patching...
Breaking: F-Cove to Reopen to Boaters Memorial Day Weekend »
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

$2M Contract Awarded for Automated Recycling Trucks

Losing bidder objects, however

 

The township council unanimously awarded a contract to a Pennsylvania company to deliver eight automated recycling collection trucks to Brick.

The council awarded a $2,064,120 contract for the trucks to Gran Turk Company of Bridgeport, Pa.

The contract calls for the trucks – Peterbilt models – to be delivered within 180 days, though Public Works Director Glenn Campbell has said the trucks may be delivered as early as April.

The township will eventually purchase 95 gallon cans which will be compatible with the trucks, with each household in town being issued one. Recycling collection, once the program is in place, will shift to once every other week instead of a once per week schedule.

The move to automated recycling is expected to generate additional revenue for the township, as Brick receives grant funding in return for higher recycling participation, as well as a savings on tipping fees that would be paid to landfills when recyclable items are discarded as trash.

There was one objector to the award of the contract, attorney Michael Wenning of the Bradley Beach-based law firm of Keith, Winters and Wenning.

Wenning said he represented one of the losing bidders, Detcon, of Farmingdale.

Wenning said his client bid based on specifications that called for 8 gauge steel resistant to 100,000psi of pressure, while the winning bid was awarded to a company that had proposed thinner, 12 gauge steel resistant to 80,000psi of pressure.

If his client had bid based on the specification that was actually awarded, the price would have been "substatially lower," said Wenning.

Dennis Kelly, an attorney with Gilmore and Monahan representing the township, advised the council the award of the bid could go forward.

"At this point, the bid, as awarded … was done appropriately," said Kelly.

Wenning said his client intends to "pursue this issue."

Related Topics: Automated Recycling and brick nj news

Cat

6:40 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

What the heck! If this story is true, why didn't the Farmingdale company get the bid?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Boose

8:26 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Somebody in PA knows somebody in town plain and simple.

Comment_arrow

clamdigger

3:06 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

look at the Gran Turk website...the portion that relates to the trucks we will be using. There seems to be little QA on the IT end of things there so who knows what their work is like.

http://www.granturk.com/

slide over to equipment and use the drop down for Labrie.

Read the info on the Labrie Automizer which appears to be the style of truck that will be used for side loading containers, seems like nobody proof read the write ups before putting it out on their website.

I'd like to know what equipment the Peterbilt's will be using for garbage collection.

Resident

7:17 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Allow Detcon to rebid, who cares if it insults the other company, its business being done with our money. Let them both rebid if nessesary. Just get the best deal.

Reply

DennyD

7:47 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Makes you skeptical as to who knows who. hmmmm

Reply

FD

7:53 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

So they didn't compare apples to apples in the bid. The Farmingdale company bid as the requirements stated, they came out and said that if the bids we equal their bid would have been "substatially lower," and yet the council is moving forward paying the higher price. Hey council admit there was an error and move this for a rebid. Far too long have we the Taxpayers had to pay for your lack of knowledge or failure to admit mistakes. Step up to the plate and be on our side for once !!

Reply

clamdigger

8:19 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

with the psi difference along with the weight (over 2 Lb p/sq.ft) difference between the two gauges of steel there cause for concern on the durability. yes heavier steel means the trucks weight more leading to more wear and tear as well as fuel consumption but what is the trade off in life span of the containers?

I agree this should be a rebid based on the new specs, unless the Farmingdale Co. missed something from the start. How does one company get away w/ one set of specs and the other doesn't? The trucks aren't even built and something stinks already.

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

8:46 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

It all comes down to how the bid spec was put out. It could have asked for alternates.
Sounds like the Farmingdale company missed something when he submitted the bid... now wants a do-over.

Comment_arrow

Jerry Belle

12:07 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

"Sounds like the Farmingdale company missed something when he submitted the bid... now wants a do-over." [JD] Weel, if the Township could save money for us taxpaying citizens, what's wrong with a DO-OVER?

Comment_arrow

JD

12:44 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Jerry...
Read Dan's remarks below..
that is not how the bidding process works... you don't get a do-over because you screwed up the bid you submitted. Otherwise, there would be do-overs with EVERY bid!!!

Comment_arrow

Jerry Belle

6:43 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

JD, of course you don't get a do-over if you simply screwed up, but if the bids were changed and a lower quality was permitted, then the change in bids should indicate that bids can be re-submitted, no? You seem to accept that the Farmingdale company made an "error" when nothing in this article, nor you saying to see Dan's comment indicates they made the "error". Is it fair to accept the company that submitted a lower quality product without asking if others can meet or do better with their bids (or was only one company privy to information that the bid specs can be altered? Again, Dan's comments don't add any additional light on the subject matter of the specs (it doesn't sound like an OPRA request is going to be made soon either.

Boose

8:25 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

No surprises here. I've seen first hand how the bidding system works. This is a common practice that has caused many reputable companies to lose out on contracts. There's always one who "revises the specs" to submit a lower bid. However, this is the same practice Harley Davidson used to get the WW2 military contract. Except HD INCREASED the quality (engine size) for the same price. I wish the township garages would pay more attention to the contract specs and validate as opposed to just looking at the specs on the labels. This has been happening with batteries and garage supplies for years.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Joseph Bricktown

7:00 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Nice Refference to the Indian 741 & Harley WLA, Good Point

Xavier

8:39 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Wow that is so shady lol. Every time I feel like Barnegat is corrupt I read about what goes on in Brick and feel a little bit better.

Reply

Glenn

8:49 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

What gauge metal was listed in the bid specifications? If it was 12, then Detcon screwed up by bidding 8 gauge. If 8 gauge was specified then the town should rebeid at 12 gauge if that is what we want. It's all in the specs when it is public bidding.

Reply

OceanCounty

8:58 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

"What gauge metal was listed in the bid specifications? If it was 12, then Detcon screwed up by bidding 8 gauge. If 8 gauge was specified then the town should rebeid at 12 gauge if that is what we want. It's all in the specs when it is public bidding."

EXACTLY; Until we know what specification was in the proposal, all this conversation is simply conjecture.

Reply

Bricktown Lew

9:05 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

People, that's just the way it is. I know that personally. I remember in my past of having better products at a better price and knowing more about the products, the uses, etc. However, I would not get a contract because I was not a pretty young blonde that looked good in a tight black minidress. Sometimes, it doesn't matter who you are or how good your product is. It's all about favorites. That's why I left that business.

Reply

John C

11:25 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Glad to see that the current council majority is continuing to implement the sound decisions that were set in motion by the prior council.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

1:23 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Right.... like the Ice Palace debacle?

Sal Petoia

11:25 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

For Dan Nee: Can you post a copy of the bid specs? Without the facts, there is too much second guessing. Our elected officials owe it to the people they presumably represent to show their decisions are in the best interest of the public. For too long much of what has been done is clouded in misinformation and suspicion.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

11:57 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

I would have to file an OPRA request for the bid specs. They are not advertised along with the legal notice for the bid solicitation, nor are they available on the township's website. In other words, that is not a document that is readily available at one's fingertips to post.

It was Detcon's attorney who said the specification called for 8 gauge steel at 100K psi.

Comment_arrow

Joseph Bricktown

7:06 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

That's GREAT DAN !! How long before you file for the OPRA request ? & How long will it take for you to post those Bid Specs? I'm Glad to see you are following this up with the bid specs so we can read them ourselves. Friends have told me thatthe brick patch is a wastre of time with only limited information & sketchy stories. Once you post that inf I can prove to others that this is a Valid information sorce & not just a Time waster. Thanks Again Daniel, we are looking forward to your response & Posting of the Bids.

Harry Wood

11:32 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Peterbuilt Trucks the Cadalliac of trucks Why not International or Freightliner trucks
and save even more money

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Daniel Nee

11:59 am on Thursday, January 3, 2013

The current trucks used for garbage collection are Peterbilts, so the township already has a cache of spare parts, plus the mechanics are trained to work on Peterbilts. From what I've been told, they are generally built better than their competitors.

Comment_arrow

mike

4:55 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Harry Wood, Internationals are always having computer problems and are always getting repaired. My friend repairs heavy duty trucks and always has 2-3 Internationals in his shop every week.

Comment_arrow

mike

4:56 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

The town will spend so much money repairing them, not worth the $$$

Jerry Belle

12:03 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Once again this shows the hypocrisy of township officials telling us to "buy local", "save jobs", "keep the money in New Jersey", but then they go outside of the state to Pennsylvania and award the grant to a company that, if the article is correct, offered something less substantial than the specs called for to begin with... "bid based on specifications that called for 8 gauge steel resistant to 100,000psi of pressure, while the winning bid was awarded to a company that had proposed thinner, 12 gauge steel resistant to 80,000psi of pressure." How can the award be given to someone that came in with an inferior product than the original specs required?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

12:47 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Because per Dan, the spec was 12guage...
the trucks aren't made in Farmingdale anyway...

Comment_arrow

mike

5:00 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Like JD said, they aren't build from the bottom up in Farmingdale. The business in Farmingdale repairs the trucks for the towns, and prepares the truck for final delivery (like adding graphics, final touches)

Comment_arrow

Jerry Belle

6:46 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

JD, re: "Because per Dan, the spec was 12guage... " unless Dan's own comment was removed before I came back to this forum, where does Dan state that the bid specifically called for 12 guage?

Comment_arrow

JDB

5:14 pm on Monday, February 25, 2013

Also note that the Labrie bodies that Gran Turk sells are made in Canada.
Detcon Bid Bridgeport bodies made in Texas USA !

Tommy

12:04 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

It's called BID RIDDING, it's the same old same. They know it, we know it, the lawyers know it, the bidders know it, everybody knows it. But the corruption still prevails. This is more of we're gonna do whatever we want politics. Why should this be swept under the rug? This should be exposed along with everyone who has and had a part in every aspect of this deal. Investigate everyone under the RECO ACT. Everyone and their brother.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Glenn

1:42 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

That would be bid "rigging" and according to Dan, the Detcon attorney said it was spec'd @ 8 gauge. If that is the case, here comes another lawsuit.

FD

12:42 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

After the fiscal cliff debacle. I have decided on a new voting strategy.
I will no longer vote for anyone, republican or democrat that has been in office longer than 1 term.
I want my politicians getting in and working on problems not reelections.
Career politicians are killing this country!!

My strategy applies down to local level as well.

Reply

Cosmo

12:52 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

I still would like to know how this saves us money? because the laborer does not have to get out of the truck? I am assuming plastic, cardboard and newspaper will all go in one blue can like we have at drumpoint fields and then need to be sorted at a transfer station. So we need more labor to sort the one combined truck instead of sorting at the homes at pickup. Anyone have any answers? or do we just need to spend money to make someone happy?

Reply
Comment_arrow

JD

1:18 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

The return on investment for this project is negligible...
put another way... a business owner would NOT make this investment as savings are not enough to warrant the expenditure!!!
Old article on it...

Comment_arrow

Glenn

1:46 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Co-mingling of plastic, glass, cardboard, etc. started over a year ago at the county level and has no effect on Brick labor. The trucks and containers cuts the labor at least in half as there will only be pickups every other week. Not to mention less wear and tear and fuel savings.

Comment_arrow

JD

2:05 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Glenn... no reduction in labor...
only savings was worker comp related..
here is how you determine labor savings... did they lay anyone off... it they didn't, then no labor savings..
It's about a $5million project with about $250,000/yr in savings if I recall.

Comment_arrow

Cosmo

2:05 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Is it safe to assume you are Glenn Campbell?

Cosmo

2:00 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

They could do that now and not spend anything on trucks or containers. Pick up every 2 weeks and save money. So we get less service and get to pay the same or more? How long will it take to recover the investment in the equipment and containers?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Glenn

2:11 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

No, that would be incorrect to assume that I am Glenn Campbell. My name is Glenn Berry and I am retired and a Brick resident for over 10 years while my wife's family date back to the mid 1950's.

Comment_arrow

Cosmo

2:17 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Sorry I thought you were Glenn Campbell responding with information only he seems to have.

Comment_arrow

JD

2:56 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Here is one of the articles from the summer...
http://brick.patch.com/articles/brick-to-switch-to-automated-recycling-pickup

As you can see... there has not been any study as to how much worker comp will go down... how much tipping fees will go down... and much more money can be made from more people recycling...
but, there is no labor savings... nobody will be laidoff...

Comment_arrow

Cosmo

4:12 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

So their logic is more people will recycle because we paid for cans & trucks? And w/c claims will fall because they are not picking up empty bottles and cans? Jesus, I have a bridge to sell them.

Brick

4:58 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

One of the things I love about living in Brick is that we have recycling picked up once a week. Our family tries to recycle everything and with a pick-up every other week and one garbage can (even a big one) we will not be able to fit all of our recycling in it.

Reply

Tommy

9:11 pm on Thursday, January 3, 2013

Thanks for correcting my typo Glenn. Your correct it is BID RIGGING. By the time any payback is realized on this it will be time to purchase new trucks and cans. This is an insult. I had leaf bags sitting all along the block here for two months, I had to pick the phone up and call for them to get picked up. And Glenn that is Taxation Without Representation in my book. Same treatment as when we couldn't get plowed our for days. It's despicable!

Reply

clamdigger

8:02 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Dan Nee,

can you find out if will we be able to purchase a second recycle can as we are permitted to do with the regular trash bins? I know after 2 weeks I could have more than 1 cans worth of stuff to recycle.

thanks,

C/D

Reply
Comment_arrow

type writer

10:20 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

@ clamdigger......Your empty beer cans for the week alone, would fill up one recycle can. Then throw in your empty whiskey bottles and dirty magazines and you will definitely need another can.

Stop The Gluttony in Brick Township

9:05 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Why not hold off on this contract all together & allocate the $2 million to further help the residents that fell victim to Superstorm Sandy!!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

Cosmo

10:23 am on Friday, January 4, 2013

Lets see how smart you are. We are spending upwards of 5.5 million for something that will not return investment in our lifetime. It was bullied thru by some people without answering why the plan doesn't save us money. If they really wanted to save money, they should have just made collections bi-weekly and laid off 3 or 4 workers. -no equipment investment or materials investment (cans). Can you smell it? Look to see who buys a new boat in the next 6 months.

Bertha

3:42 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

I want to congratulate the Director of P.W. and Council for thier decision to award the contract to Grand Turk. I understand that these are the same trucks the township has been using since 1996 with no problems of the roof or sides splitting or rupturing.
And are still working today, these are the same trucks that Waste Management and Republic Waste uses in thier automated truck fleet, and these co's don't have to go out to bid. If you can save close to $4,000.00 per truck, do not have to retrain your mechanics, drivers or restock your parts room with new truck body parts it sounds to me that this decision was made with the best intrest of the Tax Payers in mind.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tommy

6:31 pm on Friday, January 4, 2013

You gotta be kidding me!! Are you serious?

Bertha

7:07 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Yes Tommy very serious, Do you know the cost of one dump cylinder piston, $7500.00 for a new one, so lets spend more money for untried trucks and throw out the existing inventory and restock with prices such as these. Thats great planning.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sal Petoia

10:25 am on Saturday, January 5, 2013

Bertha: I don't think it is as simple as that. Years back the Board of Education switched from gasoline engines to diesel engines in their buses. New training, parts, etc. were needed. In the long run money was saved by having engines that lasted longer, got better mileage and used (at that time) cheaper fuel. We don't know what the current inventory for spare parts for Gran Turk trucks is, or if what is on the shelf are compatible with the trucks being bought. What I hope was done is what is called a life cycle cost analysis which would determine the better deal. More importantly, of course, is whether Gran Turk complied with the specifications which, so far, have remained hidden. All we have so far is a lawyer's word.

Comment_arrow

Tommy

4:27 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

I won't dignify this nonsense.

Cosmo

3:39 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

What does the dump or blade piston have to with the brand of truck? a truck body can be installed on any truck.

Reply

Tommy

4:29 pm on Saturday, January 5, 2013

My last comment is at you Bertha. Obviously you have an interest beyond a tax payers interest.

Reply

Bertha

9:47 am on Sunday, January 6, 2013

Thank you Sal for an intelligent response, Cosmo, the truck body is what is in question (if what I saw from the Council meeting is the only issus) but yes I do undesrtand that these trucks are a combo of two companies, the cab and body
And Tommy please keep to your pledge and do not respond.
Thank You all. .

Reply

Leave a comment

 

The Brick Patch
Valentine's Shopping Guide

See the full guide!

Patch Picks