patching...
Breaking: Bayville Man Stabbed Saturday Night in Seaside Heights Has Been Released; Suspect Still At Large »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Former BTHS Football Coach Appears in Tense Tenure Hearing

Despite plea, not enough votes in favor of extending tenure to Patrick Dowling

 

The township Board of Education reversed its decision against granting tenure to two district employees Monday night, but a motion on a third – former Dragons head football coach and current special education teacher Patrick Dowling – failed to garner enough board support to reverse a previous vote.

Dowling was among three teachers who were not granted tenure in April, when the board voted on a long list of teachers recommended by administrators to receive it.

Two of those teachers, John Bach and Adam Sacco, will now receive tenure following private hearings, known as Donaldson hearings, held Monday night where they pled their cases to board members.

Dowling requested his hearing be held in public, however, and what ensued was an oft-heated exchange with board members scrutizining Dowling's record and Dowling accusing board members of playing politics.

"My goal here tonight is to bring an end to the personal attacks on me, my career and my education," Dowling told board members as he began his public address.

"I have never stopped being the teacher I was hired to be. I have never failed the children," he said. "This district failed me and the children. I have not failed this district."

Several witnesses, including Superintendent Walter Hrycenko, supported Dowling.

"No matter who talks about Pat Dowling, everyone talks about the character he possesses and how he shares that with his students," said Hrycenko, calling the former coach a role model for his students.

"Coach is one of the biggest influences of my life," said BTHS student Kelly Martyn, reading a letter written by her brother, former football player Sean Martyn, who is now suffering from cancer. "I just hope you do the right thing."

But board members took issue with some negative remarks given to Dowling in employment evaluations, including an allegation that he relied too much on worksheets, had trouble managing his classroom, was sarcastic towards a student during an evaluation and had a student fall asleep in his classroom during an evaluation.

Dowling defended his record, however, telling board members the vast majority of his evaluations were positive, and circumstances differ in special education classrooms.

"I know the makeup of my children in the room," he said, of the evaluation that mentioned the sarcasm. "Some days they come in cursing me off. I can't write them up every two minutes. I don't think it was a fair assessment of what I do in the classroom."

Board member Susan Suter said she was "offended" by Dowling accusing board members of denying him tenure because of the controversy surrounding him replacing legendary head football coach Warren Wolf.

"I know nothing about football," Suter said. "This is about your job performance."

But there was evidence the football controversy – after he retired, Wolf did not agree with Dowling's hiring and later was successful in running for a seat on the board – did find its way into the hallways of Brick Township High School.

After board member Walter Campbell asked why none of Dowling's observations were performed by his building principal, as is customary, BTHS Principal Dennis Filippone admitted he was "advised by my superiors that it might not be in my best interest to observe Mr. Dowling" due to ongoing controversy.

Filippone said he was not ordered to refrain from observing Dowling, however.

"In hindsight, it was probably a bad decision" not to observe Dowling himself, said Filippone.

At one point in the hearing, board member John Talty said the district "created a job" for Dowling after originally hiring him as a coach, leading to other teachers being shuffled around to make room.

Dowling admitted he applied to be a coach and was offerred a regular teaching job during the hiring process. But further discussion on the matter led by Talty visibly upset Hrycenko, who turned to board attorney John Sahradnik and said, "Jack, make him stop."

"Stop this now or I will file charges," he said.

Sahradnik then advised board members to discuss only Dowling's teaching record.

Discussions continued, focusing on Dowling's classroom management skills and other issues cited in evaluations.

Eventually, board member Kim V. Terebush made a motion to extend Dowling a contract and offer him tenure. When it came to a vote, Terebush and Campbell voted yes; Talty voted no; and Len Cuppari, Susan Suter and Sharon Kight voted to abstain. Board member Larry Reid was not at the meeting.

Suter and Kight both said they needed more information before they could make a decision; Cuppari was forced to abstain because he is a principal in the Howell Township school district, where Dowling serves on the Board of Education.

Because there were not enough 'yes' to constitute a majority, Sahradnik said the result of the April vote – which did not extend tenure to Dowling – would still stand.

The board has 72 hours to hold another vote on the issue, however, and Dowling's attorney, Stephen B. Hunter, said his client would agree to extend that deadline.

Under state law, teachers must either be granted tenure or denied tenure and let go after three years in a school district. Dowling's third year will end on the last day of school this month.

Related Topics: Patrick Dowling and brick nj news

JSmom

6:40 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I can't believe that when the superintendent, assistant superintendent, principal, assistant principal, and department chair--all people who have education degrees, have taught themselves, and observed Mr. Dowling--recommend him for tenure, people can assume anything but Board politics have anything to do with his tenure denial. That was a travesty last night and made me glad that I do not live or work in Brick. That Board has no respect for the educators who work there or the students who attend their schools. There is something wrong when a group of people who have never taught, know nothing about pedagogy, curriculums, IEPs, behavior modification, or classroom management can decide that the people who do know about those things (i.e. the district administrators) are wrong. The bottom line is that a good man and a lot of students are not being considered in this decision. And finally, yes, unlike the Board, I will admit that I am biased in this situation as Mr. Dowling is a good friend and coach to my kids. However, my bias does not change the ridiculousness that I witnessed last night.

Reply
Comment_arrow

joseph

9:20 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

the meeting last night which I attended was as much about football as to the qualifications of Mr. Dowling as a teacher. Why was Mr. Dowlings supporters allowed to talk about football. Mr. Dowling was not renewed as the football coach and it was not the BOE who made that decision, it Was Mr. Hrycenko the Superintendent, Mr. Bruno, the athletic Director who made that decision. The BOE never voted yes or no on this decision. Apparently there was enough discrepancy in his qualification to want some to question whether or not he should be retained.The fact that 99.8% of all teachers and 100% of all Administrators are rated Satisfactory (the highest rating) is a reason in my opinion to be very suspect to the process of granting tenure. The good old boys club in Brick is well and thriving and one must question why with all these superior teachers and Administrators our students are not getting a better overall education. I am encouraged by the fact that this BOE is asking questions rather than just rubber stamps what this short term Superintendent wants.

Mr. Hrycenko tried to shout down Mr. Talty who was asking different question of Mr. Dowling and had some comments, even to the point that we in the audience could hear Mr. Hrycenko directing the Board attorney to tell Mr Talty to stop or shut him down. Does not Mr. Talty and Mrs. Suter have the same right to express their opinions and ask question as us in the audience?

Comment_arrow

Ashamed

10:09 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

joseph, so this whole Dowling thing has nothing to do about football? A man who has taught for 22 years, has had tenure in multiple districts prior, who is recommended by all of his superiors, and is the ONLY one who has yet to be granted tenure by this BOE, this has nothing to do with football? You are not that niave are you? This has all to do with football and people will make up any lie or smear to attempt to get rid of Dowling. What comes around goes around and if this BOE denies Dowling there will be payback for those involved in doing this, mark my words.

Comment_arrow

relieved parent

6:35 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Couldn't have said it better myself!!!

Comment_arrow

JB

8:41 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Right on! Who do these board members think they are? I don't know Mr. Dowling, but I am embarrassed of this BOE. I am embarrassed to send my kids to this district. Stop getting involved in Personnel matters, that is what the administrators are for. This whole saga makes me sick, with the Principal at Drum Pt to these teachers.

Comment_arrow

ashamed of brick

5:11 pm on Friday, June 15, 2012

what a shame that the boe got there way and didnt give tenure to coach dowling. hoping that the future is brighter for him else where. coach dowling never had a chance he was treated like an outside from the get go from the leader of the school and all the followers of mrs. kight. and for those who ruined someone life over football, how do you sleep at night....remember karma

Ashamed

6:45 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

When does this non sense end? Now they have granted tenure to every single person up for, it in the district, except Patrick Dowling, and some still want to say this is not political or is about football? What a joke. Suter says it's not about football? Oh...OK, we are all moron's out here. If read correctly, sounds like John Talty is the only current NO, he says no to everything that he ever voted on against Dowling so that's just political. Maybe the rest come to their sense do the right thing and end this? Please, enough already.

Reply

Lil'DragonMom

6:49 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

No opinion on this particular case because I have not followed the details enough, but...........
There needs to be a better process. You can't vote no, and then abstain because you need more info, especially after a hearing. If the BOE needs any info, they should have it prior to a vote. This is the POLICY and PROCEDURE the BOE should be working on....reworking the evaluations, so they are specific to the information needed to make good decisions. How can people be making votes and then still say they need more info the next time? If there was not enough info from the beginning then ALL should have abstained from the beginning. No school district, no business, no gov't can run effectively this way.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ashamed

7:06 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Good point Lil DragonMom, you are right how, how, after all of this time, doi you still need MORE time to vote? Wow, I guess they are not too concerned with screwing with people's lives.

JD

7:02 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

What was the vote last time.... in other words...
This shows 2 to 1 and 3 abstains...

If Cuppari, Suter, and Kight what to abstain due to conflicts... why were they permitted to participate to begin with!!! That is a clear conflict of interest and are not permitted to participate in the proceedings whatsoever... no questions.. nothing. A clear violation of due process..

Bricktucky!!! what bozo's on the BOE!!! Can't Brick do better!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lil'DragonMom

7:45 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Last time was Terebush Yes, Talty No, Suter No, Reid No, Campbell No, Cuppari absent, Kight absent. (4-1)

This vote shows Campbell changed his vote to yes, Reid did not attend and Suter is now abstaining.

Comment_arrow

Lil'DragonMom

7:58 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

As far as the conflict, the 2 BOE members who could not vote did not vote. They missed the April mtg and abstained at this mtg. With them not voting, that leaves 5 BOE members and there would be 4 yes votes needed.

Just as an FYI...in the event there were more BOE members that had conflict and needed to abstain, where there could be no quorum for the vote...there is a doctrine of necessity that would be put into place allowing them to vote. Policy 9325

Comment_arrow

JD

8:03 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Suter absteining... what a joke...
yet she voted the first time!!! Ridiculous!!!
Isn't she up for re-election in the fall!!!

Comment_arrow

JD

8:04 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Those that have a conflict... not only CANNOT vote...
but CANNOT participate!!! ie. Kight... file another ethics violation on her... she is a bozo.

JD

7:06 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Kight has a clear conflict because Dowling booted her hubby as football booster president!!! The parents of the team wanted to be in charge of booster club and Dowling agreed.... then changed the locks!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mrgrumpass

8:27 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

JD you’re at it again, name calling and for ethics charges? As always I am sorry for participating in what will once more become your blog! It must be a great weight to know everything about everything! I will turn my computer off now sorry JD!

Comment_arrow

JD

8:30 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

It's a clear ethics violation...
if you have a conflict... you cannot participate in the proceedings!!!
File an ethics complaint Dowling!!! She had one before!!

KMC

7:27 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Very sad situation with this Board. All teachers and administrators were granted tenure. Except for Mr. Dowling. And we are supposed to think that this is a fair Board? And the way he is being treated at the tenure hearing. This is all about football. And when the board members admit this, they will get my respect. But don't sit and act like it doesn't have anything to do with the fact that he was given the football coaches job. He applied for the job and the board at that time gave it to him. You should not take that out on him. He had every right to apply for the job. I don't feel that any teacher or administrator should have tenure, but if you are giving it to the rest of them then he should have it too. Unless he is not a good teacher. And from what I hear, that is not the case.

Reply

knarfie

7:52 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Nothing ever changes in Brick. The Board of Ed has been a political pawn for years and always will be, no matter who gets shafted.

Reply

Mrgrumpass

8:15 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I have a problem with his tenure, first he was hired with a salary about 10G’s less than the superintendent was making at the time, and this football genius was supposed to be a star the team has had dismal seasons, and then to find out he has class room management problems, and if I read it right with Special ED students, I say NO!

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

8:52 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Again... misinformation mrgrumpass...
Dowling is not $10K less than super... lol... super is about 190K i believe!!!

Chief Wahoo

8:16 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Jack, make it stop !

Sounds just like the kind of guy , you want leading your district ...... LOL

What a bunch of drama queens..,. They act worse than the kids they are paid to babysit

Reply

Lori Morrison

8:29 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Kids come into class cursing you off? A classified students IEP does not allow for disrespect in his program. His comments lead me to believe that he does not have control of his classroom. Modifications are made for the students specific learning disabilities. Behavioral modification students are in a separate program that Mr. Dowling is not teaching in.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DennyD

9:06 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

As a former teacher that had to deal with kids "on the edge" I totally disagree with you Ms. Morrison. Kids are classified for a specific reason. Many of these kids are not happy in school. They bring that attitude with them daily. They may be frustrated, feel inadequate or just want to be in any other place but school. As an educator you try to tilt them the other way. Sometimes things are said in the heat of the moment and they cannot be taken back. Unless you have taught in that environment your "solution" does not hold water. We do whatever we can to NOT suspend an at risk student. Apparently 8 evaluators saw Mr. Dowling as a very competent teacher. In April a new Supervisor is hired and and her evaluation depicts an entirely different person. How about the title "hired gun"? All of Mr. Dowling's evaluators were there last night sans 1. Guess who wasn't there. DO WHAT IS RIGHT. Mr. Kull and especially Mr. Dan Duddy had it nailed! Let's get beyond the hate. Mr. Talty has a conflict of interest too. Mrs. Kight, I see you as someone who has suddenly realized the humane part of dealing with people you do not necessarily agree with. If Dan Duddy had become the new Dragon's Head Coach 10-15 years ago he would be now be revered as Coach Wolf was. Notice I said was. This mess began 3 years ago. The football issue was resolved! Allow Mr. Dowling to earn a living as a teacher and role model to kids that are at risk educationally. Thank-you

Comment_arrow

ParentM

9:12 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Lori...Thats nonsense! If you have children of your own, then you would know that, as you try to apply the same rules to each of your children, sometimes, you have to "modify" your means to get what you want for each individual child. "BEHAVIOR MODIFICATION" is an ESSENTIAL skill to be a successful TEACHER! ESPECIALLY!!!! for special ed students!!!! Also, children are so disrespectful today. They act as though the teachers need to earn THEIR respect as opposed to THEM respecting the teachers. Sorry to say, but that is something only a parent can hand down to the child.
I am not involved in football, or BTHS, and don't know Patrick Dowling. BUT I do know of the contraversy that surrounds the poor man. He never had a chance coming in. People in this town are so stuck on Mr. Wolf. Really? No disrespect to him, his legacy speaks for itself. But come on!! Give it up already. And, if any of you know anything about sports you would know that even the greatest of all coaches have losing seasons!! Many times, many consecutive seasons.
This BOE is nothing more than a lynch mob. They came in swinging and are proving that they are nothing more than a bunch of power tripping individuals who feel the need to control those around them. Maybe they have no control in their personal lives? Next election....vote them out! The epitomy of "BRICKTUCKY!

Comment_arrow

JD

9:13 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Nicely said Denny D.

Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

10:02 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

ParentM, I do have 2 children attending Brick High School, one is classified in the LD math program with another teacher. DennyD, I am not a teacher but a parent with a child in the program and know what is expected of the students in his LD math class. I cannot comment specifically on his teaching skills, but I do have first hand experience with behavior requirements for program that he is part of. My comment was based on his statement. If my child was cursing him off I would want to know about it.

Comment_arrow

DennyD

11:34 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ms.Morrison,
I respect your concern about wanting to know if your child was disrespectful toward his/her teacher. If it was a one shot deal, no biggie. If it was continual I agree that the parent should be notified. Teachers that work with Special kids, many times, are the only one that the kid opens up to. Having a rapport with kids is the greatest gift a teacher can have. You said you would want to know. That is admirable. Not every parent shares your concern. I cannot count the number of kids that "opened up" to me in my 39 year career. It seems to me that Mr. Dowling has a similar way to relate to kids. Before you can "teach" a kid at risk, they have to TRUST you. They have to BELIEVE that you BELIEVE in them. Are there some lowbrow things that come to pass? Certainly. By dealing with it one on one and not writing them up is how you gain their trust. Before anyone sees this as a weakness(not ratting them out) talk to the kids! Kids are very honest and blunt when you ask them about their teachers. It appears that Mr. Dowling has the ability to gain the trust of the kids, thus it enables him to be an effective teacher.

Comment_arrow

brick strong

11:32 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Denny D..You had your share of out of control kids and you were respected as being fare and taking no crap..With that said some of these kids today need direction because they don't get it at home and thank god there are teachers who try to teach these kids that respect goes a long way in life ,rather temper tantrums ???

Comment_arrow

ParentM

9:30 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Lori - DennyD said exactly what I would have said. Let the man (Mr. Dowling), do his job. I don't agree with tenure either but thats what we have, and he obviously has earned it! This BOE needs to step back.

chip-fisherman

8:51 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Kind of strange that the super told the twp lawyer to insist on Talty to stop asking questions in reference to the teaching job being created for Mr. Dowling. Priorities are kind of screwed up when a person has to interview for a coaching job and then given a teaching job rather then interview for the teaching job and given a coaching position.

Reply
Comment_arrow

DennyD

9:09 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The issue is whether Mr. Dowling is doing a good job of teaching Special Education students in mathematics. It is not how, what or why he was hired. Is he or isn't an effective TEACHER. That is what the issue is.

JD

9:16 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ron Sutter is a vice principle at Brick High School...
Any relationship to BOE Sutter?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed LeFurge

11:08 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ron Sutter is the VP. Susan Suter is the BOE member. No relation, Sutter has two Ts and Suter has one.

Mommyof3

9:17 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Come on people...think about it!! Mr Dowliing was the head coach in 2 other towns (maybe more, but 2 that I remember) before Brick...my guess is he wasn't granted tenure in those other schools either. That leaves me thinking he's not that great of teacher, and only wants to be a coach! Now if my memory is right, his last fooball football, before Brick, finished dead last and didn't win one game! IF he was good at either, then WHY did he keep changing schools?? Money? No tenure? Makes ya think!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ashamed

9:24 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Mommyof3, this is the sad part of this whole Dowling thing. Dowling HAS held tenure in 3 seperate districts. He has moved districts as he has taken on new football jobs. he innuendo is he hasn't had tenure in 22 years. This is a lie and a smear against Dowling, but that is what people like Talty resort to lies and smears. Stop the non sense and do the right thing.

Comment_arrow

Mommyof3

9:30 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ashamed: If that's the case, then our BOE is doing him a favor! Why should we pay him MORE money and grant tenure only to have him leave once he finds a heach coaching job?

Comment_arrow

Ashamed

9:41 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Mommyof3, Mr Dowling already is a football coach again in Point Boro, but he's still still a teacher in Brick. So your point is the BOE firing Mr Dowling is actually doing him and his 6 kids a favor? Hmmmm, trying to process your logic here. I will say the ignorance of many in Brick people never ceases to amaze me.

Comment_arrow

10% Tax Cut NOW

10:18 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The right thing is to recall this BOE - they have been dead aaginst Mr.Dowling from day one. It's time to to cross the bridge of who you know. Mr.Dowling is doing a fantastic job . Are there any negative job performances in his personal file ? I don't think so - Mr.Talty I have lost all respect in the way you are handling personal matters. It's time to start working for what best for Brick Township and for our future our children not your inflateted ego's.

Comment_arrow

Kim Askin

11:47 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

mommyof3, please get your facts straight before you post on this blog....you obviously have no idea about mr dowlings long and successful teaching career, the many school districts he received tenure in or his choices to move districts for his career advancement and work/family balance. It is also obvious that u did not attend the boe meeting last night to hear his current coworkers, supervisors, administrators as well as supervisors from other districts speak with incredible passion and esteem about mr dowlings solid teaching skills, professional accomplishments or talent in relating to his special needs students.

Comment_arrow

Mommyof3

1:36 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ashamed: Great that he got a job as a football coach for Point Boro! Then why is it he's still able to be a teacher in Brick? Doesn't he need to be a teacher in Point Boro then?? I do not know that's why I'm asking.

Tom Cular

9:28 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I don't think any teacher or administrator should be granted tenure, but that's annother issue. Maybe it's time for Mr. Wolf to cease his antics and go tend to his garden. He had a good run and a successful career, of that there is no doubt. It should be obvious that Wolf has had a vendetta against Dowling from the start, including his short term on the BOE to influence their decisions.

Reply

hmh

10:36 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The one key point that we all seem to be overlooking is that this man, who by all accounts is a very nice man, took a chance by leaving his old district to make more money here in Brick. He was hired at an $80,000 plus per year teaching position with the idea that he would also be the head coach of the football team. He no longer is the football coach, therefore is only there to do part of what he was hired for. By taking the Brick job, there was a risk-reward situation set up. He took the risk, if he was successful, he would have reaped the reward. It just did not work out that way. It was the chance that he took and unfortunately, the worst case scenario played out. I am a former Dragon, who was ashamed at the behavior of our town (and definitely not a Wolf fan), but please again, understand that this is the risk that comes with tenure, a risk he knowingly took.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

10:51 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

His teaching salary was $75K... that is what everyone is paid with his teaching experience... they don't start at the bottom rung again.
Then add his coaching stipends...

Comment_arrow

DennyD

10:57 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

hmh,
The only issue here is whether he is a competent teacher. The teaching part of the overall salary is 80-90%.

Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

3:31 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Dowling's salary for this school year was $84,578.

Ed LeFurge

11:11 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Everyone says that this is no a football issue. Yet I have a hard time grasping the fact that at the meeting last night, most of the people who spoke on Mr. Dowlings behalf brought up football. If the man keeps saying to forget about football, then why are his OWN people bringing it up?

Reply
Comment_arrow

DennyD

11:41 am on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Come on Ed,
You, I and everyone else knows what this whole situation was predicated on. Dan Duddy's dissertation was magnificent! Did you hear it?

Comment_arrow

Ed LeFurge

2:12 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I did, and I agree it was great! I just have a hard time understanding how Mr. Dowling wanted football to have nothing to do with it, yet most of the people who spoke on his behalf spoke of him as a football coach. The hearing was based on him as a teacher, not a football coach.

Comment_arrow

DennyD

2:28 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Not really. All of the evaluators spoke on his classroom proficiency. If he had never stepped on a football field in Brick Township he would have been given tenure. The nitpicking being done by Mrs. Suter is incredible. This is to justify her vote the first time around? I guess she went through all of the evaluations of all the other people who were looking at tenure this year. So far she is 0 for 3. My suggestion Mrs. Suter, is to look in the mirror. Being a member of a BOE can be a 1 year term or could last for decades. You are dealing with peoples' livlihood! This is not some sort of gotcha game. Do you know why the person that wrote those evaluations was not there last night? I'd like to know! You should like to know! You could have asked her directly exactly what she observed. She, conveniently, was not there.

Comment_arrow

Ed LeFurge

10:27 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I disagree! Mrs. Suter is one of the best board members in my opinion. She does a lot of work that goes unrecognized. And actually I do know why she wasn't there last night, and quite frankly I don't think that's anyone's bussiness.

Kim Askin

12:03 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

It is a sad state of affairs when utter cluelessness to the workings of the special education classroom, embarrassing disorganization, vengeful motivations and political agendas of people who haven't been in a classroom since they were students themselves are what decide the fate and future of an amazing man and educator and his family and NOT the well spoken professional opinions of the colleagues and administrators who work with him every day. Kudos to Terebush, Cuppari and Campbell for speaking up and doing the right thing. Shame on you, Kight, Talty and Suter. You embarrassed yourselves and your town last night!

Reply

Chief Wahoo

12:20 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Sounds like everyone who complains believes they should get tenure. Let's just give everyone in Bricktucky tenure !

Reply

Jeremiah Greene

12:25 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I am a WOLF fan but I think Mr. Cole's speech last night was absolutely fantastic!

Reply

DennyD

1:54 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

As was Dan Duddy's! NO ONE was more of a disciple of Coach Wolf than Coach Duddy. For all the BOE members, it is time to bury the hatchet! I do my homework. I have been in contact with many people who have been involved with Superintendent elect Dr. Walter Uszenski. I have heard many many good things! Dr. Uszenski has made it known that this is his last stop! He has 4 years! Please give Mr. Dowling his due. Give him his deserved tenure! Time to do what is right for all concerned. Mr. Hyrcenko deserves your respect too. So does Mrs. LaRusso! Get past all these trivial "negative" matters. The last three years have been brutal. How about a fresh new start ? Negativity just drains your battery.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Ed LeFurge

2:16 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I agree that we need a fresh start for Dr. U! He is a very nice man and seems to be able to bring a lot to Brick Township. Whether the BOE made the right or wrong decision last night, we need to move on and focus on giving Dr. U the best for him to help Brick excel!

Comment_arrow

Ashamed

2:57 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Ed, the BOE has not completed what happened last night, they still have several folks to vote and they need to end it positively. Denny is correct, they need to end this Dowling situation on positive note and then move towards starting new with Dr U, while not spending time trying to continue to pay back Walter H. Time to move forward. If Dowling doesn't get resolved the right way, I predict continued paybacks are likely to happen and before you know it the BOE is flipping again and trying to pay back what the other side did. Stop the non sense, for once and for all. Do the right thing with Dowling, do the right thing with the new Super and the old Super and let's try and move Brick forward for a change.

Comment_arrow

Ed LeFurge

10:30 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

The only thing that is likely to happens is Mr. Dowling appealing to the Commishoner. The board has a 72 hour period to make their vote, and they decided to last night. Unless a something miraculous happens, don't expect another vote to occur.

Comment_arrow

Julius Magnussson The 3rd

10:13 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Mr. LeFurge were you even there at the meeting?

Mommyof3

2:15 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

OK...we are all adults here so can we PLEASE stop saying that all kids that have a learning disablity also have BEHAVIOR problems and that they don't want to learn!! I'm sorry but the two don't always go together!!! I know!! Both of my older 2 have learning disablities and not ONE has behavior problem! They know right from wrong, would NEVER disrepect ANY teacher and they wanted to learn!! I got to know alot of BTHS special ed teachers during this time (along with kids & some parents) and I must say, NOT one child in my son's 4 years of high school AND my daughter's 4 years of high school combined were ever disrespectful to any of the teachers!!!! Now, in their so-called "normal classes" well, lets just say that there were some very wild ones. In the long run, parents need to parent their child and teachers need to teach! This town's education system is going down hill big time and that needs to change!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

DennyD

3:00 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Mommyof3,
No one said all. Slow down. There were specific instances cited in Mr. Dowling's evaluations. Your statement,"parents need to parent their child", while spot on is not reality. "Teachers need to teach" They sure do. I can see your passion! When you are deaing with kids with learning disabilities or some other issues it can really beat you up. If you were not in the classroom with those kids for all those years you really cannot conclude wha did and did not happen. I empathize with you! I have a special needs son at home and was never in his classroom at Brick High School. I could only go by what I was told. To get back on task here, apparently Mr. Dowling is a very effective teacher in his discipline.

jack smith

3:25 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Oh my, how could he expect to be tenured after using sarcasm in the classroom? A student fell asleep in class? I have never heard of such a thing. He relies on worksheets too much? How did he make it three years with this kind of track record?

This man was a respected educator for twenty plus years, at varios schools throughout the state and now will forever have a tarnished reputation due to the morons involved in this situation.

Reply

jack smith

3:29 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I blame the beloved Wolf the most. Sending his brainwashed lackeys on a personal vendetta against this man. If you want to retire from coaching retire don't continue on a personal crusade to destroy someones livelihood because you felt left out of the decision making process of the next head coach. Hire a brick boy for the brick job, but i'll take a job in another town. Hypocritical old goat.

Reply

jack smith

3:31 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

When Dowling wins his inevitable lawsuit against the town remember who was responsible. Remember these names involved during election day as well. This town is just a sad ongoing joke.

Reply

brick strong

7:26 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Its sad ..he had a good reputation before he got here ..and one old person can destroy his life and career..how sad is that..shame on those let this happen ..

Reply

relieved parent

7:38 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

We moved to this town 15 years ago because of the schools In the last 4 years I have seen the BOE go to pot. In my opinion, some of the board members are there for the wrong reasons. You attack this poor man who has done nothing but apply for a coaching job in our district. He got the job and was good at it. My son was one of his players. He has nothing but high regard and respect for Mr Dowling. He always put the kids first which is something some of you say you do, but clearly other agendas come first! He isn't a "good old boy". So he isn't from Brick, BIG DEAL. So now you have to grow up in Brick to be a good coach or a good teacher! His reputation speaks for itself. As if all that bs wasn't enough. Now you're going after his job and you are trying to prevent him from supporting his family. For what? Let it go already! Isn' t the BOE supposed to support the recommendations of the people that are actually paid to evaluate the teachers! If the Superintendent, the Asst. Superintendent etc. are behind Dowling and are supporting his tenure. Who are you to decide against it? It is time for the BOE to do what is right for the kids and the schools, end of story! Have to say, I am glad my kids have graduated and I don't have to concern myself anymore with all the bs that goes on within our school system . Dowling is a good man and a good teacher. Hopefully you will do the right thing and grant him tenure.Can't imagine what an outsider thinks when they read all this bull! Sad!!

Reply

Tapuout

7:56 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Lol lol lol the martyr chief is calling other people drama queens, cry babies and complainers? wow isn't that the pot calling the kettle black what a hypocrit but we already know that right bricktucky

Reply

Joseph Woolston Brick

7:57 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

My first observation is, there are only a few BOE meetings a year, there shouldn't be any excuse for any board member not attending unless there is a death in the family or extreme illness with hospitalization. Second, this whole thing is about football! This year I have lost respect for two people I liked and respected. I saw "politics" raise it's ugly head, politics I thought would never be used by the two people I knew. Warren Wolf to me was a great man, most respected teacher and an accomplished Football coach, when I voted for him for the board, I did so because I thought he would be for the kids, but then I saw the real reason he wanted that seat on the board, to get rid of Dowling as coach, after mission was accomplished he left. I felt like a total idiot, I was conned and used by Wolf in the voting booth. Then Talty who again I thought wouldn't be involved in the politics of Brick and I thought wanted his seat to help the kids, seems to be continuing Wolfs work. A kid fell asleep during his class? Did anyone ask the kid why? Was he/she up late studying, working, partying? Next time you go to a BOE meeting, take a look around you and see how many people are nodding off. Guess that means some members need to be replaced!

Reply

JB

8:54 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

This nonsense is really attracting quality teaching candidates to apply and work in Brick....how sad?

This is a perfect example why teachers need tenure! Imagine how many more staff this BOE would be after if they were't tenured....

Reply
Comment_arrow

Resident

7:46 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

JB, beg to disagree, tenure is a horrible idea formulated by unions to protect their due paying members, plain and simple. If you are good at your job and deserve to be there, you will/should be retained, why should you be protected simply because of longevity? Results shhould be the only measuring stick. Tenure protects too many teachers that just mail it in knowing they are protected. As for the football connection, unfortunately due to the ugliness of the circumstances surrounding the hire and the poor records he produced after so much support from the superintendent it does not shock me they are trying to wipe the slate clean and move on.

Comment_arrow

Joseph Woolston Brick

11:42 pm on Monday, June 18, 2012

Resident,
It's obvious you are not a teacher or don't have one in your family. Tenure is not a horrible idea and came about in the early days of the unions not to keep bad teachers working, but to prevent unfair practices by BOEs, Principles, Mayors and other people in power. Good teachers would be fired because someone in powers niece just graduated from college and needed a teaching position, back in the day, no problem if Uncle Politician was on the board or someone in power, he would just fire and replace with the niece/nephew newbie teacher. Sound familiar sort of like our own town hall shenanigans.

gimmeabreak

9:18 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Are you people kidding? CLEARLY the guy was hired for a job that didn't exist, along with one for his assistant. It was sham with the super and the old board right from the start. Were you crying about politics then? This guy goes through districts like Kim Kardashian goes through men. the guy goes from step 11 in Monroe to step 18 in Brick? Really? Nothing dirty there, right? It goes both ways. You can't get hired as a political scam and then complain when you get found out. All his cronies just went on and on and on and on about FOOTBALL and nothing else! Not ONE student or parent of a student! If all it takes for a tenured overpriced teaching job in Brick is having people say you are a good coach and you have a lot of mouths to feed, then why do we even require college degrees? You people are so ignorant it isn't even funny. GREAT teacher who lets his kid curse at him; way to control a classroom! Oh, and those of you who think the bar should be lowered for these kids are completely out of touch. Your kids will be living with you and on welfare when they are 43 because they won't be able to keep a job because you are telling them it's okay to curse at people because you are classified. Let it go already! Brick is not the NFL breeding farm. Worry about your kids getting an education and let the football stories go! All we needed was Springsteen's Glory Days playing in the room last night! Maybe all these backroom deals is why the super got the axe.

Reply

george

9:31 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

So who believes a word said by Pat Dowling??? Not me. He kept on wanting to throw out his bad evaluation. Instead of owning it and admitting he might have had a bad day, he chose to malign the administrator who wrote it. Mr. Hrycenko thought enough of this person to appoint and recommend her for the position, and yet he didn't think enough of Mr. Filippone to allow him to evaluate Mr. Dowling. I smell something fishy here.

Why doesn't everyone just let this guy go to the next school district like he always does? How many has he been in now? A 22 year teacher should have control over his class, no matter how many times Denny D posts things on this blog, he still was only an in school suspension teacher who watched tv all day and played on the computer. He really is no judge of how a well managed special ed class should function. No offense Denny, but you really need to leave this blog and go to St. John Vianney with Tony C. and fade away from Brick.

Stop the vicious attacks on John Talty and now Susan Suter. They have the guts to ask questions instead of rubber stamping tenure on a person or just grand standing like Mrs. Terebush does.

Reply
Comment_arrow

george

9:36 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

Mrs. Suter, I commend you for your intelligence and hard work and taking the time to read through all those evaluations. Mr. Talty I also respect you for taking your time and spending it on the children of Brick as a BOE member. Your honesty and integrity show through everything you say.

What everyone does not know is that Mr. Dowling dooped us all. He is already employed in South Brunswick. That was all a show last night. So Dan Duddy, Denis, William Kleisslor, and the magnificent peeping Ed Cole, you were all used, How does it feel? Off to another school district we go with our 6 little munchkins in tow. And let's not forget Brunhilda Dowling who had to sit with Walter H at all the football games. Can you get Walter a job too Pat? He worked so hard for you.

Anthony

10:44 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

They should just get rid of tenure altogether. What a joke. Teachers that are complete slackers are skating by and collecting a paycheck. Teachers should be judged by their merits, and the performance of their students. If you want to keep your job as a teacher, then you'd better tighten up your belt and--get this--TEACH! Good teachers keep their job, bad teachers are sent on their way. Ill never understand why teachers can perform badly, be completely hated by their students, and keep their job year after year until they retire on everyone else's dime. There isn't a job like it in the world. The whole idea of tenure us an archaic and ridiculous concept and should be abolished.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mrpipp

6:59 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

You have to keep a tenure system because of all the politics we are experiences in Brick right now. You can not leave the decision of who can get fired to the BOE. They have obviously proven that they will not make rational decisions, and instead will hold vendettas and hand out political favors. I agree that tenure is archaic and should be revamped, but getting rid of it and putting the decision in the hands of a corrupt BOE (most of which have never taught a day in their lives) is not the answer. ...... really the whole system of education in America needs to change!

brick strong

11:37 pm on Tuesday, June 12, 2012

I am getting so fed up with the political B.S. in our schools systems..Why can't we just do whats right for the kids and forget who's who and what click are you in ?? KIDS NEED A EDUCATION ..and they don't need to hear or read about the problems the school board can't solve..They are our future and you are sending a shitty message that you can't do what right with name calling..VERY SAD..ELECTED AND OVER PAID FOOLS..

Reply
Comment_arrow

Lori Morrison

7:09 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

If Mr. Dowling had a private hearing the same as the other two teachers, he could have properly addressed the issues that cannot be discussed at a public hearing. The other two teachers did receive tenure after the private meeting. Why did he want this to be done at a public meeting?

Comment_arrow

joseph

9:11 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

I agree that students need a education. For this to take place you need leadership that is honest , has integrity and the guts to go against the grain when necessary. This in my opinion has not occurred in the Dowling case. This was a man who came to Brick and was given a salary which was 2 steps higher (approx. $10,000) than he should have received. Why did Mr. Hrycenko give him this and not do it for other so called Highly Qualified teachers who were teaching the same subject?
It is my understanding that many of the BOE members had questions regarding those teachers and an administrator who were initially not granted tenure. Apparently Mr. Hrycenko refused to allow BOE members to ask those persons the questions that they wanted answered before casting a vote. After denying them a vote, the BOE got a chance to ask their questions and apparently based on the 2nd vote, their questions were answered to the BOE satisfaction.
In Regards to Mr. Dowling I was present and almost every speaker who spoke on Dowlings behalf spoke about football, and why it was important to vote for Dowling otherwise Coach Wolf legacy would be compromised??? After watching this spectacle one must come to the conclusion that this was a staged event designed to intimidate the BOE, which is some cases was the result. Let us keep in mind the Observation that was negative to Mr. Dowling was the last official evaluation done and I think showed he did not have good class management of the class.

Comment_arrow

GROWUP People

6:50 pm on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

I agree with you Brick resident82, I personally can't stand how the BOE is behaving! I didn't like it before when Wolf and Talty were being treated poorly ( in my opinion) it was all about the power to control the vote and they were treated as if they weren't part of the board. So the tables turned and the Brick Residents voted and gave the power to Talty and Kight. Unfortunately power seems to make grown adults act like bullies...Now we have the same exact thing going on with the BOE once again! When are the Brick Residents going to find people to hold these positions and do what is right for the CHILDREN for a change instead of the BOE acting like CHILDREN! It is very upsetting and all its doing is teaching our children that all it takes is to have the numbers. It is obvious what this whole thing is about, it has been going on for the last few years, just different sides taking turns being the bully!

Resident

8:04 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Had the superintendent actually taken the overwhelming advice in the beginning to hire a coach with Brick Football roots, none of this would be happening. Do I blame Dowling for going for the football job, no, do I blame Hyrchenko for allowing his ego to over rule the consensus, absolutely! Hyrchenko is a perfect example of how rediculous tenure is......lets see, get rid of him as a super, but because of tenure, give him the second in command job.........puulleeease!

Reply

Julius Magnussson The 3rd

9:49 am on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

THE CHILDREN ARE THE FUTURE SAVE MR. DOWLING.... SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

GROWUP People

7:13 pm on Wednesday, June 13, 2012

Would it have been a better idea to hire someone with Brick roots first, well of course. One would think if you went to school here and lived here your whole life, you would get preference over someone from outside of our community...however it was not and is not Dowling's fault and he has been getting punished since day one!!! And everyone knows it! He has 6 children and I know a little about trying to support a family of that size...Why did he put this out in the public for discussion...well that is simple...it's been in the public since he got the job, years ago. I hope all you Dowling hater's do not move out of Brick because how would you feel if a town treated you as poorly as HALF of our town has....SHAME ON ALL OF YOU both new and old BOE members for using this man in this way!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Resident

5:32 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012

The shame is on Hrychenko, he should have set his ego aside and listened to what the towns residents wanted. Dowling heard the uproar and took the job anyway, he could have stayed in his last, what, 3 district jobs, but took the gamble, no one forced him. I sat through a football banquet where Dowling spoke only of himself and barely mentioned the accolades of his players, I knew enough then.

Embarassed brick resident

8:48 am on Thursday, June 14, 2012

Unbelievable!!!! It is so sad an so blatantly obvious that the Brick BOE is corrupt!! Ew! I am embarrassed for you... Ps check the tape a few of you fell asleep during the meeting that was started an hour an a half late .. Maybe u need to get control!

Reply

SMBrick

12:24 am on Friday, June 15, 2012

It was EMBARRASSING to see how Kight, Suter and Talty acted at that meeting. There is no meeting in any public forum that should have been run like that zoo. And then for them to say "they need more information" in order to vote...I mean really...what information? They have a responsibility to vote up or down on the appeal, whether or not one's husband was ousted as booster president. A person has three years of reviews, almost all stellar, has students, other faculty and sfaff saying he works well there, why do you trash that individual? Only reason is politics, football (Wolff who is now working outside of Brick, how ironic), and a corrupt board. How can three people (Kight, Suter and Talty) act that way and go home and to their own families, to their children? How can they do that, destroy a person with innuendos and as Talty said "having information" that he can't share, but somehow "knows," throw those allegations out like it is fact and then sleep at night? They will someday have to account for their actions to a much more important higher power for destroying someone's life..good luck with that.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks