and you were one of the first people to use statements with the word "FOOLS", "IDIOTS" and the best of all " I know where you live". I posted a few days ago that no one would take you seriously if you continued to abuse people in that manner and from what I can tell now, no one does. It is a shame that we can't use this place to intelligently and calmly interact with one another and approach this serious issue with a sense of togetherness. The mud slinging that started right in the beginning squelched that from ever happening.

79

7:30 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

just remember ...... “Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.” Something for the group too think about.

Reply
Comment_arrow

peteypete

8:47 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

frank, this is REALLY what you are doing with your retirement time?? go outside and enjoy the beautiful weather. commenting on here 50 times a day is mindless.

Comment_arrow

Doug

9:55 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

You should go and repeat this to Steve and company. A truer statement could be more appropriate when it comes to that administration

DONT TREAD ON ME

8:11 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

So to recap... 1) I can vote yes and pay about $300-$400 more and keep all my current services including garbage collection and police. Or...2) I can vote no and pay a private hauler $300- $400 for trash removal and lose police officers. Either way, Steve gets what he wants. I'm not about to cut off my nose to spite my face. I'll be voting yes on the 27th, but the good ole boys will not get my vote come November. Hopefully we will have a few candidates that are ready to cut the real fat in this town. The same goes for Steve next year. But I wouldn't be surprised if he resigns after September 1st to avoid a show down with the governor regarding his multiple full time jobs.

Reply

localexpert

8:22 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

"All politics are local" Hey 78 why not attack Dont Tread On Me????Since he agrees with you thats o.k.What a hypocrite.....

Reply

George

8:42 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Vote No don;t blamed for voting to raise taxes they are goin g to use it against you in future elections don't fall for scare tactics send a message.

Reply

George

8:43 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Vote No don;t be blamed for voting to raise taxes they are goin g to use it against you in future elections don't fall for scare tactics send a message.

Reply

Mare

9:13 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

“Whoever is careless with the truth in small matters cannot be trusted with important matters.”
A quote for all of you "YES MEN" to think about.... I'm not a "YES MAN" for anyone, I'm making the intelligent choice by voting NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

9:45 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

I agree with you Mare well said you have to draw the line and say NO.

Scott Pezarras

11:38 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

Wow, the untruths and misguided comments are running rampid tonight. The issue with the referendum is a simple question for all people with an assessment of $350,000 or less. That assessment involves 80% of all residential properties in the Township.

The fact is the referendum question contains a an increase in the amount to be raised by taxes of 8.23 cents, that is all the people of Brick Township are going to be voting on in the April 27th election.

The facts are that at 8.23 cents and a $350,000 assessment 80% of ALL residences in in the Twp will pay less for ALL service levels to remain exactly as they are today for an additional $288 or LESS per year or an additional $24 per month.

If garbage is outsourced (the property owner will be responsible for obtaining a private subscription with a private hauler on their own) the Township will be out of the garbage and recycling business. According to my research the cost to get this service provided by a private hauler ranges anywhere from $300 (Manchester) to $500 (Jackson) with Howell coming in at $340 per year. All bulk stops or additional services such as refrigerators, stoves, is extra and priced accordingly by the size of the item (anywhere from $25 for small bulk item to $65 for a sofa). These are facts, and can be verified through the Municipalities, taxpayers in those municipalities, or the haulers that provide service to these residents.

Continued

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

12:14 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Scott if there was a detailed spending plan for this money I might vote yes if I agreed with it but I don't vote yes on blank contracts .

Scott Pezarras

11:58 pm on Monday, April 4, 2011

(Sorry meant rampant not rampid)

The question being posed on April 27th from 7am to 9pm should be carefully considered by each individual household to see what is financially beneficial to you. For those with an assessment in excess of $350,000, well you are going to have to make a quality of life issue decision. If you or anybody in your family utilize any recreation services or parks in Town, then it might work for you.

This is the issue plain and simple, don't get caught up in all the rhetoric on this site regarding who or who did not get raises, percentages of increases in taxes, and capital expenditures because these have NOTHING to do with the referendum question.

Capital expenditures are EXEMPT from the 2% CAP Law, and the other supposed cost saving measures mentioned on this site will not fix a $8.65 million problem.

So now that you know the facts, which are indisputable because they come from the financials of the Twp., I ask that you vote logically, not emotionally, on April 27th, and for God's sake leave the politiking until after this vote! There will be plenty of time to politic after April 27th and at that time deal with the other issues.

Thank you.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

12:44 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Scott no politis intended I and alot of the people I have talked to want a detailed report of where this money is going and what it is going to fix. If you supply this the politicing and negative arguments will stop it is up to you.

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

11:50 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Mr. Pezarras with all due respect you are creating an “us and them” bias division. I’m one of the 20% whose house is over assessed at more than twice the $350,000K. I’m getting over charged for the same services that a person who pays $350,000K or less pays. Why would I spend more than twice as much for the same hamburger at McDonalds? -- Which in reality is what is happening. The increase in garbage and police should be a flat increase to all home owners. Isn’t the cost for these services the same per household? – Answer that one Mr. Pezarras. School taxes should be a per head tax like in other states including persons who rent. I was required to pay a per head tax when I rented in PA plus I had very affordable privatize trash pick-up. The bulk of the NEW monies to cover your budget should not have to be picked up by the 20% of citizens who are already shouldering most of the current costs in this town including your salary.
Brick needs to redraw the lines on how homes and property are assessed. Primary, secondary and tertiary. People and business should be taxed more on primary streets versus secondary then lastly tertiary. (cont.)

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

11:51 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

I pay much more in taxes, but am tired of being serviced last when it comes time for plowing. Something is greatly wrong with this picture. Also in Brick the laws and rules have changed for the waterfront homeowner where we have to seek more variances, today if we block the views of our non-waterfront neighbors who property is almost the same size as well as their homes square footage, we are supposed to yield to them, yet they pay less than half the taxes that I do and yet they may have a trashy yard which code enforcement does nothing about? Are the Brick’s officials Robinhood and their Merry Men? Rob the “supposed” rich and give breaks to the poor? I say “supposed” because not all waterfront home owners are made out of money like you and other inland residents may think. Longer time residents like us are hardworking retirees not Wall Street Hedge Fund people or Township Business Administrators.
The way assessments in Brick are figured is downright discriminatory. They should be assessed at a much higher rate for a water view. If you did that you could easily raise the money to meet your budget. Bottom line is, and I get this from your post loud and clear, that 80% of the property owners in Brick are not paying their fair share or contributing enough of their fair share. We the 20% per the town council can easily afford to fit the tax bill for the 80%. (cont.)

Comment_arrow

Concerned Brick Citizen

11:52 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

The other issue is that most people who are assessed higher and live on the water don’t even have a say because these are their second homes! No wonder many of them are for sale. The assessments and taxes don’t justify living in Brick. What are you going to do when you can no longer rely on the 20% to fill the hole in your budgets? The 80% need to contribute more. I can only hope and pray that this final vote is NO! – Mr Pezarras you, Steve or Juan need to purchase my house for the current assessed value. Then and only then will you understand…

parkway

12:21 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Thank you Scott, I think the politics should wait and the concentration should be on what is best in the long run. I want my garbage picked up and I want to be able to bring my recycling to the PWD. I also do not want to see any layoffs.

Reply

Think

12:41 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Let me say this, If Scott is liar, he would not be wasting his time posting to you people. If Scott was left alone to run this town, we would not be in this predicament.

We need an independent council and then let Scott do his job.

Don't let Jose Deer, probably AKA Joseph Lamb and other democrats postings confuse you. They are running rampant on this blog. They are so foolish that they think they have to bash this issue to gain election votes. No I am not a republican and No I did not vote for all of the current council people. And Yes I will vote them out of office, but I am not wasting my vote on you, Jose Deer.

Reply

Jose Deer

1:17 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

"Methinks the Pezarras doth protest too much,"

Reply

Jose Deer

1:31 am on Tuesday, April 5, 2011

this $300 increase (and much more for 20% of you) is just for the municipal bill......the county is going to whack you, the schools are going to whack you (lets not even talk about stat