UPDATED: Point Beach Bars to Stay Open Until 2 A.M. for Now, State Rules
State ABC won't let town enforce midnight bar closings yet
Point Beach bars can stay open until 2 a.m. for now until an appeal is decided, ruled the director of the state Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control on Friday night.
The town is temporarily barred from enforcing an ordinance, adopted on May 15, that would have compelled all bars in Point Beach to stop serving alcohol at midnight starting Sunday, now that ABC Director Michael Halfacre has granted a "stay." (See attached PDF).
Halfacre wrote in his ruling that compelling Jenkinson's and Martell's to close at midnight while the appeal they filed against the ordinance is pending, would be unfair.
"Should the Appellants prevail after a full hearing, there is no method of redress for them to recoup the financial losses they would incur while the earlier closing time was in effect," Halfacre wrote.
"Acts destroying a complainant’s business, custom and profits do an irreparable injury and authorize the issuance of a preliminary injunction," he wrote, citing case law.
By granting the stay, Halfacre is giving Jenkinson's and Martell's one of two things they asked for in appealing the bar ordinance. The second thing they want is for the state to invalidate the ordinance.
In a statement to the media, released with his ruling, Halfacre states: "The Division of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) has today issued a stay on the hours ordinance 2012-15, temporarily preserving the closing time status quo of 2 a.m. for ABC licensed establishments in Point Pleasant Beach.
"The Division has also been asked to rule on the legality of the ordinance and legal proceedings on this matter will begin in due course. The stay will remain effective until those proceedings have been completed."
The boardwalk businesses, in their appeal, allege that the ordinance was used as a tool to "extort" money from them since the town had seriously considered adopting a second ordinance giving bars the option to pay a fee to stay open later.
The fee would be to pay for extra police services, which were needed last year, when emergency appropriations of $155,000 were paid for police overtime, and this year when more special police officers were hired for summer duty.
Halfacre, in his ruling released Friday, says that even though the town never adopted the second ordinance to give bars the option to pay to stay open past midnight, the fact that they had strongly considered it raises a question about the legitimacy of adopting the first ordinance.
"...the substantial factual history dating back at least a year, including various public comments made by elected officials, combined with the surcharge ordinance in its various iterations, gives rise to a legitimate inquiry into the motivations behind an otherwise valid exercise of municipal authority," says Halfacre, adding that municipalities do have the right to limit hours of operations of bars.
He then makes it clear that he has the authority "to refuse to apply an ordinance if I determine that ordinance was entered into in bad faith or for an illegitimate purpose."
"Consequently, although the Governing Body has the authority to restrict hours of operation, the substantial factual history here raises at least the need for an inquiry into the allegations of bad faith or illegitimate purpose," Halfacre writes.
"Therefore, a hearing before the Office of Administrative Law is appropriate to make findings of fact upon which my ultimate decision will be based," he wrote.
Halfacre has the authority to either accept or reject a finding made by an administrative law judge.
Municipal officials and boardwalk representatives had negotiated to try to avert midnight closings. Jenkinson's and Martell's had offered, jointly, to pay $160,000 for each of the next five years to help pay for police coverage. However, Mayor Vincent Barrella and three council members said the offer came with no mechanism that allowed the town to be sure it was going to be able to collect the promised cash.
Mayor Vincent Barrella's statement, in response to the decision, is as follows, in its entirety:
"The Borough was disappointed to learn this afternoon of ABC Director Halfacre’s decision to stay the implementation of Ordinance 2012-15, thereby subjecting the residents of Point Pleasant Beach to more of the riotous behavior and degradation of quality of life that the 12 am closing sought to quell.
"We are also surprised, that a former mayor would not seek to uphold an action that is to be accorded the presumption of validity based, we believe, on the theory that the Beach ought to simply provide for additional enforcement.
"While we have not had the opportunity to fully review the basis of his decision, mandating the stay of implementation of the ordinance usurps the traditional role of local government to the detriment of our local citizens. We remain confident that our determination will be upheld after full hearing and we will be reviewing our options."
Barrella's reference to a "former mayor" is a reference to Halfacre being a former mayor of Fair Haven in Monmouth County.
Marilou Halvorsen, Jenkinson's Director of Marketing, said, "We're pleased with the decision." She said she would not comment further until tomorrow after she and Jenkinson's owners and attorneys had a chance to review the decision.
The decision had been expected all day, but was not released to interested parties until sometime after 7 p.m. and not released to the media until nearly 7:30 p.m.
When Zach Hosseini, an ABC spokesman, when asked why it wasn't until the evening that Halfacre released the decision, he said he did not know. When asked if negotiations were going on between Halfacre and any interested parties, he said, "I don't believe so, not that I know of."
When asked if Halfacre would respond to Barrella's comment or other questions, Hosseini said, "No, I don't think that would be appropriate."
Halfacre's decision says that both parties had met with him on June 19 and were still communicating with each other this past week.
"Finally, a telephonic conference was held on June 27 for final comments from the parties, as there appeared to be some indication that this matter may be resolved by the parties. Efforts toward resolution, however, were unsuccessful," Halfacre writes.
mailman
7:35 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Should have taken the money. Everything the mayor states is just simply false.
Thundercrack
7:39 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I guess money really can buy anything. Such a shame. What's the point of any kind of democracy? Pathetic.
MoonDogie
8:18 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Thurndercrack, exactly what are you insinuating by money can buy anything? Please explain.
Ray Criptkie
12:20 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
What democracy are you referring to Thundercrack? The majority of the citizens of PPB were totally against this! Is that the same democracy that voted NO to a parking plan and wound up with a ridiculous one anyway?
sharon remtory
9:37 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
you are absolutely right....all the homeowners probably will have to endure another summer of this nonsense. By the time the appeal is heard, the summer will be over. What a shame.....I don't want to read the township complaining about paying for more police officers.....
MoonDogie
7:41 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
As it should be. Now allow our fine Police Department to do their job and let ALL of our business owners take care of business as usual!
GG
8:56 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Fine? If you say so? You are right about one thing. Business as usual?
Been here before
7:44 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Barrella. Not close to the truth. What happened here is that you tried to impose taxes the legislature told you were improper. And you did so for your selfish political purposes. If you really think the summers in PPB are going to be that bad, resign and move. I'm sure your house will sell immediately---despite your slanderous comments about PPB.
mailman
7:44 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Yup thundercrack, money can buy a whole lot of cops like we used to have in order to take care of whatever issue remains from last year. Mayor and council should have let the bw pay for it like they offered.
Scott
7:52 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
All I'm gonna say is.....TOLD YOU SO!!! It'll NEVER happen. Have a great summer everyone. I know I will :)
GG
8:50 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Scott, You were right that it'll NEVER happen. I knew too!!! I guess you are also aware of unscrupulous town you live in. You know it smells bad, when the ABC ruling is going against a town that wants to set its own hours that they are legally entitled to. Every town that surrounds Point Pleasant Beach gets to set their own hours (they are all different) should be indication that the venality of the ABC director, the BW and their followers.
MoonDogie
9:28 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
GG, This might be an important part of the decision to keep in mind:
"Consequently, although the Governing Body has the authority to restrict hours of operation, the substantial factual history here raises at least the need for an inquiry into the allegations of bad faith or illegitimate purpose,"
lj
7:58 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Barrella is short on intellect and ability. Now let's impeach Corbally on parking. Can we charge Barella on what he cost the town. Jerk first class.
Seeing Red
8:01 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Can the town sue the lawyer for malpractice? Can a resident sue the lawyer to get the fees spent on his bad advice back? Sure should be able to, don't you think?
Pat Kender
9:12 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
yes you should be able to do that
interesting
10:37 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Why sue the lawyer for malpractice? He was doing what your mayor and council requested...perhaps you should consider taking the legal action against them, after all, they were the ones seeking to extort money from the boardwalk businesses and yet, even when the money was offered, they got gready and wanted more. Look no further than your mayor for a place to lay the blame for all the money wasted.
JD
8:05 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
If you recall, Storino said he had detectives monitoring after midnight...
He is building a case based upon facts... regarding alleged problems...
then with all the issues with the parking ordinance and wanting to collect fees for after midnight closing... it will be thrown out.
I do believe.... they will mediate to a "last call" at 1am... and out the door by 2am and even food establishments closed by 2am.... however, they have to get rid of parking ordinance.
PPNB
8:12 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Wow there's gonna be stuff hitting the fan now
Nick Carraway
8:13 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Barrella should've said that he, Corbally, Tooker, Gordon and their followers are disappointed to learn that they couldn't strong-arm the ABC, like they have done so many others in town and tried to do to the BW and other businesses. The Borough is disappointed to learn that we didn't take the money that was offered, because now the bars will remain open but we won't get any additional money to help offset the police costs. Maybe everyone who supports this decision should send Halfacre a personal thank you note, just to let him know that Barrella may be the Mayor (although not voted in by a majority of the voters) but he doesn't speak for all of us.
Spooner
10:34 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
...any more e-mail chain updates from Cathy Kelly?
Grew up in Point Pleasant
12:12 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
It seems to just be greed and control by Barrella. Now he has nothing coming in for extra police. Seems like bad business to me. They offered to pay and it seemed reasonable and that wasn't good enough. Good for the Storino's and Martell's they have been here long before this Mayor and I can assure long after.
GG
1:14 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Grew up in Point Pleasant, Really? Not only Point Beach, all the other towns close by knows that Jenkinson's and Martell's is definitely in control of the town, county, ABC director, the State of NJ and even the police. The list keeps getting longer. They own all of them.
Been here before
7:16 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG---another conspiracy theorist with no facts. I know where you can get an aluminum hat, cheap!
Been here before
8:17 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Certainly once we remove from office, in order, Corbally Tooker Gordon and Barrella we will all be better off. Then we can build a real partnership with the Boardwalk to keep our town safe. Based on facts, not the exaggerations these politicians needed people to believe to win elections.
Paul
1:03 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Been here before, How is that? Don't they all play politics. Politics is played in every single decision and move a town makes. Please.....Even some residents are playing politics. How do you think all these politicians get in? From the residents that are playing politics in some way.
PPNB
8:19 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
This makes me want to go barefoot and drink in my backyard till 2 am. Then I'll go through dollars down the toilet
Better Living
8:30 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Mailman-
Taken what? Can't take what was not given!
Not only that... if they don't pay, the town can't even enforce them to!
Bogus offer by BW anyway.... stalling tactic that WORKED!
mailman
9:45 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
The BW offered $160k / year. They obligated to the fact if they did not give any year for the next five years, they would forfeit their liquor licenses. They based the mechanism to give the money on the Sea Girt example, which exists and is a legal way for bars to pay for cops. They did everything that the Mayor asked them to do. Your Mayor and his council people said that it only amounted to $3 per household a month and voted not to take it. The deal would have been done, but the Mayor's ego has cost us all now!
Better Living
8:32 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Always comes down to who you now. As expected, the BW used their connections.
BW runs PPB....
Shame.
Town going to pot!
PPNB
8:33 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Redundant!
Been here before
8:42 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
and alone......sad really---clinging blindly to Barrella myths
mattmurphy
10:11 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Better Living - Who you now?
Ray Criptkie
12:24 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Feel free to leave Better Living!
Beach_N8iv
6:10 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Isn't that how the malcontents got the bar closing and parking scam passed to begin with?
Part Timer
8:43 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
WOW, the amount of revenue from parking tickets this weekend will pay for the extra police...
PPNB
8:47 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Summer over already?? Make yourself a nice big keg of kool aid
GG
12:47 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
It is going to be needed being the BW will not pay for the extra police.
liam
8:52 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
For every actionthere is an equal but opposite reaction. That being said. All of the 21 to 40 crowd will rent beach houses and hotels where the bars are open till 2on am. Landlords and inn keepers will fill the gap with whomever they can oht of desperation. Welfare, sec8, crack heads and junkies. Blood gang members etc. Be careful what u wish for
Been here before
8:56 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
liam. It oesn't appear you know anything about PPB. Your predictions for the future have no basis. In truth everyone agrees PPB should never have cut the cops. Now that they have been restored, D4 is great. Where do you live?
liam
8:59 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
If you own realestate in point beach,
FIRE SALE NOW!
liam
9:00 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Lived in point for 15a years. Now im on the right side of the bridge
PPNB
9:01 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Lots of laughs. Shouldn't you be on a ledge
liam
9:02 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
The restoration may be temporary
liam
9:05 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I understand ppb. Wants to be like the right side of the bridge, but trying to make it happen over night will be devastating to the economy
Danny Schatz
11:40 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
how is this going to devastate the economy?
Been here before
9:06 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Not going to be temporary. Decision says is "some question" Council had "improper" motive. Is no question---just listen to tapes---the things Gordon said based on what Barrella taught him cost the town any chance of winning
GG
12:11 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
The entire town has improper motives. Reid is guilty of wanting to still vote on taking the 800,000 from the BW that he considered "extortion" Did not matter, he still wanted to go thru with it. "The shrimp is really not free"
Been here before
7:24 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG---why is it you and every other Barrella supporter can't tell the difference between a donation, and extortion---when you give it because you want to it is a gift----if you give it because someone has threatened you it is extortion. Reid was against extortion and in favor of donations. Simple straightforward truth. I think we know why you and all the other Barrellaistas cannot see this
blindbert
9:10 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Whats the smell in this room?
Did you notice it Brick?
Didn't you notice a powerful and obnoxiuos oder of mendacity!
There ain't nothin more powerful than the oder of mendacity!
You can smell it, it smells like death!
mailman
9:13 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I think it's your feet.
mattmurphy
9:37 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Blindbert - the only mendacious odor is that of Corbally, Barrella, Tooker and Gordon. You're right, it does smell like death! Their political death! I can smell it! It is permeating throughout Point Pleasant Beach. It smells wonderful! They are not so powerful, but they are still obnoxious, and so are you and Mr. Happy!!!!! Have an enjoyable evening, I know I will!
Full Timer
10:51 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Bert, Oder (also spelled Odra) is a river in Central Europe. I believe you meant odor, unless you are extending this issue to Czechoslovakia and Poland. In the meantime, justice is served ..as are drinks until 2AM.
Maggie the Cat
11:49 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Blindbert, "You won't live with mendacity? Well, you're an expert at it!"
Part Timer
9:12 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
This is something that should have been done a long time ago.
This is direct from the laws set by the ABC...
http://www.nj.gov/oag/abc/downloads/ag-law-enforce-directive-2007-2.pdf
PPNB
9:47 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
2007 really. Are you kidding. I mean the tourism study was from 2007
Part Timer
9:57 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
PPNB, That is when the Law was written... jack A$$
Go look on the ABC website...............
PPNB
10:03 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
You discredited the tourism study because it was from 2007... And probably have yet to read it.. I understand you're upset, But you did say that You did not care how late the bars were open.... Take it like a man and don't be calling people names.
bars stay open
Part Timer
11:04 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
PPNB, Residents First - that was a STUDY this is a LAW.
PPNB
11:57 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Part timer. It's not a law in point pleasant beach. Are you 1 of those people who are all smug when the law is on their side .
I think rental units should pay their fair share for the impact they cause.
msrd
9:15 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
This whole thing was BS from the start. People are not going to behave any less stupid leaving a bar at midnight vs 2am. There was no reason for all of this mess to begin with...the bar owners offered to pay huge sums of money for extra police patrol from the beginning and it should have been graciously accepted then.
GG
12:01 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
You have one thing right. It is all BS!
Mimi
8:59 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Amen!
Pat Kender
9:23 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I cant believe that the residents of the beach cant see through what the mayor is all about. This man COULD NOT afford Spring Lake, Bay Head, Sea Girt etc. He is driving everyone crazy trying to make it like that. The residents should take up a collection, sell his house and buy him one in Sea Girt or Spring Lake. It will save them all a lot of legal fees. His ego is huge and he wont let this go and he is not really a local...just a benny who bought here...and immediately wanted things to go his way. Amazing how people will follow someone blindly and take up his cause, not really knowing his motivation. Just a "Nation of Sheep"
Belmarchick
10:13 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
My thoughts exactly all along following this story. This is the talk of Southern Monmouth County precisely - the mayor & the other complaining parties that moved into PB & are complaining could not afford SL or Sea Girt, etc... They moved below the bridge. You want quiet - buy in SL or Sea Girt. And I am a Benny who moved to Belmar (but not next to DJais). Stupid is as stupid does.
GG
11:56 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Belmar? They cleaned up their act and now Pt. Beach is being stopped to clean up theres from the ABC. There was an issue at Bar A recently, it was in the paper. About noisy bar patrons leaving, going out scream and cursing in the neighborhood while fetching their car in the back lot that they should have not been using in the first place. The difference is their town council, I think it was Wall? Cracked down immediately by making them closing the lot and fining them daily. They listened to their residents who were getting disturbed.
Joseph Woolston Brick
7:41 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Reminds me of the people who bought the new homes that were built by the railroad loop in Bayhead, the loop has been there for almost a hundred years. They bought the homes (that were pretty pricey) knowing damn well the loop was right in their backyard, you could plainly see it from their property. Then they started complaining about the noise, REALLY? They filed all kinds of law suits and lost. Now you have people buying homes in a resort town where you know there is going to be an expectation of noise and activity you won't find in a normal town and their complaining! They are just as stupid as the people that bought the homes by the loop.
GG
10:33 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
JWB, I totally agree about increased fines on bad behavior. Make them expensive with no negotiating power in court. The other trick is, getting our police to give tickets out by mandating the ordinances and laws that are in place with no exceptions. Stop all the warnings and whining by just giving the tickets out and do not play favorites.
Pat Kender
9:36 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I also want to let you know that problems did not just start in Point Beach. Problems have been going on all over the nation and the world with people not respecting other people. This is not something that is happening just in the Beach. Watch the news, read a paper...24 years ago I was walking my grandson in his stroller. We walked along Ocean Ave and up Arnold and thru the parking lot by the bandshell. This is in broad daylight. There was a woman on a blanket with 2 men. They were all servicing each other. I had time to walk to the police station, not the boardwalk one, and report it and they were still there doing their thing. They were arrested. This happened 24 years ago...Not in Martells, Jenkinsons or Frankies but in broad daylight by the bandshell. Probably drug related but it happened in 1987. Stop trying to blame every problem on the boardwalk. A lot of nice people go there and enjoy the rides, the stands, the Aquarium etc. There are a few morons, there always was...even when I was a kid on the boardwalk. There were groups of teenagers scattered along the bw every night. The police would make us get off the railings..now that was a high crime...but I will admit there were some tough kids on the boardwalk also and they did cause some trouble and fights...I am talking 45 years ago when there was a jukebox in front of the bumper cars and we would dance on the boardwalk when the police werent looking...because they didnt allow that either..Barella is nuts
Ray Criptkie
12:29 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
All so true Pat!
Joseph Woolston Brick
8:52 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Pat I agree, we were all kids once. But as nuts as it may seem, I blame the increase of bad behavior at the BW squarely on the MTV show "Jersey Shore" The behaviors have increased in the last five years that the show has been on the air. The kids are shown fighting and other behaviors that are not acceptable but think they are as the show does not show the repercussions of their actions. There's Snooki on the beach, in the middle of the day drunk off her ass and she gets a slap on the wrist. Kids notice this stuff. Party time in Seaside! Seaside meanwhile turns a blind eye because of all the money their making from the show now these kids think that any boardwalk is the same as Seaside and they came up to Point and act the same way. WRONG! If you think my theory is off the wall, may I bring up more examples. Fort Lauderdale, Daytona Beach Florida and Palm Springs California were all subjects of spring break movies. Those movies brought headaches that were so bad to all those towns, that they decided to dissuade spring breakers from making their town a destination to head to. Instead of the circus side show and pissing contest that Barella and Storino have decided to get into, those towns simply increased the fines for such things as urinating in public, public intoxication and the like, the fines were expensive and there were no negotiations in court either. You peed in public, paid the clerk $1,500! That's all Point has to do and the behaviors will end!
Mimi
9:22 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Couldn't agree more Pat! I grew up next to the BW, enjoyed it with family and friends and even worked there for a short time as a teen. This is not a BW issue it is a social issue and it is sad when I think about what our children are exposed to these days. As an Italian American and Jersey Sore native, I am repulsed by the show "Jersey Shore" and how it depicts us as a whole. I have never seen it but know enough of what goes on from commercials and the News. It has done a lot of damage to our beautiful shore communities. We all know where we live! I was born here and understood what it was all about as a small child! I also understood where I was living when I decided to buy here! There will always be idiot parents raising idiot kids and in no way should their bad parenting be blamed on the BW! I was against this early closing from the start and not because of anything having to do with the BW! They will survive no matter what! I care about my neighbor who owns a bed and breakfast, my former classmates who have small businesses in town and my child who has a nice little summer job and rides his bike home after closing. Get the cops out there and jack up the fines!! Send a message that PPB cops don't mess around and you will quickly see that things will change once you start punishing the real trouble makers not the local business owners!
Buddy
9:16 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Could not have been a truer post on this blog. I have been in PPB my whole life also and remember that jukebox playing "sunshine of your love" by Cream. And your right, sitting on the railing was a "high" crime in those days. Lets bring back the Hoffman House and the dancing girls in the cages........LOL. Barrella and cohorts got what they desereved.....SLAPPED IN THE FACE!!!!!!!
blindbert
9:37 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Follow the money!
mailman
9:41 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Blindbert, there is no money. Your Mayor and council voted against accepting it.
mattmurphy
9:57 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Blindbert - What money? Do you mean the $800k that the Mayor and his three Stooges decided not to accept. The money that the BW was willing to pay to offset the cost for police presence on the BW. The money that they tried to extort from the BW. Is that the money you are talking about and the money that we should follow? Remember one thing, this has NEVER been about "Quality of Life" issues for the residents of PPB. If you think it was, you are even dumber than you appear to be.
msrd
9:41 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I agree....and there are regular people who go to enjoy the tiki or jenks on a Saturday night who don't get wasted and pee on lawns at 2am. The problems up there are a result of the decline in morals and civility...and that is a much broader issue than will be addressed by closing a bar early.
Part Timer
9:59 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
The problems also stem from patrons being over served....
Pat Kender
9:59 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
exactly what I am talking about...
PPNB
10:07 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Part timer.. I thought you were taking themselves summer off. Things not going your way. Have a drink, watch a movie, I suggest the barefoot contessa.
Mimi
9:41 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Part timer, I am not saying that people are never over served but I don't think that is the main problem! This generation of teens and young adults are into whatever they can get their hands on! Recreational and especially prescription drugs are abused on a regular basis! Pharmacies have made so many restrictions that kids are now taking bath salts, smoking salvia and huffing whatever they can get high off of! I was walking the boards last week and saw a girl trying to get into the Tiki bar. She was so out of her mind on whatever she was on they would not let her or her friends in and then told the friends to take her home! God only knows what half of these kids show up on!! Then to have a drink on top of it?? It is all a disaster waiting to happen! There is something wrong with our society where its children need to numb themselves so badly they cannot even function!
Part Timer
11:02 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
PPNB, what happened to residents first????
PPNB
11:59 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Part timer. It's not a law in point pleasant beach. Are you 1 of those people who are all smug when the law is on their side .
I think rental units should pay their fair share for the impact they cause.
Been here before
9:52 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Finally, sensible views---the evidence is unmistakable to anyone who travels
MoonDogie
9:56 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
someone is noticeably missing…is Mr. Happy SAD?
mattmurphy
10:05 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
I hope we didn't hurt Mr. Happy's feelings!!!!
Ray Criptkie
12:30 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Maybe poor Mr. Happy is drinking away his sorrows:)
Opinionated
10:03 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Seems the ABC Director finds the behavior of your "leaders" suspicious. Will there be an investigation? Now the fun begins.
mattmurphy
10:13 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Opinionated - I hope there will be an investigation not only with our leaders, but also with CK who forwarded confidential e-mails. Let the fun begin!
mailman
10:24 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Agreed! I am looking forward to them trying to spin the facts, misrepresent and try to pull the wool over the eyes of a State legal panel! Let the games begin!
GG
11:17 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Should be. Let's start with investigation with councilmen's Mayer and Gordon who were on the negotiating team that everyone agreed at that point pleasant beach has been having increasingly problems that are alcohol related and the need for extra police. Let's even investigate the former councilmen who also tried to get extra money needed for the police prior, the last time around. The police even admitted their was increasingly problems, the worse in 17 years on record. I was under the impression and reason for the snap, crackle and pop program. Lets go back and get all the minutes from what was said by all of them. Even the boardwalk and their lawyers admitted and acknowledged the problems and the reason they all came together to begin with. ( LIKE YOU SAID ABOVE IN YOUR STATEMENT) Will their be an investigation of them too. Or maybe the police are lying and suspicious too and they should be investigate while we are out investigating the town in general. Like Mattmurphy says, Let the fun begin!
GG
11:45 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
mailman, Really? Who is pulling the wool over who's eyes? You do know that NJ is the Soprano State. If not get the book, maybe you will learn something.
Maggie Hart-Zuhowski
10:21 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
YEAH! Great news. I am confident that this decision will be upheld. Let's celebrate 4th of July and move on off this now ( for at least 8 weeks left of summer)
Cathy Kelly
1:19 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
mattmurphy,just saw this comment,haha...let the investigations begin,,,thanks for the laugh........
GG
10:51 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
MoonDogie, responding to your above comment. If that is the case then they have an obligation to look at it both ways. "Allegations of bad faith"? or "illegitimate purpose"? Councilmen Reid, Councilmen Mayer who voted in favor of the BW on all issues was part of that Bad faith and illegitimate purpose. Our own Councilmen felt it was an "extortion" yet they still voted on taking the money. Mr. Reid quoted in writing that he felt it was wrong and "extortion" but still wanted the council to vote on taking money from his bw friends. Again the Unscrupulous decision shines thru. I wonder if something happens bad after 12 that is related to BW, is the Director of ABC Mr. Halfacre going to take the responsibility? Blood will be on his hands.
Spooner
11:14 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
GG- it's evident that you haven't read the Director's stay order, otherwise you would have seen that the town has remedies. . .but listen. . .you go take the time and read it. . .then we can debate. As for your spin on Reid & Mayer...don't forget to include Lurie. . .he was against the early bar closing last August. The reason they voted to accept the money was because the town and it's attorney framed the ordinance in such a way that they had no choice. Normally ordinances are discussed and drawn up for all to approve. When you have controversial ordinances here where they split into 2012-15 & 2012-16, your faced with voting yes or no as the ordinance is written. It was more important for Mayer & Reid to keep the bars open, that's why they voted the way you describe. . .
GG
11:26 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Spooner, I know how they voted and who they support. But Reid voted and then admitted it was an extortion and then still wanted to vote to take what he was calling "extortion money" which floored Councilmen Gordon... I know I read it some were. I would call it flip-flopped back and fourth.
Nick Carraway
12:22 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, if you want to rely on statements Gordon has made, then don't forget that when Reid mentioned this was extortion, Gordon told him that the surcharge ordinance was the mechanism designed to help the bars stay open. Reid also asked the Boro Attorney whether that surcharge ordinance was legal, and the Boro Attorney said that it was enforceable. If you're on a boat, and someone puts weights on your legs so that you can't move, and tells you "I'm going to throw this guy, who can't swim, overboard. When I do it, you can throw this life preserver with a hole in it out to him." You say "No, that's wrong. Don't throw that guy overboard. He can't swim, and this life preserver has a hole in it!" But, the guy gets thrown overboard anyway. Don't you still throw out the life preserver to at least try to give him a chance, or do you just sit there, do nothing, and watch the guy drown? This whole thing was designed by Barrella and crew. They put it out as one ordinance, and when they were told, by the BW attorneys that it wasn't legal, they split it up. Then, the Barrella crew first adopted the midnight closings, leaving those who felt that the midnight closings were the wrong decision only one option: to vote for the surcharge ordinance. Now, explain to me why the Barrella crew didn't vote for the surcharge ordinance, since they're the ones who designed it and kept introducing it.
PPNB
12:51 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Because they were hoisted by their own petard
Cathy Kelly
11:06 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
first to spooner,not only have I not replied to you,I stopped reading what you post and skip over whenever I see your name. I have proven over and over how wrong and how many lies you have spread so please stop addressing me...........second,while I have stated from day one that I do not agree with these ordinances,the fact that the abc did not allow what is law in nj for EVERY other town should be and will be sent to every newstation across the country...Yes money does buy the law,,we see it firsthand...The law is the law whether you agree or not but obviously not in our town...Everyone can have their own opinion but this is blatant....And while you are all patting yourselves on the back that the BW beat the council,the residents are still getting screwed....so tell me how the BW is protecting the residents and doing the right thing????????
Full Timer
11:54 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Cathy, do you honestly believe that new stations throughout the country are interested in a story about a closing ordinance being oveturned? NJ News 12 barely gives it more than a minute or two. I don't see Brian Williams using this as his lead story any time in the future.
Been here before
6:05 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Barrella myths Cathy Kelly continues to Believe:
1. Every other town has these kinds of restrictions----no, they don't. This is just what Barrella has been telling you. And those towns followed Part TImer's ABC regs on actullt proving with facts who drank what where. That kind of facr finding has never been done inPPB. Instead BArrella made decisions on deliberate exaggerations.
2. The residents are being screwed because of the BW. Nonsense---the people to blame for no money and no early closings are Barrella and crew for trying to grap power they don't have
Cathy Kelly
11:08 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
The residents are still paying for the Police,the residents are still dealing with the out of control tourists,the residents are still paying for the 7 day a week garbage pickup(overtime on Sunday) so please explain how this is a good thing for the residents
GG
11:30 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
IT IS NOT!! If the boardwalk decided themselves to pack up and leave. In all the falsehood that our taxes would go up, they would actually go down. You see, the BW needs the police and the police needs the BW.
Spooner
11:42 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
Ms Kelly: Pat Storino said on another thread that he picks up the BW's garbage. . .so who's lying. . .you or him...
..."I've avoided him," Storino said. "They say we don't do our fair share. We pick up the garbage on the boardwalk and we man the municipal toilets that Barrella closed his first week in office."...
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/midnight-closing-will-force-50-layoffs-at-jenkinson-s-says-storino
...and the ABC Director is right on the law. . .your Mayor knows that. . .now I know he will never admit it publicly. . .but if it wasn't for Tooker and Corbally, he would have taken the money. The town is bleeding red ink. . .your in hock with emergency approbations...money that can't be recouped outside the levy cap(police costs)
PS: CK-please do not respond to this post...and oh our Mr Happy(the gate keeper here) only allows 2 question marks??
Cathy Kelly
12:12 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
full timer,this is about principle for me.....how can you sit there and say its ok(whether or not)you agree with the decision....it is clear on the ABC website what the law is and the fact that they are going against their own laws set for the whole state of NJ is dispicable,,,,again I have not agreed with the ordinances from day one,but anyone with any kind of morals has to question what happened here,,,it is dispicable and trust me someone will pick it up.....How do we teach our children right from wrong and sit back and accept what is so blatantly wrong.....like I said this is about principle.....
Ray Criptkie
12:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Because Cathy, we can still go out for a drink occaisionally, because the local comedy club, whoose acts start around 10:30 will still be open, because we can still go to Frankie's for a late night buger, or go to the Tiki Bar and dance to Don't Call Me Francis on Sunday nights, because we can still go to our favorite BYOB on New Year's Eve and actually ring in the New Year!
Ray Criptkie
12:44 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Also because extortion is illegal, and should be illegal, that is why the ABC gave the town a stay. If it was a simple all bars close at 12:00am period, then the ABC probably would have stayed out of it, but we all know that was Not the case here, ABC is simply following the law and the law clearly states that extortion is ILLEGAL!!!
Been here before
6:07 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Then lobby Trenton----Barrella never had the power to change this and he does not have that power now----only the folks in Trenton can do it----and they are not going to do it because it is not fair to the rest of the municipalities with much higher tax rates than PPB-----you really are just selfish dumb and Barrellized, aren't you?
Jane Reynolds
11:47 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
the residents get their garbage picked up 7 days a week...........boardwalk does their own and picks up the garbage on the towns section of the boardwalk and pays the $20K to keep the bathrooms open and clean that are under the police station.....which the mayor closed during his first year in office, leaving NO public restrooms for our visitors...
MoonDogie
11:11 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
GG, seems like you are trying to put a spin on the ruling so that it slants in your directlion. Not gonna happen. The ABC ruled in favor of the BW in spite of the regulation that towns can set their own specific closing times for bars due to the fact that "...the substantial factual history dating back at least a year, including various public comments made by elected officials, combined with the surcharge ordinance in its various iterations, gives rise to a legitimate inquiry into the motivations behind an otherwise valid exercise of municipal authority," says Halfacre, adding that municipalities do have the right to limit hours of operations of bars.
I believe Mr. Halfacre knows that it was his responsibility to consider both sides, but do feel free to call him to explain what you feel his obligations are.
GG
11:42 pm on Friday, June 29, 2012
MoonDogie, Why? So he can give me his B.S. spin that slants in his and the BW direction. It does not take a rocket scientist to see the writing on the wall. Maybe he should get investigated too! While he was Mayor,I think of Fair Haven? Right before Christie appointed him as the ABC director he was a speaker at OUR TOWNS REPUBLICAN CLUB. If I recall, I was sent a flier in the mail to come listen to Mr. Halfacre to speak in our town. You do not find that a conflict of interest.
MoonDogie
12:02 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, so you have ideas. Not good ones, but you do have ideas. Lets first of all preclude any past or present Republican from overseeing any decision making process (WHAT?). If you are a Republican, you go to Republican Club functions, if you are a Democrat you do the same for that party. Independents, same thing. What was your point? Are you saying everyone, except the FAB 4, are suspect or crooked? Do you want everyone investigated? You seem to have problems with alot of people. The only writing on the wall is that there is a process - for all things. When you put yourself in a position to be scrutinized, you must accept responsibility for your actions. That goes for everyone involved. So accept the ruling; take it like a man, or woman. I, for one, am ready to get this behind us and get the town out from under this dark and damaging cloud!
Full Timer
12:05 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike Corbally, You are noticeably absent from posting tonight. Although we will always be on opposing sides on the closing issue, I again want to thank you for dedication in doing what you believe is best for our community. I'm off to Jenk's Raw bar for a beer or two and will remember the days when we were on the same side. Goodnight.
Ray Criptkie
12:46 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike is at home crying:(
Mr Happy's boss
12:17 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Cathy Kelly - bla bla bla bla bla
Your credibility is totally shot.
GG
12:53 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
The credibility of the entire town is shot.
Nick Carraway
12:26 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms. Kelly, you're right...how do you teach your children right from wrong, especially when you forward an e-mail from a lawyer, when that e-mail specifically says that it's privileged information and if you're not the intended recipient, you have to notify the lawyer who sent it and you cannot forward it? The ABC does have laws, but it is also smart enough to try to see if there's been any corruption of the laws on the part of government officials in this case. I'm sure you'll learn all about that when you get a subpoena and have to come in and explain how you got that e-mail that you forwarded from the BW's attorney.
Cathy Kelly
12:57 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
ha ha now thats funny
Cathy Kelly
1:13 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
nick,obviously you haven't realized that the intimidation way does not work on me,,,go for it,I am actually urging you to follow through with,I can guarantee you have more to lose than me so once again,stop threatening and do it........
Jane Reynolds
1:14 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
NJSA 33:1-40 is a nj statute that does allow municipalities to limit the hours of operations of licensed establishments........however upon appeal NJSA 33:1-41 provides the director may..."set aside, vacate and repeal the limitation..." look it up people
MoonDogie
12:29 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Wait, CK, did you say it was about "PRINCIPLE" for you? and "going against laws"? And that "anyone with any kind of morals has to question what happened here". And to continue, " it is dispicable and trust me someone will pick it up.....How do we teach our children right from wrong and sit back and accept what is so blatantly wrong.....like I said this is about principle….." Whoa… talk about denial. (Please do not forward)
Cathy Kelly
12:46 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
thats absolutely what i said
Been here before
8:59 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
But it is a lie---principal supports the rule of law----and the rule of law says Barrella tried to impose taxes after the legislature told him no------really that simple. No reason to imagine conspiracies. Just a good lawyer making a sensible ruling. If everyone who lost a lawsuit claimed the fix was in the rule of law would soon disintegrate. So no, Ms. Kelly, this is not about principle for you---it is, was, and always has been only about Barrella for you---otherwise you'd be complaining about him just like we all are
GG
12:31 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
MoonDogie, Take it any way you want to. I do have a problem when I am continually getting lied to from all parties involved. I do not believe any of them. I was responding to Opinionated and mailboy that seemed to want an investigation on a lot individuals and I agreed. You are right, all should be scrutinized and accept responsibility for your actions. You are right, that it goes for everyone involved. That is why I said investigate them all. I am not accepting a ruling, when I think the ruling was tainted.
Cathy Kelly
12:34 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
spooner,i find it hysterical that you say what you do...remember this,,your words......
Spooner
10:57 am on Friday, August 26, 2011
I don't listen to much to radio or weather channel, so I haven't caught any of their ads. . .but this is outrageous and just plain gluttonous on the part of Jenkinsons and Martells. . .
Just wondering what they pay their PR person. . .whats her name Halvorsen. . .time to change their PR . . .telling people to come down Friday-Saturday when the Governor might order mandatory evaluation. . .that means Mr. Storino and Mr.Bassinger. . .NO people on the Boardwalk!
Or the comments where
...
Spooner
1:20 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms Kelly- for the nth time. . .you want to take something out of context. . .then post the link...so others can if they want read the whole story not just your version. . .like when I posted what Pat Storino said above??( and Happy I'm observing your rules)
Now if you read the thread I posted regarding Pat Storino. . .Ms Halvorsen did respond to queries about their advertising. . .Maybe she even read my post. . .and Ms Kelly: as Pat Storino and his family(whose been living here a lot longer than you) said. . .they don't want those undesirables. . .even more than you!
...and coming out of Pat's mouth. . .hired detectives to be out there after closing. . .that implies there now going to be documenting what PD reports? Won't be surprised if there also carrying cameras. . .Thank You Vinny. . .Hey I forgot: Vinny I know you called Paul Mulshine. . .looking to read more of his Beach trash this Sunday in the Ledger?
GG
12:37 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I am sure there will be a lot of bw supporters drinking FREE beers and partying and celebrating all night long up at the boards. I am sure the police will joining you up there too!
MoonDogie
12:40 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
sour grapes
Cathy Kelly
1:38 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
spooner,there is a reason that i don't respond to you,because you truly are insane,,,I posted the link that you stated your comments on,as if that would make a difference on what you posted.....you have been so hypocritical and you try to backtrack and justify what you write but you have been caught yet you seem to think that noone notices,,,,if you don't address me,I will gladly not correct you...go away and worry about your own town....
Spooner
1:55 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms Kelly: this is what you posted...correct me if I'm wrong. . . but let me know by some grid square pixel location where I can put my pointer on to click on the link...
Cathy Kelly
12:34 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
spooner,i find it hysterical that you say what you do...remember this,,your words......
Spooner
10:57 am on Friday, August 26, 2011
I don't listen to much to radio or weather channel, so I haven't caught any of their ads. . .but this is outrageous and just plain gluttonous on the part of Jenkinsons and Martells. . .
Just wondering what they pay their PR person. . .whats her name Halvorsen. . .time to change their PR . . .telling people to come down Friday-Saturday when the Governor might order mandatory evaluation. . .that means Mr. Storino and Mr.Bassinger. . .NO people on the Boardwalk!
Or the comments where
...
Cathy Kelly
12:44 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
spooner,,,remember these comments from you.................................
article Meeting Between Point Beach Council and Boardwalk Business Owners Open to Public
Spooner
11:07 am on Wednesday, July 13, 2011
Last Saturday night, or more correctly Sunday morning I went on the Internet to check out the web cam at Martell's. . .it was wall to wall people partying away. Now the owner Dave Bassinder has a right to promote his business, but unfortunately that business along with similar businesses in the Beach attracts and draws the same type of individuals we read about here that gravitate to Sea Side.
It's as if this Snooki and her "guidos & guidettes" sub culture...portraying behavior on MTV have given a sort of it's OK to come here and copy-cat them. . .
Mean while Bassinder and others are raking in the shekels hand over fist. . .while the quality of life and the taxing of the town's resources suffer. . .
...
Cathy Kelly
1:04 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
from where i stand,this is a good thing...the bw proved that they have more power than our elected officials,kudos to them,now we can move on,,,they want to do whats right for the residents,well now is the perfect time to make a donation(reimburse the taxpayers)to the police endowment fund,they can show the residents that they are good neighbors and give the money to the police that at this present time the residents are paying for...it works out for everyone,,,,,
Been here before
5:57 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Not a chance the BW will bail out your boy Barrella, BUT, as soon as he is gone watch the money flow. In the meantime the BW money will go to NON-Barrella resident groups like the First Aid, the Public Education Foundation, the Firs Dept, the Little League etc and anything and everyone except Barrella, Tooker Corbally and Gordon---as it should be
MoonDogie
8:55 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
CK, Please give the people a little more credit. The BW does NOT have more power than our elected officials. You seem to be overlooking the unethical behavior demonstrated by some of the elected officials (specifically FOUR of them). I know, during his campaign walks, that Vinnie looked me in the eyes and said closing bars earlier would never happen under his watch because it would create a dangerous situation for the town. His campaign words, not mine. Good thing I watched his body language and didn't fall for his silver tongued political speech I guess his script was designed to fit the district he was working that day. When someone lies to me - it's over.
Cathy Kelly
1:09 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ray...your words....obviously you are not a cop and a little jealous of our police,,,,,either that or you are just ignorant.....
Ray Criptkie
10:31 pm on Wednesday, May 16, 2012
I tend to agree with everything Stephen Schneider said. Plus I know that our 18 paid cops have more training but come on folks, they are at the top of the pay scale in the state and we are a dead town 9 months of the year. As to their training and fitness, there are a few that top the weight scales over 300lbs, they could not pass any physical fitness test given today! If you are going to be paid the big bucks, you should at least be able to run 1 block without having a heart attack!!! If they did more than just ride around town we would have more revenue already! Speed limits in town are a joke and that alone could produce year round revenue. Closing the bars early will cost more police dollars because our $10.00 an hour specials will not be able to issue all the dui's at 2:30 when people return home from the bars in other towns, only our 100k plus boys could do that!
John Q
1:40 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Cathy, you hit the nail on the head.
Spooner
2:01 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms Kelly- again I have to keep reminding you to post the link to the story your commenting on. . .unless you don't want me to find something that you or others said. . .
Now your on the Tiki video. . .What's your point?. . .Do you think I support the trash coming here. . .You need to have your head examined!. . .Let me know whose living down here wants that crap. . . and while we're talking about the trash...I looked in the Ocean Star for your letter attacking the Snooki crowd. . .you know the "guidos & guidettes" that degrades the same ethic group of Barrella's heritage...did I miss it?
So stop giving us your sanctimonious bull. . .
P C
2:04 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Cathy kally, if that is your rea nam pleade stop proving what an ignorant, uninformed person you are. Everytime you post these false rumors you claim insinuate they are fact by saying you heard or you read it somewhere. What are you 12 years old?
I'm really curious, does it hurt having Barella's arm shoved up yor butt every time you write a post? You seem to be the puppet and he is the vantriliquest!
Wholovestheboardwalk
3:26 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I think everyone in Point Pleasant Beach needs to lighten up and go out for a drink, now you can go out to anyone of our 22 Bars & Restaurants and enjoy yourself till 2am. Enjoy the rest of the summer !! and on a personal note thank you to the Boardwalk Bars for standing up for what is right, once again you saved this town like you have done many times before.
GG
8:11 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Really? In a one mile town we have a total of 22 Bars&Restaurants (that have bars in them. Wow, No wonder there is so many problems in this small town. Now I know why so many residents have drinking problems including our kids. I am wondering who allowed this many bars in this little town. These establishments have been allowed to expand too. We can all agree this did not happen under Barrella's watch. The ABC director failed the residents that have to put up all the bad drunken behavior. When is it going to be enough? When one our own children gets severely hurt. The ABC director Mr. Halfacre obviously did not take the residents in mind when he made his decision. He also stated he was convinced that the ordinance has the potential negative ripple effect on the endeavors and enterprises outside of Point Pleasant Beach. Why should the residents be responsible for other towns endeavors and enterprises that are allowed to set their own bar hours? So our town could say that SSH endeavors and enterprises effect us as a town.
Been here before
8:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG---How many bars where here when you moved in? DON'T MOVE HERE AND THEN TRY AND CHANGE PPB TO WHAT YOU WANT---if you did not and don't want to live in a town with 22 bars you move, not the bars here long before you
Spooner
10:53 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I believe it was Max Gannon in his testimony when Martells in 1992 looked to change it's location...that there were 27 retail liquor licenses?
Anthony spek
5:42 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Glad to see that extortion is not legal I think I'll grab a beer at 12:01
Mr Happy's boss
6:58 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Has anyone seen or heard from Mr Happy?
Commentator 27
7:37 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Back on April4 I posted the following in response to a post of Cath Kelly's lauding the Governing body for their extrotion attempt:
"Commentator 27
11:37 am on Wednesday, April 4, 2012
Cath Kelly------You are so right----this is the begining of the end for your boy Barrrella and his bullies. They have been exposed. They are not and never were interested in quality of life---they are interested in only one thing----reelection. They want to trumpet how much money they can get from the Boardwalk so they can get more of their kind elected and reelected.. But the bar owners are not going to put up with this extortion. This will end in a lawsuit the Borough cannot win----but it willl be worth it to end Barrella's politcal career."
A. Resident
7:49 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
As for the town needing the money to pay for the added Police patrols,what they should do is revamp the way the Officers are deployed.They should have looked at different schedules for the Dept,possibly going to a 12 hr schedule and putting the manpower where it is needed the most (time of day and location) Instead they hire 88 Special Officers and flood the town east of the tracks .And then think of a way to pay them. A better schedule and manpower deployment could have solved the problem. It seems that our mayor is tryng to be a junior Mayor Bloomburgh. Next thing we wont be able to get a 20oz slurpie at 7-11. Remember the midnight closing didnt work in Belmar and it's NOT going to work here,
Mr Happy's boss
8:06 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Remember in November 2013 election to start the process to stop this vincanity. We can start by getting rid of Tooker and Corbally. Let's take our town back.
Mike Corbally
10:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
The problem is we don't have the town. The BW does. Have a great summer.
MoonDogie
5:57 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
No, Mike, the problem is that you THINK you should have the town! It's not yours to have. You represent us, the people of the town. You and your crew can be replaced and we will carry on…you will simply fade away.
lisad
8:16 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Its about time people fight back against these towns that think they can rule with an iron fist. how stupid when they go after the biggest tax rateables in the boro..talk about biting the hand that feeds them. People who complain should know prior to moving near these establishments that if they are looking for peace and quiet you don't move across the street from a bar or boardwalk for that matter. I truly hope that the state squashes Point Beach on this matter. I am tired of watching the business that sustain economies having the screws put to them.
PennyStocks
5:36 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
martells pays 20 grand in town taxes
Spooner
12:09 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
PennysStocks- according to county tax record of 308 Broadwalk(Martells). . .the property tax is more like almost $94,000...
PROPERTY INFORMATION
308 Boardwalk (308boardwalk)
Point Pleasant Beach, NJ
Dimensions : 176 X 320
Coordinants : 0.00 / 0.00
Land Ass. : 8,750,000.00
Build Ass. : 250,000.00
Total Ass. : 9,000,000.00
Class : 4a
Map : 5
Tax : 93,960.00
Don Grohowski
8:16 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Bring back The Rip Tide, 5 beers for a dollar, and the Hoffman House.
MoonDogie
9:05 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
@Don…right. These "newbees" have no idea what it was like back in the day. And we did just great, didn't we? Makes my hair stand up when these haters refer to PPB as 'our town'.
Buddy
9:21 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Agreed....it was 7 for a $1 at one point!!!!!
Rick
8:19 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
READ THIS CAREFULLY GUYS! Not surprised at all of this result. Here's my concern, and many owners on the Boardwalk are saying the same thing.
To favor the Mayors goals, what he may continue to do ( in my opinion and others) AND I'M NOT SAYING FOR FACT THAT THIS IS HAPPENING, is influence, less patrols on the Boardwalk and have homeowners call in screaming and yelling like I do, about the " Jersey Shore " type, garbage going down the Boardwalk screaming and yelling like idiots. Then he can say," Look at all the problems we're still having in district 4 because the bars didn't close at midnight. Now that I've said that, let me be clear on one thing. I don't care when you close the bars, whether it be midnight, 2 a.m. or 4 a.m. Without true security on the Boardwalk you're asking for trouble and it will continue to be a nightmare living on or near the boardwalk. I would ask particularly those 2 bars on the Boardwalk to be better citizens and make an arrangement ( I know there's legal issues, but fight it with the effort you used to stop the 12 closing time) and pay for and hire, just as you do in your bars, off duty cops from other towns, to patrol the drunks that you release on the Boardwalk. It would have never come to this, if you would have acknowledged the problem and fixed it.You also jeopardize the livelihoods of all the other bar owners and employees in town, because you haven't controlled your problems and they may pay the price for it.
lisad
9:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
and if your mayor pulls crap like that start the recall
GG
9:52 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Really? I do not think so.
Nick Carraway
10:06 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Rick, I understand what you're trying to suggest, but I want you to think long and hard about your suggesting. What you want is for private cops (off duty cops), paid for by the BW, to patrol the actual boardwalk. That would make those cops BW employees. I am not comfortable with the idea that we are going to turn what is a public thoroughfare over to BW employees to patrol. There are a lot of people posting here, yourself perhaps included, who think that the BW is responsibile for the current state of affairs because they acted irresponsibly. If that's what you think, then why would you want to make them responsible for patroling the actual BW? I don't think the BW has acted irresponsibly, but even I don't think this is a good idea. I would much rather see the BW pay money to our town to fund PPB cops to patrol the BW, which is really what the BW offered when it offered the money. There should be a relationship with the BW owners and the PPB police so that the two can work together to try to address problems, and I think that, for years, that was the history of our town, before Barrella and the rest of the GB members (and I mean for the past years, not just the current ones) decided to star making decisions that affected the ability of our police department. That's not the BW's fault. I understand that these decisions were made to save tax dollars, but we're paying the price for those decisions. They should've taken the money the BW offered.
PennyStocks
5:38 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
nick why dont you just go count those bw dollars you got and stop trying to blame barrella and tooker for the mess your boys Hennessy and dyer made of the police department
John57
9:08 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Let the whining begin! Oh wait, It began a long time ago. A Resident, you're exactly right. With over a 100 cops/specials hired this summer, there's no reason anyone should be peeing on lawns when the bars close. They aren't deployed properly, when you most need them.
JD
9:17 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
PPB should just merge with PPBoro....
lots of cost savings that the taxpayer will benefit.... include merging the 2 school districts.
If Barrella needs more money.... put in an occupation tax for all those that work in PPB except for owners of businesses.
GG
10:14 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Now that sounds like the best idea thus far. How quick do you think it can be done. God knows the schools have lost their credibility too. They are already taking tuition students. They already have lowered and comprised their standards. Rumor has it they inflate or change grades for only some students. It is all about "Green" Dr. Ravally 's theory of filling up the classrooms, as an empty seat on plane. Or is it to keep his schools running to promote himself and his growing staff to keep Point Pleasant Beach up and going. "We need more students" Point Pleasant might not want to merge with Point Pleasant Beach being they out scored us two years in a row. This will never happen, Its nice to dream. Don't worry the town of Bay Head will not let it happen.
St0917
9:26 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Look at this folks another point beach plan has back fired on them not only are the bars staying open till 2am they lost the money also. So now the tax payers are footing the total bill for the police officers that will be out there, instead of have a little supplement to help foot the bill. GOOD JOB
PennyStocks
5:39 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
youre right it was little
lisad
9:38 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
and Sto, would you rather not have the tax revenue those business's bring in to help lower your taxes to begin with? i just don't get people....the more i see, the more i think we breed a band of idiots.
GG
9:42 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Here is a solution, not that it is good. Can't afford all the police, Just fire and let them all go. Then Point Pleasant Beach can continue being the town of Problems and Alcoholics who find their town acceptable in becoming a Seaside.
GG
9:45 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Look at all the post that promote alcohol! Yeah, Point Pleasant Beach you must all be so proud of yourselves that you can continue to keep on drinking past 12, while the one's who are paying attention is watching the town go down the toilet.
Nick Carraway
9:52 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms. Kelly, I'm not trying to intimidate you, but I am trying to open your eyes to what I think is completely reckless and hypocritical behavior. I cannot even imagine why you would feel that you had the right to poke your head into this very important legal matter, one that is tearing the town apart. Who appointed you or elected you or what credentials do you have that you think that you should make decisions that could affect this litigation? As far as I can tell, you're just a resident, like so many of the rest of us. How would you feel if another resident did something so serious as to distribute by e-mail what was clearly intended to be privileged attorney material, and to do it and clearly edit it so that you didn't show what the GB's position was? I have my own opinion as to how I would like to see this mess end, but I'm willing to accept the fact that it may not go the way I'd like, but I have a real hard time accepting the fact that any resident should have the right to mess with this litigation the way that you have. I asked you if you even thought about whether you should send that e-mail before you actually did it. You've never responded, proving that you have no sense of responsibility or conscience. You say that I have more to lose than you do. Is that because you don't feel invested in this town the way that I do?
Cathy Kelly
10:11 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I was asked to forward an email,which i did...You talk about being hypocritical yet back in March when a confidential email from our Boro Attorney was sent out, in the middle of negotiations you absolutely had no problem with that and nothing to say....Maybe you should look in the mirror...
Mike Corbally
10:31 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Nick,
Letting the residents read for themselves what they offered as opposed to your spin isn't illegal or corrupt. Everyone on this blog takes themselves far too seriously including myself sometimes. Lets just hope it is a good summer for all.
MoonDogie
11:00 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms. Kelly, you forwarded the email because you were aked to? if someone asked you to jump off a bridge, would you do it just because you were asked to do it? I believe in the book "Responsibility 101", that is the first lesson we learn from our parents - make decisions only after fully considering the risk and outcome.
MoonDogie
11:09 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike C. REALLY? do you really think that we as citizens should be able to distribute confidential information that is clearly not intended for a public audience due to pending litigation? WOW….didn't think your rating could drop any lower, but congratulations….you managed to do it!
Nick Carraway
11:23 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Ms. Kelly, I'm more than happy to explain to you why I think this is different. We all found out that the BW attorney had read something that the Boro Atty had prepared because the BW attorney wrote that in his response (that he had reviewed something prepared by the Boro Atty) and the BW atty's letter was posted here on the Patch. Obviously, the BW's atty did not think that there had been any breach in confidentiality, and there probably wasn't. Why? Because the matter wasn't already in court. What it looked like to me is that someone (and for all I know, it was Gertner, which would still be okay) showed the BW's atty the law that the Barrella crew thought was on their side. The BW's atty sent something to the GB that said "Um, you may have some problems. This is the law that I think is against you." And, the BW's atty must've been somewhat convincing because, after that, the Barrella crew split up that bar closing/surcharge ordinance into 2 ordinances, rather than keep it as one. But, everyone was still in negotiations, something which I believe you have posted that you supported and encouraged. The e-mail you forwarded is entirely different because it was clearly confidential information and it was sent out after everyone was already in court. So, the one in March might've been helpful in bringing both sides together. Yours was not. Now, explain to me why you went postal over that "sharing" in March, but thought it was okay to share this one now?
Nick Carraway
11:29 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Councilman Corbally, if it were true that "letting the residents read for themselve what was offered" by forwarding that confidential e-mail from the BW's atty to the public via the Kelly e-mail chain was proper, then the identity of the person who forwarded it to Ms. Kelly would not have been omitted. And, in case you haven't noticed, Kelly's chain is not considered to be a true public forum. A Council meeting is a true public forum, a place where the entire public is welcomed to attend, and that is the appropriate place to publicly reveal such issues, assuming that's legal, and the Minutes compiled by Ms. Ellsworth are the only official written record of those meetings. I find it interesting that you are posting here, defending what was sent out to the Kelly chain. BTW, did Gertner ever get that document over to the BW's lawyers? I see in the e-mail chain that they expected to receive it before the hearing, but still hadn't gotten it as of the date of that e-mail.
Mike Corbally
11:35 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Moon,
Yes! Really! The negotiations were long over when that was released, and I believe that fact that the BW wouldn't accept any conditions is significant. I hope for the best because unlike all other towns it appears PPB is the only town that is unable to put conditions on liquor licenses as needed. Stop by one day after hours and lets discuss the big picture. Mike
Mike Corbally
11:55 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I sent it to the Patch, The Ocean Star, and Ms. Kelly. Trying to put facts out there instead of fiction. Sue me! Oh wait! Their is a line.
GG
12:10 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
MoonDogie, You are right? I wonder which council member gave her this confidential information? You must have an inside on who it was? I think if you knew you would have left us all in on it unless it was a council member that you support.
mailman
12:57 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mr. Corbally, this is far from over and you and your counterparts will have to explain the course of your actions over the past year to a group of people that you will be unable to mislead. Your decisions represent the the thoughts of a very small portion of the residents of this town. I think that you, Barrella, Gordon and Tooker should spend some time studying American history and relearning exactly what democracy is before you return to the next council meeting and attempt to "represent us" any further. Your current vantage point is currently from the bottom of a deep hole looking up and it is doing us all harm.
MoonDogie
2:46 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
So Mike, in regard to "The negotiations were long over when that was released" …apparently you are splitting hairs. Negotiations vs. Litigation. So you think this is over? This may all come into play when the courts decide what was rightly shared or wrongly leaked. In the meantime, you might want to take the position of not being "above the law" simply because you sit at the head table.
ppb1955
3:15 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike Corbally You should be ashamed of your actions first you hide a document that was sent by the county . Now you are leaking out confidential documents to Kathy Kelly. We all know about the rumored skeletons in your closet. I am sorry to say but i fear that all the rumors about you are true.
PennyStocks
5:43 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
the idiots dont know the difference between a confidential document and sand paper
lisad
9:55 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG you are clueless. What people seem to be promoting is allowing people to live their lives. I for one do not even really drink anymore..save for a glass of wine with dinner a couple times a week and on occasion when i go down to the stone pony to see a friend sing there...PB is extorting money from one of the hands that feeds you people and it is sickening to watch as a handful of people who scream the loudest are heard...my guess is the mayor is pissed off that Jenk's won their tax appeal....and this is his way of trying to screw them....i hope you are enjoying your tax payers money being wasted on this which will probably end up in favor of storvino or whatever his name is...
GG
10:53 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Really? How exactly is the BW feeding me as a tax payer? How is it, as a tax payer I am extorting money from the BW? And you are calling me clueless, maybe you better stop drinking all together. I pay for myself. I hate to break it to you, it is more than a handful of people. It has nothing to do with the tax appeal. The only one who is getting screwed here is the tax payers.
Mike Corbally
10:04 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Obviously I am disappointed with the Director's decision, and we will review whether we ask for a reversal at the next council meeting. The Director has effectively denied the will of the people. I hope all Point Pleasant Beach establishments work to quell the incidents which take away from our residents' quality of life. The bar owners simply tried to throw money at a problem they need to control and manage. They never offered solutions and repeatedly vowed to litigate any restrictions put on their licenses that the Director said we should consider. I home everyone has a great summer. I plan too!
John57
11:05 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
They denied the will of the whiners, not will of the majority of residents. Mr. Corbally, since you're here, can you tell us how many cops are working at 2 AM?
Part Timer
11:34 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike Corbally,
This is something that should have been done a long time ago.
If you are looking for answers on where the problems stem from then I suggest you have the Chief enforce the laws written by the Attorney General for the ABC.
This is direct from the laws set by the ABC...
http://www.nj.gov/oag/abc/downloads/ag-law-enforce-directive-2007-2.pdf
GG
11:56 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
You are not stopping anyone. It is called being bullies. They have way to much power and money. They can buy anything and obviously anyone. You do not have to look to far. Look at our own current and past councilmen and some bought residents that look up to their masters who brainwash them. They will continue and repeatedly vow to litigate any restrictions put on their licenses that the Director said we should consider or anything else for that matter. Why should they come up with any solutions? When they do not have to? I have to give them and their lawyers credit. They are very smart with their tactics, stalling, control and their claim of good faith of monetary bribes to turn a blind eye. Hook, Line and Sinker they sucked you in to their trap.
Spooner
11:57 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mr Corbally...getting to be ad nauseum: you don't have the political support as you claim in the "will of the people" Your Council vote was 3-3. . .the Mayor who was elected by a minority vote of 21%(812-3800+) of registered voters broke the tie. The Mayor like you and Tooker are partisan activists who have personal emotions invested(see Barrella's statement in town's response to Stone-Mandia BW bar closing appeal) which negates rendering an objective decision as a tie breaker. . .Saying the Director denied the will of the people is misleading and rhetorical...and like I said: where's your political support[give us the numbers]?
There should have been a bipartisan/independent (not from D4) sponsored referendum put on the ballot last year. . .
...and D4 is not recognized under the Constitution and the statutes of NJ as a sovereign entity. . . but you appear to be attempting to make some facsimile of it into one...covered under the municipal umbrella of PPB. . .Do I have that wrong? Please don't say YES again!
Ray Criptkie
12:36 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Really Mike? The will of the people? The same people that voted NO to your proposed parking plan?
mailman
1:02 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Again, the bar owners threw money at the problem because you told them they had to. If you are still in line the Mayor, the money no longer matters. The costs of the specials in his opinion is small change and very affordable. Three dollars per month per household. You were all perfectly comfortable letting it go, so let it go.
Mike Corbally
1:02 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
The people that were elected made a decision on what they believed to be in the best interest of the safety and welfare of the residents. If you don't agree that's fine. We are free targets when the election rolls around. I would fear the fact that it doesn't matter who you elect that the BW is ultimately calling the shots. That's not democracy, more like dictatorship. The process is broken. I'm off to the Beach. Ocean Grove! Enjoy.
mailman
1:08 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Don't know why you wouldn't head up to the inlet beach. It's probably the nicest spot on the Jersey Shore, unless you feel more comfortable leaving our beautiful town nowadays.
ppb1955
3:29 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Mike Corbally Why didnt you send the directors request and restrictions that he supposedly asked for out with the confidential document that you leaked to Kathy Kelly. Also why go to Ocean Grove you can enjoy the beautiful Maryland Ave beach. You should support our town isnt it true we own that beach but lease it to someone.
PennyStocks
5:45 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
hey spooner can you even balance a checkbook
Buddy
9:26 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Don't get a DUI on the way up or back. Better off, leave a response and and I will send a car for you at my cost....ONE WAY!!!
Just Saying
10:11 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Hey guidos, do the local tax payers a favor and only take a dump and urinate on the lawns of houses with the Italian flags flying out front.
Clown Baby
11:59 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Growing up as a local kid that was basically how we picked the houses to mess with. Unless we knew you were local then you were safe.
Part Timer
10:33 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Just saying with the stupid comment,
Try picking up your local paper, you will be surprised to see how many locals are listed in the police report....
Clown Baby
11:25 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Hey Part Timer I didn't know the summer was over yet???
Part Timer
11:36 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Addicted to the Patch....
PPNB
12:07 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Part timer. Completely sympathize with the addiction. Welcome back.
Now, if you would go back to your usual well founded comments, I would stop trying to bug you. There is still a lot of summer left. And as you said time will tell..
Jayne038
11:17 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Here is a link about the outcome of the Mayor's grand plan.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8Dshk1XfDc
GG
12:02 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
This town is comical. This sums it up! Willy Wonka...Greed, power, control.
Jayne038
12:38 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG
You are correct, someone in this town is obsessed with greed, power, and control, but it isn't Willy Wonka or the BW owners!
GG
2:39 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Jayne038, HaHaHa, you are comical. It is never the boardwalk's fault and their owners. You must be family. You are right, they are so good and do nothing wrong. They run an honest business. They are not greedy and do not use their power or control in anything they want or get.
Jayne038
3:28 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG
I am glad we are in agreement, the BW does seem to run an honest business, as far as I can tell. They take care of their own garbage, maintain the boardwalk restrooms, and give consistantly to the first aid, little league, fire dept., etc. Perhaps Barella is jealous that he is not a successful businessman able to make these types of donations? You can't blame the BW that the majority of residents are upset that the FAB FOUR turned down the 800k to help pay for the specials, which is what all of this was about in the first place.
MamaTribune
12:42 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Get Real: You can't lose anything, when the intentions of what was offered is fake? The word Majority is being used way to much, in the opinions of the comments being left in ones favor. It is for their own point of view or take on what happened. We have an awful lot of Majorities on both sides. This is what the residents I hear spreading. The $800,000 offer was spread out over 5 years along with boardwalk stipulations and conditions. Money couldn't be excepted any longer, once the boardwalk owners labeled the town extortionist.
lisad
11:49 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
@GG. You are clueless. That boardwalk is the biggest rateable in your boro so yeah, they do feed you as they keep your taxes lower and those bars make up a large part of it. you people who complain, go buy your properties in Bay Head or Mantoloking Shores if you want peace and quiet. Those establishments have been there long before you were. Hell my parents met at Jenks in the 50's.
Opinionated
12:06 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I cannot possibly express my opinion of the thought of merging Point Boro and PPB. Denise would permanently ban me from here because of the language I would use. THIS is a perfect example why meging of towns is not that great an idea. Mr. Corbally, et al., The ABC Director very clearly stated that he believes you may be in your rights to set your closing time upon review and approval from the State. HOWEVER, he feels uncomfortable with your actions that led up to your decision. An investigation SHOULD be conducted to confirm that nothing was done improperly. I do have an amusing scenario I would like to share. It's VERY far fetched but it will make you laugh. The Orthodox Community in Lakewood comes in and purchases the Boardwalk and turns it into a place of worship. The parking ban will be thrown out to accomodate the worshippers. One by one, the houses in the area will be sold and converted into religious retreats. The tax bills on the remaining houses will exceed the mortgage payments. I guess it would be history repeating itself. Asbury Park, Ocean Grove, and many other shore towns were started as religious retreats. Just wondering.
GG
12:54 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Why? Are you just another beach resident that thinks your town is so much better than Point Boro? Get off your "High Horse" that you are sitting on. Soon enough Point Boro will be fetching more for their houses than in the Beach. They will not even want to merge with you anyway.
Opinionated
5:13 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, I live in the Boro and want absolutely NOTHING to do with PPB. Perhaps I did not express that well enough in my previous post. Please reread my 4th sentence in my last post above. I say "you" when referring to that town, PPB.
oldsoldier
12:17 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I could be mistaken, and if I am please correct me. Did this not all start because the residents there were upset about the drunks urinating and otherwise causing problems on their properties in addition to the police costs? If so, It sounds to me like the politicians in PPB are doing the will of the residents. If so, good for them. It tells me that PPB residents are willing to tolerate drunks to a certain point. So, if I just had to get drunk until in the early morning, I guess I should do it at home or find another town to do it in. Sounds like the people have spoken, leave them be.
Clown Baby
1:28 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
You are mistaken sir.
MamaTribune
12:54 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Correct.
GG
12:26 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
lisa, Now I know you are clueless if you think the boardwalk has not changed since your parents meet in the 50's. Then there really is no hope for you. That scare tactic is getting old. If the boardwalk, the biggest ratable disappeared tomorrow who has a theory and thinks that point beach would close up and vanish off the map of NJ. Is out of touch. The taxes are not all that low on the contrary of what others what many to think or believe in comparison to what you get. Basically it is fake and a fraud and they have a great gig going.
lisad
1:56 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
i certainly didn't say what you are alluding to in your first sentence. You truly are ignorant if you don't think the boardwalk and bars don't cover a significant portion of your boro's rateables...i also didn't say your "taxes are low", they are being kept lower then they would be without the bw.....i'll bet you are Snookie in drag just trying to stir up some s
GG
2:33 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
lisa, Who is ignorant? Again, That is what they want everyone to think that the taxes are kept low because of the ratable's from the boardwalk businesses. Usually the people that talk s about taxes are not even paying taxes. What an intelligent comment? Snookie in drag? I thought things could not get any worse.. You just proved that wrong.
GG
12:36 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Sorry for the error, "Want many to think or believe. If anything our taxes would go down.... You can get rid of majority of the full-time police, you will not be a need for all the specials, bike police and ticket police. The town would be able to cut a lot of salaries, benefits, they all would not be needed. The only thing the boardwalk is feeding is the police and the police is feeding them. What are you going to tell me next,?I am responsible and obligated for all these individuals jobs too.
mailman
12:50 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Spring Lake or Bay Head is all set up for you. Make the move. This is Point Pleasant Beach. We have a history and although we have a few issues to deal with, including replacing a Mayor and 3 council people, we love our town. If you do not like it, move. Period
GG
1:13 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
mailman, Seaside Heights is all set up for YOU. Make the move. I forgot you do not have to. Point Pleasant Beach will soon be Seaside Heights. Matter of fact let's start selling parking spaces on the County roads too just like Seaside is allowed so we can make more money just like them being we are going to become them.
Clown Baby
1:34 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, PPB is not even close to Seaside, nor will it ever be. Your town has basically one bar it can't control.
John Q
12:39 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
It's a real shame that town is in such an uproar over two hours. Where is the proof that this will even alleviate the issues at hand. What's to say that it's primarily the BW that is responsible for the rowdy and unruly behavior? What about the "afterparties" that tons of people go to once the bars close? It's unrealistic to think that shutting bars down at 2am is going to put an immediate stop fix the problem. The only bandaid I see is to bring in more summer help, to patrol the neighborhoods between the hours of 1am and 4am. How about advertising a few rules (laws) of the town closer to the BW to deter people from committing the offenses. How about going after the people that are committing these offenses and increasing the fines so that we can afford to provide more protection for the town and it's people.
Ray Criptkie
10:46 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Because that John Q would actually make sense!
RJS@BHS
1:27 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Just an observation. During a 45 minute breakfast at Perks today, I counted 11 passbys by teams of two police officers on foot patrol and/or bike patrol. I will assume they were enforcing parking rules. I'm not normally out past midnight, but I'm curious if that vigilance is present in the hours around the bar closings. It seems to me that a crackdown on those violating the law would take care of the quality of life. $250+ tickets for disorderly conduct and public urination would fund the police pay. Require courtroom appearances and report violators to their hometown press. The former worked for me after an open container violation at Yankee Stadium during the Guiliani years. Not only did I face a steep fine, I had to take time from work to appear. I still remember this lesson from my 20s.
lisad
1:52 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
ah a voice of reason, unfortunately the PB administration lacks the ability to reason...instead they want to resort to blackmail. No one is allowed to be accountable for their own actions anymore. As far as the tandem rent a cops in Point, about all they seem to be good for is expired meters..let them do some real police work.
vin c
2:34 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Agree that all we need is right police presence at right times at right locations with right penalties.
GG
5:21 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
vin c, Sounds good in a perfect world.
mailman
2:00 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, seems you and I have differing opinions on what makes a town a family environment and what detracts from quality of life. Families of all backgrounds and ethnicities coming to our town does not make it a worse place. The certain rowdy group that have planted their roots over the past couple years in the absence of our cops are now being dealt with, as has been done in the past if you didn't know. Perhaps you should head to Ocean Grove beach with MC and relax for a day. Life is good and PPB is not going to fall into the ocean any time soon.
GG
2:22 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
mailman, The only one who is playing a race card is yourself, Who said anything about backgrounds and ethnicity? Is you yourself.
Denise Di Stephan
2:15 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Folks, we're not tolerating biased comments against any nationality, race, color or religion. Comments are being deleted and, if they continue, accounts will be suspended.
Barrella's Ego
2:20 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
You know, we could not see it at the time, but those Republicans who turned their back on Barrella and supported the recall knew something the rest of us are just now learning---- the The most dangerous threat to the PPB we know and love is Vince Barrella’s conviction that he knows bettwer than we do
mailman
2:35 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, I would ask you to clarify exactly why you feel "PPB is turning into Seaside", but I know you will default to the same stories about rowdiness that occurred last summer. The simple fact that you would fully support PPB merging w the Boro shows that you want nothing other than to turn this town on its head. History means nothing. The families that have lived here mean nothing. And quite obviously the BW and town businesses mean nothing. Again, that is why I say to you: move. Or stay, fight the fight and lose the war. We are not letting go of our town and our history anytime soon.
GG
6:12 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
mailman, Less families are coming This was always a family resort town as long as I can remember. The two boardwalk businesses are the ones' who advertise to the bar crowd. The bar crowd just wants to drink from early morning until wee hours in the morning. They have no respect for our town in any way. They get all pumped up with liquor then creates problems in a residential neighborhood. They scream, curse and pee for starters should be a good indication. They treat our town like a large garbage dump. Look at the police blotter every now then. It has nothing to do with anything other than families are coming less. I do not blame them. We have a short memory in the beach.., our own not that long ago had no problem merging in with PPB our leaders were being lead by the nose by former councilwomen Sue Rogers. I am tired of hearing about how good of a town we are, no one is willing to admit what is going on in our town or schools. Every district in town dislikes each other. No one really wants to pay for the police, teachers, town workers. They say that they do, then they don't. The businesses do not want to help with police that is needed mainly in their location. Every one wants to fight amongst each other. Excuse me for saying Uncle... I give up. Let us all merge together because that is what so many seem like that is what they want to do. You know the silent majority that everyone always talks about.
mailman
6:49 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, I almost don't even want to respond to that rant you just provided, but I will one last time. How many fewer families are coming to town? I have never seen the weekend days so busy, and they are not bar people. Where are your stats? How do the BW bars advertise inappropriately to their customers? Jenks has invited anyone to meet with their marketing person and see how they promote, perhaps you should do so. Again, where are your facts? Seems to me there are dozens of cops in the streets handling any disturbance issues from the bars, and you have posted that we should fire them all. As far as paying for them, that was your Mayor and his council deciding that the we, the taxpayers, could eat the $3/month for the specials, not the BW. They were fully committed and ready to do so. As far as your other points, I don't even know where to begin, other than repeating myself: move. Most do not dislike their neighbors, or have a problem paying for education or services and we love our little town the way it is. Again, take a day off and relax. You seem to be rambling a bunch of garbage without any support. We know you are upset the bars will be open in January until 2 am. That's just the way it always has been, and the way it will remain.
mailman
6:54 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Another winning quote from an Independent supporter:
GG wrote:
9:42 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
"Here is a solution, not that it is good. Can't afford all the police, Just fire and let them all go. Then Point Pleasant Beach can continue being the town of Problems and Alcoholics who find their town acceptable in becoming a Seaside."
I don't think we will be paying you much attention here on out.
Just Saying
2:36 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
If the boardwalk bars stopped serving alcohol, they would still pay the same amount of property taxes to pt. beach. Why do people think that the town would go broke if the bars stopped serving alcohol? Ocean City. does just fine and they dont sell any alcohol in the entire town.
JD
3:07 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Wrong...
Commercial property is based upon market rate to rent...
lower revenue to the boardwalk bars... means lower value for property... means lower taxes!!
Duh!
Gkb
2:55 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Oh contair. Property would no longer be as valuable along with every other bar. They would file for re evaluation and win. That would lower tax base amd everyone goes up.
Rick
3:12 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
"Just Saying." Thanks! People just don't get it, and I'm surprised that no one has agreed with my post about Tiki and Jenks,( listed above) jeopardizing the livelihoods of the other bar owners and employees of those bars and restaurants. I guess everyone on this page is under 25 or very dumb!
Read the posts from John57, RJ@bhs,and Vin C and maybe you'll get real, and grow up. Either that or get back to your T/V. and watch Snooky. She is in favor of the bars staying open until 6 a.m.!
JD
5:26 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Maybe because they disagree....
a bit far fetched... i'm sure jenks is monitoring as he put detectives to count number of cops after midnight versus during the day, etc...
and I don't see Frankies and the other bar owners joining in the suit...
Opinionated
5:21 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
To GG, no one who loves their town would EVER want to merge with PPB with all of their baggage.
MamaTribune
1:07 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
You are all snobs. Each town thinks they are better than the next. Like your town does not have baggage. This crap is happening in all the towns thanks to our political governors and friends. As the state cuts, squeezes the towns until they can't take care of themselves then you all will be crying and want support. Watch what you all support and wish for.
GG
6:20 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I don't blame YOU, I was responding to another post.
GG
6:26 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I have to chuckle when someone does not agree or has a different opinion they pull the "you just don't get it" Just like every side feels they are winning and has the silent majority on their side.
Nick Carraway
9:28 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG, although I don't agree with your suggestion that we merge with Pt. Boro, I do agree that we should all come together as a town. You mentioned that people in each district seem to hate the other districts. I don't think that's true. I do think, however, that the political campaign that Barrella & Gordon ran (with Tooker & Corbally's help) was designed to garner votes from the biggest District in town, District 4. The voters of PPB where given the right to vote on a parking plan in November, and the majority of voters in every district, except District 4, said "No." So, Corbally, Tooker, Gordon & Barrella carved District 4 out of the rest of the town and put in a parking plan in D4. And, on top of it, the Barrella crew adopt an early bar closing time due to the complaints they receive from D4 residents about problems associated with the BW, and that early bar closing time closes all of the bars in town, including the ones on Arnold Avenue, where there have been no complaints and which aren't located in D4. You're right. The town has never been so divided. Up until this year, I bet most residentts had no idea that the town was divided up into 4 voting Districts, but they sure do now! We don't need to merge with another town. We need to bring our little town back together! Barrella, Corbally, Gordon & Tooker are not concerned with what is best for our town. They are focused on one group of residents, the residents who supported them in District 4.
GG
11:31 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
NC, I agree that there is a need to bring this little town back together. Sorry, But what has been going on here? I am not to convinced that it is ever going to happen. It might just be a little to late. You have to many bitter residents who want to get back at each other just because they are friends with someone they do not like or don't support. It is ridiculous and immature. Residents should be able to agree to disagree and support or be friends with who they like and think is the most qualified in their own judgement and opinion. It is a right and privilege to vote. It is no one's business who you vote for. There is a town manipulation that is going on. Pretty sick if you ask me. You become labeled or targeted if you don't have the same opinion. Basically, you automatically become "guilty of association" which is all so very narrow minded and sick. I never mentioned who I supported and voted for. Some things I like about the above local politicians and other things I don't. So What? I do not like 100% of any politician. All I can do is listen to each one's philosophy or go by what I have seen. Some decisions I agree with and others I don't. I can't speak for anyone else including them. ALL the residents who voted them in, has given them the power to make choices for ALL the residents. If any residents feels slighted in any way by these politicians they simply don't vote for them again. D4 is the district that has the most complaints, problems and needs.
Been here before
9:38 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
GG From just a couple of snipets from your posts above, such as:
"I guess you are also aware of unscrupulous town you live in. You know it smells bad, when the ABC ruling is going
Not only Point Beach, all the other towns close by knows that Jenkinson's and Martell's is definitely in control of the town, county, ABC director, the State of NJ and even the police
God knows the schools have lost their credibility too. They are already taking tuition students. They already have lowered and comprised their standards. Rumor has it they inflate or change grades for only some students. It is all about "Green" Dr. Ravally 's theory of filling up the classrooms, as an empty seat on plane. Or is it to keep his schools running to promote himself and his growing staff to keep Point Pleasant Beach up and going. "We need more students" Point Pleasant might not want to merge with Point Pleasant Beach being they out scored us two years in a row."
It is clear you made the wrong decision when you moved to PPB. But it is OK, you have not been here long, are not invested in the community, and are free to go. What was the runner up, Va.? Go---we'll throw a party--- you seem to believe everything Barrella has ever said to you without checking the facts so I bet you will think the party is for you
GG
10:31 pm on Saturday, June 30, 2012
Bhb Don't pretend you know me. I have been here longer than you think. I am invested enough. Yes, So What? I am not alone, it is no big secret on how many feel the same as I do. We can all pretend and keep our heads buried in the sand. Do you know were you are free to go? Can you guess that one. Once again you are wrong, I do not believe what anyone says.
Spooner
12:28 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Oh Mayor-looks like Mulshine ditched you for the Boss...in his Sunday column. . .What can I say...guess PPB story just worn out the type. . .
GG
12:48 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
NC, I just want to say, I was told it was a pilot program. It could be adjusted or scraped depending how it goes. As of today, right now, I would say more residents in D4 are very happy with the parking pilot program. Many are able to sleep the last few nights. I am not be sarcastic or rubbing it in.
Residents First
6:13 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
GG-----The quiet you here is from the police presence. It has noting to do with the silly unnecessary parking program.
How long before Barrella wants to let the tourists park on municipal roads in D4 as long as they pay? He'll claim it is the only way to avoid raising taxes. Wasn't that his plan in 2008? Isn't that what he tried to do with the Bar closings? Of course Barrella says he learned his lesson on the parking plan. Anybody buying that?
PS We all know you GG---you are the prototype Benny Come Lately-----lots of solutions based on rumor and innuendo, no historical perspective, no facts
blindbert
9:10 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Why not let tourist pay for parking ??
The town could use the revenue. Just look at yesterdays APPRESS (section B page 1) article on parking.
But we should still restrict it at night for placard holders.
GG
7:27 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Residents First, On the contrary to who you think I am. I really can't answer your questions? I do not know? Those questions should be asked to Mayor Barrella. What solutions? Every Resident has their own choices, beliefs, experiences and perspectives on what they might see, hear or know. I for one have no crystal ball. I am not someone in the INSIDE political arena. So yes, some is facts, some is half truths, some are seen and others are rumors. That is all many residents can go by. Who knows what is the truth? It is hard, when you have so many in the political arena being dishonest. My Neighbors have all said the same thing. I really do not know who is telling the truth. It is confusing because every one of the politicians are telling me something different. So there you have it. It is up to all the local politicians that throw themselves in the ugly, nasty world of "Beach Politics" They need to CONVINCE each and every resident what is truth, lies, promises that they claiming. Everyone is going to be painting a different picture of what they see. I am not trying to disrespect historical perspective. Past is what it is. I can't change it, nor do I want to. We are in the present. It is now that we need to worry about. We can't live in the past, no matter how much someone might want to. I am not trying to be nasty. You are making claims about Mayor Barrella? When claims are being made it is without providing evidence or proof. So everyone is doing the same thing.
Residents First
7:53 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
GG. Good. Now please understand PPB is not going down the tubes or in any great danger. PPB has survived different waves of different kinds of tourists for the 10 weeks of the summer for decades. The key really is extra police presence. Radical change is unnecessary. If the politicians keep their hands off, PPB’s residents and business will do just fine together. They always did------until Benny Come Lately Barrella and his crew came to power
GG
9:28 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
RF, How do you know that our town for sure or any other town for that matter will not be going down the tubes or in any great danger? I have heard that many times before. Guess what? The town did go down the tubes. What makes our town so special that we will escape the radical change? I thought the same thing about Toms River, Seaside Heights a while back. Sorry, I personally have seen the change and so have others including tourist. The change is not only in the summer, it is off season too. So are you telling me there has been problems like this before and it has been going on for decades. Are you a policeman? The police department acknowledged there is problems, the worst in 17 years. Your answer is extra police presence, How many? Do we just keep on raising the amount of police needed for the different waves of tourist? Where does it stop? Maybe that is were we do not agree. I do not feel a resident should have to pay for all the extra police every time the tourists get out of hand. My own neighbors and other resident have complained that we have to many police both in the winter and summer. They feel it is political and police are taking advantage of the situation and making more out things then it is, for their own benefit. Personally, I would rather the police. Do I totally agree on what is decided and the outcome all the time. No! Now, you know that will never happen with the politicians. But like I said, residents, police and businesses is playing politics too.
GG
9:52 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
RF, Just curious, How do you think Barrella and his crew came to power? Now everyone can believe what they want. Enough residents voted for them and gave them power. On the contrary of what you think, many residents do not agree with the boardwalk,what they are getting away, doing and done. I know there is a few dozen residents going back and fourth on the patch, most recently a few extra bar owners and employees of the boardwalk. I can promise you that is not the majority. I would say there is a lot of silent residents. Again, everyone is painting their own political painting. Seeing, Believing and hearing what they want. You are not going to change that or them. I agree, AMEN!
Residents First
11:37 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Right GG---we are not the majority---which is why most people voted for someone other than Barrella in November and self described Barrellista Loder lost by hundreds of votes in June. The majority understands, and more and more see it everyday. Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally have never been about residents, simply vendettas. You are in for a rude awakening in each of the next three Novembers.
Spooner
11:48 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
GG- Barrella came to power thanks to Joe Billotti, who was gunning for Vogel when he(they) enacted the 3% Hotel/Motel Tax. . .Then the story goes that Barrella double crossed Billotti. . .and Billotti then went after him with the recall petitions. Corbally was a Republican at one time(up to 2003) Began to have differences with the Regulars. Ran against them in 2003 and lost. Then switched parties in 2004 and has been on Council since. Do I have that correct Mike? Please don't answer. . .Tooker and Cervino came in with Barrella in 2007 as Club supported Republicans. Cervino I believe supported repeal of Motel tax, and I believe Tooker did not. . .As reported in Tourist Study: that tax revenue in 2006 amounted; if I recollect, around $244K. . .
GG
8:16 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Residents First, I know you are telling me the quiet I hear is from police presence. It may be. Others feel it is from the silly parking plan. Which is it? I do not know? I am just asking, did we not have police presence last year? Again, everyone is going to believe what they want to. From experience you are not going to change that and no matter what you and others say on patch, in council meeting, around town, people believe what they want to. You can believe me or not, I have heard so many OPINIONS on town issues, that is all they are and everyone has them. No one has more rights on their opinions than others. Politics is everywhere. They are being played in the Police Dept., Schools, Town, you get the picture. You can agree with me or not. On the contrary to what you believe there is a long list of residents that have experienced real problems in our schools and numerous complaints. Are you going to have that in schools and Town? Yes, you are. Do these Parents and residents want changes? Yes, they do. Is it so bad to want what is best for your child or town. No, it is not. Wouldn't you want what is best for your child or town? Some feel the Police is not managed properly, that is all I hear... personally I do not know. There is so many different opinions about when the full-timer police should be taking off for vacation, schedule problems, where they should be located in town and how many in each location, what they should be making? How many they have? I don't know?
blindbert
8:35 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Heard that some residents living behind 709 are starting to complain??
GG
9:33 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
I did too, Well than the residents need to either call the owner themselves or the police.
Beach_N8iv
3:43 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Sorry, wrong district. I assume that you are talking about the same cops that have been ignoring a diesel bus that has been idling for the last TEN HOURS! Again, wrong district.
Mike Corbally
4:11 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Beach, Waiting 10 hours to call the police accomplishes what?
Beach_N8iv
1:49 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
About the same as calling them. We are talking about a FULL SIZE BUS parked in plain sight. The count is now up to 20 hours, there's probably people sleeping in there. This wouldn't have lasted 20 MINUTES in the Promised Land of District 4, would it?
blindbert
9:00 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
The parking plan is working and has probably issued enough summons to pay for the signs and placards. The rest is easy money.
I went out this morning looking to see ( haha!) how plan was working? I was looking at the addresses on placards. There were quiet a bunch from inlet drive and the bungalow's. Another type were ones that just listed key #s that i would assume came from a real estate office. These were mixed in with cars in the close proximity to the placards address.
The plan is good for the people without driveways,the non resident owners,real estate agencies and seasonal renters. The people that come and actually stay generate a lot of money that does get spent in the community away from the BW.
There should be parking priority given to the people who are residents, taxpayers and their renters. The plan opens up spaces so that people that stay in the bungies and other rentals do not have to park so far away from were they will be staying.
Long Live the parking plan, It is working my friends !
blindbert
9:15 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
July 1, ? It is the liqour license renewal time.
Is it at that time that the GB can raise issues or request limtations on individual license holder as opposed to across the Board townwide restrictions???
mailman
10:15 am on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Blindbert, not after the well documented witch hunt they have put local business owners through. The State is now watching.
MamaTribune
1:13 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
So are the RESIDENTS! The State should watch and look real hard, come a little closer they might find more than they bargained for.
Tiki Truth
1:20 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Sorry to disappoint you, Barella-worshipers, but within the next two weeks the parking plan will be struck down in court. The town signed an agreement with the state years ago that renounced their right to change the parking laws like this, hence the parking plan is illegal. The best part is that once it is declared illegal, the town will have to refund all of the people who had to pay fines because of it. (Tgats 10k wasted on the signs and no way to pay for them,)
It is almost impossible for the town to win in court, not because the BW is influencing the decision but because the facts are on their side. Like the plan or not, it doesn't matter because it will soon be gone.
You won't believe me now, but you will in two weeks when we're commenting on the article "State Shus Down Parking Plan."
blindbert
2:50 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Do oyu have a reference, date, whatever, maybe a copy if this to support what you,represent.
Beach_N8iv
3:48 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Is there a shield law to protect politicians from lawsuits to recover expenses that they have caused through gross negligence?
MamaTribune
2:35 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
If this there is any truth to your statements, the towns leaders long ago made some pretty stupid mistakes. First they sell their beaches and then they renounced their rights to change parking laws in their own streets. Who sold their souls way back when? Why would they? Did they not see any future? They did not realize their would be changes in the world? I guess we have no choice other than to start handing out the pink slips to the police, town employees. Get ready to get a lot less sleep in D4.
Tiki Truth
2:55 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
It wasn't Barella who made that agreement, it was the previous administration. Regardless, it is still binding. The fact that this agreement was shown to Barella and his councilmen while they were making this parking plan and they ignored it shows just how single modes they are to damage the boardwalk.
I'm not saying its a good thing that residents have to deal with the noise at night (I know how annoying it can be). But it's only for a small part of the year, and worth it in exchang for the tourists bringing money and helping businesses (not just the bars) in our town, keeping the taxes lower.
The BW arguably had a duty to help pay for more police
Officers to offset quality of life issues, but Barella foolishly rejected their generous offer, and now the taxpayers will have to pay the price. Don't blame the BW if your property taxes go up.
MamaTribune
3:25 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
The resident taxes already went up substantially... They are slowly pushing the residents out of PPB. It has become unaffordable to so many. That is the reason why so many are trying to sell their homes. Unfortunately during the economy, the spiral decline in real-estate they can't sell. They are stuck. They will either sink or swim. Maybe the BW should start buying every house they can in D4. Some town residents should be ashamed of themselves.
Tiki Truth
2:56 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
And no, I dont have proof. But in two weeks it won't be needed.
Spooner
4:44 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Tiki Truth- if you read the lawsiut filed by the Charter boats & Marinas...in the complaint it cites the law and agreement with state, when they accepted money for storm damage. Click on lawsuit pdf file at upper right of 'patch' news article...
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/fisherman-fight-point-beach-parking-plan#c
Rick
4:19 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
It's not just extra noise that the district 4 people have to endure for the summer. It's actually for about 7 or 8 months of the year by the way, and here's the problem. Without real security on the Boardwalk ,where up to a potential of 3,000 or more people spill out of those 2 bars at the same time, a riot will occur and someone is going to get hurt or killed, and then you'll see property values go down 35% overnight and totally ruin the reputation of Point being that," family place". I've said my piece over and over. When it happens and I hope it never does, I've warned the officials and leadership of this town, to police this Boardwalk regardless who pays for it. Take 4 ticket guys off the street and put them on the Boardwalk during those dangerous hours. Now that the bars are open until two, we need security POSTED on the Boards between midnight and 3 p.m. MINIMUM!
Laura
6:37 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
I remember years ago the police were always on the boardwalk when Jenks and Martells closed. Has that changed? The difference now: it's a thousand people leaving not a couple hundred. These guests ( I use the term loosely) are not usually locals. The feel no need to respect the residents. Let's face it quite a few of them are drunk.
Residents should not have to endure that. Years ago my parents and their neighbors hired an attorney and started a fight to rid the Boro of the Silver Dollar. They were dealing with everything that the Beach residents are enduring now just on a smaller scale. It took a while but it worked for the residents.
Just because some of the posters on here don't live in the area or have an ax to grind with some of the elected officials doesn't mean those who live in the area and are bothered should just shut up and endure it.
vin c
7:52 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Agree with you Rick. As long as Jenks etc keeps emphasizing PPB as the place to go for a wild and late nite party, the odds of a major crowd 'incident' happening only increases. I also fear the former label of PPB being family-oriented will start to fade. Only see a few posters here with the same focus of concern as opposed to those focused on politics between a council and BW.
Jim
5:18 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Rick, I totally agree and it is really scary. The problem is, some residents are having a hard time admitting the town has changed or that there is even any problems. They think it is the same as it always was, No Change. Just look at some of the comments on many other articles referring to our town. I have read them and it is hard to believe. Sadly, you will see them in bold print. I have to say it is hard watching the town you loved slip away. I also have bad vibes and was thinking the same about rioting, someone getting hurt or possibly killed. I really hope not, I keep on pushing it out of my mind but it is only amount of time.
P C
5:25 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
So if the state investigates and they find this law is just a cover up for trying to extort money from the businesses, can the council people be held personally accountable?
How about Barella? He is an attorney will this put his law license at risk? I realize he isn't acting as a lawyer while he is making town decisions as the mayor but shouldn't he have acted in good faith to keep the town out of this legal mess!
Laura
6:39 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
P C
All those items donated by the Storino's would they then be considered bribes?
hippocratic oath
12:43 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Laura Beeden: PLEASE stop meddling in Point Beach affairs once and for all. WHY, WHY, WHY are you so obsessed with the Beach and our issues? What's the matter -- things getting a little too dull for the Point Boro gadfly, so you feel the compulsion to trespass into Beach government matters. Don't you have a budget to read and comment on in Point Boro? We have enough malcontents of our own here in the Beach without YOU running interference and putting in your worthless 2 cents. So -- you are dismissed -- GO AWAY now. Thanks.
Paul
10:50 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Just another retired government employee feeding off the residents and good people of New Jersey. Did you take a job at the BW yet? There is that word again, being used loosely. "INVESTIGATE" You have connections in that field. Maybe you can help in the investigation and don't stop..follow the money trail. "Good Faith" How many here are really acting in good faith for our community residents? It gets less and less do to "GREED"
Paul
11:09 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
hippocratic oath: THIS IS HYSTERICAL, Telling one person to stop posting because they do not live in the town of Point Pleasant Beach. Stop meddling in Point Beach affairs. Do you even live here yourself? How do we know? You are leaving yourself out in the malcontents? That I am almost sure goes under a few alias already. It is so.....Obvious. You do not have a problem with all the other allias that are from other towns who are constantly posting because they are in your favor? So-- you are dismissed--GO AWAY now. Thanks.
P C
6:58 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Laura, a donation is a donation, they didn't ask for anything in return for lights or things donated to first aid or fire co.
Yet, from this forum it seems like the mayor & certain council members asked for money in order to allow them to stay open and a penalty (shut down @ midnight) if they didn't pay. Obviously, two very different things!
Jim
8:06 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
wink, wink....bribe. We are asking for nothing in return
PPBProfiteering
12:58 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Sure it is always different when you are on the opposite side. We know you are a supporter of the running candidates Andy Cortes and Stephen Reid. How is Wrestling going?
Tiki Truth
7:28 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Thanks Spooner. There are a million reasons why the parking plan is illegal. All the BW has to do is state the facts, no political trickery necessary.
The sad thing is that the mayor knew that it was illegal and voted yes anyway. He has a personal vendetta against the BW (storino kept him off some stupid committee years ago+barella is just jealous) and will pursue that agenda without worrying about what's legal and what's not.
Tiki Truth
7:41 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Rick- you can't blame the BW for security problems. They offered 800K that would go towards hiring extra police. Ask barella and Corbally why they refused it.
PC- It is possible. If they are found to be guilty of attempted extortion or other things they could be in a lot of trouble.
SoylentGreen
8:05 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
280 posts, wow!
mailman
8:31 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Rick and Jim, please keep in mind that on any given busy night, both Jenks and Martells each staff a number of security people that is greater than the number of PPB cops on the streets those same nights. Even if you assumed a worse case scenario where 5% of the patrons are trouble makers capable of starting a "riot", they would still be greatly outnumbered. You're argument could be applied to the reasoning that there should be no more concerts anywhere, professional or college sports games, or the seafood festival here in PPB for that matter. Jenks in particular has been just as busy for years now, and there has never been a riot or anything close to it. You are using scare tactics for a situation that is well attended to and under control.
Jim
9:59 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
mm, I would like to start off by saying, this is not a scare tactic, this is how I feel as a resident. Tell me, mm and be honest are you a resident that actually lives in point pleasant beach? I am not stupid and I know you can lie to me. That being said, I feel there is a lot comments being made from individuals that do not even live here. I know they all have a right to comment being the article is open to everyone. If you don't mind me asking what district do you live in? I feel a lot that are posting, is focusing more about politics between the boardwalk and council. Also those who are benefiting financially in some way from the boardwalk.You are that confident in both Jenks and Martells business model and operations. You are saying they have that much control of their customers. If this is true and they have that much security will they or you take personal responsibility, if something does happen. You are right it can happen anywhere, most of the venues you are comparing are not in a residential areas in a very small beach resort town. They are not that close to beach homes. Many of these events you mentioned smartened up, they now have limited alcohol at these events because of alcoholic related problems. Absolutely it can happen at the seafood festival, even though most come for the food, craft shopping. Yes, there is alcohol, it is limited& over early. Before you&other political post attack me. I am not against tourist, you can only fit so many in this small town.
Cathy Kelly
11:51 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Jim,the people on this post will not allow you to be "just a resident"..if you complain about quality of life than you are labeled a "Barrella supporter"..I have stated over and over that I did not agree with the ordinances...I am a resident that is seeing our town changing and getting out of control. I have lived here for over 10 years and it was nowhere like it is now when we moved here....I have been attacked and accused of all sorts of things...The BW and the residents met over a year ago and EVERYONE agreed there is a problem....The solution to the problem has become Political,,,so when you stand up as a resident,the people that post here will either tell you,it has not changed etc....but everyone involved have already agreed that it has....I have tried to walk away but so many residents want to fight for what it once was and want to stop it from becoming seaside so I will stay in it....we need to find a solution and ignore the people that continue to defend the side that they are on....The residents are STILL holding the bag and still paying to subsidize what is needed for the town....We need to find a solution and ignore all those that are saying nothing has changed........
hippocratic oath
12:23 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Cathy Kelly: It's really time for you to go back to Staten Island. You've done enough damage to PPB -- meddling in the political affairs which you know absolutely NOTHING about! Your masquerade of being "just a resident" is getting old quick and the fix is in. You have violated the residents' trust through your false pretenses and peddled your misguided influence through your silly email chain. YOU -- Cathy Kelly -- pandered to and supported Barrella, Tooker, Corbally, and Gordon -- the very GANG of FOUR that gave away $800,000 in "tourism revenue" and handed the bill right back to the residents! If you really wanted to "help the residents" -- you would shut your ignorant mouth now and just GO AWAY.
PPBProfiteering
12:55 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Just another multi personality poster who obviously is a family member, friend of the boardwalk who is profiteering from the boardwalk and also supports the new political candidates Andy Cortes and Stephen Reid. Who feed off the town residents.
hippocratic oath
1:13 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Nope...sorry...none of the above, PPB Prof. Not related to any family or friend of the BW, and I'm not publicly supporting any political candidates. I'm just someone who REALLY does care about the town and is also intelligent enough to recognize who is ruining my investment....that would be Barrella, Tooker, Corbally, and Gordon. I actually voted for 2 of the 4 stooges -- NEVER AGAIN though !!!
Jane Reynolds
11:32 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
it is a "recreational/commerical zone
Residents First
10:26 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Jim--quit with the gloom and doom. PPB has always taken care of tourists with cops. Worked before working now. If you live in D4 look at your window. Not many cars---Seymour Homestead Parkway Baltimore ---even the County roads---. It is too bad you believe the Barrella nonsense---if you got out more you might actually see what is going on, instead of imagining what politicians want you to believe. Bw is, was, and will do all they can to prevent the kind of incident you forecast. Why? Because it is the only way to protect their investment. This is what folks like to ignore. Boardwalk is heavily invested in PPB---more so than many of the Benny Come Lately complainers.
Cathy Kelly
12:30 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
hippocratic,aka been here before,aka,just the truth....I see I hit a nerve....Why are you so afraid of people speaking the truth?...It is so obvious that you do not want the residents knowing the truth and speaking up.....How did I have ANYTHING to do with giving away $800,000.? please explain,I need a good laugh.........
Cathy Kelly
12:43 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
hippocratic,must make you feel like a big person to say such harsh words to me as you hide behind your little fake name....you are a joke......
hippocratic oath
12:58 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Cathy Kelly: I am a new reader here on Patch and I have no other "aka" aliases. You should be far more concerned with your own idiotic and offensive behavior -- than you are trying to figure out who I am and what my political persuasions are. Anyway -- if you can't figure out how you're directly culpable for the politcal mayhem going on here in PPB -- then you are more stupid than I originally thought. I certainly don't have the time to explain it to you. See you in Court when you're subpeoned to testify about the unethical activity on your email chain. Oh, then I'll be the one having the good laugh...LMAO that is.
mailman
11:06 pm on Sunday, July 1, 2012
Jim, read some of my posts and you tell me if you think I am a resident. Secondly, perhaps you should endure a painful night for yourself and go into Jenks and tiki, see the young people dancing and having fun. While you are there, count the bouncers and armed off duty cops that are employed by both establishments. As Residents First said, this is their investment that is being safeguarded. If You think that real estate values would drop 35% overnight (which is a crazy thing to even consider) with an incident,what do you think would happen to either of these businesses if the same were to occur under their watch? I benefit in no way from either bar. I know that cops were cut a couple years ago and some tourists that we do not want here caused a lot of trouble. The cops are back now and doing the job. This "riotous behavior" as the mayor chooses to put it simply does not exist.
Cathy Kelly
12:39 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Mailman,I am being sincere when I ask this,I know the bars have their own security to handle situations that occur in the bars..I was told that the security in the bars take the situations out of the bar and than it becomes a town Police problem. Can you tell me if this is the case or just a rumor? Does the security in the bar handle it from start to finish or does it become the towns problem?
PPBProfiteering
12:46 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
They couldn't even handle the gang fight of 3 last summer. They had to call the town police for back up. They are blowing smoke up everyone's butt. This town is done if a big brawl lets loose. One of our police just received an award for the gang fight of 3. Only in the Beach!
Cathy Kelly
12:51 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
mailman,again I am being sincere, I don't think most residents care about what happens in the bar,they care about what happens in the streets,at their houses,in the neighborhood,etc....do the bouncers and the security people handle anything that happens outside of the bars....Again,why would the residents care about what happens inside?
hippocratic oath
1:01 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Cathy Kelly: Why do you feel compelled to begin your post using the words: "I am being sincere when I ask this"? Are you NOT ALWAYS sincere, or just sometimes? LOL....
Cathy Kelly
1:11 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
hippo,no pun intended,hahahahaha now you really did make me laugh,hope to see you in court,I will be there with bells on,hahahaha
SoylentGreen
1:58 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
@PPBProfiteering At the time the gang fight went down, the armed private security was not working. Just the unarmed, night flunkies were around.
PPBProfiteering
12:38 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
HO, Knock it off, You are Just another family, friend of the boardwalk who is profiteering who supports the new running candidates Andy Cortes and Stephen Reid. Who feeds off the town residents.
hippocratic oath
1:09 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Nope...sorry...none of the above, PPB Prof. Not related to any family or friend of the BW, and I'm not publicly supporting any political candidates. I'm just someone who REALLY does care about the town and is also intelligent enough to recognize who is ruining my investment....that would be Barrella, Tooker, Corbally, and Gordon. I actually voted for 2 of the 4 stooges -- NEVER AGAIN though !!!
A Resident
8:16 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
I think a few more people need to go up to the boardwalk at bar closing time and see what actually happens. Seems as though there may be a few people posting about it, but have never actually seen what goes on and what it's really like.
PPBProfiteering
8:57 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
HO, Thanks, for proving my point. Just another resident who is more worried about being a profiteer above all else. Who does not give a darn about the residents or the town. Someone who makes their money and leaves the town in shambles.
Rick
9:27 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Great idea " A Resident "
Between 12:30 a.m. and 2:30 a.m. would be perfect. And they should bring their wives, girlfriends, kids and or grand kids over 21.
Have fun hanging with the " Jersey Shore " cast!
Paul
10:24 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
No one in their right mind would bring their wives, girlfriends, kids and or grand kids over 21 to subject themselves to rude drunken behavior at those hours. If you really knew those who are leaving comments, you would be able to connect the dots, the real reason of support. One of few things...Political opportunities currently or near future, financial gain now or in near future...It is all about Jobs or Money and these towns down the "Jersey Shore" are very well connected.
blindbert
10:26 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Was jenks really getting $25 cover charge the other night. Heard that it was that snooki was there. Thats $55,000 for the 2,200 patrons. youser!!
MoonDogie
10:39 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
These are the most ridiculous posts! People we have gotten way off track!
#1 Cathy Kelly – you seem to be a happy lady. Think everything is funny. “Haha. Hehe. That’s hysterica. You make me laughl”. FYI, this situation is nothing to laugh about. You diminish the opportunity for anyone to take you seriously.
#2 – I do not know the procedure for bars to handle difficult situations. I would think they try what they can to contain/ alleviate the problem, while staying within the confines of the law. If it becomes a more serious issue then the police would need to get involved.
#3 - Let me remind you that businesses pay taxes for the same protection everyone else is afforded. As an example, if a fight broke out in our local stationary store or hardware store, would you expect the business owners to handle it themselves or would they immediately call the police. Would you even question that? I think we all know the answer to that. Let’s forget WHO owns WHAT in town and begin to look at the big picture. Drop the vendettas and open your mind to allow us to work together to improve any and all issues. In case you haven’t noticed the BW, parking and pleasing District 4 are NOT the only issues in town. The people in districts 2, 3 and 4 are becoming the orphans of the town.
Cathy Kelly
11:47 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
Moon,you talk about ridiculous posts and than you proceed to compare the BW Bars to the stationary story and hardware store and yet you probably don't even see how ridiculous that sounds....I don't think any of this situation is funny,as a matter of fact,it actually sickens me. I find the comments like yours and some others funny...When a legitimate question is asked,you get all defensive,why?
Paul
12:02 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
BS....This town is going down the "BOB" Watch who you call orphans misfit.
MoonDogie
12:17 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Oh Cathy, please focus. YOU asked " I ask this,I know the bars have their own security to handle situations that occur in the bars..I was told that the security in the bars take the situations out of the bar and than it becomes a town Police problem. Can you tell me if this is the case or just a rumor? Does the security in the bar handle it from start to finish or does it become the towns problem?".
I was merely giving you an example of any business in town having the right to ask for police assistance regardless of WHO or WHERE, without bias. And BTW, when the town collects taxes...they don't discriminate. You pay, I pay and all businesses pay so we all have the right to ask for police assistance.
Paul
3:29 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Beach_N8iv: I do not know what happen to Mr Cav's lawn, but what ever happened?or what someone did? The police should be looking in to that. Now in reference to your remarks about BENNY come latelys just shows me how small minded you are. Every one is politicizing including yourself. BTW...I can promise you this, Majority of the people that live here are BENNY'S, there is very little residents that are left that were originally from here.
Laura
11:02 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
HO
Aren't you glad we have free speech in this country? HO you seem to want to tell everyone where to go. This is Patch not a council meeting. I always have to laugh at all the anonymous commenters who don't have the strength of their convictions to put their names to their diatribes. Do armchair bullies know they are bullies?
I like those who aren't afraid to use their real names and can stand up for what they believe whether I agree with them or not. I, at least, respect them.
Again, I don't care if the bars stay open all night. Residents DO NOT have to put up with bad behavior.
I'll bet the amount of comments would decrease dramatically if Patch used the app's method - Facebook accounts. lol
Paul
12:32 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Laura, LOL...Agreed, But then no one would be leaving comments, would they? No, because everyone would know who the bullies are. They would also follow who is connected to who and what? You would see the greed of financial gain, or maybe not. Hard to prove. It is not just the BW that has connections, Jobs are given out freely to friends in the town and schools too. You will discover who's mother, father, sister, brother, aunt, uncle, son, daughter, friends is getting financial gain through their employment. Some are even double dipping, working for both the town, school and the BW.... off all the other good residents of NJ....Why would they want it all to stop.
Part Timer
1:40 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
So Laura, because you use A first name does that mean I am supposed to know who you are? maybe Laura is not your real name, how are we supposed to know....
Post your full name and maybe you can laugh about other people remaining anonymous.
Beach_N8iv
3:01 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
After seeing what happened to Mr. Cav's lawn I don't blame people for wanting anonymity. This is a small town with a great many small minds. BENNY come latelys aside a lot of long time residents know each other and this is an issue that has torn this town apart like NOTHING I have seen in the past. Friends and neighbors are at each other's throats over this and all because a few BENNY come latelys have decided to make a fuss and got the attention of a few politicians that have nothing better to do than spend OUR money to defend themselves and the town from lawsuits that THEIR bad decisions have generated.
Vin
11:54 am on Monday, July 2, 2012
I love how people buy homes in noisy areas and then complain about the noise. If ya want quiet summer nights then don't buy a house in a resort/vacation spot.
This entire thing reminds me of the idiots that bought houses next to raceway park and then went on to complain the track was so noisy and it shouldnt be allowed to operate in a residential area while never once stopping to consider that the track was there long before the houses were.
Paul
12:41 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Vin,,, Trust me... The residents are not just talking about noise....It is much worse than that. I am almost sure the houses were there before the boardwalk. Please refrain from calling others idiots. I am sure you have been an idiot yourself at times.
Paul
12:00 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
LOL...AGREED!
John57
12:27 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Maybe "A Resident" has a point. Seeing what happens when the bars close at 2. Because for weeks now I've been trying to get Corbally and the other secret council posters and their wives to tell us how many cops are on the job @2 AM ! If the police budget is exceeded, wait did I say if, I meant when (because we don't have a director). whom do we blame? I wonder who's going to win the overtime award this year?
Full Timer
12:57 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
The solution is quite simple. On November 6th, the following public referendum needs to be added to the ballot:. "Should the bars in Point Pleasant Beach be required to stop serving alcohol at 12AM?" I have spoken to a Monmouth County superior judge friend of mine, who has informed me that, although public referendums are generally non-binding, there is a state statute that permits binding referendums on issues involving the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages for a period of 5 years, so don't argue that it would be non-binding as the law says otherwise. This is the democratic and sensible way to resolve this, at least until 2017. For those of you who are vacation home owners, and will complain that you won't have a say in this matter, you chose to purchase that second residence fully aware that you would not have the right to vote. Either contact your congressman to work on an amendment to the Constitution, or officially change your primary residence, and register to vote in the borough. If you are against this most basic method of democracy, then you are obviously one who is concerned that the outcome of such a referendum will not be to your liking. I am, next, going to inquire as to the steps needed to petition for such a question to be added. Perhaps some of you will consider doing the same.
Paul
2:16 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
F/T: The last thing we need is another lawyer and Judge in the mix. We already have to many in the mix, loving all the money they are making.
Part Timer
1:48 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
A good compromise,
Bars stay open till 2AM and parking stays in place...
Being on Central Ave I can definitely tell you there is a big difference with the noise, litter, etc. Yes the police are doing a good job as well BUT... not having the crowds walking by at 2am which is something the police cannot control (yes you are still allowed to walk in the streets of PPB) makes up for the bars being able to stay open...
PPNB
6:14 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Hear, hear
Paul
2:15 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Part Timer, Agree...But they do not want to compromise. They want their cake and eat it too.
Rick
2:29 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Hey Vin!
Let me say for the 100th time. I didn't buy a house on the Boardwalk because I was looking for piece and quiet. I love the action. I've been here for 13 years and the past 5, have been getting worse because of attitudes like yours. I now realize it's acceptable to you and where you come from, that it's o.k., to behave like trailer trash, but from where I come from, it's not acceptable to disrespect people and piss on their lawns and do whatever they want because it's a " resort area" .There's plenty of resort areas. Go to LBI where there's several bars, but they won't take the crap Point Pleasant Beach takes. Go 26 miles an hour in a 25 and you're getting a ticket. Act like the "Jersey Shore" show idiots and your getting locked up in a heart beat. That's what we need here in Point. Please never have children, because they may grow up like you and think this trashy behavior is acceptable to normal civilization.
Now, go home and put on the " Jersey Shore" HBO special because I know that you think this is the norm.
Vin
4:46 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
grats.. I've lived on the shore since I was born 35 years ago. While I will agree it has seemingly gotten worse over the last several years, it has been a steady climb and really something you should have expected when you bought a house there.
That's why when I finally could afford to purchase a home I didn't buy there. I bought slightly inland in brick.
p.s. 13 years .. your still a benny
vin c
2:37 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Well said, rick
Full Timer
3:28 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
It appears that there are no comments for or against the idea of a Referendum Vote, which indicates that people may be afraid that the democratic process will yield the result that they don't want. As it stands this may not need to go to petition for referendum. The early talk in legal circles is already hinting that the judge reviewing the appeal may order the Binding Referendum. We may not like the outcome, but at least we will know where the voters truly stand.
Beach_N8iv
4:48 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
You mean like the referendum on the parking scam? Why go to the trouble and expense when the politicians are just going to ignore the results?
blindbert
4:53 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
They billotti - motel mogul bloc voted down a bar referendum last august.
The parking referendum question was going to be only for D4. Sean insisted that it be for the entire town, but voted against it anyway.
KH was at rizzo's house for that special phone in appearance. Interesting how they included a phone in meet when they had just taken it away because Tooker took the time to call in from her vacation.
What a double standard that was??
Follow the donation money
The bloc thought that by making it townwide it would get out more votes against it. They were right on that one.
It is interesting that (the remains and replacement of the billotti bloc) this year the may want to know the voter sentiment but last year could not give a rats prat. Also "grima wormtongue" said that all taxpayers should have a say
Spooner
10:56 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
blindbert- the bar referendum was voted down in part: thanks to you's in D4 who were pushing for it...and Barrella's games he was playing with the BW. . .I think he called it negotiations...which gave Hennessy the excuse to vote against it. . .
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1257
Part Timer
3:37 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Beach_N8iv
Just curious, how far back do you go until you say someone is no longer a benny come lately?
Also keep this in mind because I know all you redneck locals forget... When the realestate boom started and all the BCL's starting buying second homes and sending you property value skyrocketing... that was ok for you...
There are not alot of locals that could afford PPB prices today so be happy that BCL's are still buying.
Beach_N8iv
4:53 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Born here. I don't care what you paid for your house, meaningless. What I do care about is how you BCLs move here and tell US what WE have to do to make you happy. I don't see why people who are trying to make a living, YEAR ROUND RESIDENTS who depend on the Summer to make a buck should be harmed by you BCLs who didn't notice a huge entertainment area when you bought your house. Don't like the town? LEAVE!
Full Timer
4:53 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Hi PT. Not all long-time residents likes the term bennie or benny, since many realize that they are the ones who ultimately support the town, be it spending on the boardwalk, in town, or, like yourself, purchasing a vacation home. If you have to be born at the shore, than I am also a "bennie", despite 50+ years in PPB as both a summer and year round resident. I certainly don't consider you a "bennie". You are my neighbor with an opposing viewpoint. FYI, in the 70s and 80s there was a home owned by locals on RT35 in Bay Head that hosted an annual "Goodbye Bennies" every Labor Day. It always irritated me.
Laura
6:15 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Redneck locals? Well don't you just think you're god's gift.
Laura Beeden
Is that good enough for you? Grew up in Bay Head, graduated from the Beach High School, live in the Boro. I also prefer animals to most people, especially preferable to those of your ilk.
Part Timer
10:03 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Read my post,
I am OK with the 2am closing but would like to see the parking plan stay....
What is so wrong with that???
Paul
3:39 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Rick, Agreed...I can't believe that some council members of this town is all right with have the "Jersey Shore" cast and their look a likes.... They are even worse than the original cast. You are so right, the council members in other towns would never tolerate what Point Pleasant Beach takes....hmmmmm..I wonder why?
Paul
3:59 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
(having)
Timmy
4:49 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Full timer - I don't know what legal circles you've been listening to but no judge is going to pit the residents vs residents in such a flammable topic. Let's recap, this ordinance was put in place to extract money from certain businesses and it was never about quality of life. After a lengthy and expensive legal process a judge will see what this governing body's intent was. Furthermore, no judge is going to let the people of the town dictate when businesses can stay open until. Let's face it, Vinny Barrella, Kris Tooker,Mike Corbally, and Bret Gordon have just cost this town millions of dollars and irreversible damage.
Full Timer
5:12 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Tim, I guess we will just have to wait for a decision on that to see if it happens. A judge interprets the law, and that statute is on the books, whether you agree or not. If you haven't noticed, this issue has residents pitted against each other already. Putting it to a vote would end the controversy over what the voters want. You are also preaching to the choir, most likely not having read my previous posts, as I am adamantly opposed to the 12AM Ordinance and believe that a majority of the voters also oppose it, which is the reason I am hoping for referendum. If not, I will live with the decision. As for my "legal circles" my information comes from a childhood friend who is now a county superior judge, and from a friend, a former Point Pleasant Beach resident and ex-council person, who is also in the legal profession and still has ties to our community. I respect their opinions and will tell you that their predictions up until now have been right on point.
blindbert
5:03 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Beach Native,
Are not the BW owner BCL's that came,, expanded and changed the business model??? It became a lot more like seaside since 1977!
Perhaps the non lined pocket residents feel that opposite!
blindbert
5:16 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
The gb should have the case heard in the Warren or Salem Vicinages!
So that it is as far away from influences
PPNB
7:25 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Does blindernie know where you are?
MoonDogie
7:46 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Ok PPNB- funniest line on the patch!
Nick Carraway
10:12 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
PPNB, that really is a great post!
PPNB
9:00 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
;) Indeed.
Timmy
6:00 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Full timer -I guess where are views differ is how the governing body got themselves in this position to begin with. Any judge should see that this bar closing ordinance was put in place for illegal purposes. Its intent was not to improve the quality of life but to extort money through another ordinance.
Full Timer
6:59 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Actually Tim, I pretty much agree that it had all the characteristics of a shakedown. We are closer on the issues than you think. Have a nice evening.
Spooner
10:23 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul- did you read the interview of Pat Storino on the 'patch'. I think he addresses a number of issues you bring up. . .and remember: him and his family live in the Beach!
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/midnight-closing-will-force-50-layoffs-at-jenkinson-s-says-storino
Nick Carraway
10:10 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Ms. Kelly, somewhere in all of these posts, you asked a question about the security in the BW bars and whether they're able to handle problems from start to finish. The BW bars, just like most other businesses, are private businesses. They don't have certain authorities which belong to the government. There is no BW jail, no BW court. The BW bars, or any other private business, do not have the right to imprison people or force them to pay fines, although, like other private citizens, they do have the right to sign a complaint against an offender with the local police department. The security the BW bars provides is to BW property, and the BW security works with the PPB police department to maintain safety and order. If you were walking down the street, and saw one guy beating the snot out of another guy, you have the right to call the police department and report it. BW security has those same rights. Think about what mall cops can do. If you think that it would be best for our town to allow BW security to assume full responsibility for the safety of the entire BW, then I encourage you to reach out to the Chief of police to see if that's something that can be done.
Cathy Kelly
11:06 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Nick,once again I will respond to your ridiculous post....I am fully aware that there is no BW jail.....The bottom line is,the security in the bars remove the problem inside the bars and put it on the Boardwalk which than becomes the towns problem which means the residents are paying for the resources being used...I know that the residents call the Police,the businesses in town call the Police so I am going to ask for a breakdown of where the most calls are coming from...Do you have a problem with that Nick? The BW has won the battle so they have the ball in their hands,they can make a donation to the Police Endowment fund and help cover the cost that is now being paid for by the residents,,,I am anxiously waiting to see if they are going to be good neighbors and show the residents that it was all the councils fault and they are going to do the right thing.....
Paul
9:45 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Nick, Agreed, It can't be left all on the BW, they do not have the authority. They should be working together like you said....If they can't get it under control then it is up to the town to do something about it....Every time the town tries to do something the BW threatens with a lawsuit. They do not want to work with the town either and no matter what a few bloggers say on here say. Many residents see it that way. Now, the Town can't tell the BW how to run their business. Who they are marketing to? But...They do have a responsibility to both the residents and tourist by taking precautions that the BW is a safe atmosphere for all. I do not know what mall cops can do, but I do know, when the Mall had a few fights, the town had the authority to close it down to keep everyone safe, and they did. Yes, they reopened the next day...the point is the town has the authority to close a place down if they deem it unsafe. The BW would never agree to assume full responsibility if they admitted they will not even open a parking lot they own for their late night customers. Why is that? Because they do not want the responsibility either. They would get sued if something happen. Their insurance would sky rocket. They already made it clear they do not want to pay anymore money. They would rather the town take responsibility and get sued. More money is taken from budget every year to pay for extra police needed for the BW area. I hear a lot of excuses on why? The BW does not want to pay.
Nick Carraway
10:14 pm on Monday, July 2, 2012
Blindbert, you know, a while ago, I asked you what it is that you actually do like about PPB. I don't think that you ever told me. Maybe if you could tell us what you do like about the town, we'd be able to figure out what exactly you're looking for.
blindbert
5:11 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
I responded to that last week or two ago. I guess you are too busy with your mutlpatching disorder to remember? Look it up
Rosario G.
1:03 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
I am not from your community nor would I want to be. I can't believe some of the comments that I am reading. Huge amount of egos and ignorance. The residents should be grateful for the "Benny's: who spend money in your town. The incredible amount of disrespect and mistreatment you show Part-time and Full-time residents that bought homes in the town. They might not be originally from the community but they are paying for your schools, your children, and town employees, from the sound of things they do not even use that many services. It is a slap in face the way they are being treated. To say they have no rights to speak, demand changes if it is effecting their quality of life is ridiculous. If someone is screaming early hours of the morning, peeing on their laws, fighting on or around these residents lawn, something should be done. It is unacceptable, if you have any council members or other residents who can't see that for their own selfish reasons. Something very wrong is going on in your town. Yes, the entertainment boardwalk was there. I am sure from year to year the crowd changes. They can't help the behavior of their customers, but it is their responsibility to control the crowd they bring and allow to stay in their place. Also, the amount of alcohol they serve. They need to put themselves in the residents shoes, I am sure they would not want the disturbance for their family and themselves that the residents have to put up with.
just the truth
7:21 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Cathy Kelly - don't hold your breath. Do you honestly think the boardwalk will just forget what the bloc has put them through over the past three months and say "ok here's the money you tried to extort" ? This thing will be tied up forever in court along with the parking plan.
Paul
10:03 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
If they wanted to be good neighbors to the residents surrounding the BW area, Yes they would. They don't, so they will make excuses and do anything to divert attention away from the problems and discredit anyone that will try. Please, don't tell me I am for the Mayor, or the Fab four. As many know, this has been going on for years. Comments that are made on here blame the council, Mayor is playing politics. Yes, they all are...Not just the Fab four that some on here complain about...You vote them out and you will get 4 more Fab four that the BW and special interest groups who play politics will want to get rid of them too. Like a few have said on here, All sides are playing politics. If anyone on here claims that is not happening then they are just fooling themselves. Try telling the residents when you are all campaigning. Try blaming it on the Mayor and Fab 4. They just might shoo you away. They no it is more than them that is causing all the problems.
MoonDogie
2:27 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
CK , I believe the best response to your suggestion was already given, "please, sir, may I have another?". Extortion and inexcusable treatment does not bode well for the possibility of a donation.
Residents First
7:36 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
To CK, BB, PT and all the rest of the BW haters led by Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally: you lost. You lost the bar closing battle and you are going to lose the parking plan battle. And you lost, not because of any dirty deals, but because you were wrong. You were sold a bill of goods by a double talking Brooklyn lawyer named Barrella. Tourists can be managed successfully, but not by exaggerating legitimate resident concerns for political purposes. Fighting does not work, cooperation for mutual benefit works.
Unfortunately the Brooklyn born lawyer that is your leader has never learned how to cooperate. He dragged PPB into battle, not because he wanted to help residents, but for his own selfish political purposes, and now the residents suffer. If you and he had put the RESIDENTYS FIRST you would have tried to work with the Boardwalk. You can’t expect the BW to give the bully the money it tried to extort. You can expect donations to organizations with no connection to Barrella-----and no---the Endowment fund is not one of them. Why, because the members: Mayor Vincent Barrella, President, Councilman Tim Lurie, Councilwoman Kristine Tooker, William Reilly, Eileen Laterza, Vice President, Sharon Cadalzo, Secretary, Paul Struncius, Christine Riehl, Treasurer (non-voting member). Unfortunately by the posts above it appears you want to continue a fight that is over. Good luck with that. My job here is done. Enjoy the summer everybody!
blindbert
7:45 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
You will just be posting under a new alias!
Part Timer
8:31 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
And that is YOUR opinion....
What is so wrong with the parking plan?
Part Timer
8:35 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Love how you label everyone a BW Hater...Why...
Beach_N8iv
9:00 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Other than the voters (the REAL residents) said NO? Why nothing.
PPNB
9:02 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
;) Indeed.
Ray Criptkie
1:52 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Part timer there is alot wrong with the parking plan. Mostly it is a huge pain in the ...! Try having teenagers that want sleep overs with other teens from town but not in Dist 4, total pain trying to arrange parking for them all!
blindbert
9:01 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Full timer,
Remember that the Motel Mogul Bloc vote down the bar referendum last year!
Spooner
10:02 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
blindbert- the bar referendum was voted down in part: thanks to you's in D4 who were pushing for it, with Corbally leading the charge...and then you had Barrella's games, that he was playing with the BW. . .I think he called it "negotiations"...which gave Hennessy the excuse to vote against it. . .
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1257
blindbert
9:05 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Full moon start today.I bet the bar crowd should be in rare form tonite!
Paul
10:17 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
I do not think so...It is hard when a holiday is during the week...unless they are down for a vacation week. It is going to be the weekend that is going to be busy, to come down for one day is hard when you have to go to work the next day. Unless it rains...then it will be a wash out.
PPNB
9:20 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
80K from BW, parking plan D4 stays, 2AM Bar close. BW employes outside directing patrons to town lot. No stacking drinks, ( if they are?) Extra restrooms at Arnold and boardwalk.Offer it, save face.
Bully Fighter
10:24 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
No Parking Plan. 80K to First Aid, Fire Company, Little League until bully politicians replaced and then money donated for specials and implement anything and everything else that works to protect the residents' and the BW's (and other businesses) investment in PPB. Face it-----the BW is not going to do anything to help as long as Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally sit on Council. If you were the BW, would you?
Paul
10:46 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF: You are wrong...Sour grapes=NO.....BW EXCUSES= YES!
Bully Fighter
10:50 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Keep trying Paul. No one is listening---but keep trying. You have 3 years to save Barrella-----but it is not enough
Paul
10:11 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Beach_N8iv, You are an arrogant SOB!
Bully Fighter
10:25 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
But right on. Paul is just a sour grapes Benny Come Lately who can't stand the fact that Barrella is such a screw up
Paul
10:51 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, SOUR GRAPES=NO. I Do not care about BARELLA and how many times you think he screwed up. BW=EXCUSES. BENNY COME LATELY=NO
Bully Fighter
11:08 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul---That was not even a good try. Bw does not need excuses. BW offered 8000K and Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally made up an excuse for not taking it. Residents lose because of politicians playing politics. And I know you want to chirp the Barrella nonsense about "no mechanism." Mechanism was simple. Ordinances withdrawn. Money shows great, money no show, ordinances get passed. Tell me, how does the BW insure that if they pay, the Council won't turn around and pass the ordinances anyway? How would they get the money back or force the Council to withdraw the ordinances? Never thought of that, did you?
Paul
4:15 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, Simply put everything in Writing. They have enough lawyers. This has nothing to do with chirping the Barrella nonsense. This is about being a good neighbor to the residents surrounding their businesses.
Beach_N8iv
4:45 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Yeah, I suppose I am, ESPECIALLY when dealing with the BENNY come lately crowd. You aren't even the first person to point that out today.
Bully Fighter
5:02 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul. Find a lawyer friend who you can trust and ask him if a municipality can sign an enforceable agreement to not pass legislation? They can not, because if they could, then whenever the majority party was to change the last act of the outgoing party would be to sign an agreement agreeing not to pass whatever legislation the new group was touting. For example I'm sure no one, me included, would have thought it ok for the outgoing council in 2010 to sign an agreement preventing the new council from repealing the hotel/motel tax. You see the problem, Paul, don't you?
Fact Checker
10:13 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Fact: what Council voted against last year was a non binding referendum proposed for political purposes (Barrella wanted his political opponents to vote against it)
Fact: the binding referendum Full Timer is talking about can only be put on the Ballot by a petition signed by 15% of the voters in the last election for General Assembly
Fact: Binding referendums prevent Council from doing anything different for a period of five years, and also prohibits another referendum during the five year period referendum
Fact: Blindbert and the other Barrella supporters do not know this because their leader, Barrella, did not tell them this
Fact: Barrella did not tell his supporters this because he feared the voters would keep the bars open, or he wanted to take credit for the bar closings
Spooner
10:14 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Full Timer- I wouldn't just be calling it a slam dunk bar win...remember the Director just issued a stay to the town's Ordinance pending the Finding of Facts by the Court. . .then I believe that decision by the Director can be appealed to Appellate and Supreme Courts. . .and looking at Barrella's past actions(recall petitions). . .it's not beyond the realm of it happening. The law as written is on the town's side. But that presupposes no change in the Council bloc makeup in November?
Bully Fighter
10:18 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Sorry Spooner but you do not know what you are talking about. The law says that the Director can void the ordinance if it was passed for an "improper purpose." Based on the on the record comments of the Council, particularly Gordon, Full Timer is correct-slam dunk before the Director, the Appellate Division and the Supreme Court
Spooner
10:37 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Bull Fighter- the "improper purpose" as you phrase it, as yet to be adjudicated. . .and I don't know what I'm talking about. . .Did you read the Directors Order. . .because that's what it said. . .so I guess he doesn't know what he's talking about either? When Martells Sea Breeze in 1992 looked to move their license...that case was appealed to Appellate Court which over ruled the town and the ABC.
Bully Fighter
10:46 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Spooner. Yes I read the Order, and yes, the "improper purpose" has yet to be adjudicated, but I assume you have heard (if you went to Council meetings as I do) or read in the paper. Gordon's comments. He admitted to the improper purpose. So although it has not been adjudicated it seems clear the improper purpose will be established and the Town will lose. And I know it will go to Appelate Division and Supreme Court, but they will also be able to read what Gordon said. I think we agree on the process to come. I think we disagree on the certainity of the town's defeat.
Spooner
2:59 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF- what's interesting...at April 17, 2012 meeting...five of them on Council, including Gordon and Tooker voted to defeat Ordinance 2012-13(Early Bar Closing) Wonder how their going to explain that vote to the Director. . .talk about dysfunctional!...
Page 1
ORDINANCE 2012-13
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOROUGH OF POINT PLEASANT BEACH,
COUNTY OF OCEAN AND STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AMENDING AND
SUPPLEMENTING CHAPTER IV, ENTITLED “ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE
CONTROL,” ADDRESSING HOURS OF OPERATION
Motion by Councilman Lurie to defeat Ordinance 2012-13 was seconded by Councilman Reid and carried by roll call vote.
VOTE: Council Members Tooker, Gordon, Mayer, Lurie, Reid….YEA
Councilman Corbally….NAY
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1385
Part Timer
11:22 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Who is this Bully Fighter RedNeck.........
Bully Fighter
11:27 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Wouldn't you like to know?
Paul
11:30 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The part-time residents that bought real-estate in this town has more power than they think. Someone stated we make up 48%? Of the PPB community which pay to operate the town and schools. Let's show the non Benny's how much power we have by not supporting them. It might be well worth changing the status of which residential house we want to claim as full-time. It is to easy to sway and get "residential renters" to vote in the political battles in this community. They welcome those Benny's because most have no real investment. Once they use the schools, they move.
Part Timer
11:54 am on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
After hearing that the 2 BW bars had asked for combined 500 Parking passes it made me wonder.
1- Out of the hundreds of employees working up there on a daily bases, how many really live in PPB.
2-Do they own a home in PPB (curious if they are more concerned with there minimum wage salary then they are about there property value)
3- How many people on here are enjoying some kind of kick back in some way or another from the BW owners, Parking in the yard, Barter System etc...
before you go start posting that I am a BW hater let me confirm a few things AGAIN.
My wife and I bought near the BW because we love the excitement and enjoy watching people, the rides and yes, going to the bars...
I am in favor of keeping the parking plan after seeing what a change it has been on our street.
Bully Fighter
12:16 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
PT---you think you would have learned you lesson on hearsay with that bar on LBI your "cousin" told you about. 500 passees, huh? Where did you hear that? Was it Barrella or Tooker or Corbally or Gordon. If you can't cite a source, and you have been debunked time and time again, why keep posting? We are not interested in unsubstaniated nonsense
Part Timer
12:39 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, So i am supposed to just Bow to you in what ever you say....
It is funny how you never offer your source when quoting or bashing someone else...
Again, call the borough hall office and ask them.
Bully Fighter
12:49 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
PT---you don't have to Bow, althought that would be nice. What you do have to do is stop with the hearsay and cite sources. If there is a fact I've posted that you would like a cite to, just ask. There are no facts posted by me that do not have a source I can point to. You can't make that claim can you? How is your "cousin?"
Jane Reynolds
3:08 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
they can live in ppb, just not in "the people's republic D4" and only get one pass if they apply.........how many did the residents of D4 get?
Vin
12:05 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The Benny homeowners don't seem to realize that the behavior they dislike so much is being exhibited by Bennies coming down for the weekends/summer and that it is not acceptable to hobble the boardwalk business to correct the problem they're where the income is coming from. They are why people are coming here and they are why you decided to buy a home here. What we should be asking is why do we not have sufficent policing to handle the issue? They should be out there with the paddy wagon trucking these people off. If the township wants to complain they can not afford it then that is due to their own mismanagement of the township and that is where the problem really lies. If the problem is bad enough to really have people looking at these types of measures then they should be able to put the officers out there, take these people in and charge them. The expense should be able to be covered by the fines incurred. If it is not then perhaps it is time to raise the fines again. I will of course acknowledge there are some serious financial complications when you are talking about a town that needs so little policing most of the year but quite alot for 3 months. This means they have to use over time (which seriously drives up the expense) or part time officers. Perhaps they should be looking more into oppurtunites with the state police or surrounding towns for police summer rental as well.
Nick Carraway
12:11 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Ms. Kelly, you know, I had noticed that on two occasions, you had asked a question, about the bar security, and you wrote "I am being sincere when I ask this" and then wrote " Does the security in the bar handle it from start to finish or does it become the towns problem? It didn't seem to me that you had gotten an answer to that question, so I attempted to provide you with an answer. I cannot imagine why you thought my response was ridiculous, nor was I trying to be rude. I just tried to answer your question, and provide you with some nformation about what BW's security limitations are. They cannot handle things "from start to finish" if that means trying to punish someone for breaking the law. The PPB police have to do that. It seemed to me that maybe you were thinking about whether the BW could hire security to patrol the whole BW, rather than just inside the bars, and if that was an idea that you were considering, I was trying to give you my thoughts on it. It now seems that what you really want is for the BW to give that $800K to the town, regardless of how the people who were negotiating with the BW behaved. As of today, all of the bars in town are still potentially facing a midnight closing. The ABC put in the stay, but it's still got to evaluate the situation and make a decision, which means that, if the BW did what you're suggesting, they could pay that $800K and still end up with midnight closings. I don't think that's fair at all.
mailman
1:46 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Nick, Ive been too busy to post. You hit the nail on the head. Thank you.
Part Timer
2:21 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Mr Corbally, How many parking passes were given to Martells and Jenks employees?
randi
7:29 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The Barella administration is not capable of managing ANYTHING. They messed up the bar closings and the parking ban. Look at the money the wasted fixing the little league field that was not broken. I hear kids do not even play on it . They bought a parking lot that nobody wants to park in. Think they have proven we need a real recall this time !
Bully Fighter
5:07 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
PT---so it was Corbally. Should have known you were a Corbally supporter, with your aversion to facts and truth and your love affair with rumor and innuendo. So some questions for you and your boy:
Joseph Woolston Brick
5:28 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Here we go again! You wonder why the behavior at the boardwalk has been so bad? Again one of the cast of the Jersey Shore gets drunk off her ass, starts dancing in the middle of a busy street during the day and she goes to court and it's pleaded down to "not using a sidewalk" and a $106 fine. THIS is why the kids think they can get away with ANYTHING at the boardwalks. This is your problem, get tough bring these kids into reality and the behaviors will stop! Here read this, it will make you sick. http://www.tmz.com/2012/07/03/deena-cortese-disorderly-conduct-failing-to-use-the-sidewalk/
Paul
7:52 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Agreed, I would hardly call 25 a Kid....These are publicity stunts and they are all in on it. It is a show,, It just attracts more trouble.....It brings more in that enjoy this kind of entertainment....,Everyone makes money including the police. More OT for them... Who owns Seaside Beaches?
Paul
5:28 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, Do you have the facts? How many parking passes in total were given to Martells and Jenks employees? If at all possible, maybe you can answer this question. If you are saying the BW was so sincere in being good neighbors by helping pay for police needed for the past couple of years now. Especially being they acknowledge and admitted in writing that there is problems. The communications had broken down a few times now. Why does the BW and Town insist everything be done behind closed doors? Why not have the discussion out in the open, so we can all hear. This way it isn't the same results over and over again. The game of He said, She said.
Bully Fighter
6:23 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
The discussions break down because the politicians exaggerate the problems and demonize the boardwalk for political purposes. As soon as the bully politicians Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally are replaced---residents and business leaders will have this solved in a day. All it takes is mutual respect and cooperation---something these politicians can not do because of their campaigns
Paul
7:35 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, You avoided my questions, you really did not answer them. I asked, how many parking passes in total were given to Martell and Jenks employee's? You come off like you know a lot, so you should Know. This is why I asked the second question. So no one can play politics and accuse others of what really was said and happened? How come this happens behind closed doors. Why can't everything be said right in front of the residents, have an open council meeting. Let the residents hear it by all. Simply stop the closed door polices a. It is the same thing with police negotiations. I can understand some things, but a lot can be done up front. It is always done behind closed doors. Then the blame games begin. It would be a lot more believable if it was done in the open. You sound like you could be a local politician yourself, if not you work for the BW. You can get rid of politicians and you get 3 more new politicians doing the same thing, Again, Politics is being played everywhere. The town, BW, police and I am quite sure the schools as well. Residents and Business leaders? What residents? If that can be done, simply do it. Who do you suggest the residents vote in? Reid? He did not even read the budget? Openly admitted that, I don't think so. Caldoza? She sued the town, I do not think so. 3 other politicians that no one even knows. Not a lot to choose from.
Bully Fighter
7:43 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul-----your comments sound much like another poster who has been discredited. Some points:
Bully Fighter
7:46 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
1. I don't know the answer to yoour question.
2. I am not a politician or a BW employee, just a local
3. We need to replace Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon---Reid will be fine---he was not permitted to have any input in the budget by the Fab four
4. You get rid of fab four----it will get done in a day
Paul
8:22 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF-----your comments sound much like another poster too, who has been discredited a couple of times. Matter a fact all these posters sound similar because we are discussing the same topic. They all could be discredited depending what side you are taking. I am not taking anyone side. I am simply asking questions from what others are asking. I find that the council could be discredited, so can the Bw and so can some residents depending on their connection. If you are in the position to lose financial gain, I would be on here to trying to discredit who is going to take away my money, does it means it is right. Because they do not have to deal with or pay what the residents that live here do.. But that is an entirely different subject. Reid voted on the budget, he voted "No" admitting he did not read it in an open public meeting. He went against Councilmen Bill Mayer. By the way, is very knowledgable. Bill Mayer was our own town council for years. Reid went against them. Bill questioned him Why and Reid did not have an answer, he couldn't answer because he does not know what he is doing or talking about. Duh, I do not think so. As just a resident, I doubt you can say it will get done in a day, unless you are connected. Just by you saying let get rid of the Fab four has been said on many other postings with different names or maybe it just four different alias post. I was told same name can be used, no safety an impostor can easily write to make it look or blame who they want.
Spooner
9:37 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul- the Council meeting minutes don't support your allegations...other than Reid voting against the budget and making mention of using surplus to address the 64% increase in property taxes over the past 5 years. . .
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1385
Paul
8:32 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Bill Mayer was our town bond council for years, Reid went against him, Reid did not know what Bill was talking about, he was just shouting him down. By the way, I am not going to vote for someone who admits they did not read the budget, why would anyone vote for a councilmen who admitted they did not Read the budget. Then to disrespect his running mate Bill Mayer who is very knowledgeable about budgets. He can't explain himself properly. He can never answer you. When he does not know, he just goes off, starts to make no sense and changes the subject. It is bazar. Sorry, If I was voting, it would not be for Mr. Reid. If anyone does, then obviously they do not go to meetings, it is based on who they know, political and stupidity, the main reason we have problems to begin with.
Bully Fighter
8:54 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Why do you feel the need to make up stuff about Reid? I understand you are disappointed. Barrella misled you and acted like a jerk. But why not stick to the facts? Why try and pretend? Gut a cite to minute meetings substantiating your claims? Did not think so? But thanks for trying.
PS---what have you to say to the over 800 people who voted for Reid in Nov and the almost 500 who voted for him in June?
PPS---and I guess you don't go to the meetings in the winter because you are pretending to be not a full time resident---as one of your other posting names would say hahah
Nick Carraway
8:43 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul, I think you are completely mischaracterizing what goes on at Council meetings. Reid has not ever shouted down Mayer. I agree that Councilman Mayer knows alot of about the numbers, but he was on a committee with Barrella and Corbally, and that's a 2-1 situation. Mayer and Reid seem to have a very good working relationship, which is more than I can say for many of the other members of the Council. I'm guessing that, like me, you were completely appalled by Councilwoman Tooker publicly calling Councilman Mayer a liar.
Nick Carraway
8:47 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Randi, holy cow, I completely forgot about the Risden's parking lot. The town paid how much money to buy that parking lot, to make money off of the tourists parking near the boardwalk, and now the town is out to discourage tourists from coming to the BW. Doesn't make much sense to me. And, Barrella was Mayor when the town bought Risden's, so it's not like he can say that it happened before his time.
Paul
9:02 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
If Councilwomen Tooker did, then I am... I do not go to ever meeting, It is a ride for me to make every meeting. I was at the meeting when Reid shouted him down, not only did he do that, he waved his had at him, like to say stop. He was talking over Bill Mayer, Bill had to wait, then try to explain the budget to Reid. Reid was not listening, maybe that is his problem... he talks to much instead of listening. Mayer said right out, there was no other option, then this increase. Reid even suggested to Bill to take more out of the surplus and Mayer and Barrella both agreed not a good idea, this was all done right in front of me. I did not get it wrong. I am not saying they do not have a good working relationship. I am saying, Reid is out of his league, he does not understand the process. He makes wild remarks and does not know how to answer a simple question. He was the same way at the debate, just blurted out of turn. I purposely went to the meet the candidates, he really did not handle himself well. Like I said, if you see most of these posts, There is some bw employees to save their jobs, some residents who are also employees to save their jobs, some regular residents to save their town and some residents that just do not like one candidate or another for their own reasonings. I never took position on who I support. I just know if some just come on here over and over to attack the same, like Fab four, it could be personal, to get back at each other for one thing or another.
Paul
9:04 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
When did Councilwomen Tooker publicly call Bill Mayer a liar? Just curious, do you have proof of that?
Fact Checker
9:25 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/tooker-says-mayer-never-brought-her-a-boardwalk-offer
On Tuesday morning, after reading that Tooker said "he's lying," Mayer said, "I'm steaming. I am not a liar. I did not lie to Kris Tooker or anyone. If she misunderstood the conversation, that's one thing. But to call me a liar is over the line."
Paul
10:16 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Fact Checker, I think calling Mr. Bill Mayer a liar is harsh.. By the explanations from all of them it seems like a lot of misunderstandings of what was said by whom. But like I said, in my other comments to Bully Fighter, This just proves me right, you have all these council members, Gordon, Tooker, Bill Mayer, having discussions with the BW owners, and lawyers and Public relations Ms. Halvorsen. They all have a different understand of what happened and what was said? They are all recalling their own understanding which was different from each others. So basically they are all misunderstanding the conversation of what was said, offered and conditions. After reading this, What I am getting out of this, They are all contradicting each other. Like I said in other comments, It is a game of He said, She said, and this was before I even read this thanks to you. Not that I am saying I agree with all of it, but it surely seems that both sides were trying to come up with some type of offer, they're definitely were conditions on giving the money. It seemed like the BW wanted to give the money, the town to accept it instead of ordinances,,,,,this would not be considered a bribe? Did the ABC see this conversation of what expired between all parties? Not that I am saying I agree with the Ordinances, but no one is innocent here. They were all having discussions, Clearly they wanted to offer money in exchange for removal of ordinances and conditions did apply.
Bully Fighter
10:45 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Look, I understand you want to blame everybody because otherwise your heroes are to blame. And, unfortunately for you , that is the truth. Barrela Tooker Corbally and Gordon pandered to squeaky wheels and then were left with no choice but to try and please the squeaky wheels and they overplayed their hand to the detriment of all residents.
No misunderstandings. Only you wishing the facts were different and their was confusion because "You can't handle the truth."
Fact Checker
9:30 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Fact Checker found no minute meetings that reflect the allegations against Reid above.
Paul
9:55 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Fact Checker, I was at that meeting. You can twist it, turn it. I do not know if the girl was typing away. All I know he questioned the budget. He had a lot to say. Admitted he did not read the budget. His only advise was to pull it from the surplus. Bill Mayer was totally against doing this and so was Barrella. Maybe you need to look a little harder being you know were to get the information from. Don't play one way, it is not allegations, Everyone at that meeting could not believe what he was saying. They were also saying, I can't believe I am saying this, but Rizzo knows more than Reid. I did not say that, but other residents around me did.
Bully Fighter
10:17 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul----Good job trying to change the subject from the dismal job done by the Fab Four. But we believe the minutes, not your biased perceptions. Thanks for playing, but you lose again.
Spooner
10:03 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul, from the minutes: this is the only comment Reid made on the budget...
Councilman Reid: taxes have gone up 64% in 5 years – per Councilman Mayer, will probably increase next year – would like to use surplus to reduce the budget –
worried about the percentage of parking and court fines.
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1385
PPNB
10:28 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Does Sandy know that the other residents are saying that about Rizzo
Paul
10:33 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Spooner, I do not think this was the date of the same meeting I was at. Go back a few prior when they were discussing the budget. I know what I heard. Either you did not go back far enough or it was after. Of the day they passed the budget. Either way if someone wants to twist it. He publicly stated he did not read the budget. He was arguing about the budget. It was a lot more than those few lines. I do not remember the date...but it was said... Maybe someone else on here will see my comments and pull it from what was said by Mr. Reid.
Paul
10:46 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, I am not trying to do anything of the sort. You can play it like it is a political game like it is, You can twist and pull any information you want to give and conveniently leave out and only give the one meeting concerning the budget. There was several meetings on the budget. It is not biased or a perception, it is the truth. So something tells me you are Mr. Reid, family or friends of Mr. Reid. You are on here politicizing. I am actually trying to ask questions to find some truth. But I should have known that majority of the comments on here are different residents who are politicizing who are going to selectively spin. I can't imagine all the spinning and lies that are going to be told to get their candidate in. The real reason, why someone gets in that should not.
Bully Fighter
10:55 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Here is a link to the website for all the meeting minutes.
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/meetings_council.php
If you can't find the one you are referring too admit you did not witnesses this and admit you are merely repeating another lie from Barrela Tooker Corbally or Gordon. Which one of the Fab Four fed you this lie?
Nick Carraway
11:47 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
Paul, I find it funny that you describe Reid holding up his hand to Mayer. I've seen Gordon do the exact same thing, and I've also heard him talk over various Council members, including Mayer. As for the budget, if you're on the Finance Committee, isn't it your job to explain the budget to your fellow Council members to persuade them to vote yes? But, they knew that they didn't need Reid's vote on the budget. As for Reid, let me tell you, I wouldn't have to read that municipal budget (and, good luck trying to understand that budget if you get a copy of it. They do a nice job of playing "hide the expenses") to know that I was going to vote "no." Our taxes have gone up by...65%???..in the years since Barrella has been Mayor. And, it wouldn't have mattered what Reid suggested, how good the suggestion was, Barrella wouldn't have listened to it. Reid's position on the budget seems clear to me, especially since Reid was willing to accept the $800K from the BW (which would've helped our taxes), which Barrella & crew were not. Instead, they implement these ordinances. Now, if those ordinances hurt the BW businesses, so that BW is entitled to a tax reduction, I don't want to hear any nonsense from Barrella & crew that it's unfair for the BW to seek a tax reduction. And, that is going to hurt my wallet, too,
paul
12:03 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Nick? Good job playing "hide the expenses" To know that I was going to vote "NO" for the budget. So obviously you are a councilmen. Paul I never took a position on who I supported or continue to support. I was just answering to other comments that were being made. It is very difficult for me to get every council meeting. I wish they would televise the meetings. I never said Gordon didn't do the exact same thing. If you say you seen it or personally experienced this, I have no reason not to believe you. I am just sick of all the incredible spinning going on from all the different post when a resident has and opinion on something or what has been said. Just look at this council with all the dealings and misunderstandings that has been going on. Randi posted his opinions and I happen to agree, the only difference is they are ALL responsible for the mismanagement that is going on. Not just the FAB 4 and the Mayor that the multiple posters who are attacking one side only and trying to discredit the other. You do not think the residents who do not post but read these post are not going to see through that conspiracy theories that I am getting excused for. I am getting accused that I did not hear and see what I did. They want me to consider their side, I do not see a lot of proof from them. They are telling you to post facts and they don't. Listen, I might have worded it wrong about a council meeting. I was not trying to discredit anyone.
Paul
11:55 pm on Tuesday, July 3, 2012
BF, I am not going to go back and fourth with you! When I get a little time I will check the town's hard to read minutes. I will not admit that the Fab Four told me anything. Because they did not. I heard it myself at one of the meetings. I do not know if the what Point Pleasant procedure is. Do they take everything that is said, or do they delete and record some of what is said. It would not surprise me if they did. I am learning something new everyday about little Point Pleasant Beach. I can tell you this, Bill Mayer was a little puzzled at Reid, He even rolled his eyes at him. Reid waited for him to finish and was trying to explain to Reid. Realized Reid wasn't getting it. His puzzled look went to a smirk. Maybe this is when they had a break, and it was not on record, all I know they were going back and fourth a bit. Believe it, Don't Believe it. I do not care. It is what transpired, was it on record,,,I can't say for sure. Because they stop meeting, going behind the doors, come back out and they are all talking amongst each other. I can say that no of the councilmen told me, So please, stop being a bully and a fighter and spinner. Stop Blaming everyone else.
PPNB
1:11 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
I'm pretty sure that the boardwalk has their own person in there recording everything that is said.
the negotiator
2:27 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Paul:
#1) Admit you're a conspiracy theorist and knock off all the BS now.
#2) If you're going to post what YOU represent as FACTS, back it up with proof! Bully Fighter gave you the town website to do your homework. Knock it off with the lame excuse: "When I get a little time I will check the town's hard to read minutes." The meeting minutes are NOT hard to read unless you are illiterate! Put your money where your mouth is! $hit or get off the pot, ma'am. Spare us with your jibberish rambling BS rhetoric without the facts to back up your statements -- PROVE IT!
#3) "PAUL'S" WORDS: "I do not know if the what Point Pleasant procedure is. Do they take everything that is said, or do they delete and record some of what is said. It would not surprise me if they did."
Paul: Are you calling Maryann Ellsworth a LIAR too? Maryann is one of the most honest and trustworthy characters in that room during the Council Meetings. She prepares the minutes based on the tape recorded proceedings. Are you actually suggesting that she would add or omit pertinent facts? If yes, please revert back to #1 -- you are a conspiracy theorist.
#4) What qualifications do you hold to classify yourself as a body language expert. "Talk to the hand" gestures and interpretations of "eye rolling" would be best left to Tanya Raiman (FOX News' Bill O'Reilly's body language expert -- you do NOT qualify for the position.)
#5) When in doubt -- just do your work & cite the minutes!
Part Timer
12:45 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
paul, stop with BF all he does is ask for your source but never comes up with his own numbers
PPNB
10:19 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Part timer. Is your house east or west of the Keeffer House? I drove down central avenue this morning. It Is a very nIce street.
Spooner
12:20 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Hey 'Part Timer'-I quoted right out of the 04/17/2012 minutes. . .how about back tracking - read it and paste what Reid said. . .I dare you! . . .or cut the BS. . .And why don't you respond to the 64% property tax increase. . .not to mention the nearly 14% increase your going to be getting next month. . .I know...the way you deal with all that . . .your one of those hypocrites...running down to the property assessor looking for your cut your taxes?
You'll are in denial. . .to the fact that the state and it's municipalities cannot continue to keep the govt machine costs growing... a situation unions and politicians created. . .This BW episode is nothing more than being symptomatic and a subterfuge...attempting to prop it up what cannot be sustained. . .
PS: since you use a moniker...even if you deny going to the assessor...we have no way of knowing the truth. . .Kind of a "catch 22"
pro tourism
10:22 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Happy 4th of July everyone. Everyone should try to get up to the boards tonight for the fireworks extravaganza. Thank you in advance to Jenkinsons for putting on the display. I hope everyone's quality of life is not effected by the booms from the fireworks.
pro tourism
10:29 am on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
I'll be sitting on my front porch have a Margarita watching the sun shine during the day and start up the grill around 3pm. Then we will all be partying till the break of dawn. Maybe I'll head up to Martells around 130am for a nightcap. Ooooh yeahhhh! !
paul
7:10 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
BF&Negotiator....No conspiracy theory....You knock off the BS!!! FACTS? REALLY...NO ONE ON HERE HAS TRUE FACTS!! SPINS,YES! I am not a Ma'am, I am a Sir.... Please, articles have been closed down do to incredible amount of inaccurate information being spread from all the different post. I do not need your persimmon of what I can and can't post, especially being everyone is guilty of the same, including the two of you. Now, I will tell you this, I heard what I did, I will say I did not word above comment correctly. Did not mean to accuse Ms. Ellsworth of any wrong doing. I should have stated, she possibly was not recording at that time. You see at the meeting I attended. I am almost sure they went in the back room. I find when that happens, nothing good comes out of it. I did go back and look at the minutes.. I am almost sure it was the 3/20/12 meeting. There was chaos and everyone seemed to be arguing and upset about something. Again, I do not know what happens behind closed doors, neither does any of you and your spins, unless you are telling me you are a councilmen. See Above comments, I think Nick might be by his comment. I was responding to Randi, that I agreed with his comments of all of the mismanaged and misinformed information, the difference between him and I is he thinks it is only the FAB 4 and the Mayor... I THINK IT IS ALL OF THEM. It had the 3/20 because Tom Highton supported the police then asked Reid... (continued) part. 1 of 2
Haha
5:37 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Yes. You are a conspiracy theorist. No one cares about you anymore, you, in all your various forms, have become irrelevant because you are Barrellized. How can it be Mayer, Reid and Lurie’s fault? They voted against Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally’s idiotic power grab.
PS---You ought to read Nick’s post again. What makes you think he is a councilman? This quote here: “As for Reid, let me tell you, I wouldn't have to read that municipal budget. . . to know that I was going to vote ‘no.’ ” Do you see all Nick said was what Reid was thinking, not what Nick was thinking. Too tough for you to process?
You see Reid’s trouble with the Budget, don’t you? The huge tax increase. Reid’s point was simple. “I am not voting for a huge tax increase. Go back, do better.” Barrella said, “We did the best we can.” So Reid voted no. Reid looking out for taxpayers. Barrella creating huge surplus now so tax increase in year he runs again is low. A trick Barrella learned from Dan Hennessey.
And if I am reading you correctly you now claim these things you think you saw and heard at a council meeting occurred “off the record.” How convenient. ” You do realize that what any of the Fab Four say about Stephen Reid is just spin, don’t you? And now you are repeating the hearsay spin. Despicable. And the reason you are irrelevant. But please keep posting. The damage you do your side with each post is truly priceless.
paul
7:41 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
2 of 2.... (it had to be the 3/20/12 council meeting) How can he vote "YES" on the police raises and "NO" on the budget, When it is the biggest item on the budget. This council meeting was confusion and chaos. Everyone was arguing. The Mayor was annoyed at Reid, he stated to Reid he had the opportunity to go look at the budget that Ms. Reihl and Councilmen worked on. The Mayor said, Reid,,, you could have made suggestions prior at the work shop budget and did not. Taking the surplus was not an option, Councilmen Agreed and said we were lucky we had the surplus sitting there waiting for us for this budget other wise we would even be in worse shape. When I was skimming through some of these minutes, on the 3/20/12 I seen Mayor Barella stating, Reid, you have an obligation to "LOOK" at the BUDGET. Here we go with the FOX NEWS CRAP, just more "SPINNING" As far as jesters,,,, it is so obvious, No need to be an expert. You would have to be an idiot not to see! I am guessing some was not recorded because they just got back from their back door pow wow. They have done this before, go in the back and come back in and start arguing right in front of the residents like we are not there. It is possible that some of this was not recorded...because of all the mismanaged and misinformed information that they ALL are responsible and capable of. That is the difference between you&me! You both just want to continue to just blame some and everyone is innocent. WHO IS IN DENIAL? HAPPY 4TH
PPNB
8:55 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Dude.... chill
Spooner
12:07 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Paul- Reid & Lurie wanted a continuation of furloughs. . .this was their point in wanting to lower property tax increases . . .A point that will be realized in about a month or so when PPB municipal taxes will go up about 14%. The question everybody should be asking. . .is when Barrella stated at that meeting: "had $1.7M is surplus this year because of long-term planning in preparing 2011 budget)"...
Not knowing how much surplus was available in 2010...other than what Barrella said at 07/06/2010 meeting regarding the budget: "go up another 1.6 cents and put it away for a rainy day – looking to build surplus – more important to protect Point Pleasant Beach than to give false impression of low tax increase – agreed with spending cuts, advised cutting more – let's convince employees who realize it means jobs if we don’t fix this"...
So the Mayor was in agreement with the $265K appropriation for the Specials budget in 2010, which was $100K less than the 2009 appropriation of $365K? This led to the under manning of enforcement in 2011, since money appropriated in the prior year determines how many Specials are hired for the follow year. . .$265K in 2010 used in 2011 for enforcement at BW...
PS : you see all this. . .it could possibly be used against town in the BW bar closing appeal?
Josh Rockson
9:27 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
This is so funny.. This has no effect on ANY OF YOU and you all act like you care for a hot minute.. RELAX
paul
10:21 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Spooner, I am calling you out... I know many say they skip your comments,,,, But we know that is a lie.... They might not like them or agree...but you are pretty good at finding things..... If you are as honest as you say you're. Can you please post the minutes from the 3/20/12 meeting....I also would like to know if their was a reporter in the room when Point Pleasant Beach was going over the budget. Do you know if Ocean Star was there? If so...is there anyway you can get me the information.... Thank You!
Spooner
12:22 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
paul- cannot post minutes due to word limitation here, but will post link...
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1352
..also came across this. . .which is very interesting if you like to read 2012 PPB town budget...
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/documents/budget_2012.pdf
mattmurphy
6:23 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
What is with this "I am calling you out" nonsense! You sound like a kid wanting to fight! Give me a break! You said that you were at the 3/20/12 council meeting so why then are you asking Spooner to post the minutes of the meeting. Don't you remember what happened at the meeting, what media was there? Too much Sangria!
voice of reason
12:45 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
mattmurphy: Right on brother!
Paul (aka Mrs. M.) is blah, blah, blahing once again. Needs to go back to Europa for a nightcap after midnight.
paul
11:51 pm on Wednesday, July 4, 2012
Spooner, great...but can you post 3/20/12 minutes and the Ocean Star that did the coverage for the Pt. Pleasant Beach Budget!
the negotiator
12:59 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Paul: Spooner has already stated that he cannot post minutes due to a word limitation here on Patch. But, he has given you the link. Why can't YOU READ the minutes yourself -- pick out the part that YOU THINK makes your point (that's assuming you really even have a point) -- copy and paste -- and post them here yourself? Why is that so difficult that you need to ask Spooner to do it for you? You can do the same for the Ocean Star coverage that you're desperately seeking. Why ask others to do your work for you? You seem to have plenty of time to post on Patch all hours of the day and night, so surely you have the time to do the research to support your ramblings, no?
Spooner
1:54 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
negotiator- don't quite understand his point about Reid being chastised by Barrella for wanting to use surplus to keep tax increases down. If you read what I posted above. . .Barrella was on a roll to build up surplus. . .Take a look at the 2012 budget. . .he(FAB-4) used up about $1.2M of the $1.7 M accumulated surplus. They(Reid & Lurie) wanted to continue with furloughs, building up surplus and then using money to hold down property taxes. . .Take a look at sheet 3C. . .accumulated absentee liability. . .you see that number of $1,277,097. . .looks like an IOU those employees have a claim on the town for?
PPBCORUPTION
10:43 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Wow, Look at all the money that is needed for our Police in this very small town. It is not just salaries, look at all the baggage that comes with it all. Let me ask this, Who needs the police? Is it for the residents? Or is it for the largest BW Business, that draw and attracts them all in. We have some crying that we need more and more police because of the incredible amount of tourist that visit. If we have an incredible amount misbehaved tourist that come, then we even need more police. Where does this stop? You have residents shouting more police, more police... that the town can no longer afford to pay for, that the residents really don't want to pay because with this comes tax increases. Looking at this budget, 7 million needed to be raised by the tax paying residents. ( don't forget Jenkinsons BW Business, they're privately own beach and all their other properties pay 1.3 million) towards the towns budget the residents pay for all the rest. Who should be paying for the extra police? Police are going to promote that more police is needed. Most likely it does because they are the ones who has said that crime has gone up 28% from the prior years. That was quoted by the Chief himself. I read it recently, please don't ask me where? Trust me I read it. It does not stop there. The largest enterprise says they pay enough.They tell the resident and the town that we are lucky to have them because the town makes money off of them parking, (continued)
PPBCORUPTION
11:03 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Municipal lot parking, tickets,fines and court fees. We should be happy about this. Why? Because it is going to bring in more misbehaved visitors that are breaking laws and ordinances. Then you have police that are pressured in writing more tickets. Hopefully they realize that tickets should only be given to tourists and residents that break the law. Looking at this budget, I am not convinced that the police is paying for themselves with the tickets that are given. Parking is another problem, We have to many visitors and not enough parking. The largest enterprise owns more parking than the town..They open up there parking for a charge during the day and closes there parking at night for their bar patrons. They will not do this because it is to much of a liability and now they would have to be responsible, their insurance would go up tremendously from all the possible law suits from their drunken patrons. To wrap it up... We have a tourists town that can't fit all the visitors that want to come. We have the largest enterprise that advertises for all ages to come and have fun. Good tourist, Bad tourist, it does not matter. You are all welcomed....Not enough parking, most likely you are going to get tickets, fines, court fees that we promote in a way because that is what the town makes money on to pay for all the necessary police. To many with Agendas, Politicians who make deals to either get something or set them up for something down the road... The residents lose.
Spooner
11:33 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
PPBCorupt- you bring up the $7M+ budget raised through taxation. . .but just take a look on Sheet 11 down at the bottom. . .you see last years figure for 2011 of around $6,246,000. . .that was about $757,000 less. . .So taxable portion of the budget has increased over 12% from last year?
http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/documents/budget_2012.pdf
Haha
7:56 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Paul. A guess you're idea is that because Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon look so foolish for passing an ordinance that cannot be upheld because of their wrongdoing, you should try and make Mr. Reid look just as foolish.
May I point out that most residents find the Barrella tax increase unacceptable, so that all you are really doing is reminding us why we need Mr. Reid on Council. I think you look even more foolish than Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon. And that, my dear, is pretty difficult to do these days.
PPBCORUPTION
9:42 am on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Politicians and Public Servants working together to s c r e w the residents of this fine town.
Been here before
12:46 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
PPBC. Couple of important fact you failed to note:
1. Police budget is a little over 3 million. Parking and Court revenue is a little over four million. There are, I believe, 18 full time officers. Not at all too many, or too expensive, for a town our size. So no WOW.
2. The 18 full time officers are what the town’s residents need in the off season. The tourists are handled, as we have learned, primarily through specials. 10.00 an hour, no benefits. A complete bargain.
3. Although you may feel, I may feel, and we all may feel, the business should pay more for police protection, the law, as we have learned, does not allow municipalities to force business to pay extra for police services, unless the legislature in Trenton gives the municipality this power.
4. In fact we are in this mess because the stubborn Brooklyn lawyer, who was elected even though most did not vote for him, refused to accept that we cannot charge business for police protection unless Trenton says so. Trenton has said no to Barrella. Many say that is due to the BW influence in Trenton. Seems to me it is because of two things. A) it won’t work for all municipalities; b) Barrella’s lack of influence in Trenton.
5. Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon turned down the offered donations; Mayer, Reid and Lurie voted to take the offered donations.
con't
PennyStocks
7:55 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
So how is it Sea Grit gets money for police from Parker House and it is not a donation.
Been here before
8:50 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
It is a donation
PennyStocks
9:08 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
wrong
Been here before
9:16 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Really, what is it, if it is not a donation?
PennyStocks
8:08 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
according to this mornings asbury park press its an ordinance
Been here before
12:46 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
6. Although we all agree our taxes are too high, it is not the tourists who cause these high taxes. PPB has the lowest tax rate of any similar municipality in Ocean County, many of whom have no tourists. Why are taxes lower than similar municipalities? Some of the reasons are: a) we 4 million a year from tourists; and b) almost 38% of the ratable value in town is commercial-------meaning business pay about 38% of the tax levy; residents pay about 62%.
7. The BW does not close lots because of liability; but because the neighbors in the condos on the North end asked them too. It is an attempt at being good neighbors.
8. The residents lost because of Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally’s arrogant misinformed power grab together with their obsession with pleasing the squeaky wheels that elected them and would not let them take the money that Mayer Lurie and Reid wanted to take.
9. “Politicans who make deaks to either get something or set them up for something down the road.” We have all heard these accusations before. I have never seen proof (because if there was proof the AG would investigate). Exactly who do you allege got what from whom, and where is the proof?
Mike Corbally
3:29 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Been here before, The accusations of pay to play are true, but that is a systemic problem with government with the ability of elected officials to appoint people to good paying, great benefits positions. The relationships may become clear as these cases play out. Show me where the governing body turned down a "donation"? How did you arrive at the $4M revenue number you tossed out there? The people of PPB should be nervous because wether you agree or not with this governing body, the people elected them. If the judges at the state or county level decide they can discriminate against one town over another because of a strong lobby, it will not matter who you elect moving forward. The law on these two specific items is on the towns side. It is not even debatable legally. These next few months will be very telling.
Been here before
4:17 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mr. Corbally: They are now many anti-pay-to-play laws. Are you saying the law was violated? Or are you saying you just don't like the perfectly legal way democrats, republicans, and independents hire people?
Donation---BW in writing 160K per year "no strings attached"
The 4 million is from the 2011 receipts. 3 million Parking, 1 million Court
No one is discriminating against PPB. PPB has not been given the power to impose local option taxes despite many requests. (Probably because so many other municipalities in New Jersey are in much worse shape financially) So when you tried to extort money the Director quite rightly called you on it. You could have closed the bars at 12, IF you had not tried to extort money (in essence imposing the taxes the legislature refused to allow you to impose). This is the "bad faith or illegitimate purpose" the director spoke about.
In short, what you did wrong is attempt to exercise powers the state legislature has, when you are a municipality. People elected GB, but did not, and could not give the GB powers they did not have.
Been here before
4:18 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mike Corbally: (con't) Why is it you refuse to understand that there simply is no way, legally, to force bussinesses to pay for police protection, no matter how much you think they should or do not like their bussiness?
How about you post the Borough Attorney e-mail that goes with the BW lawyer's you sent to Cathy Kelly so the residents can have all the relevant information.
If I were you, I would expect the Local Government Ethics Board to be calling soon
PPBCORUPTION
6:25 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Been here before, Is that enough proof, it is a problem in government, it is not what you know, It is who you know. It is easy to connect the dots, it is happening in many places, so maybe the AG should investigate.
PennyStocks
7:57 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Would that be Christie's buddy who now holds that position?
voice of reason
12:54 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Penny: And so.....To the Victor goes the spoils...Surely you know how that works, right Penny? Your Barrella buddy has filled all the PPB boards and committees with "his 'chosen' people." One need not look any further than Barrella taking Bill Ammirata OFF the Planning Board so he could put his Independent Council Candidate Tom Davis ON the Planning Board...And so....To the Victor Goes the Spoils ! But that doesn't mean it's the right thing to do.
By the way, Penny....if you were Gov. Christie....Who would YOU have appointed to become Director of the ABC? Just Curious? Barrella or Corbally?
voice of reason
12:59 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Mike Corbally: Maybe it's time for you to go back to Monmouth Beach. It seems that you were more useful there than you are here in PPB....even if you did let the animals out of the pen. Difference is....you let the animals out of the pen here in PPB with your idiotic decisions...and it's not looking very likely that those animals are going to be re-corraled anytime soon! Hope you've enjoyed your last term on the PPB Council. Bye now.
Mr Curious
12:49 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Spooner,
That is unbelievable. How can they raise taxes like that in this economy? I see they are continuing to hire people like a new dispatcher and an assistant clerk. Don't we have a clerk that makes 110k a year?
MoonDogie
3:24 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mr. Curious, glad you mentioned the newly hired assistant clert. Seems she has close ties to a certain councilperson. Hmmmm…. what a co-incidence.
Anyone care to confirm or deny, please do!
Cathy Kelly
6:35 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
been here,since you like to keep bringing my name into this, i have 1 request,Can you produce the document on here that states that the BW was making a donation with "no strings attached" You have said this more than once so can you show EVERYONE posting on here and reading these comments how we can find thedocument in writing stating this? Please don't give us excuses,show us the facts, it's quite simple really and many people will be enlightened once you show us the written document.....thyanks
Been here before
8:50 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
CK--it is in the letter sent on Thursday 5/10/2012. The letter is discussed here
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/a-letter-a-leak-and-another-boardwalk-episode-in-point-beach
But it was published in the May 12, 2012 Ocean Star. I don't have on-line access to the Ocean Star. Since you knew all this alreadey there must be more you want to say, so , if you can, please post the letter
voice of reason
1:08 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
People: The new Assistant Clerk is Janet Mutter. She is the sister-in-law of Kristine Tooker's boyfriend Eric Mutter. Tooker has been pushing for quite some time to hire an assistant helper for Maryann Ellsworth. Now isn't that just so cozy...that Tooker manages to hire a family member for the position that she fought so hard to create? OMG -- Talk about NEPOTISM !!! The FAB 4 are the biggest hypocrites going and the people are FINALLY catching on to their antics. Tooker is FINISHED, DONE, FINITO, GONE in 2013 !!!! Can't wait to see that day come !!!!!!!!!!!! One by one....OUT THEY GO!!!!!!
Mr. Happy
2:26 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
"Year by year man's liberties are trampled underfoot at the bidding of corporations and trusts, rights are invaded and law perverted. In all ages wherever a tyrant has shown himself he has always found some willing judge to clothe that tyranny in the robes of legality, and modern capitalism has proven no exception to the rule."
-Samuel Gompers wrote that in 1894. I guess things don't really change, do they?
Cathy Kelly
9:27 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
been here,the Ocean Star comes out on Fridays,here is the link to 5/11/12, i know you said it was the 12th but i can only look up the archives which was the 11th..
http://media.starnewsgroup.com/pdf/virtual_issues/2012/05.11.12.pdf
i don't see the letter anywhere...Are you expecting the readers to believe that with all of your firsthand knowledge of the situation that you cannot find a copy of the document that states it was a donation with no strings attached? C.mon,give people a little more credit....I cannot find the written document that states that but you,who supposedly has the facts should have no problem producing it....
Been here before
2:47 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Right Happy. Same nonsense Barrella spewed when the trial Court, Appellate Division, and New Jersey Supreme Court ruled against him last time. Every time a judge, or any lawyer for that matter, does not agree with Barrella, the NY lawyer's, spin he cries foul. Even though in this case the foul was by Barrella when he tried to impose the local option taxes the legislature told him he could not impose. Director correct, Barrella wrong. Just like before: Trial, Appellate, and Supreme Court right, Barrella wrong. Nice quote, just does not fit here, except for those still mired in Barrellavil.
MoonDogie
3:22 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Here's another interesting piece of infro from Barrellavil: those parking tickets that are being handed out cannot, I repeat CANNOT be paid without a COURT appearance! So, our unknowing tourists that traveled from NY, PA, or anywhere else that got tickets will have to return for a court appearance to pay that fine. Instead of printing flyers and postng signs, the "pro parking people" should have taken some time to read the fine print! And we thought it couldn't get worse!
Beach_N8iv
4:07 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Or if you have out of state plates just tear the ticket up and toss it on some squeaky wheel's lawn.
ppb1955
5:47 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Moon If you are correct Mike Corbally really jammed himself up this time. He was our ace councilman who hid the county letter that stated they were not in favor of the parking plan. And know the town has to deal with the parking ticket glitch. Will these councilmen be responsible for these devious actions.
Nick Carraway
5:16 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Geez, am I the only one who decided to spend 4th of July enjoying the weather, a BBQ and the fireworks? Paul, and anyone else who got confused, I am not a councilman (or councilwoman). I've never been on Council, nor do I have any intention of ever seeking to be on Council. I'm just a resident, husband, and dad. Paul, I'm not sure how my wording confused you, so let me try to be more clear...if I were on that Council, I wouldn't need to read the budget thoroughly to vote "no." I have gotten a copy of the municipal budget that was handed out to the public this year, and, in my opinion, they do a nice job of playing "hide the money." I don't know whether Council members get a more specific version, but if they do, that should be shared with the public. What stuck out to me was how much was put in surplus. I understand that, in a good economy, it might be nice for the town to build it's savings account, but too many people aren't getting raises, are losing their jobs and are having trouble paying their bills. Now is not the time to build the town's surplus on the backs of taxpayers. You seemed focused on Reid's failure to read the budget before he voted no. I'd like to know how thoroughly people like Tooker and Gordon read that budget before they voted "yes."
ppb1955
5:37 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mike Corbally is it true that there is a mandatory court appearance required if someone got a parking ticket in district 4 after midnight.
ppb1955
5:57 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mike Corbally you really are something else did you give Cathy Kelly the confidential email that was for the negotiations between the council and the boardwalk on the bar closing hours. No wonder you were dismissed from your cushy political patronage job in Monmouth Beach.
Been here before
8:57 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Yes, he did , he even admitted it. Local Government Eethics has no choice but to investigate after his public admission. This is copied from above:
"Mike Corbally
11:55 am on Saturday, June 30, 2012
I sent it to the Patch, The Ocean Star, and Ms. Kelly. . . ."
Mr. Happy
7:13 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
This is for the fair minded folks out there who read these blogs in the hope of getting some perspective. Consider this: The Director of the ABC that wrote about "bad faith and illegitimate purpose" is in fact a former (R) mayor that spoke at the PPB (R) club -and he was appointed by a (R) Governor who has direct ties to the (R) financial contributors ,the BW. It's a simple matter of connect the dots. Also, when you add the fact that Barrella led the exodus from the (R) party and then he and 2 council seats were won- by 3 would- be (R), you can get a pretty clear picture of where the anti- Barrella vitriolic posts were germinated.
As you can see, it's all about the (R)
Spooner
10:52 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Happy- not to bust your bubble. . .and I know you don't read Council minutes. . .but the simple fact is that your Council voted down Ordinance 2012-13... 5 to 1, including Gordon and Tooker. . . That was a big No No!. . .Now you go find out what that Ordinance was??
voice of reason
1:31 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Mr. Un-Happy: Nice try with the conspiracy theory spin once again. However, the sad truth for you, (but) the good news for all of us is that.....we the people aren't buying your political spin any longer. Go tell it on the mountain to the Romney campaign -- if you got a beef with the (R)'s. Meanwhile -- we the PPB common folks are so completely sickened by the Barrella BS shenanigans --that the (R)'s, the (D)'s, and the (I)'s have all begun a unified campaign to re-unite and rally against the FAB 4 in this order: (ABT) -- Anybody But Tooker, (ABC) -- Anybody But Corbally, (ABG) -- Anybody But Gordon, and MOST IMPORTANTLY......(ABB) -- ANYBODY BUT BARRELLA!!!!!!!!! Just you wait and see. We're coming for you Happy, and you ain't gonna be so happy with the outcomes!
PPNB
8:16 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Mister happy! great to see you!
Been here before
8:47 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Happy---what happened? Nobody responded to Barrella's "press confernece" fast enough to suit him so he dragged you out again?
Well, OK. so let's review:
1. Barrella ran on a platform of make the business pay for police.
2. He lobbied Trenton to give PPB this power he knew it did not have without Trenton’s permission---the power to impose these local option taxes.
3. The legislature said “No.”
4. Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally attempted to impose the taxes anyway
5. The DCA warned Barrella in writing that what he wanted to do was improper
6. Barrella attempted to impose the taxes anyway and got caught.
7. Because Barrella tried to extort the payments he could not impose the ABC director stayed the ordinance.
Now how is any of the this anybody’s fault except for Barrella Corbally Tooker and Gordon?
PennyStocks
9:10 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
BHB i thought fantasyland was in orlando
Been here before
9:19 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Penny---Disneyland is in Orlando. Fantasyland is where we find your view of Barrella.
MoonDogie
9:27 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Penny, what part of BHB's list of facts do you dispute? And please feel free to elaborate.
Been here before
10:00 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Thanks Moon---There won't be a response the Barrella group has developed an aversion to facts. I think we all know why.
Cathy Kelly
11:10 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
been here, did you find the offer in writing where the BW offered their donation with no strings attached? We are still waiting....
voice of reason
1:42 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Cathy Kelly: aka "Nasty Shrew": We've had enough of you too. Your words are meaningless, your email chain is a joke, you've disgraced your family, now just go away and spare PPB and yourself any more embarrassment! You backed the wrong horse in the political race -- we've all been duped at one time or another -- admit you made a huge mistake and be gone gracefully!
voice of reason
1:46 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Cathy Kelly: Did you ever consider that the offer you're seeking might just have been a verbal offer? Back in the day -- a "man's word" was just as good as a written contract.
Denise Di Stephan
10:19 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
PPBCoruption: I deleted 2 of your comments because I got a complaint from someone that you were saying they work for a particular company that they say they do not work for. Please do not respond to this here. Email me at denise.distephan@patch.com. Thank you.
Spooner
11:22 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Hey BHB- your going to love this from Barrella after he got the call from the Ocean Star after they received the BW Gasiorowski letter...
..."It is obvious that the letter was leaked either by, or at the direction of, Mr. Gasiorowski or from those associated with either Jenkinson's or Martell's with the expectation that it would prompt a story in tomorrow's edition.
..."These actions lead to an inescapable conclusion that his clients are committed to continuing their public relations war, rather than respecting the good faith of the governing body when it entrusted us to participate in discussions in the hope of reaching a global resolution," ...
...does that ring a bell(Leaking) . .and...we're seeing his "global solution". . .
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/a-letter-a-leak-and-another-boardwalk-episode-in-point-beach
Spooner
10:37 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
BHB- the BW offer of 800K over 5years became contingent by the town in the negotiations at the last minute. . . upon them dropping the parking lawsuit. . .So your right:160K per year "no strings attached". . .it was the town who added the "strings"
See Ron Gasiorowski letter to Mayor Barrella...
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/gas-letter#pdf-9896250
Cathy Kelly
10:48 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
produce the document where the BW was offering a donation with no strings attached....Not articles,the actual written document that was offered.....If it exists,it should not be that difficult to find...I myself cannot find it.....
PPBCORUPTION
10:59 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
Spooner, I am disagreeing with you on this one! This has been going on for a while. They had so many chances to make no string attached donation. This went on last year too, Winter, Spring and Summer came and went.... Then came a horrible summer the worse one in years according to the police. Then it started all over again this year. There was conditions to this donation. I would call it strings attached.
PPBCORUPTION
11:32 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
They can't, there isn't one.
Cathy Kelly
11:43 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
spooner,what's even funnier is that you cannot produce the written offer from the BW
voice of reason
1:46 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Cathy Kelly: Did you ever consider that the offer you're seeking might just have been a verbal offer? Back in the day -- a "man's word" was just as good as a written contract.
PPBCORUPTION
10:37 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
To all the Barrella haters, Liars,,,,@Been here before, Let the AG, your suggestion investigate all the current and former council members while they are at it ... they could easily be able to connect the dots and corruption going on in Point Pleasant Beach.
voice of reason
2:02 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
PPBCORRUPTION: Don't you worry...the AG is very aware of this situation and they ARE investigating. Trouble for you is....they are investigating the very folks that you are so desperately trying to defend. We shall see what the outcome brings in due time.
Just remember this: In 2004-2008...Then U.S. Attorney Chris Christie was the pit-bull prosecutor who brought down well over 50 corrupt politicians in NJ in a very short time span. (Just ask Kristine Tooker if her father's good buddy Daniel Van Pelt from Waretown, NJ (Ocean County) was one of Christie's political casualties???) U.S. Attorney Chris Christie was VERY good at his job. Mayor Barrella is NOT. I'll put my money on the Christie Administration getting to the bottom of this PPB Corruption once and for all. Then, we will hear the FINAL weaping, whining, and gnashing of teeth from the Barrella goons.
PPBCORUPTION
6:54 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Voice of Reason: I am not worrying...I was responding to Been here before, brought up bringing the AG in for an investigation. I agree and they should....Please don't stop there. They all should be investigated, including all the former councilmen and Mayors, go back and follow the politics that took place. I hope the Chris Christies Administration gets to the bottom of the Corruption once for all too. Watch what you wish for though...some of your friends just might go down too. You proved my point with the pay to play with jobs or for an exchange for something or political support. It is sickening and it is happening in many places, including in the Christie's political world. It is the way. It has been for a while. It just is more prevalent, greed has taken over, noticeable so much more today. So many are blatant with their moves, they do not care who knows. They think they are all above the law with their decisions. More pay attention, you can't pick up a paper without seeing the political casualties in all organizations, the shame of it, it is our leaders. Someone we should be able to look up to. Unfortunately we can't, they wonder why young adults do not have many to look up to.. Young Adults are more aware today, they realize and experience the politics of today at a very young age. It is a harsh lesson, but they know too. You are right and I agree about a Man's word and handshake was good at one time. Those days are over and even back then some lacked morals.
Been here before
11:20 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
PPC---if there has been all this corruption you claim, what has Barrella been doing about it for the last 4 plus years? He knows about it, but has not asked the AG to investigate? Why not? He starts so many loser lawsuits why not another? Could it be he knows that it is all BS he feeds his supporters who are just too dumb to know better? Of course you bought it, hook, line, and sinker. So much so that Ms. D had to delete two of your comments because they contained blatant falsehoods. Is she part of the conspiracy also?
Cathy Kelly
11:42 pm on Thursday, July 5, 2012
still waiting for the written offer
PPBCORUPTION
1:16 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Sure, The only reason why she deleted the comments was because you were the one who complained. So obvious you are one of the BS liars yourself getting away with your nonsense. Please it was absolutely the truth. She deleted because someone claimed they did not have the job......sure they did. Just another blatant falsehood in the neighborhood!
voice of reason
2:03 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Cathy Kelly: Did you ever consider that the offer you're seeking might just have been a verbal offer? Back in the day -- a "man's word" was just as good as a written contract.
Mike Corbally
10:56 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
The AG coming to Ocean County and Point Pleasant Beach would be welcomed by this taxpayer.
Been here before
7:10 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Barrella, and his supporters maybe the poorest losers we have ever seen. Nothing is ever their fault. They try and impose illegal option taxes, get caught, and now want to claim they lost because of political connections. Same thing Barrella claimed when the Courts disagreed with him on the recall. Seems Barrella's idea is the only fair contest is the one he wins. If he loses Barrella always beleives the game was rigged. Anybosy know of just one time when he lost and did not say the fix was in?
PPBCORUPTION
7:10 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Voice of reason, see my above comment to you... I agree that a "man's word" was just as good as a written contract, even now and then you would get someone who lacked morals. It is how you were brought up and the temptations as you grown and which path you take. In todays' world the lack of ethics and morals is more prevalent because of what society has become. It comes down to greed and I can't get enough of money, power and material world we live in. It is never enough. I do not even care about the parking plan or bar closings, I can't stand the politics, the cheaters, liars, those who steal. It seams to be everywhere and on all sides.. But as they all say....that's politics.
Been here before
7:20 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Good Morning Ms. Kelly. I see you and the rest of the Barrella spin machine is in full swing this morning. Looks like Barrella has woken up to the fact that the majority of residents are onto his game. But, good news, I found where I learned there had been an offer with no strings attached. Here is the link to the article and the information. I do not have a copy of the e-mail that is quoted by the Patch. Of course who knows, maybe you believe Ms. D is part of the conspiracy also.
http://pointpleasant.patch.com/articles/tooker-says-mayer-never-brought-her-a-boardwalk-offer
“Before the last council meeting on the 17th, we got word of another ordinance pertaining to early bar closings," Bassinder said. "Then we got a copy of the new ordinance, on Friday, April 13th. That's when I knew the offer was rejected.
"Martells and Jenk's were willing to make a yearly payment to the town with no strings attached to help cover costs with policing districts 3 and 4. We've always tried to be good neighbors and a positive influence in the community and will continue to do so," Bassinder wrote.
Mr Curious
8:11 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
I see the mayor held some kind of spin, I mean news conference yesterday and seems to have gotten himself in further legal trouble by making slanderous and libelous accusations towards Reid, Halfacre, and boardwalk officials. Barrella's clouded mind couldn't remember that his extortion like actions along with Gordon,Tooker, and Corbally are the reason the town is in this mess and all of them are facing ethics violations at the very least.
Joe
10:26 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
It is not considered slanderous when it is true.
Mr Curious
8:14 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Cathy Kelly - a written offer was submitted by the boardwalk attorney and was rejected by the fab four.
Mr. Happy
9:04 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Hi Been Here Before- You're kidding right? After Mr. Bassinder said he "knew the offer was rejected" he goes on to say they were going to make a "no strings attached offer." This is your proof? That's like Mr. Happy saying he would be playing for the Yankees...if he wasn't cut by his high school team. C'mon, wise up.
Been here before
9:18 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Mr. Happy--what did you think I was trying to prove? Ms. Kelley asked where was the writing that I refered to where the BW said they offered the money with no strings attached. It was in the e-mail quoted. Certainly those, such as yourself, who have been Barrellaized, will want to prtend the offer was not made, but we all know it was. In fact, Mr. Lurie made a motion the offer be accepted. Mayer. Lurie, and Reid voted yes. The fab four, pandering to the squeaky wheels, voted no. Now, because of their illegal power grab, the residents have no early bar closings and no money to help pay for specials.
MoonDogie
10:16 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
VOR,, thank you for the information on the new Assistant Clerk that was hired:
1:08 am on Friday, July 6
People: The new Assistant Clerk is Janet Mutter. She is the sister-in-law of Kristine Tooker's boyfriend Eric Mutter. Tooker has been pushing for quite some time to hire an assistant helper for Maryann Ellsworth. Now isn't that just so cozy...that Tooker manages to hire a family member for the position that she fought so hard to create? OMG -- Talk about NEPOTISM !!! The FAB 4 are the biggest hypocrites going and the people are FINALLY catching on to their antics. Tooker is FINISHED, DONE, FINITO, GONE in 2013 !!!! Can't wait to see that day come !!!!!!!!!!!! One by one....OUT THEY GO!!!!!!
MoonDogie
10:22 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Now, if we can just get Mike C, or one of his "in the know" counter parts to confirm (or deny) that there is a mandatory court appearance for people who received after midnight parking tickets in district 4. Calling Mike....calling Mike Corbally....hello?
Mike Corbally
10:52 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Yes, as of today. The timing of the ordinance prevented it from being put on the payable list. We are trying to speed up the process. For the record, the ordinance was properly written. Everyone that makes accusations that errors were made is wrong. Of course, if you are one of the people that your adult child FORGOT to put the tag up, I would understand your frustration. Been there!
MoonDogie
11:23 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Thank you for your response Mike. And no one in my family has gotten a ticket. My concerns are with the over burdened court schedule this may cause as well as the inconvenience of having to take a day off of work to pay the fine. Hey, if you ignore laws, you deserve a ticket, but it seems like extreme punishment for a parking ticket. I'll be interested to see if the problem is fixed. And if it is, will the current ticket holders still have a court appearance?
Full Timer
11:43 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
Hi Mike,
Won't this tie up the PPB court system with more work, possibly requiring overtime, which will cost us money as well as inconveniencing those visitors who get the tickets? Can you just see the headline" Town Requires Court Appearance For Parking Ticket"? Court appearances are not mandatory for many misdemeanor moving violations if you plead guilty. Although I am "on the fence" about the Ordinance, I am certainly not in favor of a court appearance. This should have been planned out before enforcement began. In an act of "Civil Disobedience" (Thanks Henry David Thoreau) I may just leave my tag off and park on the street this weekend and challenge the mandatory appearance, in order to file a complaint with the NJ DMV and DOT. If they determine the court appearances were not required and the town overstepped it's authority in requiring them, could it be legally feasible that the borough could be asked to refund the violations? I will try to find the answer to that one.
Mike Corbally
11:59 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
NO!
Mike Corbally
11:58 am on Friday, July 6, 2012
I agree the court appearance should not be needed. This is unfortunately, one of the many government issues that should be able to be fixed quickly. We are trying. I was surprised that jay walking and other minor infractions are on the list, and some fines I would think a court appearance should be needed are not. That is not for me to judge though. The court has scheduled a night court session for these fines, but I've been told we may be able to accept payments with certain paperwork. I will give you more info as I get it.
Full Timer
12:58 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Thanks for your prompt reply Mike. Stay cool and enjoy the weekend.
blindbert
3:40 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
Go parking plan all you BW lovers with MPD (multi personality disorder)!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
blindbert
3:45 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
The parking plan is working. It works very well and "I am so glad, I'm glad, glad , glad!"
Jane Reynolds
5:11 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
take your meds
Joe
10:32 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
So do I, Love it, Love it, Love it..... So true about the ( BW multi personality disorder) Funny....Lets all call them BWMPD'S.
blindbert
5:48 pm on Friday, July 6, 2012
BW schill