patching...
Breaking: Gov. Christie: Seaside Heights Opening 'An Incredible Day for New Jersey' »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Fozman Appointed to Brick MUA, Will Remain on Council

Some residents upset with council's decision

 

Jim Fozman will simultaneously serve as a township councilman as well as a commissioner for the Brick Township Municipal Utilities Authority.

The township council appointed Fozman to a five year term on the regional water and sewerage authority despite the objection of fellow Councilman Joseph Sangiovanni, the sole member of the governing body to vote against his appointment.

Council members Bob Moore, John Ducey and Susan Lydecker – all Democrats – voted in favor of Fozman's appointment. Councilman Domenick Brando, a Republican, abstained from the vote because he is a BTMUA employee. Councilman Dan Toth, also a Republican, was absent from the meeting.

Following the vote, residents excoriated the council – especially Moore, the newly-elected council president – for not allowing public comment before the vote took place.

Moore would later apologize for the public comment flap.

Though not unprecedented in Brick, it is rare for a sitting councilman to also serve as a BTMUA commissioner, officials and former officials of the township said at the meeting.

Fozman, who this year decided to take township-provided health insurance benefits for himself and his wife, will also receive a $2,500 stipend for serving as a commissioner in addition to the $8,000 stipend he receives for serving on the council. If he was not taking township benefits, he would have been eligible for benefits through the BTMUA.

Fozman is also eligible for an additional $5,000 stipend for opting out of the MUA's health insurance plan, though he said he would not initially take that money. When pressed by members of the public, Fozman would not commit to permanently declining the additional stipend, however.

"Double dipping is double dipping, I don't care who you are," said resident George Scott during the council's public comment session.

"I've chastised Republicans for the same thing in the past. I've asked people to resign," Scott would later say. "There are people in here tonight who I like, but who I've taken to the carpet. I hope people in November don't have short memories."

"I think it's a direct conflict of interest to have two public jobs, especially being on the council," said resident Larry Reid, who serves on the school board.

School board members receive no stipend and are not eligible for any benefits.

Moore said multiple resumes were received by a council committee for review, and Fozman recused himself from the committee because he had submitted his.

"At the time, we felt that it was the proper thing to do," said Moore, regarding Fozman's appointment. "He's retired, so he's going to have more time to spend with the town. It's a critical position over there."

Fozman said during the meeting that he was no longer working and Brick Township was his only employer. He will replace Joseph Buttacavoli on the BTMUA board and serve through Jan. 31, 2018.

Fozman, as well as Moore, began receiving township-provided health insurance benefits for the first time this year. Ducey and Toth also receive those benefits.

Related Topics: BTMUA, Jim Fozman, and brick nj news

Donnie Brasco

6:12 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I have in issues with him handling both positions, especially since he is retired. So in theory he does have the time to perform both duties. I do, however, have an issue with the possibility of receiving a stipend for not taking health benefits from the BTMUA.

Reply

Donnie Brasco

6:12 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Correction. I do not have any issue.....

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

8:28 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

NO integrity either ^^^^^^^^

BW

7:12 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Here we go. Sometimes you just have to shake your head, and hide your wallet.

Reply

Tired of the BS

7:38 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I just find it "amazing" how so many people in government have two jobs, one of which they are appointed to. Threre really are no better candidates out there for these second jobs? Too much patronage

Reply

knarfie

7:43 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Same old BS. Just different parties, One worse than the other. When does it stop?

Reply

knarfie

7:44 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Moore running the meetings should be amusing, if not embarrassing.

Reply

Sal Petoia

8:14 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I attended and spoke at last night's meeting, challenging those council people voting for the selection to show the logic of why, in the face of other qualified candidates, they would appoint a sitting council member to serve on the BTMUA. It was obvious that some back room deals were made when the newly seated council president, Bob Moore, could or would not provide the rationale for the selection of Fozman other than he is retired. Being "retired" is a justification??? I supported the four Democrats when they ran because they were new and "untainted" by the politics of the past, and I don't like one party rule which is what we had. But a year into their job has proven they are no different than other politicians… self-serving. Making matters worse was Fozman's response to a question about whether he would take a stipend instead of health benefits, which was, "Not at this time". Other than Susan Lydecker, the rest of the Democrats are a disappointment. It's time to change to non-partisan government and get independents to run who will serve the people rather than themselves.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JHill

8:25 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Same here as I voted for the Dem's because the Republican's were so bad but these guys are more of the same.
Voting them all out next election since they got elected in as a team we'll ote them out as a team. That way they can "retire" for good.
Unbellievable that this guy is 57 years old and we are now on the hook for full Cadillac lifetime benefits for him and his family and an $80,000/year pension once he retires in 8 years. More of the same old crap that is bankrupting this town and every town across the country.

Comment_arrow

Art Sholty

9:43 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Way to go Sal.
What goes around, comes around and this is nothing more than reverse politics only the Democrats are doing the dirty work at this moment in time.
A tongue tied Moore coupled with a man who lets his wife wear the pants during council meetings, etc. are the main liars in this latest fiasco of "what can we steal for ourselves," all in the name of paybacks.
Sal Petoia knows exactly what has taken place yet I know full well that even if his name were entered into consideration for the BTMUA he would have been passed-by. This was a FOZMAN deal and an additional income for this liar because he will be getting an additional stipened for not taking the health benefits from the BTMUA.
I guess quitting work is another way of being false when it comes to garnering more taxpayer $$$$.
Sal Petoia is correct, listen to him, Brick needs NON-PARTISON POLITICS, we can all be D or R but to operate Brick, we need to keep politics out of the problems.
Nice comment Sal.

Comment_arrow

Proud

10:58 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Susan Lydecker = liar & disapointment!!!!

JHill

8:20 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

All of these guys are weasels. Did he "retire" or did his company go out of business? How is an HVAC guy with a HS education in any way qualified to run the MUA?
Look what he said during election time...I wonder if he is going to eliminate the "Cadillac" benefits for MUA employees now that he is the head.

__If elected or re-elected to council, will you choose to receive taxpayer-funded health benefits from your elected position? Why or why not?__

If elected to Brick Council, I will not take taxpayer funded medical benefits. I have a private medical plan through my company and I am trying to save Brick taxpayers money, not spend it.

The Republicans oppose our plan, but if all four of us are elected, we will be able to implement it despite their opposition. We will begin, on day one, to put in place our 6-point plan to address property taxes, which consists of these action items:

Eliminate unnecessary political jobs.
Eliminate overpriced no-bid contracts to campaign contributors.
Eliminate Cadillac benefits for MUA appointees.
Implement a plan for regular maintenance of our roads and infrastructure.
Conduct an operational audit to identify more cost savings.
No more full-time pay for part-time work.

Reply

type writer

8:25 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Jim Fozman is a LIAR. Jim Fozman is a clown and the joke is on us.

Reply

Sal Petoia

8:32 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

How about if the council publishes the resumes of all who applied for the MUA position so the public can compare the qualifications of Fozman against others. Let's see if the selection can stand up against public scrutiny.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Donnie Brasco

8:49 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Great idea. I think this should be a policy. That way the public can clearly see if a person is qualified and more importantly is a qualified person is overlooked for a appointed friend or family member that is not qualified.

JB

8:36 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

We should have known better. I trusted him and the rest of them so I asked for it. Guess all the others will get jobs also. Funny how when u win an election in Brick you also get a job as a party favor.

Reply

Justmeasking

8:37 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Come on folks, we are only talking $2500.00 here. If he is qualified and can give the time required and maybe "extra" time because he is retired what’s the big deal? I could understand being "upset" if he was receiving a full salary and benefits but really $2500.00? My big problem is why are these council members allowed to receive "benefits" that cost the tax payers ridiculous amounts of money? I also believe fire commissioners in the towns three districts are afforded benefits as well. Are you kidding me? Full benefits for fire commissioners who meet once a month for maybe an hour or two? How in the world is that allowed?

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

8:41 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Jim Fozman is not qualified. Jim Fozman is a proven LIAR. I do not want proven LIARS on any board or council in Brick..

Comment_arrow

bths06

9:28 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Slippery Slope- While I agree he is not qualified, must we not forgot the most unqualified person running the MUA Jim "I like water" Lacey.

This may be the newest thing to be mad about but we cannot forgot the things done in the past as well.

Comment_arrow

oldkodger

11:37 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

criminals started the Brick MUA years ago

Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

5:20 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Fire Commissioners do not receive any benefits.

type writer

8:38 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Jim Fozman, Bob Moore and John Ducey are all members of the Joe Scarpelli democrat Team. They wake up in the morning and think to themselves, " What can I do today in townhall to make more money for me and my family and friends.".
They are all members of the friends and family club that spend ALL their time trying to get rich off the tax payers money.

Reply

Mrgrumpass

8:39 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL,
RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL,
RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL,
RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL,
RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL, RE CALL!

Reply

DennyD

8:45 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

It's funny that no one said a word about the Mayor sucking $55K from Brick while doing his "real job" on the TRMUA. Talk about a double dipper.

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

8:50 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

No one said a word about Acrapolis double dipping? Are you kidding me? Why do you think these democrat LIARS were elected in the first place? What are you going senile from too many head locks and pancakes?

Comment_arrow

Tom Daynes

8:53 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Mayor takes no salary Denny in Brick-Get your facts right!

Comment_arrow

DennyD

9:11 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

What about the last three years? $165K for a part time Mayor. That's not chump change. I might be getting senile but my "memory" isn't that foggy.

Comment_arrow

DennyD

9:23 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Why don't we ask Scott Pezzaras? He reads this blog and responds. You cut the checks Scott. Does the Mayor still get his $55K for his part time job? Easy enough? YES or NO?

Comment_arrow

DennyD

12:36 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Yo Slippery, why no posting of your name? No cahones?

Tom Daynes

8:47 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Council president Bob Moore-his wife is now working for the town in the building Dept. You cant make this stuff up. Check it out Dan Nee

Reply
Comment_arrow

BW

9:09 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

That is 100% false. He wanted to take 1.00 but the town attorney said there would have to be an ordnance to do it and there never was a vote. The Mayor receives 53,000 per year from us. Look it up!

This is why this town is so screwed up. You have the R koolaide and the D koolaide and those that drink it twist and spin and lie about the facts. The FACT is both parties are liars and thieves.

Comment_arrow

Art Sholty

9:50 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I guess that a working wife can suppliment the loss of overtime when Moore is needed to attend meetings.....................how the hell did this happen? Is there a new insurance policy for this new employment? What gives?

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

11:29 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

The mayor did not take the salary in 2012. My presumption was that he would not take it in 2013 and thus far I have not heard anything to the contrary. I will look into it and report back accordingly in the near future.

Comment_arrow

oldkodger

11:43 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I'm sure she is well qualified at sipping coffee

Comment_arrow

DennyD

8:34 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

For Scott Pezarras-Thank-you for your response!

Comment_arrow

David N.

3:10 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

The potential for problems are clearcut. Most responsible companies do not allow for relatives to work in the same work location. This takes the cake. Conflicts of Interest are ASTONISHING.

common sense

9:06 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I hope you morons that put these NEW people in office are getting the change you were promised! What a joke.

Reply

JB

9:10 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

It's amazing how they are making the mayor look good. They must think we are very stupid.

Reply

Joseph Woolston Brick

9:20 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

We all went to the polls the last time, to stop the shenanigans in the Township Council. We voted for what we hoped would be our Washington, Jefferson and Lincoln. What we got was Moe, Larry and Curly......back to the drawing board.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

2:36 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Please excuse me but an apologue is in order Joe, Moe , Larry and Curly always gave us a good chuckle and a smile they never lied to us they only gave what we expected from them they were truly great Americans!

Comment_arrow

Joseph Woolston Brick

11:26 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Actually your right, Hows this, these guys are about as useless as a fleas on an elephants ass! ?

FD

9:23 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Question: Are all the resumes posted?

Additionally, like I said recently, I will never vote for anyone running for a 2nd term at any level gov't regardless of partry. Career politicians are killing this country, it's all about them and not us !!

Great move Democrats looks like you turned the ball over to the other side at the next election..........

Reply
Comment_arrow

Art Sholty

9:54 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Remember FD that the ABSTAINER DAN TOTH WILL BE RUNNING NEXT FALL. Will you give him a yes or no? I know what my answer is.........................NO

Comment_arrow

FD

10:04 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

He should have resigned already !! I would have respected him more, no honor - no vote !!

Comment_arrow

TimeForChange

12:32 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

The article says that he was absent, not an abstainer.

Chief Wahoo

9:28 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Property tax revolt NOW !!!!!!!!

Hey maybe finally after all these years , some of you will realize that Chief Wahoo is NOT the crazy one , but speaks the truth.

There is NO difference in either gang of thiefs.

Property Tax Revolt !!

Reply

FD

9:45 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

We all need to be smarter, we are the stupid ones. All the Republican vs. Democrat finger pointing comments and actions by both parties are a way of keeping us the Taxpayer fighting each other while both parties take from us. Let's wake up and form a Taxpayer party. For the record I no longer consider myself a Republican, I was never a Democrat however I did vote that way in the local election last time around.
You have to understand that they are the ones pulling the strings getting us to fight about this party or that party, yet they take from us because we are distracted fighting each other !!! TIME TO WAKE UP, let's form a TAXPAYER PARTY !!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Vince Latchford

10:46 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Some sort of independent third party would be the only solution. The Dems and Reps can't help themselves once in office. They either reward their supporters or their supporters leave them and they never get elected again. That's why all the talk of reform from either party is bunk. The theory is "All these positions are filled with the other guys, we should fill them with our guys". Stop to think about how many positions just in Brick are filled with political favorites and how much tax money could be saved if the Town was run by an independent party that had no obligation to pad the payroll with hacks.

The danger is that both parties know this and whenever there's a movement to establish a third party, the meetings are filled with "stealth" supporters attempting to use a phony 3rd ticket to undermine the real opposition. The hardest part of real reform would be finding actual people who want reform and are not party operatives or self-serving wannabes.

Art Sholty

9:56 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Hey WAHOO
You sound like me...................I've told everyone the same thing only I got boooooed. How come you have changed?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Chief Wahoo

10:46 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Changed ???.....I never changed......You believe in the red vs.blue teams BS......not me, never have and never will.....i can only hope people finally are Waking up to this fact and maybe these 4 clowns will be the reason

This state is corrupt....There is nothing about Jersey Strong.....Its all a lie.....Just as Christies Speech was nothing but lies

The property taxes are killing, actually make that killed this state.....i put that mostly on the DemocRATS but of course its benefits both gang of thiefs to do nothing about it

knarfie

10:16 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

This crew is worse than what we had, only probably even not as qualified, if that is possible. What a circus our government has become. All clowns. Come on Sal, it's time.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

3:22 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

(continued from above, or below) If the people really want to change, we can do it! It is obvious from reading the posts here and elsewhere that the people are dissatisfied. The conditions are ripe for change, but don't expect the politicians to make it easy. They could simply pass an ordinance putting the question on the ballot and let the people decide. But they won't! Too much money and power involved in the way of patronage, appointments, etc. They don't want to give up the golden goose. Can you imagine Gilmore losing his grip on Brick if independents got elected and would decide who will be township attorney? However, the people can act on their own. Petitions can be circulated to put a referendum for a change on the ballot. If the petition drive is successful, the question goes on the ballot and the people decide. Democracy at work. So, instead of complaining, are there any energetic people out there willing to make a sacrifice to improve our town?

Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

3:23 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Knarfie: I'm a senior citizen now and do not relish an election campaign, as much as I would like to get into the fight. I, as many know, am an independent and do not favor partisan government, especially when one party rules. I worked to bring about the first change of government back in the 1960's from the old township committee form to our first non-partisan mayor council form. We had that form for over 20 years until the Republicans caused a change to a partisan form. My goal, at this stage of my life, is to see Brick return to non-partisan government which would make it easier for anyone to seek public office. With no party designation on the ballot, all would have a fairer chance of being elected, i.e. those who simply vote party line would have to think about who they are voting for because the usual party designation would be absent. But I am told that will never happen… "the train has left the station". Baloney! (continued below)

Comment_arrow

Chief Wahoo

10:48 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Congratulations to Jim and Vera......All the taxpayers should be so proud of them

Andy Pat

11:54 am on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Dear Slippery Slope-could you offer any support to the connection you cite between Scarpelli and the current democrat councilmembers? And has any members of the Acropolis team (past or present) sought similar self-enrichment? And by no means do 2 wrongs make a right.

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

12:08 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I will give you the connection since you are obviously too stupid or partisan to see for yourself.

Crooked Lying Joe Scarpelli, Brick democrat club member. Same as Ducey, Fozman the Conman, Moore and Lydecker.

Scarpelli, Fozman the Conman, and Moore are proven admitted liars. Ducey a "misleader"

All of the above are politically connected by The democratic Starkey machine.

Have a nice day.

FD

12:31 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Folks remember they want us to fight each other... We need to look out for one another not finger point. Time for a gov't change, TAXPAYER PARTY NOW....

Simple Platform:

Do we need it.
How does it benefit the taxpayer.

Reply

Geoff Dubrowsky

1:11 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I am willing to serve for benefits only! Just in case anyone cares:) Happy New Year Brick!

Reply

Proud

1:12 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

@Brick Living,.... #1 - seems like you think I am Vera, and I am not. #2 - They next time you choose to post, double check your punctuation or lack there of. You are another example of a keyboard warrior who is in need of an English class. Check out the Vocational School Adult Classes or OCC!!!

Reply

Proud

1:46 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Hmmmm I smell a witch-hunt...........give the new Council a chance to do their best before you start casting stones. I don't particularly care for Susan Lydecker, can we discuss her sordid past?

Reply

Luck

2:01 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Oh my GOD! How can this liar be on the MUA, make decisions for Brick town and also for the Brick MUA which have interlocal aggreements between each other. It did not take the Dem council long to put this fix in. Fozman is a liar as is his buddy Ducey, I voted for Ducey and will never vote for him ecer again. Disgusting is what this double dipping fool just did.

Reply

Proud

2:10 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

All these comments and yet not one person has said they have a copy of a document signed by Fozman stating EXACTLY what he will be receiving! hmmmmm

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

5:58 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Proud - A copy of Mr. Fozman's signed letter requesting health benefits was attached to the earlier article. I was present at the meeting last night where he discussed his acceptance of the MUA salary.

Greg

2:17 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I am sending a letter to the attorney generals office to check and see if a sitting council member and a sitting MUA commision is ethical.

Reply

Andy Pat

2:21 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Slope-asked for support. Not to be insulted and dished more innuendo. You seem to be quite the online bully. Whatcha like in real life? Oh yeah-no answer to 2nd question about Acropolis team-self enrichment. You really need not answer. I have no time for your word games.

Reply

dan connolly

2:26 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

brick just sucks period...the schools have no water theres unrine n shit in the classroom bathrooms, the crime rate sucks its becoming like nothern nj Time to leave the armpit of the US

Reply

WMS826

3:23 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

You mean to tell me there is no one else in a town of 85 thousand people who they could choose for this position.

Next we will have all the non assuming liberal kooks weighing in here to support this by writing..But you don't know ..he may be the best man for the job...

We are all doomed, secession now...take down goverment and start over.

Reply

OceanCounty

5:16 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Quote from JHill above: "Unbellievable that this guy is 57 years old and we are now on the hook for full Cadillac lifetime benefits for him and his family and an $80,000/year pension once he retires in 8 years."

I find it hard to believe Council members get "Cadilac lifetime benefits" or an " $80,000/year pension once he retires in 8 years"

Does anyone actually know what the Council Member benefits are? I hope they make some contribution towards their health benefits like other township workers do.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

6:02 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Their contribution would be based on their salary, which in the case of a council member would be $8,000.

Comment_arrow

OceanCounty

8:42 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

@Daniel Nee. I guess you are indicating the Council Members are paid $8K/Year? However, the questions were: 1. What are their benefits, and do they make any contribution towards them.

EYE Poppi

5:35 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I would make a bet they hear from some govern(mental) agency soon informing them that a sitting councilperson cannot also be a commissioner run by the council in the SAME town.

Reply

Dark Angel

5:58 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I know somebody here knows exactly what James Fozman makes totalled for both positions. Can someone tell me? Now, I personally receive $7000 per year for an "opt out" payment not to take my small business insurance plan (2 employees).
My employer chose to change plans to a hig deductible(2500 per year) meaning I pay $2500 first and then I get the 80% coverage with deductibles per year. AKA a medical savings plan. I personally can not fund my medical plan, therefore I opted out. So, only $2500 per year, REALLY??? I guess, I should feel lucky. Did I mention I still have the insurance coverage, why? Because the company only qualifies if they have at least 2 employees. Now, am I taking advantage? Or is the company using my employee status? We shouldn't worry about the $2500.

Reply

HELP..

6:19 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

@dark angle you need Insurance...Maybe we should run and get from the Town....But we can saying we wouldn't take it and get elected then take it ...Sounds like a plan right ?

Reply

Dark Angel

6:20 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Two more cents...........I would never buy a Cadilac personally.The quality is just not there! I know this is off subject but maybe they could offer a better quality vehicle???

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

6:42 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

I'd give the ATS a test drive, but I don't think I'd take it over the 3-Series, which I test drove last year when pondering a car purchase. Ended up with an SUV instead, but nothing beats the 3er in that class, in my humble opinion.

Boater59

6:38 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

Just what Bricktown needs is another double dipper. Has everyone forgotten our Mayor is doing the same thing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

OceanCounty

11:58 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Now they can say "Read my lips, I lied"

Joseph Woolston Brick

11:32 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

How does one go about returning this town to a non-partisan town council and Mayor?

Reply

Sal Petoia

11:49 pm on Wednesday, January 9, 2013

The easier way is to elect people to the council who will pass an ordinance putting a question regarding a change on the ballot for people to vote on. If the people vote for change, it gets implemented. The harder way is for petitions to be circulated, much like when the referendum about the Ice Palace purchase was sought. If the petition drive is successful, the question goes on the ballot. That's the simple explanation.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

2:09 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

Sal has it correct. These are, essentially, the only two options for such a proposition.

oldsoldier

6:29 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

While I agree with Sal, I do not have faith in the people to vote that way. This last election proved, for all the complaints of candidates, we the people were not willing to vote for the other guy. Now look at the messes we have. Yes, I would like to be proven wrong, but I believe the next election will still show us with the same people, unless they choose not to run.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

7:46 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

oldsoldier: Only when the people have "had enough" will they be motivated to act. The proposed Ice Palace purchase was an example. The StopOverSpending group was not opposed to the purchase per se, but felt the people should decide an expenditure of that magnitude. We used the Initiative and Referendum authority permitted under our form of government to block the council's purchase by successfully petitioning to have the question put on the ballot. The people were so motivated that the response to sign the petitions was overwhelming. The result was that the council abandoned the purchase, therefore negating the need for a referendum. Is a change of government to non-partisan at a stage where people will overwhelmingly support it? Perhaps. But it's like the engine in your car.... you can have the fuel and the air, but it still needs a spark to ignite it. Any sparks out there?

Comment_arrow

bths06

12:19 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

You are talking about the country as a whole but if you look at the last municipal election here in Brick WE the voting public voiced our concern and voted out the council members because we didn't like what was going on. While I agree I would not have faith in the Country voting for change it might be a different story in just Brick as it was shown in the election in 2011.

Justmeasking

8:46 am on Thursday, January 10, 2013

The Ocean Ice Palace is a disgrace, I have a family member who plays High School hockey and have been to a few games at a few different venues. Out of all the venues I have visited in this area and also outside of this area the Ocean Ice Palace is just horrendous, it’s embarrassing. Now getting back to the “gist” of this article. Can someone please answer me why "less than" part time employees such as sitting council members, fire commissioners etc. are allowed to collect full benefits (medical coverage, prescription coverage etc.)? These council persons go to a couple of meetings a month at best, maybe 3 or 4 hours a month. If this is the norm everywhere I am going to run for one of these elected positions just for the medical benefits. How much you want to bet they also get their cell phones paid for? Some probably get vehicles or vehicle allowances as well. WHY IS THIS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN?

Reply
Comment_arrow

OceanCounty

12:04 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

"WHY IS THIS ALLOWED TO HAPPEN?" The answer is simple- we vote them in based on their platform promises, but we have no way to hold their feet to the fire, and they know that. It's a shame, but a fact of life. The only way to stop some of the abuse is to change and reduce their benefit package, and make them pay their fair share like all the other workers do.

Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

7:15 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

Justmeasking, Fire Commissioners DO NOT receive benefits or pensions. They only receive an annual salary.

Portia

6:21 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

It is a dangerous precedent to set. No Sitting Councilperson should serve on the BTMUA. Consider that Councilman Fozman will be Brando's boss and both will now recuse themselves from BTMUA votes. Should the taxpayers bankroll self-serving POLITICIANS who continually recuse themselves from key votes? Doesn't matter who the Councilperson is - it is a deleterious practice, counterproductive on all levels. Folks should petition the Council to abolish this Unethical Practice. Although the Powers that Be may ignore the People's Voice, our voices would be heard. ENOUGH is ENOUGH!

Reply

mineeeemoh

10:48 pm on Thursday, January 10, 2013

can someone please explain double dipping?

Reply

oldsoldier

6:22 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

To Sal - I will give you that. Yes, my view was tainted because of the county and federal elections. Perhaps this year we the people of our town can elect officias that will do what they promise, and not just take care of themselves and their friends.

To Portia - That precedent was set a long time ago. MUA's are favorite places to appoint elected officals to. I beleive because it is a low profile postion.

Reply

Sal Petoia

8:25 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

Just read the Press this AM and am furious! This was Moore's explanation for choosing Fozman: "We looked over the (sic) all of the resumes that we received and we thought that he was the best person for the job" "It's a critical position over there and with Jim being retired it allows him to give more time to the position." This is pure B.S. coming from people we elected to make change! I'll compare my resume any day against Fozman's, and I am retired! Talk about adding insult to injury! If Moore has the courage, he should reveal all the resumes. Wake up people…. we have to stop electing these party clowns and get independents into office who will act in our behalf instead of feathering their own nests. Party leaders are smug because they know independents don't have the finances to mount a serious campaign, but with electronic communications perhaps expensive mailers are not needed to get a message out. We need to band together to stop the "politics as usual" game!

Reply
Comment_arrow

DennyD

8:37 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

Truer words have never been spoken. The two party system has killed this country.

Comment_arrow

Vince Latchford

10:27 am on Friday, January 11, 2013

OK Sal. If it's going to happen in Brick, it will probably start with you or someone like you finding a facility that can host a meeting of like-minded voters and announcing that we will be forming an independentg party, and all interested should attend. I'll come.

Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

4:01 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Vince: Good suggestion! If we can generate enough interest from those who read the Patch, will try to initiate something.

Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

7:20 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

Mr. Petoia, I would support an Independent Party. Non partisian government worked well for Brick in the past, many people from both parties worked together for the people without worries of backlash.

Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

5:40 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Lori Morrison: If we can get enough people interested as indicated by responses on the Patch , I am sure we can get a team together to work for non-partisan government. Petitioning may be our only option since it is unlikely those in power will put an ordinance on the ballot. Just remember, it is a lot of work to get the required number of names, and that is what those in power count on.... that the people don't have the drive to pursue it. However, on the bright side is that we did it with the Ice Palace petition drive.

Sal Petoia

Manny Espenoza

3:24 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Cannot believe it, We voted for ths clown because they/he talked about doing the opposite of what Fozman and Ducey cooked up. This is no suprise as Ducey was talking about this all along as he himself lied and took health benefits when he said that he would not. Hope Ducey or Fozman do not even consider running for Mayor as we all have their number now.

Reply

knarfie

4:39 pm on Friday, January 11, 2013

Ducey for Mayor? Please. What area of law does he practice? He is the most unimpressive lawyer I have ever seen. If he were assigned to defend me in a murder trial, I would arrive in court with my trousers slit and my head shaved. Fozman is barely literate. Steve is actually looking better each day because of these failures.

Reply
Comment_arrow

George

12:50 pm on Saturday, January 12, 2013

knarfie how would you know you sound like a republican refugee.

Melinda

11:59 am on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Simply a disgrace but all too common for the greedy power-mongers to POLLUTE the process. The BTMUA was created in part to fall under the jurisdiction of the Council but NEVER intended for the Council to be a voting member (Commissioner.) This is an extremely heinious Act on behalf of those who voted for the disinegration of Separation of Powers. Surprized that Councilman Ducey, a lawyer would not fully understand the implications of such an unsound practice.

Reply

David N.

3:03 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

Say it isn't so. When will the corruption end? "Council president Bob Moore-his wife is now working for the town in the building Dept. You cant make this stuff up. Check it out Dan Nee" Talk about CONFLICT OF INTEREST. Imagine having to give her a directive. Unconsionable. Someone please verify. There is no way this can be true.

Reply

mineeeemoh

9:16 pm on Sunday, January 13, 2013

From 1998 to 2003 Former Councilman Kavanagh served as Council Laison to the BTMUA, while also a sitting as a Councilman here in Brick. He also served as Alternate Commissioner to the BTMUA between 2001 and 2003 while serving as a Councilman here in Brick. Former Councilman Mr Michael Thulen was appointed Laison in 2004 after a Republican majority took control of the Council in 2003.

Reply

frances

7:41 am on Monday, January 14, 2013

Clear conflict of interest and challenges the spirit of the Separation of Powers! Wholeheartedly agree with the overwhelming objective non-partisan citizens comments. Bravo to Sal Petoia. Would you be interested in serving on the BTMUA at this stage of your life? Deflecting from the issues at hand will not change all that's wrong in a Sitting Councilman serving in both capacities. It is my hope that we can do better.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

6:41 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

Frances: Yes, in fact I did submit a resume. . My goals would have been to investigate alternate sources of water to assure a supply untainted by upstream pollution; seek additional customers from outside communities so that the added revenue would allow lower costs for Brick rate payers; seek to be the eventual provider of water to our barrier island citizens so they would not need to pay higher costs to a private water company. I previously served 8 years on the MUA, during which I was instrumental in saving $2 million(!) by insisting we find a buyer for the material needed to be excavated to build the reservoir. Some of the commissioners at that time were ready to pay that amount to have the dirt removed but instead were persuaded to have our engineer, Steve Specht, seek other ways the dirt could be used. Monmouth County Reclamation agreed to remove the soil at no cost to Brick for use in covering their landfill in Tinton falls. Savings: $2 million!

Sal Petoia

6:49 pm on Tuesday, January 15, 2013

To those interested in non-partisan government: It's a long shot, but if we can elect three independent council members in Nov, they can work to put an ordinance on the ballot. It is possible one of the remaining four council persons could be convinced to join in which would assure passage . If the ordinance creating a referendum is passed, then the people will have a chance to vote for or against a change to non-partisan. Maybe we can get three independents who can be "write in" candidates. Like I said, it's a long shot, but not impossible. Wouldn't that be a wake-up call to politics as usual!

Reply

frances

7:50 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Sal: It is my strong belief that you should attend the next Council Meeting and request that they reconsider their Selection and appoint you to the BTMUA. Clearly, you have much to offer relative to the position. I am carefully considering your thoughts on non-partisan form of Government here in Brick Township. It may be time for me to put on MY Walking Shoes and Walk the Walk . . .

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

9:59 am on Friday, January 18, 2013

Frances: Thank you for your thoughts, but council members already knew of my interest to serve, and they certainly had enough information to choose wisely. I am sure that other candidates were well qualified to serve, too. They (council) advertised seeking candidates for the MUA, but in the end they proved it was all a charade by picking one of their own sitting council members for the position. That simply reeks of a back room deal! What I, and I am sure many, would like to see now are what are Mr. Fozman's goals for the MUA? I revealed some of mine in an earlier post. And what qualifications does he bring to the MUA? In my case I'm a licensed professional engineer and planner (now retired), and I had over 20 years on the planning and zoning boards combined, as well as 8 years on the BTMUA, all without ever having been a political party member. I doubt Fozman can match that. In the end, the newest members of the council are really no different than those they replaced… only their party designation is different. We need to open the door to allow more people rather than just party members to seek office. Non-partisan government can be a step in that direction. I hope we can get some independents to seek office in November to try to break the stranglehold parties have on our local government. So far, other than yourself and a few others, I don't see a surge in interest to changing the government, but we can certainly hope that will change.

Sal Petoia

4:45 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

Several of you (e.g. Lori, Knarfie, Frances, Vince,) expressed interest in Brick returning to non-partisan government and questioned how it could be done. I provided an overview in previous posts, but here is more info to consider… according to the Optional Municipal Charter Law for a town whose population is 70,000 or more, 10 percent of the registered voters would need to sign a petition. Brick has over 70,000 residents. As of March 2011, Brick had 48,760 registered voters. Accordingly, we would need roughly 5000 VALID signatures for a change in government question to be put on the ballot. A change of government committee should be formed to decide exactly what form of new government should be put before the people to vote on. I have proposed a mayor council form much like we currently have, except it would be non-partisan. In addition, I would recommend that we look into having wards so that the various sections of town could have their own representative. I suggest five wards which would need to be divided so that the population in each are roughly equal. One council person would be elected from each ward. Two council persons would continue to be elected "at large", much as they are now. This would avoid any one section of town from dominating an election or the council. The committee could also look into the possibility of incorporating term limits to avoid some representatives remaining in office for life, but this may be difficult. Anyone interested?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Katherine Lockwood

4:25 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sal this is a wonderful plan and I would like to talk to you more about it.

Sal Petoia

4:48 pm on Friday, January 18, 2013

For Dan Nee: Is this site still active? Is there a way to give this message wider circulation?

Reply

frances

10:45 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

Sal: Patch could do an indepth piece on "A change of Government." Press release to the local media (radio/press.) Sal, I am carefully considering your recommendations and giving it serious consideration. Once I commit to a worthy cause I won't rest until achievement is sought.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

11:14 am on Saturday, January 19, 2013

frances: How can we publish a piece on Patch? I've already written an article which provides information. A petition drive is labor intensive. We would need a lot of people to get involved. We can also start a committee of interested people, meet to discuss government alternatives, how to implement, etc. My preferences are already posted above, but there hasn't been many responses other than yours. People need to get involved... not just gripe about what is going on in town. We CAN change things despite what the naysayers believe. They didn't believe we could pull off the referendum on the Ice Palace, but we did, causing the council to back down and repeal the ordinance to purchase. I am hoping to hear from several readers who expressed interest, but this particular site seems to be seeing less and less responses. Don't lose interest!

Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

4:55 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sal as for your comment on the Ice Palace you would not have done anything if the Dems didn't join you just too blemish the R's, so don't make it seem like it was an grass root campaign! As for your plan I am behind you 100% and will help!

Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

5:07 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Mr. Grumpass: Such is the world of politics. Nonetheless, the effort consisted of support by people who are both Democrats AND Republicans. This was a community issue which would have affected all of us tax-wise. It was a matter of principle to have the people vote on the purchase. Just as the matter concerning the Foodtown site should be a matter to be voted on by the people. Glad you agree with a move to non-partisan government!

oldkodger

4:31 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

they should meet in secret like the old mafia

Reply

darrell

7:01 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Keep posting on Patch. I am telling all my friends to sign on to patch and read about what's going on. Especially returning to non-partisan government. I'm in.

Reply

Katherine Lockwood

8:21 pm on Sunday, February 24, 2013

Sweet, Darrell I hope you are a popular guy;)

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks