patching...
Breaking: Obama and Christie to Visit Jersey Shore on Tuesday »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

UPDATED: Point Beach Votes for 1 a.m. Bar Closing Time

But that won't happen without boardwalk businesses agreeing

 

The Point Beach Mayor and Council voted narrowly on Tuesday night for bars to stop serving alcohol at 1 a.m.

However, that won't happen without agreement from boardwalk businesses which are appealing the council's May 15 vote to stop serving alcohol at midnight.

Ed McGlynn, an attorney representing Jenkinson's Boardwalk, said after the vote that he and other boardwalk business representatives have not yet decided if they will agree with a 1 a.m. closing and they will not be releasing any information Tuesday.

The vote is an offer of a "compromise," according to the mayor and councilmembers who voted in favor of the 1 a.m. closing time.

Councilmembers Michael Corbally, Bret Gordon, Kristine Tooker and Mayor Vincent Barrella (who broke a tie) voted for the 1 a.m. closing, with Councilmembers William Mayer, Tim Lurie and Stephen Reid voting no.

Like the recent ordinance adopted on May 15, calling for midnight closings, the vote taken Tuesday night also does not call for the town to accept payments from Jenkinson's and Martell's for police services.

Before the vote for the 1 a.m.closing time, there had been a failed vote to allow bars to stay open until 2 a.m., as they do now, and to take the payments offered by the two largest boardwalk businesses. Jenkinson's and Martell's had offered to pay $160,000 for five years, totalling to $800,000 to help pay for police services.

The vote to keep the bars open until 2 a.m., and to accept payments, was supported by Lurie, Mayer and Reid, with Tooker, Gordon and Corbally voting no, and the mayor voting no to break the tie.

Gordon said he was amazed that any of the council members were still considering taking payments from the boardwalk businesses after the boardwalk, in its appeal to ABC, accused the council of "extorting" money from them.

Reid said he still believes it was "extortion" for the council to tell the boardwalk to pay in order to stay open past midnight. However, he said he has always been in favor of negotiations to work out a solution and that he is still in favor of that.

When Jenkinson's and Martell's offered the $800,000, the mayor and some council members had said they could not accept that because there had been no agreement on creating a mechanism for how the town could enforce that those payments would be made and exactly which business would pay which percentage of that total amount.

The council and boardwalk businesses have been nudged by Michael Halfacre, Director of the state Division of Alcohol Beverage Control, which is responsible for making a decision on the appeal, to work together to come up with a compromise to help avert a midnight closing.

While Halfacre urged cooperation, he did not dictate that the town should accept the offer of $800,000 from Jenkinson's and Martell's. He just said the two parties should try to come up with a compromise.

If the boardwalk businesses do not agree, then the 1 a.m. closing will not go into effect and the matter will be transferred to the state Office of Administrative Law, which will schedule a hearing, Gertner said.

When asked after the meeting what the difference is between a 1 a.m. cut-off and the current 2 a.m. cut-off, Barrella said the council is trying to compromise at the request of Halfacre.

Barrella said that while the law, as acknowledged by ABC, clearly allows municipalities to regulate bars' hours of operation, there is no way to know how Halfacre will rule, so it was in the town's best interest to offer a compromise.

"Having the law on your side doesn't necessarily mean you're going to win," said Barrella, adding he was basing that comment partially on his own professional experience as a litigator. "You always have to take into account the hazards of litigation.

"If the director didn't ask for a compromise, you wouldn't have heard one," he added.

Thomas Davis, a Point Beach resident running as an Independent for one of two Borough Council seats in the November election, said during the meeting that he commends the councilmembers who voted for the 1 a.m. bar closing.

"I hope it leads to some positive changes," Davis said.

Frank Kineavy, owner of Frankie's Bar and Grill, told the council, as he has told them at previous meetings, "I am again proposing a fact-finding commission, made up of members of council, police, members of the bar business, and residents in District 4, to observe the problems that are in this neighborhood, see where the accountability is, figure out where the problems are and eliminate them.

"If there is a mess down there, I think we should all observe it and really help this town," he said. "We are being asked by the director of the ABC to logically solve a problem. I think if the bars all burned down tomorrow, there would (still) be problems on the boardwalk. I think if we can figure out how to eliiminate the problems, if you come up with the right management principles, I think that would improve the quality of life."

John Morongiello, Atlantic Avenue, asked if the decision is a resolution or an ordinance.

Gertner said, "It's a direction to me" to know how to proceed in further dialogue with ABC.

Gertner said if the offer is accepted by the boardwalk businesses, both parties would consent to a temporary "stay" of the ordinance mandating that alcohol not be served past midnight.

That would give the town time to prepare an amendment to the original ordinance, the "midnight" deadline would be changed to "1 a.m.," the amendment would be advertised, introduced at a council meeting and then adopted at a subsequent council meeting.

Related Topics: Alcohol, Bars, Closing, Point Beach, Point Pleasant Beach, Summer, Tourism, serving, and serving alcohol

joe tomato

9:21 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

What a circus act. So the fab four of Barrella Corbally Tooker Gordon just gave the bars back one more hour but will not take 160k a year for more police? Wtf are these morons doing.

Reply

steve

9:28 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Why? Just make it until 2. What difference is closing by 1 going to do? Really? Fighting back and fourth and dragging our town through the mud just so a compromise can be made. How is this helping the town in any way? This has been a ridiculous charade. Is the town going to get money for extra police to control the crowds?

Reply

joe tomato

9:36 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

No extra money steve. They said they didn't want the money. For one freakin hour they just cost every taxpayer 160k per year.

Reply
Comment_arrow

PPB2012

11:29 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I don't think people will mind going home at one...especially on any night except Saturday. But how does this solve any problems in town?

EPosner

9:52 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The reason they can't take the money because earlier in May it was decided that to take the money being offered from the bars would be unlawful. I'm sure the town would gladly have taken the money but they simply can't due to the laws created by the ABC. Something with the amount that was being offered exceeded 10%. I'll try to look for it.

Reply

Full Timer

9:58 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Most likely an attempt to side-track the an ABC Ruling that would have invalidated the 12AM Ordinance with the strategy that the Ordinance can no longer be overruled by the ABC since it is no longer in effect. Certainly shows a "buckle" in the armor of the Barella Camp. The legal question is will an decision by the ABC overruling the original 12AM Ordinance still apply to the new 1AM Ordinance or will the Boardwalk have to re-appeal? Is this really a "compromise" or an attempt by the Barella Camp to save face before the ABC ruling? Is the tide turning or is this simply justice prevailing in the good old USA?

Reply

Beach_N8iv

10:06 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Thread goes epic in 5, 4, 3 . . . .

Reply

MoonDoggie

10:10 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

I think there is some confusion....It's "Government of the people, by the people, for the people" NOT " By FOUR people ".

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I think you mean DISTRICT four people.

Joseph Woolston Brick

10:17 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Guess the Mayor found a Dolphin head in his bed!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jayne038

11:20 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

That is the funniest thing I have ever read on one of these threads....hilarious!!!!

Comment_arrow

paulie

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Now that is really funny!

joe tomato

10:27 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

It should be understood that before this vote to keep the bars open until 1am took place Lurie Reid and Mayer voted to keep the bars open until 2am and take the 160k a year for 5 years. That got voted down and then the fab four voted to keep the bars open until 1am for no money at all.

Reply

common sense

10:32 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

was parking part of the meeting

Reply

SavvyHairLoft

10:35 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

@JoeTomato amazing.....1hr more...and they couldn't take the 160k...either they are just utterly confused by the legal councils recommendation or just totally flustered...am i the only one who doesnt understand?? isnt this about getting more help for the police to keep the peace.?? so by them not taking the $$ and giving an extra hour?? this sounds more like its a personal grudge then "PPB Business"

Reply

Col Nathan R Jessup

11:04 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Well at this rate, the next council meeting these four bozos will vote to keep the bars open until 2am and pay them 100k to do so.

Reply

Spooner

11:12 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Hey Mayor: lifting the parking restrictions. . . or is there something that doesn't compute over there. . .What's the point of going to a 1 AM closing when bar patrons have to get off their stools and go move their cars to Silver Lake. . .and then for what... come back and drink for another half hour!

@PPB BusinessOwner: this is all about 200-300 residents...which includes the Mayor, Councilman Corbally & Tooker. . .all living in District 4...that want to run the town. . .

Reply

PPB2012

11:18 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Yep. They and residents like Dave C. are so bad for the town. This just creates more problems with people moving around at all hours. If its not the bars its that there are too many cops or town workers. If not that its the Canadian geese excrement. If not that then its the weeds at the lakes....point beach is home to those who complain yet do nothing about it.

Reply

Jerseygirl

11:20 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Well seaside is very excited there drooling over the $$$$ they will be making off of some hard headed politicians trying to destroy the fun in this town. Now the newspapers and media beews channel are making sure families and young people to think about someplace else. sSeaside is welcoming this 12 am closing

Reply

PPB2012

11:23 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

Well the residents would love if everyone went there instead. But that will never happen.

Reply
Comment_arrow

ShoreThing

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

You will love it right up til you get your new tax bill! your taxes are mighty low for a seaside town!! Why do you think that is? I love all the Benny go home crap.... when the bennies leave and take their money elsewhere whats going to happen? your home valueswill plummet and your taxes will skyrocket! Enjoy the peace and quiet, if the rule passes cause it will get quieter each year as people have to sell there homes because they cant pay their real estate taxes.

PPB2012

11:33 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

But they will expect Jenks or martells to fix the little league fields.

Reply

Hippocratic Oath

11:49 pm on Tuesday, June 26, 2012

The Hippocratic Oath is an oath historically taken by physicians to practice medicine ETHICALLY and HONESTLY.

In short it states: "I will prescribe regimens for the good of my patients according to my ability and my judgment and never do harm to anyone...I will give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such counsel..."

A Hippocratic Oath is also needed for the lying, cheating, stealing, self-serving politicians too. This Barrella, Tooker, Gordon, Corbally group had the nerve to criticize the former Council for their decision on the Hotel/Motel Tax reduction. As Forrest Gump once said, "Stupid is as stupid does." I'll take Cervino, Rizzo, Dyer, and Hennessey any day over this group of misfit clowns. Tooker and Corbally (2013), Gordon (2014), and Barrella (2015) will be filed into the political waste basket -- one by one -- in that order.

Reply
Comment_arrow

steve

12:09 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

No Way, The former councilmen were no better. Unfortunately not all doctors, lawyers, teachers, politicians, etc.... follow the Hippocratic Oath. There was no honesty or ethics in the former councilmen you mention either. They had no problem lying, cheating, stealing, self-serving It was not just the Hotel/Motel Tax reduction they were selling their soul for. If they continued with their nonsense there was a good chance or possibility we would have been swallowed up by Point Pleasant and Brick.

Comment_arrow

Been here before

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The difference is that Hennessey/Dyer were feeding tea party squeaky wheels who thought the right thing to do was cut expenses to cut taxes---tea party crap that works in big bureaucracies but is useless in PPB. But Barrella Tooker Gordon and Corbally know just what they are doing---------feeding the squeaky wheel BW haters for the sole purpose of political power

Chief Wahoo

12:27 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

if the bars hold on a few more weeks , they will be open until 4AM and Barella will be paying them.......what a clown !

Reply

bayboat

9:31 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Turning down 800k was a bonehead move. You can pay alot of specials with that.
The council looks like chickens with their heads cut off.
This should be a ballot question.

Reply

jonnyyayas

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I specifically said Santiago was not to be touched!

Reply

craig

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Glad I don't live in Point Beach.You have bigger problems than Bars.What was once a lovely little town is now controlled by greed and selfisness from all sides. I moved out in the 80's but remain close by. So sad to see the type crowd that now inhabits the BW.The off season motel patrons were th beginnig of the end for Seaside(criminals, pedefiles,section 8,ect,)and Beach is already there. Beach is a scary place in winter and there's nothing that can be done about it with train station and an abundence of sleazy motels in town.On the plus side the downtown is quite nice.Too bad they are caught up in this mess along with many long time residents that have watched the BW area decline.I do hope the tide turns.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Opinionated

9:47 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hey, at least the county will have more places to put their social cases. Perhaps they will have enough room to place those in Lakewood's Tent City also.

Comment_arrow

Full Timer

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Sad but true. The beach bungalow area is starting to resemble a small "barrio" in the winter and crime in the off-season is up. These are two problems that nobody focuses on. If it were not for my daughters , now college age, who still love PPB in the summer, I too would consider leaving. The "boardwalk issues" are just one of many that need to be considered.

TJ

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

It is amazing....... Councilman Reid is a typical politician. Talking out of two sides of his mouth. He claims taking money from the boardwalk is considered "extortion" then votes to take the money. Councilmen Mayer and Lurie also voted to still take money from the Boardwalk, yet smart enough to say nothing.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Central avenue

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Putting in an ordinance that requires them to pay to stay open is extortion. Same as putting a gun to thier heads. The BW came back willing to NEGOTIATE- that's how civilized people do things. Big difference. Yes, they should take the money that is NEGOTIATED rather than forced.

pt beach resident

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

how do we stop the littering? why do i never see anyone get tickets for throwing their trash on the curb and in our yards? i live in district 4 and it's getting out of control. i know this has nothing to do with the bars closing an hour later but i needed to know if other people are getting aggrevated about the garbage that is all over the place.

Reply

TJ

9:32 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

This situation just gets worse as it goes on. Does anyone comprehend just what happened? 1) We have councilmen calling it an "extortion" to take the money then voted to take money from the boardwalk. 2) We have the boardwalk that based its appealed to the ABC that it was an "extortion" attempt.....Yeah...they are really sincere and wanted to work with the town in helping them with the extra cost for extra police needed to control the crowds that are their customers. I don't think so...3) You have a resident John Morongiello questioning, is the decision a resolution or an ordinance? I would say both John.... It became an ordinance first. The ordinance went through. It became a resolution when director Halfacre did not want to do his job. He ordered them to go back to the table and compromise. There are procedures that have to be follow. 4) Director Halfacre did not do his job by letting the town set their own hours that they are legally able to do. 5) How can Frank Kineavy suggestion work? Get a Fact finder. Really? Fact finding is a bunch a bull....Getting all sides together.......The council, businesses, police, D4 residents? How come only D4 residents? The other district residents don't count . All decisions made affect the whole town, not just only one district. His own bar business is not even in D4... isn't this ordinance affecting him, yet he wants to shut out all residents but D4. What do you think they all have been doing in getting to this point?

Reply
Comment_arrow

mailman

9:47 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

They have been steaming ahead with ill measures and ignoring the requests of the majority of PPB residents. If they possibly took a step out of their homes at night to really assess the issues, they may see that it takes more than going after 2 BW businesses with a slew of poorly thought-out ordinances. They do not want to see the truth, and you seem to agree. They gave up $800k for a 45 minute earlier last call. Please explain that for everyone. . .

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

His bar is effected by these laws, the bar closings must be for the entire town, not just the bars in district 4. And according to the town this also effects all the BYOB restaurants in town as well!

Comment_arrow

TJ

3:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

What is your point? All bars is effected by these bar closings.

Opinionated

9:40 am on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

PPB seems to be a town in decline unless something is done. Their reputation will keep many of us away until they clean up their act. You tried to recall this circus act and failed. You really need to try again if you all truly cared about your town and its reputation. Right now, you are dependent on tourism so it does matter what outsiders think. Hopefully you will all wake up before your "problem children" bankrupt your town. I'm sure if that happened the "leaders" will blame on the "overpaid" public employees, their unions, and their pensions. I hate to see bad happen to your town because you seem to have good people there. Just remember this: Bad things happen when good people do nothing to stop them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Beach_N8iv

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

What would you suggest? We voted against the parking scam and the Mayor and Council of District 4 ignored us. "Oh those silly voters, they don't know what's good for them or what they really want. We'll fix it for them."
Voting the offenders out of office takes time and an educated electorate. In case you haven't noticed, we have neither.

Comment_arrow

Been here before

3:13 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The right answer is too remove the bad politicans. First step is Reid and Cortes win in November 2012. Tooker and Corbally need to get dumped in 2013. Then Barrella will no longer control the Council. Then replace Gordon in 2014 with someone who knows something ablout the town he wants to lead. Finally get rid of Barrella in 2015.

Comment_arrow

TJ

3:50 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Bhb, Reid is the same councilmen who basically said the other councilmen is extorting money from the BW. Then the next breath lets vote on taking the money from the BW. That is not a councilmen that I want representing the town of PPB. It does not matter, they all become bad politicians. "Your Words" No matter, Who is in? When they do not agree with the different groups in all districts. They are all playing politics and then the residents want them out. Each individual resident is going to support who? or What? They believe in.

TJ

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

mailman.....How do you know what the majority is? Put it on the ballot so all the residents can vote is the only way anyone can make that statement. If I recall, most of the new council members have stated they are stepping out of their homes and walking the streets all hours to asses the issues. What i have read and got out of it that the BW was calling it an ."extortion" in their ABC appeal. Is that not the 800k?

Reply

the cooler

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

There has to be more to this story. You can't tell me that the four members of council who originally wanted money from the boardwalk, then closed all the bars down at 12am unless they paid a fee, now just gave all the bars back an hour making the closing time 1am but without any money coming in that they originally requested. Please tell me I'm missing something. Please tell me these four council people didn't just ignore almost a million dollars over five years because their egos and stupidity got in the way. Closing at 1am or 2am will not make one ounce of difference for the quality of life so why did they not take this money? For the love of god please tell me I'm missing a huge piece of this puzzle.

Reply

TJ

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

If the BW was truly sincere about helping the RESIDENTS of the town? They would have just given the money along time ago. They were well aware of all the complaints the residents of D4. They repeatedly have said they wanted to be good neighbors to the residents surrounding their bars. If that is the case, Why didn't they? They use the excuse that is because of the Mayor. They would not have been doing it for the Mayor, They would have been doing it for the RESIDENTS.

Reply

TJ

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

"from the residents of D4"

Reply

Been here before

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

TJ. Have to disagree with you there. What happened here is clear. Politicans Barrella Tooker Corbally and Gordon ran on a platform of "make the BW pay more." When the state legislature would not give Barrella the power to tax he asked for he decided to do it anyway. He figured BW makes so much money they would just pay. He did not count on a fight. ABC is right that was extortion to try and compell payment. But nothing to stop donations. But squeaky wheels would not let them take the money. Now BW is going to say no and ABC is going to stay ordinance and residents will get 0

Reply

Clown Baby

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Wow this town is starting to be a joke.

Reply

Spooner

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

...more of the Barrella's [BS] antics. . .out of one side of his(their) mouth they say: with the 1AM closing...we don't want the BW money. . .then Barrella apparently after the meeting...tells the Associated Press(AP) with regard to ABC ruling against the town...

...the borough would likely appeal that decision, and said a ruling against the midnight closing law would constitute a state-imposed unfunded mandate, suggesting it could be challenged on those grounds as well...

This has to be known as duplicity with stupidity. . .if the money wasn't the issue with the 1AM closing. . .why is it an issue to go to Court over in extending the closing time one hour. . .Wasn't it the BW who originally agreed to pay the money ...to stay open to 2AM?. . .and now if the ABC rules against them, they want to go to Court to get the money they could have gotten all along??

http://www.therepublic.com/view/story/a399bb7e82664bd981c473d54d9bdb2b/NJ--Shore-Things-Boardwalk-Brouhaha

Reply

Mike Corbally

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

The BW turned down the compromise offered by the Council. So much for trying to be good neighbors.

Reply
Comment_arrow

mailman

2:10 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

How were you and your council buddies looking to treat your neighbors known as residents while crafting this deal? Did the subject ever come up? No money and nearly equally as late closings (which is fine by me as long as we have the cops)? You have consistently bashed the owners of the BW. At least the four of you have a career in comedy after you are voted out of office one by one. You're a funny guy!

Comment_arrow

PPB2012

2:12 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mike...you guys turned down a lot of money!

Comment_arrow

Been here before

3:17 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

You are the bad neighbor, councilman. You exaggerated the behavior of a few bad apples in D4. You hid the County's refusal to agree to your parking plan on the County roads in town. You passed illegal ordinances to compel business owners to pay taxes the legislature has told you are beyond your power. Leaving the residents with 2 am bar closings, no money from the BW, and a disaster of a parking plan. All this to feed your ego and vendetta against the BW. You call that being a good neighbor? We, your neighbors, don’t. See you in November 2013 on the way out.

Comment_arrow

mattmurphy

7:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Mike Corbally - who are you kidding when you say the Council was trying to be good neighbors! Even the Mayor states in the above article if the commissioner didn't ask for a compromise, there wouldn't have been one. This has never been about "Quality of Life" for the residents of PPB. You and the Mayor have your own personal vendetta against the BW and have been trying to stick it to them for years. Admit it, you screwed up and as always are trying to put the blame on the BW. Why should they accept the compromise for a 1 a.m. closing. The parking plan still calls for no parking in D4 from 12 a.m. to 6 a.m. Instead of trying to extort money from the BW to stay open until 2 a.m. in the very beginning the council should have made an attempt to be good neighbors. Admit it, you and Mayor Barrella along with your puppets Tooker and Gordon created this mess. Unfortunately, all of the residents are affected by your decisions, not just the few in D4.

Just the Truth

1:42 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I want to applaud the only person who made sense last night. Now that we have undone the police cuts begun in 2008, the right move is to see if there still is a problem.

Frank Kineavy, owner of Frankie's Bar and Grill said: "If there is a mess down there, I think we should all observe it and really help this town," he said. Rather than have Barrella, Tooker, Gordon and Corbally politicize the situation in D4, Frankie suggests we find out what is actually going on. Squeaky wheels say it is real bad; rest of us say “it is not bad now that the cops are back.” So here is Frankie’s suggestion:

"I am again proposing a fact-finding commission, made up of members of council, police, members of the bar business, and residents in District 4, to observe the problems that are in this neighborhood, see where the accountability is, figure out where the problems are and eliminate them.”

I would take the politicians out, they can’t help. The politicians are not interested in solutions for residents; the politicians are interested in solutions for politicians. Shameful really. But police, business, and residents with different views on the condition in D4 should be able to get this done for the benefit of all.

Let's take the politicians out----they had their chance, and they failed miserably.

Reply
Comment_arrow

TJ

3:01 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Fred, The fact finding would be a great idea if everyone was honest. With that being said! Every side would be finding facts that suits them. You do not think the bar businesses is political? You do not think the police is political? You do not think the council members is political? You don't think some residents have been political? It will not work in a town like this. A town driven by Me, Me, Me, Me ...Good Luck!

Comment_arrow

Been here before

4:19 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Geez---TJ---does not look like there is any reason for you to stay. Please do not let the door hit you on the way out.

Fred

2:10 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Why should the behavior of drunken patrons be taken out on the town or the boardwalk businesses?! Whatever happened to personal responsibility? If you are drunk and peeing on somebodies lawn - get ticketed - pay a fine... Period. The town has plenty of specials and police - just restructure where they are at what time - problem solved! I though gov't was for the people by the people not just a handful of government officials ruling their little world! WTF People?!

Reply

PPB2012

2:10 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

They obviously have no power to do anything and they certainly aren't respected.

Reply

Been here before

2:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Let’s all keep in mind that these politicians, Tooker, Corbally, Gordon and Barrella have deliberately exaggerated what tourists in D4 do. One of my D4 neighbors told Tooker she did not experience any problems in D4. Tooker told her she was “too tolerant” of tourists. Imagine that!! How many of the squeaky wheels did Tooker, Corbally, Gordon and Barrella create by telling them they were "too tolerant?"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Full Timer

3:54 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

I've been in D4 a block from the boardwalk for over 50 years and believe also that the tourist behavior was exaggerated. Yes, there is noise and issues with some, but I never experienced what was reported by many. Apparently this story and resulting posts are now ancient history with Jenks and Martells turning down the compromise.

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

12:11 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Tooker can only say what she is told to say, she has none of her own opinions, or experience for that matter, she spends most of her summers in Florida.

TJ

3:36 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

You are all looking through green color glasses.

Reply

rocco

4:22 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

put a $12.00 toll at the bridges and bay head put poice jobs up for bid, lowest bid gets the job 401 k and 35% toward your health benefits

Reply

Mr. Happy

8:55 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Hi Spooner- Be a doll and post the Mulshine article from today's Star Ledger please.
As I wrote in the other thread, it's a SLAM DUNK! Thanks!

Reply

Been here before

9:37 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Not necessary Mr. Happy, better to read Full Timer above. Someone who loves the Beach and still lives here, not someone who loved the Beach, but moved to Bay Head.

Reply

Spooner

10:31 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Enough of Paul Mulshine. . .Mulshine is a Barrella stooge. . .Barrella invited him to the meeting...and Barrella called him about the BW decision...

Published: Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 4:03 PM Updated: Wednesday, June 27, 2012, 4:51 PM
Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger By Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger

...But yesterday afternoon Barrella called to tell me the bars had rejected the deal...

...you tell Paul Mulshine to come here and debate his doody whop that he writes! . . .also the Storino's are Italians too. . .stick that up your racist pipe Paul. . .

Reply

Mr. Happy

11:06 pm on Wednesday, June 27, 2012

Thanks Spooner for the Mulshine info. Good to see that we both agree this article needs to be seen. There's hope for you yet! Thanks again.

Reply

bg robbins

1:57 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

I don't think this will work Pt Pleasant bch is a town where a lot of people come to drink and party. If you close the bars early , people may attempt to drink 6 packs on the beach or cases in their Motel rooms and disturb more people and make more trouble for the cops to handle.

Reply

Mr. Happy

7:19 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Hi Been Here- In your 2:36 post Wednesday, you now claim that the bloc has not only exaggerated, but created the D4 problems. This logic kinda sounds like those people that downplay or deny the Holocaust in the face of overwhelming factual evidence. Your thoughts on that issue? Wondering if there is a pattern. Just curious, thanks.

Reply

Been here before

7:35 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Politicians creating problems by cutting cops so they can ride to the rescue. Yes Happy, by cutting cops (see special numbers from Chief above---fewer specials in 2011 than 2010) politicians created problems to exaggerate for their own selfish political ambitions. Tell me, Happy, who was in charge of Council in 2011-------Barrella, Tooker, Corbally
And yes, Happy, when Ms. Tooker is busy telling residents of D4 they are too tolerant, she is part of the problem, not part of the solution.
The Gang of Four can repeat forever that they were just working for residents, but no money and 2:00 am reveals to us all that it was all about them, not us.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Spooner

10:58 am on Thursday, June 28, 2012

According to July 19, 2011 Council meeting minutes: Corbally along with others on Council, including Barrella, and Tooker, under funded Specials Budget for 2011 summer...

Councilman Lurie: thought, that when fully funding Specials in this year’s budget, as a result of bringing back the hotel tax back, we were bringing Specials to levels they were at in previous years – surprised there are 10 less – brought revenue anticipations up in the budget, because we were fully funded for Specials (requested $365,000 in 2011 for Specials – got $305,000; Councilman Corbally: they were funded at the 2009 level; Chief O’Hara: 2009 level was $365,000, 2010 was $265,000 – he requested $365,000 but doesn’t believe they got it – been trying to make it work, but the situation has changed beyond expectations)...

Mike: you being the committee goto guy, perhaps you can explain the discrepancies between your numbers and the Police Chiefs?

http://www.pointpleasantbeach.org/news.php?action=fullnews&id=1243

Comment_arrow

Ray Criptkie

12:13 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Once again, with a real question posted Mike Corbally remains quiet!

Gina

11:12 pm on Thursday, June 28, 2012

Ray: Mike Corbally has been answering the questions, maybe you are not listening or just don't comprehend.

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks